12th Man of the Day
In what I hope will become a re-occurring tribute to our drooling cousins in College Station, today we bring you BC's first honorary 12th Man of the Day, Judge Richard Posner.

Idoit, I Am.
Other than merely looking like an Aggie, The Poz has no affiliations to A&M other than thinking like one. Which makes his stacks of degrees from Yale, Harvard, Chicago, and a bunch of other smart learning institutions seem instantly worthless. I also tend to doubt the (self-published) entrance on Wikipedia proclaiming The Poz to be "the most cited legal scholar of all time" and one of the "most respected judges in the United States." This guy wants to be Brandeis in the worst way. scally probably interned for him at one point.

Anything for justice!
You see Judge Posner has a little problem with the way the World Wide Web works. This whole linking between web sites thing? Not gonna do it. It's protected, copywritten material that the rightful owners should collect a toll for, argues The Poz:
Expanding copyright law to bar online access to copyrighted materials without the copyright holder's consent, or to bar linking to or paraphrasing copyrighted materials without the copyright holder's consent, might be necessary to keep free riding on content financed by online newspapers from so impairing the incentive to create costly news-gathering operations that news services like Reuters and the Associated Press would become the only professional, nongovernmental sources of news and opinion.
Other than writing like a deflated windbag judge with a gross disregard for periods, logic, or an understanding of the medium he's criticizing, The Poz has a pretty good point: Newspapers are going broke and this is the only fucking idea I can come up with to save them. Ol' Dick can't take his morning constitutional without the Grey Lady in hand, its day-old news freshly creased. Not when the real enemy is still at large. The democratic weapons of mass destruction known as "Laptops and "wifi" might somehow cross signals with his Viagra and stream porn across his synapses while rendering conservative! judicial! opinions! with a quill pen!
So let's go after the real enemy - The Internet - and bring that floozy Al Gore right down with it. All you who dare to read the nyt.com or latimes.com for free are soon to face a judgment day when all links between copyrighted content shall cease to exist. Boom, motherfucker! The Internet as you know it will be taken down like an AT-AT on planet Hoth and literally crumple to the ground ... you know, where reality exists and newspapers are still read. Here at BC, we'll subsist by linking to eachother's stories in our own form of non-credentialed inbreeding.

All your links are belong to us!
To summarize: Richard Posner, publisher of 40 books and ranking judge in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago, is actually proposing that links between sites that share proprietary copyrighted be banned. We all know it's not news unless it's printed in a newspaper but this takes stupidity to a whole new level. But wait, there's more! Not only should links be banned but the paraphrasing of copyrighted material -- the work of pretty much every blog out there -- would also be forbidden. So if I wanted to share my thoughts on an article about Scipio's sex change published in the San Francisco Chronicle? Out of luck. I would link to it but it's illegal. Google? Adios, pinche. Twitter? The work of the devil!
The logic that you could just turn off the tap of free information in order to save the bloated dead carcass that is the newspaper business model is Aggy at best, and well, it just doesn't get any worse than that.
So for this ingenious solution to usurp the Internet and return Newspapers to their rightful place at the top of the, uh, newschain, I hereby award Richard Posner BC's first ever 12th Man of the Day award.
Nice work, Dick.

Bankruptcy, front door to your right.
Can I get a whoop whoop?
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can someone post a link showing that the horse is already out of the barn?
by HenryJames on Jul 2, 2009 4:12 PM CDT reply actions
The Chinese government couldn’t police a copyright law like that.
Or could they?
by RRR on Jul 2, 2009 4:40 PM CDT reply actions
Jesus. Listen, I read Teh Barking Carnivals at work so I don’t have to think about work-related topics. Reading an IP article here is like watching a porno movie about a married couple who fall asleep on the couch while watching reality show re-runs.
In any case, I don’t understand Dickie P’s position here. Existing copyright law would arguably preclude you from accessing copyrighted on-line content without permission. The fact that the internet contains a vast sea of free content is evidence that a lot of providers have implied consent.
The real rub is Posner’s attack a fundamental axiom of copyright law by holding summaries of news articles to infringe. Copyright is intended to protect the expression of ideas, and not the ideas themselves.
On the other hand, the free rider issue is a real problem. The Supreme Court dealt with this issue before (way back in 1918 in International News Service v. Associated Press), and relied on unfair competition rather than copyright law to prevent competitors from appropriating of the content of a news story.
The Giant Interwebbings has made this problem stickier, as content is now being summarized by uncredentialed hacks whose readership adds nothing to the coffers of the news agencies who track down the information. And, therefore, not enough eyes fall on the content-originator’s website to justify ad revenues and enable further origination of content. Blogs are economic parasites that may eventually strangle their host.
by BrickHorn on Jul 2, 2009 5:04 PM CDT reply actions
as content is now being summarized by uncredentialed hacks whose readership adds nothing to the coffers of the news agencies who track down the information
That summarizes our operation nicely.
by Vasherized on Jul 2, 2009 5:08 PM CDT reply actions
Judge Posner also once ruled on a case involving Ligers, and Tigons. It’s true.
by Steve Nebraska on Jul 2, 2009 5:27 PM CDT reply actions
Ligers are pretty much my favorite animals. They are like a lion and tiger mixed…bred for its skills in magic.
by Napolean Dynamite on Jul 2, 2009 5:37 PM CDT reply actions
“So if I wanted to share my thoughts on an article about Scipio’s sex change published in the San Francisco Chronicle? Out of luck.”
Well piddly poo. Take backs.
by The Poz on Jul 2, 2009 5:55 PM CDT reply actions

by 






















