Texas Longhorns Depth Chart: OU Version
Not much new to report.
John Chiles and Marquise Goodwin are listed as 'or' at the Sub B position. I'm not sure of the question, but I don't think the answer is 'either Chiles or Goodwin.' Malcolm Williams is third team and also second team flanker behind Shipley. He'll play a lot!
Starting tailback will either be Fozzy Whitaker or Kenny Hayter Ivan Williams Cody Johnson. We can sure use Johnson's explosiveness against the Sooners.
David Snow is the sole starter at right guard. Michael Huey must still be banged up, and he's having trouble blocking the other team's front seven when they know where the ball is going 9 times out of 10.
Ben Alexander and Kheeston Randall are listed as co-starters opposite Lamarr Houston. Both played well against Colorado.
Blake Gideon has dispatched all usurpers at the right safety position.
But at least we're not making noise about Jared Norton and Blaine Irby playing.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This caught my eye.
Punter: John Gold OR Justin Tucker
by srr50 on Oct 13, 2009 8:39 AM CDT reply actions
Remember all the hand-wringing in the offseason over defensive tackle? Many hands, overly-excessive wringing. I don’t think I’ve heard a peep about any deficiencies there since August.
by nordberg on Oct 13, 2009 8:40 AM CDT reply actions
i heard both collins and scott may be back for the game…at least that’s the rumor coming outta norman.
by psychotherapy on Oct 13, 2009 9:09 AM CDT reply actions
Oh, if we lose, you can bet the great majority of Texas fans will be laying this loss at the feet of Norton and Irby. No doubt.
by uthookem on Oct 13, 2009 9:14 AM CDT reply actions
I was shocked at the lack of Goodwin and Monroe in the game last weekend. I guarantee we see a lot more of both on Saturday. Let’s just hope we don’t give the ball to Monroe EVERY time he is in the game. Starting to become a little obvious.
by Nik on Oct 13, 2009 10:30 AM CDT reply actions
If someone is really really good does it really matter that much that the other team “knows” they will get the ball? everyteam we play knows that Shipley will get the vast majority of passes. If Texas had Barry Sanders or Walter Payton on the sidelines, would we not play them beacuse it would show a tendancy?
Furthermore, it is amazing that Mack and Co. seems so worried about tendancies, yet the offense is so predictable half the damn stadium knows the play.
by Holdem on Oct 13, 2009 10:45 AM CDT reply actions
“If someone is really really good does it really matter that much that the other team "knows" they will get the ball?”
On that play, yes. You can stop Earl Campbell by putting 11 in the box if you are absolutely confident it will be a run between the tackles. there is a big difference in your allocation of defensive resources between knowing someone is going to get the ball at that exact momment and knowing it will happen a number of times at some point in the game.
by stuckinmn on Oct 13, 2009 11:55 AM CDT reply actions
Tailback: 28 Fozzy Whittaker OR 1 Barack Obama
by ArmTackler on Oct 13, 2009 12:09 PM CDT reply actions
“On that play, yes. You can stop Earl Campbell by putting 11 in the box if you are absolutely confident it will be a run between the tackles. there is a big difference in your allocation of defensive resources between knowing someone is going to get the ball at that exact momment and knowing it will happen a number of times at some point in the game.”
I’ll give you this, but we heard this same excuse with Cedric Benson his freshman year. It is a relatively easy tendancy to break, run him into the line once, if it works, keep doing it, if not, play fake the shit out of it and go over the top. Its not like DJ Monroe is so inexperienced that he is going to get confused and tackle Colt as he sets up to pass.
by Holdem on Oct 13, 2009 2:14 PM CDT reply actions
One carry and Barack would be the leading John Heisman candidate.
Say what you want about Cody and his explosiveness. Nobody’s explosive behind that line. CJ had three td’s in last years game and one of them required some speed, along with power. He’s not slow, he just needs a larger hole when we’re incapable of supplying a microscopic one.
Defensive tackle has been a pleasant surprise. Muschamp has proven to be a talent maximizer. The other guy, not so much.
by magnusbleuveigner on Oct 13, 2009 5:10 PM CDT reply actions
Yes Nordberg, but we didn’t wring our hands about being able to score a god damn touchdown. Substitute reasons and it was warranted. No, it doesn’t need to make sense. Not much I say in the next few days will.
by lowery on Oct 13, 2009 5:13 PM CDT reply actions
“Remember all the hand-wringing in the offseason over defensive tackle?”
Muschamp covers a multitude of sins.
by Fried Rice on Oct 13, 2009 8:06 PM CDT reply actions
He also faces his first truly credible running threat on SAT. Hope it goes well.
by Sailor Ripley on Oct 13, 2009 10:37 PM CDT reply actions

by 























