Mustain't gonna start at QB for USC
Looks like former Arkansas starting QB and Texas recruit Mitch Mustain won't be the starting QB for USC next year. When you begin your athletic journey by saying yes to Houston Nutt, you have to expect bumps in the road. Or a twenty car pileup.
And so who is the starter? That's right. Aaron Corp. You say his name like you say the name Steve Holt!

Why Corp? I mean aside from the fact that he gets things done.
"At the end of the day, he's been able to take the team down the field and not turn the ball over," quarterbacks coach Jeremy Bates said. "That's the biggest separation right now."
That's coach speak. We know the real reason Corp is starting.
He didn't turn down a scholarship offer from Mack Brown.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mustain’s mom is blowing up Carroll’s Twitter feed right now.
by Vasherized on Apr 22, 2009 9:03 AM CDT reply actions
From the cited LA Times article:
-—————————————————————
Asked if he felt he got a fair chance to compete for the job, Mustain replied that he had talked to Bates about that but then declined to share the details of the conversation.
“I guess it depends on how you interpret drives or reps or whatever,” Mustain said, calmly. “That’s their interpretation and that’s something I’ve talked to them about, but the point is we’ve just got to keep battling.”
-—————————————————————-
Mitch Mustain is the heiress to the Massengill fortune.
by NateHeupel on Apr 22, 2009 9:32 AM CDT reply actions
Vasher:
EDITED FOR ACCURACY: “Mustain’s mom is blowing Carroll right now.”
by NateHeupel on Apr 22, 2009 9:35 AM CDT reply actions
Him and his parents need to schedule a meeting with the AD like pronto.
by Chooky on Apr 22, 2009 10:01 AM CDT reply actions
this is getting creepy.
mack is the godfather. you want to be his friend.
by glenn on Apr 22, 2009 10:20 AM CDT reply actions
When are we going to get a take on all of the high profile athletes that spurned Mack? I can only think of Adrian Peterson that panned out…
by uthookem on Apr 22, 2009 10:29 AM CDT reply actions
peterson had a nice career in college, but nothing like he had the talent to enjoy. mack touched him, too.
by glenn on Apr 22, 2009 10:32 AM CDT reply actions
Mack certainly touched him more than Eric Hall did.
by HenryJames on Apr 22, 2009 10:34 AM CDT reply actions
c’mon, hj. you know what i mean. peterson’s name should be up there with earl and billy sims and eric dickerson, and it’s not.
good point, though, about hall. imagine if peterson had to go against what muschamp is constructing instead of hall and company.
by glenn on Apr 22, 2009 10:39 AM CDT reply actions
Tommie Harris is the only clear example of a player punking Mack Brown and getting away scott free.
by BatesHorn on Apr 22, 2009 10:39 AM CDT reply actions
I think Adrian Peterson’s issues have less to do with the “curse of the Brown-bino” than they do Chuck “3rd and” Long’s offensive strategy that he affectionately called “Run his ass into the ground”.
by NateHeupel on Apr 22, 2009 11:18 AM CDT reply actions
good point, martellus. what a waste.
[by the way, mb, it’s ‘all right’ not ‘alright’. given your schooling, i understand completely.]
by glenn on Apr 22, 2009 11:37 AM CDT reply actions
Yep, I was basing Peterson on basically winning the 12-0 game for OU his freshman year and wrecking shit in the NFL. He is actually one of the players that I like to watch in the league. I mean, don’t get me wrong, he’s a traitor-sonofabitch that likes cock-flavored popsicles, but damn he can run.
by uthookem on Apr 22, 2009 11:38 AM CDT reply actions
if college football was like college basketball these days, freshman year would be a college career for the great ones, but it’s not. in sum, peterson’s college career was wasted compared to the greats of the game, and his every nfl accolade is just one more evidential data point.
by glenn on Apr 22, 2009 11:50 AM CDT reply actions
The Mack Brown curse is pretty tenuous on this one right? I gather from this thread that we offered him a scholarship, but there wasn’t any stringing us along was there?
by PatronSaint on Apr 22, 2009 12:13 PM CDT reply actions
I’m with PatronSaint on this one… Mustain didn’t do enough for Mack to give him the industrial-strength curse his career so far seems to have required. I think it’s a little Mack curse, but mostly an “I Trusted Houston Nutt” curse…
by the Bobs on Apr 22, 2009 1:16 PM CDT reply actions
“peterson had a nice career in college, but nothing like he had the talent to enjoy.”
Peterson in the same backfield as VY would have netted us another NC and 5-6 heismans (Peterson and VY getting co-heismans each year of course), and would likely have lengthened his pro career.
by Horncasting on Apr 22, 2009 4:34 PM CDT reply actions
“Peterson in the same backfield as VY would have netted us another NC and 5-6 heismans (Peterson and VY getting co-heismans each year of course), and would likely have lengthened his pro career.”
I think this is actually inaccurate. I’ll go one further and say that UT doesn’t win the 2005 national championship or any national championship with AD in the backfield.
First of all, anyone who paid any attention to Vince Young’s career at all knew that the 12-0 shutout game was the turning point for him. He resolved to be a team leader and not get beat like that again. He was a much better player for the rest of 2004 and 2005, and UT as a whole was better for it. That mental progression and improved team chemistry doesn’t occur if AD is in the backfield.
Getting back on point, the UT offense under Vince wasn’t the kind of offense that would’ve been able to use both of them effectively. Adrian Peterson was effective out of formations where he could come downhill with a head of steam like the single back w/ QB under center and the I. Unlike Jamaal Charles, who was more of a shifty, speed option, he’s not effective as a supplemental option to a running QB.
Vince Young was effective in formations where he could utilize his run/pass option as a threat, improvise on his own, and capitalize on the fact that he could take off at any point in time. Enter the shotgun zone read. That sort of offense doesn’t lend itself to a dedicated power back.
by NateHeupel on Apr 23, 2009 9:32 AM CDT reply actions
That mental progression and improved team chemistry doesn’t occur if AD is in the backfield.
Nate,
That’s nothing more than verbal gymnastics.
So you’re saying the two of the most dominant college football players at their respective positions in the same backfield would essentially cancel eachother out because neither could properly lead in the other’s presence?
Hooey. They wouldn’t have even needed an offensive line or wide receivers.
by Vasherized on Apr 23, 2009 9:43 AM CDT reply actions
Mitch and I would make an awesome backfield if we transferred to the same school.
by Emmanuel Moody on Apr 25, 2009 1:13 AM CDT reply actions

by 






















