Why Texas Isn't Playing Wisconsin Next Year
ESPN's attempt to broker a game between the Longhorns and the Badgers may not have fallen apart because they couldn't agree to a Horn return visit to Madison. It may have fallen apart because Texas is playing at Wyoming next year. Wisconsin says the game didn't get off the ground because neither side was ready to give up a home game.
While both teams non-conference schedules for 2009 border on the laughable, neither was willing to add another road game. Wisconsin has 7 home games, while Texas has 6 games in Austin. The Horns are the designated "home" team for the OU battle in 2009. Right now Texas plays at home four times through October 10th, and then won't play in Austin again for almost another month. The Horns three non-conference home games are Louisiana-Monroe, Central Florida and UTEP. Colorado opens Big 12 play in Austin before the trip to Dallas.
Wisconsin has games at home against Northern Illinois, Fresno State, and D-1AA Wofford. They go to Hawaii. UT was willing to move the Central Florida game to another year, but Wisconsin said they had to have 7 home game this season for financial reasons. Texas was also adamant about keeping its home schedule.
As budgets get bigger and finances get stretched, the need for seven home games will be one of the biggest pressure points used by those who want to get Texas-OU to a home-and-home series.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why is Texas playing a game at Wyoming? Trying to break into the famed Wyoming recruiting turf?
by Texas_Dawg on Jan 20, 2009 9:12 PM CST reply actions
“As budgets get bigger and finances get stretched…”
I don’t get how your finances get stretched when you have a $13.2 billion endowment, with $25 million alone for athletics.
by TXinDC on Jan 20, 2009 9:49 PM CST reply actions
Considering ou’s ooc schedule we’re really starting to look like a closely shorn labia. Someday soon we’re going to be on the outside looking in, again, and have nobody to blame but ourselves and DeLoss…
by oozingsmegma on Jan 20, 2009 10:19 PM CST reply actions
I doubt we have a problem in 2009 as long as we win all of our games.
Hook ’em!
by uthookem on Jan 20, 2009 10:22 PM CST reply actions
I doubt we have a problem in 2009 as long as we win all of our games.
Hook ‘em!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Let’s do a hypothetical. We lose all but one regular season game, say at OK State, yet we’re able to make it to Big 12 and win. You will probably find a lot of prognosticators that will say this is a good possibility.
Now, as a one loss team we will likely be in the Top 5, but with our weak SOS we run a strong risk of not being Top 2 and thus not invited to the BCS championship.
by Texoz on Jan 20, 2009 10:53 PM CST reply actions
Dodds isn’ to blame. Brown is a coelenterate, if you haven’t noticed lately, and the line “there won’t be anymore Ohio States” uttered in the AD offices before the 2005 season had Mack’s voice attached. He’s determined the who’s and the where’s during his reign. We went from a school that played anyone to a school that squats to pee.
The Wisconsin pork up will haunt us with any loss, and we’ll deserve it.
by CloseToJumping on Jan 20, 2009 11:24 PM CST reply actions
c{oe}lenterate, a. and n.
A. adj. Belonging to the C{oe}lenterata. B. n. A member of the C{oe}lenterata.
1. One of the primary groups into which Leuckart, followed by others, divided the Animal Kingdom. As constituted by him, the group contains animals possessing a digestive cavity with which a peripheral system of canals frequently communicates, with prehensile organs disposed in a circle round the mouth, and all, or nearly all, provided with thread-cells or nematocysts: divided into Ctenophora, Actinozoa (corals, sea-anemones) and Hydrozoa.
by Parlin Hall on Jan 21, 2009 12:35 AM CST reply actions
Yeah, that’s some seriously impressive word usage, CTJ!
by Brian Combs on Jan 21, 2009 8:06 AM CST reply actions
“I don’t get how your finances get stretched when you have a $13.2 billion endowment, with $25 million alone for athletics.”
I wouldn’t touch an endowment over one football game, either.
The Texas spin is, they agreed to come. Therefore, the hangup was the return. Bielema’s quote says, I didn’t mind playing in Austin, so we talked about it, but we wouldn’t give up the home game either.
I think there probably was a compromise out there but neither side was willing to consider it.
I’d split the gate, or do 55-45, whatever it took to keep Texas whole on the time value of the money. I don’t know what UW clears from a home game, but splitting the gate probably would enable both sides to get what they want, which is a marquee game that will give them national attention and boost the SOS.
I see in this the realization by Mack that the 2009 schedule is a BCS anchor. The money lost with a split is a short-term wager on winning a spot in the BCSCG. It doesn’t seem like that bad a bet to me.
by Bob in Houston on Jan 21, 2009 8:26 AM CST reply actions
I’d split the gate, or do 55-45, whatever it took to keep Texas whole on the time value of the money.
I’m so conditioned now that I read that as splitting the gate 45-35.
by PatronSaint on Jan 21, 2009 8:43 AM CST reply actions
Since the possibility is now dead, if you’ve never been to Madison and Camp Randall, I highly recommend attending a game.
The stadium is everything you want out of a college football venue. Side-street lined high energy college atmosphere Classic coliseum style stadium, complete with Ivy on gated columns. Perfect capacity size, not obnoxious like Mich/OSU, but incredibly loud. Fans who understand their role. Easy access in and out of game. Walk friendly venues for post-game eating/drinking.
by Mockingbird on Jan 21, 2009 10:01 AM CST reply actions
If there aren’t jorts, couch burnings, and excessive verbal assaults/threatened head bashings as visiting fans go to the stadium, then I’m unimpressed.
by sl xpress on Jan 21, 2009 10:44 AM CST reply actions
I’ve seen that here in Houston HJ, is that stuff any good?
by uthookem on Jan 21, 2009 11:30 AM CST reply actions
It’ called a Leinie for pete’s sake. Also known as liquid gold and you just come on up to Chippewa if you wanna find out.
Thirsty Pagan Brewing up in Superior also has some mighty fine suds.
Go Byadgers.
by Vasherized on Jan 21, 2009 11:36 AM CST reply actions
“…the group contains animals possessing a digestive cavity with which a peripheral system of canals frequently communicates, with prehensile organs disposed in a circle round the mouth…”
Does that mean “mealy mouthed” then? I’m a bit confused as to the context.
by exuLt on Jan 21, 2009 11:56 AM CST reply actions
“We’re all Bill Snyder now.”
All your patsy are belong to us.
by exuLt on Jan 21, 2009 12:08 PM CST reply actions
Their Summer Wheat, Honey Weiss and Summer Shandy are all good summer beers.
by HenryJames on Jan 21, 2009 12:38 PM CST reply actions
Does that mean "mealy mouthed" then? I’m a bit confused as to the context.
It’s an invertebrate.
State St. would be a blast. I’d love a roadie to Madison.
by Sailor Ripley on Jan 21, 2009 12:42 PM CST reply actions
Heterosexual Midwesterners drink Schmidt.
by Minnesotahorn on Jan 21, 2009 12:50 PM CST reply actions
Well it sure seems more reasonable for us to not give up a home game than for them…. They already have 7 home games!! Looking at their history, they seem to get 7 every year. We recently have gotten 6 one year, 8 the next, 7 one year… 5 the next. Sure seems more reasonable for another team to have to eat an extra road game for once.
Blame lies with the badgers on this one.
by Orangechipper on Jan 21, 2009 1:05 PM CST reply actions
“Sure seems more reasonable for another team to have to eat an extra road game for once.”
I dunno… Based on a quick look, Wisconsin officially sponsors 24 men’s and women’s sports. Texas funds 18.
by Bob in Houston on Jan 21, 2009 1:18 PM CST reply actions
If you are ever up in Chippewa Falls you should do a tour of the Leinie’s brewery. Just a small little brewery in a scenic town. They don’t really mention the fact that they are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Miller.
You could also stop by Hudson, Wisconsin- home of Jim Bertelsen.
by Stuck in MN on Jan 21, 2009 2:20 PM CST reply actions
Not our fault that Wisconsin offers curling and Hockey. ;)
I think its fair to say that its more reasonable for Wisconsin to lose a home game. I did probably go a wee bit too far saying that anyone is to BLAME, though.
http://i.ehow.com/images/GlobalPhoto/Articles/2162530/curling-main_Full.jpg
by Orangechipper on Jan 21, 2009 2:33 PM CST reply actions
BC should have its annual “investor conference” in Madison.
Just use the 2008 surplus to order the Barkshire Hathaway T’s now.
by Vasherized on Jan 21, 2009 5:16 PM CST reply actions
“I dunno… Based on a quick look, Wisconsin officially sponsors 24 men’s and women’s sports. Texas funds 18.”
November 2008 Texas Monthly. Read it. DeLoss limited the amount of teams that Texas has so that all teams would have access to the best coaches, training, etc. Quality over quantity.
by Sasha_Is_A_Longhorn_Dog on Jan 21, 2009 11:03 PM CST reply actions
“November 2008 Texas Monthly. Read it. DeLoss limited the amount of teams that Texas has so that all teams would have access to the best coaches, training, etc. Quality over quantity.”
The point there was that Wisconsin has a legitimate reason to want to keep the game, whomever it chooses to play. Orangechipper just figured UW should give it up, when it spends the money on more sports than Texas.
by Bob in Houston on Jan 22, 2009 3:14 PM CST reply actions

by 























