Sooner Tragic
In 2004, Oklahoma put together what many amongst their fanbase and the media believed to be was one of the finest college football teams ever assembled. They worked Texas in embarrassing fashion with a 12-0 showing in the RRR, much to our chagrin. They survived the occasional scare, but more or less waltzed to 12-0 before playing USC. USC then proceeded to play banjo on the collective sooner ass to the tune of 55-19 and what appeared to be a magical season immediately fell apart.
Along with that collapse came the departures of various important pieces in the overall sooner puzzle, most of the departures coming on the offensive side of the ball. Consider them:
3 OL – Wes Sims, Jamaal Brown, Vince Carter
1 QB – Heisman Winner Jason White
4 WR – Will Peoples, Mark Bradley, Mark Clayton, Brandon Jones
1 TB – Kejaun Jones
1 TE – James Moses
Defensively, they also lost a few guys, but the majority of the losses occurred on offense, and they were considerable.
Few people going into 2005 really, really believed that the Sooners would struggle to overcome these losses. "Hey, it’s Bob Stoops and Oklahoma, they reload, right?" Well, as it turned out, no, they don’t always reload. Some folks were skeptical before that 2005 season and they were justified in the aftermath. That Oklahoma team went on to an 8-4 record with a win in the Holiday Bowl over Oregon, but suffering losses to TCU, UCLA, Texas, and Texas Tech. For a national power/player, they were mediocre.
Outside of their Heisman Trophy-winning QB actually being dumb enough to return this year, along with their stud TE being that stupid as well (more on them later), the similarities between the 2005 and 2009 season were not difficult to see ahead of the game this past Saturday.
What is amazing is how willing people are to not learn lessons the first time they’re given the opportunity.
-Don’t fight land wars in Southeast Asia,
-Never trust a gypsy or a stripper.
-Never root for OU.
-If Bob Stoops or his staff members are talking, they are lying.
-If you are going to be a top 3 pick in the NFL draft, you don’t need to return for another year of college athletics.
I will leave the first 2 items as discussions for other times or never. The last 3 items stun me in their continued pervasiveness.
Never Root for OU
I posted on this last season before they played Tech, and there was this concept among the UT fanbase that they should root for OU because if OU won, Texas would then be lined up for the title. Um, no. You would have to be dumber than Sam Bradford’s cross-eyed, 1000-yard stare to ever do this not once, but twice. Only bad things happen when OU wins. That has never not been true.
Yet somehow, fast forwarding to less than a year later, here we are. OU has a loss to open the season and they’ve got a great shot at having another mediocre year. Bradford and Gresham are down with long term injuries, even if they’ll be back for Texas (it looks unlikely for either of them at this moment, otherwise the Sooner program would be giving much rosier takes on their injuries than they are now). And then, lo and behold, within 24 hours of the loss and the updated forecast on the possibilities of misery that their fanbase might be exposed to, we’ve got our own set of mouthbreathing troglodytes running around on the net and the call-in shows, COMPLAINING about the sooner loss.
"I think this taints the Red River Rivalry."
"I worry that this will harm our strength of schedule."
"We won’t get as much credit for the win as we should."
Those are rough quotes from threads I’ve seen on 3 boards since Saturday and then I heard a guy call in on a national show and whine similarly. We must have the most emotional, simpering, insecure fanbase in all of sports outside of Boston for this to be happening already.
Do us all a public service and beat these ignorant buffoons into a coma if you encounter anyone in your physical vicinity anytime soon that is complaining or whining about a) Sooner losses or b) wishing they’d be at full strength when we play them.
If OU never won another game, we’d be better for it. We’d find other enemies, and those other enemies would happily find us. We won’t be at full strength when we play them, them being hurt is just fine. It is football. It happens. Stop rubbing yourself in concern over it.
Bob Stoops is the Kryptonite of Truth
I consider it amusing every season when the media laps up what Stoops and his staff tells them about their team. It is hilarious to watch the Sooner boards revel in the staff’s platitudes as truths. I find it amazing when our fanbase also buys into it.
This offseason, they claimed this would be the best OL they’ve ever had, that Eldridge was the best OL in their history, and they expected to be competing for a national title again. They’ll probably be repeating these things after they pummel Idaho State this weekend.
If you bet on OU Saturday, you deserve to have your money taken. The OU fans deserve to feel betrayed and disturbed. The pundits within the media preaching their strength deserve to look like idiots.
Any recruit that has the choice of OU and UT and leaves the state to go to OU deserves to have an L hung on their forehead every damn time they come back across the border.
Now the guy is lying as sure as he is breathing in regard to the status of both Bradford and Gresham. They have no idea when Bradford will be back, or they know he won’t be back for some time. The only guy known to have ever returned from a grade 3 sprain is Joel Klatt, and the merits of that return and his injury diagnosis remain iffy. Now we’re hearing that Gresham could be done for the year, and then Stoops quickly denies it, even though surgery hasn’t even occurred. Outside of the ACL field test, which usually is pretty accurate in terms of diagnosing an ACL tear, there is no way to understand the depths of the guy’s knee damage until the surgery is finished.
It certainly behooves Stoops to lie, however. What truth does he have to build on? His OL is weak. His bowl record is weak. He did talk to these guys about coming back. Fooling fans, the voters, and his opponents works in his favor. Sun Tzu was right about deception, but only if one has a plan in place to take advantage of it. This time around, Stoops doesn’t. He has Tulsa, Miami, Baylor, and Texas coming up as 4 of the next 5 games. All of those are formidable opponents for the Sooner team at this point, especially without Gresham and Bradford. What good does it do Stoops, right now, to speak honestly about those injuries with these games coming up?
Projected NFL 1st Rounders Should Go Pro
When UT’s Roy Williams came back after his Junior year, and before that, when Ricky did the same, I was certainly excited as a fan. At the same time, I was nervous for those guys and their decision to return. When Vince Young decided to go pro, I was happy for him and understood.
What I can’t figure out is what in the world the Big 4 at OU were thinking. Specifically, Bradford’s decision to return could go down as one of the most idiotic decisions in CFB since Virginia decided to retain Al Groh for one more year.
Bradford knew with certainty the following:
1) His offense was losing 4 OLs and 3 of the top 5 receiving targets.
2) He was going to be a top 3 pick in the draft.
I’m sorry, but what else did he need to know? Please spare the considerations for enjoying school life and such. Right. My guess is that the guy has difficulty counting and failed to understand that the numbers in a draft don’t get any "higher" than 1. The decision making process then went sideways from there.
Gresham, McCoy and Williams cannot be regarded much better. Gresham had to know he was going to be the primary passing target. That may sound great, until one considers that his stock was already established within the NFL ranks and he was going to be subjecting himself to a number of hits this year. There is word out there right now that Gresham might be done for the year himself. Whatever is going on with him, the Sooner program is staying awfully closed mouth about it.
Someone failed to let Trent Williams know that he was not going to look nearly as good when he wasn’t playing with 4 other experienced OL starters. He looked overweight, slow, and stupid. Kevin Wilson can extol his virtues as a 4.7 40 yard warlock, but "that’s all". I suppose so.
Gerald McCoy comes out of the BYU game as the standalone returnee that is healthy and unblemished. He was a monster on the field and that surprised no one. The guy was going to be a top 10 pick in the last draft. Not much has changed. If I am Gerald McCoy, however, I am a little nervous about the remainder of the season. He’s one of the only OU DL’s that I can remember during the Stoops era that hasn’t had some sort of issue that impacted his ability to play. Dan Cody literally went insane. Dusty Dvoracek beat someone into a coma. Justin Chaisson didn’t even get to school before he was in trouble. Demarcus Granger got suspended for stealing HenryJames’ mink coat at the Fiesta Bowl. Tommie Harris battled injuries regularly. Auston English has been hurt plenty. The list goes on. I honestly can’t think of a guy besides McCoy that came out unscathed. Good luck with all that.
One has to wonder what it is that Stoops possesses within his sales skill set that enables him to do what he does with players and recruits. Even after disaster after disaster, such as Malcolm Kelly or Chad Roark, he continues to bring in top talent. They’re then set up to be bamboozled in a similar manner. Even after guys like Ryan Reynolds and Jason White are told to stay on the field, only to wind up injured worse, guys like Gresham and Bradford appear to be willing to sacrifice millions of dollars in an effort to come back prematurely from injury in a season that is likely already toast. Guys like Leinart make obvious, horrible mistakes financially in returning for another year, yet all of 4 of the aforementioned players decide to return to a decidedly weaker team this season. None of it makes any sense. It isn’t like a degree from OU has value, so it isn’t about the education. It also can’t be about the location – Norman is worse than a gulag. It makes me scratch my head.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great stuff all around.
OU has some interesting games coming up and I’ll be watching them very intently.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 8, 2009 6:17 PM CDT reply actions
But can we trust Gypsy Strippers? Because my internet girlfriend from Romania seems legit.
by misterloki on Sep 8, 2009 9:12 PM CDT reply actions
“Impacted”
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
by panchoclaus on Sep 8, 2009 9:25 PM CDT reply actions
Gotta disagree with you about rooting for OU when they played Tech last year. It was our only hope. Baylor nearly pulled it off for us. Thats the only time I’ve ever rooted for them and hopefully the last. Point is, I’ll root for OU if it means Texas could win the Big 12 south, play for the Big 12 championship, and have a legitimate shot to play in a MNC.
by probablymaybe on Sep 8, 2009 9:29 PM CDT reply actions
We must have the most emotional, simpering, insecure fanbase in all of sports outside of Boston for this to be happening already.
Bah, you’re five years behind the times. That was pre-2004.
by bigdukesix on Sep 8, 2009 9:44 PM CDT reply actions
As an MU fan I was very happy Maclin left because he had nothing but downside ahead of him. Maclin wanted to stay and Pinkel tells him he has to go now . Contrast that with Pelini who flies up to Oregon to recruit a sure fire top 10 pick in Suh to stay. He had to have learned that trick from Stoops.
The guaranteed money thrown at top picks today makes it insane to stay in school. For $30m Bradford could have recreated college in a few years if he had to. Plus, how different is the NFL from college, really? The money is a lot larger, the women are hotter so why stay?
by hughakston on Sep 8, 2009 9:47 PM CDT reply actions
Unfortunately, bad career decisions resulting in personal loss of millions will continue to be made by otherwise smart athletes, in OU and elsewhere. The next round of Stoops recruits will not learn from the mistakes being made right now by their predecessors. An athlete does not make career decisions the same way, say, an MBA grad does. The world of an athlete is romanticized in our society, and the very best among them are regarded with feelings ranging from admiration to adulation all the way to worship. The best of them hear the call to be courageous, to be selfless, to be heroic. When you’re a kid, and the hopes of your peers, your school, your state are all pinned on you, and everyone is begging you to stay, it becomes easier to tell yourself that you will not be selling out to the NFL, that you’re here because you love football, that you’ll stay until you can’t, because that’s what you are, a selfless hero, a savior. In the heat of a game, Jordan Shipley is not thinking about how his next catch will earn him that much more in the NFL. He is there with a warrior’s mentality, to succeed, to defeat, to conquer. Anyway, it is the mythology that we create around these players that deceive them, that make them give too much.
- FAAAAARRTT**
by Fried Rice on Sep 8, 2009 10:00 PM CDT reply actions
Turning down NFL millions to return to OU begins to make more sense when you remember where these guys come from. For those who grew up where Bradford (OKC), Gresham (Ardmore) and McCoy (OKC) did, merely playing for OU is considered taking up residence in Valhalla. Playing a key role on a championship team there means the beer is delivered by eager celestial concubines. It may seem meager to us as outsiders when compared to a shot at national fame and much larger fortune than being “taken care of for life” north of the Red River. However, it is hard to overstate the stature of that program in the state.
As for Williams who is from Longview, well, he is an offensive lineman. And, with apologies to those hailing from there, have you spent much time in Longview?
by hopefulhorn on Sep 8, 2009 10:02 PM CDT reply actions
I still find it amusing that OU played for a NC in 2004 over an udefeated Auburn team who beat the defending NC LSU team led by Nick Saban as well as other SEC foes. The media was fooled in 2004 by Sooner propaganda and they fell for the same trap in 08.
The only reason to go to Dallas this year is to find the parties where girls romance each other.
by groundhogday on Sep 8, 2009 10:37 PM CDT reply actions
Venables and Stoops are well known negative recruiters and habitual liars. The injury to Bradford was pretty similar to what happened to Stephen McGee last year early in the season. It took McGee until the Texas game to even try to play again and he was not 100%, and he never should have taken the field last yield as it jeorpardized his pro future. Fortunately he didn’t get hurt in the Texas game, but there wasn’t much upside other than playing in a rivalry game 1 more time. If Bradford somehow see’s the light he won’t play again this year. McGee was fine by the time the combine rolled around did reasonably well there. I thought it was pretty funny lately when Jackson Jeffcoat struck the Sooners from his list because they contacted him during a dead period. His parents theorized that if the coach doesn’t follow the rules he can’t be trusted. I don’t think the sooners will be down for long, but since it is a zero sum game it helps my Aggies if bloom goes off the Stoops rose.
by kilgoretrout on Sep 8, 2009 11:55 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks for the responses, guys.
Groundhog—
You’re crossing up 2003 and 2004. 2003 was OU being blown out by KSU, then playing LSU in the Sugar while USC played Iowa in the Rose. 2004 was undefeated USC vs. undefeated OU while undefeated Auburn watched from the sidelines. I know because I used to confuse the two seasons myself.
hopefulhorn—
You make a great point about the whole social structure in the land of joad. I’ve been to Longview and you make a good point there as well.
FriedRice—
While I agree that this will continue to occur, it doesn’t make it any less delicious to rip on it now.
hughakston—
I agree with everything you typed, including the take on Pelini. The Stoops coaching tree is strong, selfish, and widespread. Suh could be anywhere but Lincoln right now with millions in his bank account.
bigdukesix—
Pre-VY, I complained as loudly as anyone, and I don’t regret it. I will attest that things are different now, including how I see things regarding this program. A national title can do that for you, I suppose.
probablymaybe—
As I posted then and repeated now, there is nothing good to come of rooting for them. I linked an article in which I gave a number of ways in which we could make the title game even with an OU loss to Tech. And they were right. As was the concept that the worst thing that can possibly happen when rooting for OU probably will occur.
panchoclaus—
Using “impacted” in verbal form for “impact” has been debated and approved by the dictionary boards and is considered standard use since early last century. I do commend you on your English skills, however, sir.
misterloki—
I think you should not only trust the Internet girlfriend, but pay for her to move over here and settle down. Good luck.
by CloseToJumping on Sep 9, 2009 12:04 AM CDT reply actions
CTJ,
No, I didn’t confuse the years but you make another great point. OU snowed the voters in 03 as well when USC should have been playing LSU in the Sugar after OU was blown out by KSU in the Big 12 CG. How did I forget that?
If you go back to 04, the big 12 was somewhat weak and they barely got by a number of teams (namely Okie State and A#M). Their d no longer had Tommie Harris, etc. Adrian Peterson covered up numerous holes on that team and if UT had exhibited any guts in 04 we would have beaten them. OU should have not played USC ahead of that Auburn team. A team that defeated the defending National Champions in a slug fest.
My point is, OU continues to snow the media with outrageous propaganda.
by Groundhog Day on Sep 9, 2009 12:30 AM CDT reply actions
Yeah, I am not sure what I was thinking in regard to your original. I must have glanced and misread it. I agree with your point completely, in any event.
by CloseToJumping on Sep 9, 2009 12:36 AM CDT reply actions
ctj, what makes you think that Stoops convinced any of these players to return to OU. You post lie after lie after lie, and finally your lies become fact. At least in your feeble mind. Stoops has always advised players that project in the first round to take the money. That is how he advised Tommie Harris. That was also his advice to AD. Bradford stated that there were several reasons for his return. Among those advisers was Bill Parcells. He told Sam to gain more weight. He also told him that a QB needed forty starts in college to be ready for the NFL. Sam has 28 at that point. McCoy promised his mother that he would graduate. She died his freshman year from cancer. Apparently, he intends to keep his promise. Trent Williams was projected second round. He wanted first round money that was usually reserved for LT’s. So, he returned and requested a move to the left side. BTW, he played the left side his entire career prior to OU. Gresham has never detailed his reasons for returning to my knowledge but I am sure that Bob Stoops did not trick him into staying.
You mentioned Ricky Williams. He had nothing to gain but he returned for another year. You were excited. Isn’t that nice. Did you call him out as being stupid??? Did you call out Mack for openly and publicly recruiting him to stay. Mack knew he could be injured but he was also crucial for Mack’s first year success. Did Mack really care about Rick Williams and his future or was Mack more concerned about Mack Brown’s future? So, he arranged the Hicks payoff to keep Ricky around. Tell me again about how almost all Class A baseball players batting ,238 get a major league contract and 250k bonus.
by soonerspy on Sep 9, 2009 12:37 AM CDT reply actions
Great stuff, CTJ.
The Bradford and Gresham injuries will have a big impact on players from all over making these decisions in subsequent years. Lots of agents licking their lips.
interesting question about Big Game Bob on the Forum over at Boomer and Sooner:
by Sailor Ripley on Sep 9, 2009 1:20 AM CDT reply actions
soonerspy—
In regard to how we know Stoops talked to them about coming back, well, apply Occam’s Razor. That rule doesn’t always work, but it sure works a lot. The simplest answer here is that he did speak with them and implore a return.
Look at the alternatives:
1) He completely ignored them and went out of his way to avoid a discussion on the subject with them.
2) He pushed them to go pro and told them that that was their best decision and then they ignored him.
Do either of those come across as plausible by the comparison of him talking to them, and having other folks talk to them, in an effort to influence them to return, which, by the way, benefits him directly?
The history of this guy’s behavior gives enough evidence to find it easier to assume that he did what was in his best interest instead of what benefited others more.
That question might have been intentionally naive, but you’d have to be willfully oblivious to look at the set of points presented here and in your own mind to come out the other side of the discussion as believing that he did not play a role in them returning. The world isn’t a procedural court of law. What do your eyes and instincts tell you?
In regard to Bradford, his dad was public in the winter about thinking it a good idea for the guy to go pro.
Your complaining about Ricky WIlliams and the implied transgression with HIcks might even be worth entertaining as far as a discussion if you weren’t a sooner calling it into question. You guys don’t seem to get this, but the rest of the world views you as a pathetic joke when it comes to integrity, playing within the rules, etc. You’ve never won anything without cheating. The entire concept of your state and school mascot is that of cheating. The government, no less.
Sell stupid somewhere else. We realize you have plenty of it to pass around, so try the NFL boards or something, that way you can converse with fans of other professional franchises as well.
by CloseToJumping on Sep 9, 2009 1:23 AM CDT reply actions
Great post, CTJ.
Speaking of the OU hype machine. Did anyone notice how “great” that world beater Dominique Franks looked this past weekend? That secondary looks awfully weak. Outside of the DL and Travis Lewis this OU team has a lot weaknesses. The game at Miami could get ugly in a hurry and all of a sudden Baylor looks like an interesting game.
Soonerspy,
OU is lucky to have McCoy as a student athlete. He seems like a great kid who values a degree and loves his home state university. For that, I hope he stays healthy throughout this season. It’s also possible that he chose to improve his status from late first rounder to top 10 pick as he was awfully inconsistent last year due to nagging injuries. However, he played a hell of a game against Florida.
But I have no idea why Gresham came back as he was a force all year and most certainly would have been the first tight end taken in last year’s draft. I certainly liked him a lot better than Pettigrew because of the matchup problems he created with that size and speed. He had nothing to gain by staying and I look forward to what he has to say about his OU days after he leaves Norman. We’ve certainly heard from the Tommie Harris’ and the Malcolm Kellys of the world regarding their time at OU.
by Groundhog Day on Sep 9, 2009 1:30 AM CDT reply actions
I guess the premise that sooners work off of is the same as that of their collection of coaches and administrators: Lie, lie, lie, and when you’re caught, lie some more. While that may work with the NCAA and it’s toothless enforcement arm, we the people of the court of public opinion, and those capable of doing basic Internet research and remembering back 8 months, do not have to believe or acknowledge your pathetic bullshit as anything but the lies that they are.
You called me a liar above, soonerspy, and then you asked for proof. Well, courtesy of Trips Left from a forum thread, who did the work before I had to, here is a breakdown of just some simple data backing up the concept that Stoops talked these guys into coming back. But don’t let facts get in your way while you bluster about hoping no one notices the truth.
Enjoy:
#
Trips Right Administrator
Posted 9 hours ago 63.76.139.12 Edit Delete Undelete
Stoops was pitching Bradford to come back. He wasn’t advising him or asking him to weigh the pros and cons, he was flat out manipulating the kid. Check out this reasoned reponse to legitimate question before Bradfords announcement.
http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/bob-stoops/
Tebow, a junior, and Bradford, a sophomore, were asked about the N.F.L. on Saturday night and gave wait-and-see answers. Oklahoma Coach Bob Stoops, however, went on a diatribe that could have melted Mel Kiper’s hair gel.
"You don’t know that," Stoops said sternly to a reporter who said that Bradford projected high in the N.F.L. draft. "Those people who are projecting that have no idea about that. You guys are making something that isn’t there unless you have got a draft projection back that I didn’t. O.K.? So you’re going on speculation that rarely is correct. If he’s a top-five guy, he ought to go. If he isn’t, he’ll be a top-five guy at some point in his career. At least that’s my belief. There’s a big difference. He still has a lot he’ll improve and mature and physically grow and mentally handling everything. There’s so much that people don’t talk about that throw those projections around that don’t take into consideration."
#
Trips Right Administrator
Posted 9 hours ago 63.76.139.12 Edit Delete Undelete
And this gem.
http://www.tulsabeacon.com/?p=1304
"We are pleased that these players are returning to our program," said OU head coach Bob Stoops.
"They understand the value of gaining another year of experience and improving their position in the draft along with the value of either finishing their degree or being within a few hours of completing it," said Stoops.
Stoops said the average career in the NFL is only 3.5 years.
"I think they all see the value in another year’s experience improving their draft position," Stoops said. "Every time you improved five spots, eight spots, ten spots, if you improve a round, you have three or four times your money. That’s a factor.
He talked about the differences in salary between a second or third round pick and a late round pick; a first round pick and a second or third round pick and being picked in the top half of the first round versus the bottom half of the first round.
"They all want to take care of their parents, they want to be able to take care of their family," Stoops said.
"The second and third round money you’re going to be able to take care of yourself and that’s about it. First round, you’re talking about taking care of yourself and some other people. They want to solidify those positions and be in as strong a position as they can be when they enter the draft.
"So, when you do it that way and you jump draft positions forward, you really make a more significant amount of money and you’re more experienced and prepared for that atmosphere. So they see the value in that, and I appreciate those guys.
"I also think our players recognize the opportunities we have as a program to pursue more championships and that’s something that means a lot to all of us."
Players who stay in college for four years almost always improve their draft status, barring injuries.
"It’s a lot harder to cut a first-round pick," Stoops said
by CloseToJumping on Sep 9, 2009 1:33 AM CDT reply actions
Groundhog,
I hate OU. I mean I really hate those inbred skunk pelt trading banjo players.
But in 2004, OU absolutely deserved to play in the BCS bowl over Auburn. The Big 12 was not down. In fact the Big 12 South was loaded — Texas was #6, aggy was #22, Tech was #23, Okie State was #32 (rankings before bowl games when the champ game participants were decided).
Okie played a nonconference schedule of UH, Bowling Green (ranked 36th in AP), and Oregon. Auburn played a nonconference of Louisiana Monroe, Citadel, and La Tech. Per Sagarin, OU’s SOS was the 13th toughest. Auburn’s was the 60th toughest.
So Mobilehoma deserved to go over Auburn.
OU had by far the best win by killing us that year.
by randywatson on Sep 9, 2009 6:57 AM CDT reply actions
CloseToJumping, Saul Alinsky would be proud:
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
-Rules for Radicals
by monkeywrench on Sep 9, 2009 8:32 AM CDT reply actions
It may seem meager to us as outsiders when compared to a shot at national fame and much larger fortune than being "taken care of for life" north of the Red River. However, it is hard to overstate the stature of that program in the state.
That seemed to work out pretty well for Billy Sims. I think NFL money will provide a better life than the occasional free 3.2 beer and a reserved bed at the Tulsa Salvation Army shelter.
by BrickHorn on Sep 9, 2009 9:10 AM CDT reply actions
Randy,
You make good points, but it’s possible that Auburn was the better team that year and anyone who goes through the SEC undefeated is a special team as it doesn’t happen very often. Also, if you look at those scores, it’s obvious there were some weaknesses on defense which were really exposed in the Orange Bowl.
Also, Randy, and I hope this doesn’t happen but could Texas be this year’s Auburn because our OOC schedule is so embarrassing? What if Florida, USC, and Texas finish the season undefeated? USC plays two tough OOC opponents in Notre Dame and Ohio State plus the pac 10. Texas needs Oregon to lose to Utah and Purdue. They also need Oregon State to get a beat down by Cincinnati and Georgia to beat Arizona State.
The above scenario is possible but Florida finishing undefeated is no given as recent history has shown and that team will miss Percy Harvin more than people think. Texas needs to run the table.
by Groundhog Day on Sep 9, 2009 9:49 AM CDT reply actions
CTJ,
You nailed all three premises. This was timely, spot on and should be required reading not just for Longhorn fans but all fans of CFB, not to mention mothers of recruits.
Regarding item #3, it was abuntantly clear then as it is now, that the BS responses from both sides of BS’s mouth regarding his stars draft status back in the Spring were a blatant indication of his willingness to manipulate his own players for his personal benefit and to keep the toothless hoards in the “Land of Joad” (apologies ctj but I’m going to use that one for a while) appeased. Oops! – now it backfired, time for plan B, which not so coincidentally involves more lying just like plan A, only now its about how great Landry Jones is, the OL will surely come together, Gresham’s not out for the seasson!, first game jitters, blah, blah blah.
I, like most Longhorn fans, feel badly for good kids/players like Bradford and Gresham and wish them well. But this isn’t about them. It’s about that lying, headphone throwing Narcissist and his visor toting staff that will do or say anything to feed the monster in Norman. I.E. “Don’t worry Mrs. FiveStar Recruits Mother, we’ll coach him up and send him to the NFL (now muttering) unless of course we need him to turn down millions in the NFL and play injured to save our asses.”
by txtower on Sep 9, 2009 9:59 AM CDT reply actions
Aggy and OU are our main competition for recruits… if we lose out on a bluechipper, 8 out of 10 times its to one of those two schools. If they do poorly… we get more recruits. We get more recruits…. WE win more and they lose more…
This is the current cycle that aggy is in that has prevented them from competing on a regular basis. OU COULD begin said cycle if they lose a bunch this year.
In summary, NEVER ROOT FOR OU.
by Donny Boudreaux on Sep 9, 2009 10:02 AM CDT reply actions
Agree with Sooner spy that Bradford had a number of legit reasons for coming back. I’m sure he couldn’t have anticipated all the problems on the O-line, but knew it would be weaker.
Gresham I don’t understand.
by theclapper on Sep 9, 2009 10:04 AM CDT reply actions
monkeywrench:
I think Alinsky’s intent was to use ridicule as a means of squelching the opposition and putting them on the defensive. The use of facts, support or justification is not critical – it’s an emotion-driven tactic.
Contrast that with observations that are rooted in logic, supported by analysis and backed by facts, quotes, statements, etc. that are taken completely in context and, preferably, from the subject of the observation. For an example, see what CTJ and Trips put together.
So, where do Baylor & OU play this year?
by Levander Williams on Sep 9, 2009 10:27 AM CDT reply actions
A&M’s starting to lose recruits to Tech and, yes, Baylor. A&M is probably still one of the main competitions for UT recruits, but they’re starting to get beat by other programs, too.
Baylor is at Norman the week before OU-TX.
by ponderos on Sep 9, 2009 10:34 AM CDT reply actions
I’m going to venture that CTJ really enjoyed writing this article. His Bob Stoops voodoo doll has to be in shreds by now.
by Vasherized on Sep 9, 2009 10:50 AM CDT reply actions
CTJ,
All points pitch perfect except for using the Ny Times blog as proof of anything. They still employ the likes of Thayer Evans and therefore cannot be trusted, much like the Blow U coaching staff.
by fswood21 on Sep 9, 2009 10:50 AM CDT reply actions
Suh is on record as saying that the only reason he returned was to restore the family’s honor. Cf. the 2008 SOTU:
“The other tackle is Ndamukong Suh, whose name in the Ngema tribe in Cameroon means ‘I’ll move aside. Take the open grasslands.’”
During Pelini’s visit, they turned the lights low and chanted ritual curses on Henry James and his offspring.
by parlinhall on Sep 9, 2009 10:54 AM CDT reply actions
But what is Stoops motive for playing up his team? It seems to me if he downplays them he wouldn’t get the backlash from the media and fans when it comes crumbling down, and if they play better than advertised he comes out smelling like roses.
by bighornfan32 on Sep 9, 2009 12:35 PM CDT reply actions
The bottom line is if the team knows Bradford is out for the year, they’ll mail it in. This is why Stoops keeps obfuscating.
Apparently, the lockerroom at halftime of the BYU game was like a morgue. No one stood up and tried rally the troops which isn’t surprising because ou’s really good at playing from ahead and keeping an edge. Knock ’em in the mouth and they fold like a bunch of frontrunners. Think Mike Tyson.
by Trips Right on Sep 9, 2009 12:47 PM CDT reply actions
Posted on shaggybevo by an Okie State fan that said he got it from a Sooner:

by Huckleberry on Sep 9, 2009 12:53 PM CDT reply actions
“But what is Stoops motive for playing up his team?”
Denial isn’t just a river in Egypt.
by txtower on Sep 9, 2009 2:47 PM CDT reply actions
Yeah, as someone said, you gotta consider that Oklahoma is a pit of a State, and that football program of theirs is, bar none, the best thing they have going. I can see kids growing up having wet dreams about going there and putting on the red longjohns, and when the time comes to leave, they can’t bring themselves to do it. That’s one of the reasons why they don’t want to leave. Of course, the other reasons you can chalk up to them being Oklahomans (is that what they’re called?), and as such, aren’t very bright folks.
by yojimbox on Sep 9, 2009 2:49 PM CDT reply actions
Don’t be so down on ridicule. From this side of the RRR, rather than merely pointing out stupidity, I would much rather point AND laugh at it.
Like that bumper sticker says, “Tact is for People Who Are Not Smart Enough to be Sarcastic”
by Fried Rice on Sep 9, 2009 3:23 PM CDT reply actions
I hear the greatest center in sooner history broke hand today..
by doback on Sep 9, 2009 3:30 PM CDT reply actions
Unless you’re from Oklahoma, in which case the way you wrote it the first time makes more sense.
by Steve Nebraska on Sep 9, 2009 3:55 PM CDT reply actions
Not from oklahoma. Every time I post sober something like this happens..
by doback on Sep 9, 2009 4:08 PM CDT reply actions
I will only add – don’t lump all the guys who coached under BS or his dad into the same class. I know of at least one college coach from that tree who told me this winter that Bradford was a damned idiot for staying at OU.
by Ag_in_TX on Sep 10, 2009 10:17 AM CDT reply actions
True Longhorns should demonstrate class. This is not a classy article, particularly the dig on Dan Cody. Clinical depression is not something to make fun of.
by Rusty Shackleford on Nov 13, 2009 3:02 AM CST reply actions

by 




















