Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

How Not To Hire A D-1 College Football Coach

Tennessee has the blueprint.

First, you might want to avoid hiring Lane Kiffin.

Star-divide

Since Kiffin bolted for USC after one year at Tennessee, the Vols Athletics Director, Mike Hamilton has been turned down by:

Will Muschamp, a defensive coordinator with no head coaching experience, who was offered almost 3 and half times what he is making right now at Texas.

Troy Calhoun, where again Tennesse offered him 3 times what he is making at the Air Force Academy.

And now David Cutcliffe, the head coach at Duke, a revered former assistant at Tennessee who had the backing of both Peyton and Eli Manning has said no.

Cutcliffe had accepted the job, but balked at being told he had to keep most of Kiffin's staff.

It seems that when Tennessee hired Lane Kiffin, they not only let him pay his assistants more than any other staff in college football, they also agreed that Tennessee would owe two seasons of pay to any coach it fired if that coach didn’t secure employment elsewhere. Kippy Brown, who has applied for the head coaching position, would be owed three seasons of pay if he’s not retained.

Former Longhorn player Willie Mack Garza is among the assistants that Kiffin left behind.

Yeah, rule # 1 might be just don't hire Lane Kiffin.

Comment 47 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Fulmer just keeps looking better and better.

by lazer2280 on Jan 15, 2010 9:01 AM CST reply actions  

If Mike Hamilton keeps his job it will be damning evidence of how HFCS (High Fructose Corn Syrup) can damage ones mental faculties, assuming there were any present to begin with.

by dasmithjones on Jan 15, 2010 9:06 AM CST reply actions  

I don’t know how Hamilton keeps his job after this debacle and that asinine contract he gave Kiffin and staff.

by maninblack on Jan 15, 2010 9:11 AM CST reply actions  

Snubbed by someone with ties to the program for Duke. Ouch.

by coloradoag on Jan 15, 2010 9:11 AM CST reply actions  

They should promote Willie Mack Garza, based solely on the awesomeness of his name.

Of course a black guy named Garza probably wouldn’t go over so well in SEC country.

by nordberg on Jan 15, 2010 9:17 AM CST reply actions  

SEC coaching has become a complete circus.

That conference is the common thread in all coaching sleeze and drama.

They all just throw their entire budget at each hire and hope for the best.

by mockingbird on Jan 15, 2010 9:20 AM CST reply actions  

If they are already still paying Fulmer for firing him, he might as well be coaching.

by thestos on Jan 15, 2010 9:23 AM CST reply actions  

You would really blame Kiffin for leaving a second-tier job for arguably the top job in college football? That’s an irrational hatred there.

by bigdukesix on Jan 15, 2010 9:33 AM CST reply actions  

Leaving for your dream job is one thing — practicing a scorched earth policy on the way out (having your assistant call Tennessee recruits while still in town) is something else.

The dude is a sleazbag with other sleazbags working for him.

by srr50 on Jan 15, 2010 9:36 AM CST reply actions  

can someone explain why muschamp would turn down the tenn job- I know it’s not as good as texas but its a sure fire beginning ans he could return to texas if he wanted. what’s the reason????

by dumb as hell on Jan 15, 2010 9:37 AM CST reply actions  

“You would really blame Kiffin for leaving a second-tier job for arguably the top job in college football? That’s an irrational hatred there.”

Kiffin is a dirty little shit, but Tennessee should blame themselves for ever hiring him in the first place.

Pete Carroll made the USC job appear to be the best gig in college football. It isn’t. Fickle alumni and fans, mediocre facilities, etc. Better than Tennessee to be sure, however.

by coloradoag on Jan 15, 2010 9:39 AM CST reply actions  

can someone explain why muschamp would turn down the tenn job- I know it’s not as good as texas but its a sure fire beginning ans he could return to texas if he wanted. what’s the reason????

Aside from the fact that the program is a train wreck, the Athletics Director has no clue, it’s recruiting base it thin, and it ranks – at best – as the 4th program in it’s league, I can’t imagine why anyone would turn the job down.

by srr50 on Jan 15, 2010 9:44 AM CST reply actions  

To answer the question, Muschamp probably knows when Mack will retire and is probably comfortable with it. Two, there is no guarantee that he could return, what if he goes and fails? He’s out in three years and back to coaching Southern Miss. or such. Now he waits two years, earns as much if not more than what he would have earned at Tennessee and has several years of goodwill at Texas.

by holdem on Jan 15, 2010 9:46 AM CST reply actions  

“can someone explain why muschamp would turn down the tenn job- I know it’s not as good as texas but its a sure fire beginning ans he could return to texas if he wanted. what’s the reason????”

Tennessee will always be second fiddle in the conference to Alabama, Florida, LSU, hell, even Auburn and Georgia. Tennessee is also at a severe recruiting disadvantage compared to the aforementioned schools. The program has a brutal rebuilding phase in front of them. Why would Muschamp want the headaches and potentially damaged reputation that would come with that job. He was completely right to stay put.

by coloradoag on Jan 15, 2010 9:47 AM CST reply actions  

What a donkey show.

BTW, did Clipper Cooper kill Scipio in Pasadena and bury him somewhere on the TransPacific Ocean Railroad? I miss his rapist wit..

by Lloyd Christmas on Jan 15, 2010 9:58 AM CST reply actions  

I imagine one great big reason everyone is running like hell from the Tennessee job is that they have to keep Kiffin’s staff for at least 2 years. Who wants to go into (possibly their first) a HC job with somebody else’s cast-offs? They’re a trainwreck, nobody wants to step into that mess.

by TOR on Jan 15, 2010 10:02 AM CST reply actions  

I can’t speak for Muschamp, but here’s why I would stay at Texas:

Austin v. Knoxville. For anybody with a family, this is a big deal.

Working with Mack Brown vs. Hamilton

A short-term financial sacrifice, but the opportunity for stable, long-term, accumulation of very serious coin working with good people in a great institution that has the most powerful financial model in the country.

It’s the same reason that senior associates at Wachtell Lipton, or VPs at Goldman Sachs, frequently pass up the opportunity to go to other firms for higher wages .

by Kosciuszko on Jan 15, 2010 10:07 AM CST reply actions  

Owhn’t no nuthin bout no coaching fuhbaw. Dang ol AD get fired lika shut neva hard that dude man. Dang ol wrong UT guy said.

by Boomhauer on Jan 15, 2010 10:11 AM CST reply actions  

Chili Mac Garza is what we always called him.

I get the impression Lane Kiffin is a puppet set up so the older sleazebags can do their tricks behind the scene.

by Art Vandelay on Jan 15, 2010 10:15 AM CST reply actions  

Kiffin is an instant gratification kind of guy. Look at his coaching career (limited though it is). He never stayed in one spot very long, and he’s always looking for something bigger and better. Tennessee was looking at a minimum of two more years before they were seriously competitive with the league’s elite teams. And that assumes things go well for him and the team.
At USC, he is instantly among the leagues elite teams. Further, he has the most highly recruited quarterback in last year’s class with a year of experience already under his belt. He can compete for conference and (possibly) national titles immediately. I think that had a lot to do with why he took the job. Building up a program takes time. He doesn’t like to wait.
At the end of the day, everyone is looking out for #1. Kiffin did a good job of that, Tennessee did not. I don’t agree with what Kiffin did, but Tennessee should have been looking out for Tennessee.

by lazer2280 on Jan 15, 2010 10:38 AM CST reply actions  

Didn’t Tennessee recently have some possible infraction issue with hostess hookups?

by Kenneth Ivory on Jan 15, 2010 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

Kiffin is a certified D bag. There is no way around it.

However, I agree that TN was not looking out for themselves. This guy raised read flags from day one that he is all about himself.

He says he purposely got the negative media attention so he TN would be always in the news, but it is clear he did it because he likes to see his own face and hear his voice on TV.

The guy will sink USC before it is said and done, and Oregon will become the team of the PAC-10.

by Blake Stansbery on Jan 15, 2010 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

Now you tell me…

by Tommy Trojan on Jan 15, 2010 10:46 AM CST reply actions  

They supposedly sent hostesses to watch some players in South Carolina, when the hostesses are supposed to stay around campus.

by Bob in Houston on Jan 15, 2010 10:55 AM CST reply actions  

What up and coming coach in his right mind would agree to take on the staff of the former coach especially one as slimy as Kiffin. I can understand a coach or two but to take on an entire staff that presumably you can’t fire?

That’s why you get turned down by the coach at Duke and the coach at Air Force ouch.

Next up . . . .

by Roach on Jan 15, 2010 11:08 AM CST reply actions  

Wow. What a disaster.

More and more indications as to why Muschamp didn’t take this job. We’d better hope that someone who has their act together doesn’t come around and throw a similar deal (7yrs, $21M) his way.

by Levander Williams on Jan 15, 2010 11:15 AM CST reply actions  

Everyone needs to hope that Georgia does well these next couple years otherwise Muschamp will likely be coaching them.

by UTHornFan014 on Jan 15, 2010 11:24 AM CST reply actions  

Interesting development re the legacy Tennessee staff. Have to think that figured significantly in Muschamp’s decision.

I just don’t know if I feel more or less sanguine about us holding onto Muschamp after this week.

by blackscholes on Jan 15, 2010 11:49 AM CST reply actions  

Honestly, people really think the USC job is the best job in CFB? Wow.

by CloseToJumping on Jan 15, 2010 12:21 PM CST reply actions  

Derek Dooley? Obviously everyone’s first choice.

by TOR on Jan 15, 2010 12:26 PM CST reply actions  

And now the HC at La. Tech is the leading candidate?

In a way, UT’s search for a head football coach eerlily reminds me of my search for a date to my senior prom many moons ago – the longer it went, the lower my standards got.

by Ag_in_TX on Jan 15, 2010 12:46 PM CST reply actions  

Maybe George O’Leary has his resume ready…

by ChicagoTTU on Jan 15, 2010 1:11 PM CST reply actions  

They should just give the job to Kippy. But Willie Mack does have the best hi-top-fade in Longhorn football history. He was either the Kid or Play of our DBs. I don’t remember which one was Kid and which one was Play. But they were awesome.

by Sugarpants on Jan 15, 2010 1:21 PM CST reply actions  

Dang. No wonder these coaches need agents. Shame on Tennessee for getting out maneuvered by a punk. Sounds like their program will be screwed up for awhile.

by Major Cult on Jan 15, 2010 1:27 PM CST reply actions  

Clusterfuck, thy name is Tennessee.

by j.r.69 on Jan 15, 2010 1:43 PM CST reply actions  

these colleges are looking like they have no SKILLS at contracts and hiring people,I mean if you have a name you can walk in there and have anything you want and they’ll SIGN………then the coach can walk scott free.My dad would be pissed,went to Tenn. good thing he cant see this crap.also to top it off they fired Fulmer,even if he was losing.

by cpabis on Jan 15, 2010 1:50 PM CST reply actions  

Joker. Kippy. Damn, mamas of SEC coaches should lay off the hooch, at least during pregnancy.

by mr. sunshine on Jan 15, 2010 1:56 PM CST reply actions  

I hope our attorneys are watching this shit. Sounds like all these coach “weddings” need some serious prenuptial agreements for when the romancin’ stops.

by Major Cult on Jan 15, 2010 2:10 PM CST reply actions  

Kid had the high top fade.

by uthookem on Jan 15, 2010 2:47 PM CST reply actions  

CloseToJumping said:

Honestly, people really think the USC job is the best job in CFB? Wow.
-—-
To be fair, USC has a huge recruiting advantage, has an excellent tradition, has a home game in their conference champion BCS bowl game every year (Rose Bowl obviously), has the local police completely in their pocket, are in a weak sister conference but can still go to the national championship by going undefeated based almost solely on their national reputation. Plus, there’s hot chicks in SoCal (I prefer our or more natural looking Texas girls myself).

I mean, Pete Carroll won 1.5 national championships at USC and he’s a terrible field coach. Imagine what Saban could do there. While UT, OU, and the top 5 of the SEC are hoping to land two or three 5* players per year, SC is pulling in upwards of eight.

by hodad on Jan 15, 2010 3:06 PM CST reply actions  

CTJ:

I think living on the beach at a school with a great football history, an equally great history of looking the other way regarding the “recruitment” of athletes, making a ton of money, sitting smack dab in the middle of a shit load of talent, with no real competition (UCLA is really a basketball school) would appeal a large number of the coaches in the country. Especially those residing in places like Norman, Lincoln, Alabama etc.

There are plenty of negatives, some of which I’ve listed elsewhere but yes, USC is right up there.

Other than Texas, which I’ve stated before could easily switch places with USC, which job job is better?

by Roach on Jan 15, 2010 3:11 PM CST reply actions  

For being considered big business, the hirers and firers in college football sure are chumps.

by milksteak on Jan 15, 2010 3:31 PM CST reply actions  

How you rate the USC job depends on how important you think stadium, facilities, and actual campus location are. In USC’s case, these all suck. When they were losing 12 in a row to ND and 8 in a row to UCLA, who would have said it was the top job? There are 15-20 programs that at any time could be considered “top” jobs. It’s what the coach makes of it.

by trkhorn on Jan 15, 2010 7:43 PM CST reply actions  

The USC job 5 years ago was the top job no doubt. With the impending scholarship reductions it is moving down the list.

Yes, I am optimistic the NCAA will grow a set. A small set, but still.

by llogg on Jan 15, 2010 8:36 PM CST reply actions  

Call me crazy but I like this La Tech guy.

by Newy25 on Jan 15, 2010 8:39 PM CST reply actions  

You crazy.

by Name (required) on Jan 16, 2010 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

Go Saints! Become a fan of facebook page here: Colts Will Lose Super Bowl 2010!

by Alexander Chenevert on Jan 31, 2010 10:30 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Link2_small BrickHorn

Propeller_helmet_small Huck L Berry

Picture_016_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Billlittle0_small Fake Ken Tremendous

Authors

Williams_ranger_dugout_small WWMcClyde

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Small ColoradoAg

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover

Small John Kocurek

Thumbnail_small Drew Kelson

Barker Emeritus

Tn_homeimage7_small Parlin

220px-henry_james_by_john_singer_sargent_cleaned_small HenryJames

Small Doperbo