2011 Texas Football Recruiting: Spring Snapshot
Some recruiting opinions, ill-formed as they are. I'm interested in yours.
Offense
QB
David Ash
I like Ash fine and he was a recruiting lay-up from the start. He has the requisite size, he throws a solid ball, and he's a willing, if not particularly dangerous, runner. We need to target an elite level guy next year.
J.W. Walsh has been my preferred guy here since I saw his sophomore tape. However, his Dad is a canny coach and would prefer his son not sit behind Gilbert, then have to contend with an elite physical talent in Connor Wood and a brother-of-legend, both with a year on him.
Oklahoma State offered Walsh a depth chart as open as their admission policies, where he is all but assured of a starting gig within his first two years, placing him at the nexus of men's Golf Prick fashion and men's haircare for the foreseeable future. No Metroplex kid can pass that up.
OL
Christian Westerman
Garrett Greenlea
Sedrick Flowers
Josh Cochran
Taylor Doyle
Marcus Hutchins
We're done here. This is a big haul and I'm particularly enthused about the first three names on the list. Greenlea has a NFL frame as a high school junior and it will shock me not at all if he proves to be the best of the bunch, Westerman is an athletic animal sought by every team in the country, and Flowers is an interior masher with the feet to get to the next level defender.
Cochran, Doyle & Hutchins all need to get bigger and stronger and I expect at least one of them to pan.
One nit to pick: rather than taking big OL numbers (we do the Class of Beef thing about every five years, with varied results) and hoping some pan, I'd like a more concerted effort to convert Defensive Linemen over to OL. I don't want to just throw bodies at this problem - this isn't Somme.
There are always a few guys buried on DL depth charts, or high school DL who can be convinced that their future is on the other side of the ball, that are substantial athletic upgrades over the "elite" OL. They just need coaching and experience.
WR
Jaxon Shipley
Miles Onyegbule
Jaxon Shipley is the real deal: hands, route-running, quickness. We should get a productive seven years out of him.
Onyegbule is a big body wide receiver that will approximate what Dan Buckner gave us. If he's not scared of contact and can avoid Aggie equestriennes, his upside is considerably higher. He'll play quarterback this year and, like John Harris, that's better for his development than catching wobbly five yard hitches.
As a general rule, if an elite high school wide receiver can't get viable QB play, I want him playing QB. He'll get tougher, develop skills useful after the catch, and gain the confidence of game management.
TE
M.J. McFarland
Big body, great hands, athletic, straight line slow. Generally, I'd prefer a big TE that can win jump balls than a speed demon. The other realistic choice here was Max Stevenson (the Chris Barnett saga grows strange) - who actually does run extremely well - so it will be interesting to follow this and see how it plays out. At worst, he's Mike Jones.
RB
Joe Bergeron
Bergeron is a true fullback/H-back. He can catch, run, block and he has looked like a thirty two year old man since he was fifteen. Very Lebron/Oden/Parish.
At HB, it's Malcolm Brown or bust. I don't see the massive separation between Brown and some of the rest of the field - particularly Brandon Williams - that most others see, but there's no question that he's elite.
I'm a Brandon Williams fan and we may circle back to him if Brown doesn't succumb to Mack's mesmerism. Williams is as committed to Baylor as Tiger was to his marriage.
I contend that we should take two true runners here and accelerate the departure/position switch of some of the role redundancy on our current depth chart, but it looks like it will be only one. I guess we need room for Johnathan Gray. Ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha!
The state has 20 legit good to great runners this year. If you can't find your RB in this crop, your evaluations are hopeless.
Defense
DL
Desmond Jackson
He's the best Defensive Tackle in the state, arguably the nation. Tolly takes good DT recruits and makes them millionaires. It's as predictable as the tides. We'll try to add a DT or DE to the mix, but position switches in this class and in the two ahead of him will flesh out the depth chart sufficiently for next year if we want to save our bullets.
LB
Kendall Thompson
Chet Moss
Steve Edmond
Edmond is a huge get - one of the best players in the class. He can play LB or with his hand down and he's everything you want. Physical, brutal, fast, football smart.
Moss is a program kid with deep coaching ties and a good enough athlete not to be described as a reach. I like that he always makes the tackle. I wish more of his tackles weren't of the "sure and capable" variety. More than any other recruit, I'll watch his senior film with interest.
Kendall Thompson. The calculus is pretty simple. Do you always take an athletic, productive East Texas kid with grades still growing into his frame? Yes. Always. They want it more. Future DE.
DB
Leroy Scott
Sheroid Evans
Scott is the best corner in the state - think of a stronger Roderick Babers. Evans is the best safety in the state and an elite, world-class track athlete who will stick his head in there - a rare combo. Programs selling him on track could make for some interesting times until signing day if he doesn't love football first and foremost. We could use another guy here if he's elite.
AF'LETE
Quandre Diggs
Mykkele Thompson
Quandre is a dynamo, a slightly smaller Adrian Phillips from last year's class. He's very skilled, begs to have him the game placed on his shoulders, and a mean bastard on defense. We don't think he can play CB for us, so he's likely a safety on D.
He's also a potential change up RB, a Quan Cosby clone in the slot, and a strong kick returner. Basically, you just take guys like Quandre and the position eventually makes itself apparent. Even if they don't pan, you've got a guy on special teams that can collect scalps.
Mykkele Thompson, who raised some eyebrows as a questionable take, strikes me as future defensive back all the way and I don't doubt for a minute that Akina sees some Michael Huff Cedric Griffin in him - San Antonio, a little under the radar, catches well, rangy, hasn't seen enough weight room, jumps and runs well, long wingspan.
Does he like contact? Can he carry 195-200 pounds? Can he adopt a true defensive mentality? The answer to those question will tell you his future.
Wrap-up
This class is as impressive as it has been painless to put together. Texas recruiting is running at a freakish level of optimization right now. I'm not sure we engage in recruiting so much as selection and anointing.
Where do we go from here?
We have 19 and will likely take only 3-4 more. So it's cherry-picking time. We have no pressing needs beyond RB, so it's really about taking interesting players and being picky in doing so. You also want to give yourself a liittle slack for late bloomers, summer camp guys, and the senior who bursts on the scene after a freakish growth spurt.
RB Malcolm Brown is the top priority. You have to like our chances.
CB Josh Turner, the best player in the state of Oklahoma, and a good program fit (read: grades, good head on shoulders), seems a strong possibility.
I don't totally discount DL Cedric Reed or even DT Quincy Russell recommiting (he loved us for 24 hours). We won't take Marquis Anderson unless something changes.
DE stud Jermauria Rascoe is still susceptible to a late-Muschamp push but getting La kids away from LSU is, uh, interesting. If we grab him, he'll keep it on the lowdown until signing day to limit stress.
LB Anthony Wallace appears OU bound. Pity.
We'll always add another guy that's a surprise, too.
Your thoughts?
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Any hope for Vaughters? Or was that always a fool’s hope.
by Burnt Orange Wookiee on Apr 15, 2010 5:28 PM CDT reply actions
Moss, although not a fan favorite recruit, strikes me as the type of kid that has the potential of being a locker room leader. He has an accelerated knowledge of the game, is purportedly a hard worker with good character, and is a good enough tacker to be a contributor on special teams. Unless he’s the golf prick of the locker room, I don’t mind having a guy like this every year come on board.
by alma on Apr 15, 2010 5:37 PM CDT reply actions
As a general rule, if an elite high school wide receiver can’t get viable QB play, I want him playing QB.
I would think that it is a good thing for a WR to understand what a QB wants from his WRs.
by Bob in Houston on Apr 15, 2010 5:42 PM CDT reply actions
Good writeup Scip and not a whole lot to add.. I wrote someone on an email last week that when it is all said and done, that Greenlea might end up being the best of the bunch. That’s not to put any of the other OL down, it may just be how strong this class might end up being. I also agree that turning DL into OL is something that can end up with great results such as the outstanding ’05 NC OL where several were cross leveled recruited 3* DLmen.
I also agree that this class needs an elite RB and Malcom Brown fits the bill very well but I think anyone of the top three will be effective if GD is dedicated to a balanced run O. It is awesome that now all they have to do is concentrate on cherry picking difference makers….awesome. Mack surely has the machine rolling now and it is a good time to be a Longhorn fan.
by SoldierHorn on Apr 15, 2010 6:29 PM CDT reply actions
No, because he’s somewhere between alabaster and ivory.
Scipio,
Nice rundown. Who would win in a cage match between Greenlea and Westerman? Or Leroy Scott and Sheroid Evans ? This is all that’s left to debate with a class this loaded.
Recruiting has become almost automatic for Texas at every position except RB and that irks me. I’m content with Brown or Williams as long as one of them doesn’t end up at OU.
by Vasherized on Apr 15, 2010 7:43 PM CDT reply actions
BOW -
It would be crazy to discount anything 10 months before national signing day. But it sounds like things have cooled.
alma –
If he represents a reach, it’s not going to make us slip a disc.
BIH -
Yeah, nothing wrong with building a little empathy for the QBs task and learning a little more about coverages.
Soldierhorn –
Thanks for your comments. When I saw some pictures of Greenlea next to Mack in his office, I was shocked. There are plenty of big guys kicking around, but he’s huge and height/weight proportionate.
austin 420 -
I prefer a good East African.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 15, 2010 7:52 PM CDT reply actions
Vasherized -
I’m with you.
Our RB issues are more about what is it we’re recruiting to? To what end? A zone read back, a power I guy, or a run/catch threat? And if pass protection is an absolute must, you’ve got another layer.
My feeling is that Brown – a former RB – has some strong ideas and input here and that while Brown sees the big picture of recruiting in ways most can’t conceive, it doesn’t mean he’s small picture perfect in some of our evals.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 15, 2010 7:58 PM CDT reply actions
John Harris’ senior film at QB was great. I’m excited to see Miles run around at the position.
by whoopspat on Apr 15, 2010 8:16 PM CDT reply actions
alma carelessly left off “coach on the field”.
by nordberg on Apr 15, 2010 8:26 PM CDT reply actions
Scip,
Let me explain something to you, good sir, because I feel certain that the only time you’ve made it north of the Red River is if your flight from LAX to Heathrow had to make an emergency landing at Will Rogers Int’l Airport. I’m hard pressed to think of a school in Oklahoma where OU has less of a chance of pulling a high school kid aside from Stillwater High than Millwood. This is the same place that birthed the Woods “triplets” worshiped by OSU fans. The fact that OU is still in the hunt for Turner is solely a testament to Willie Martinez’ history of putting DB’s in the NFL at Georgia.
“I’d like a more concerted effort to convert Defensive Linemen over to OL”
Jammal Brown, imo. This sort of conversion can work with great effect.
by NateHeupel on Apr 15, 2010 8:43 PM CDT reply actions
WTF is up with Aaron Green? I don’t understand why we can’t take BOTH Mal and Aaron, they complement each other perfectly. Why slowplay the position when it’s the strongest it will be instate (not to mention pretty good nationally) possibly ever. And we still can take John Gray next year as our primary RB target. Make BANK!
Close out with:
RB: Malcolm Brown AND Aaron Green
OL: Matt Hegarty
CB: Josh Turner
DE/LB: 1 out of Cedric Reed, James Vaughters, Jermauria Rasco
Think back to the last couple of years before y’all call me greedy with 7 O-Line and both RBs…
by Blake Borron on Apr 15, 2010 10:02 PM CDT reply actions
Ha, Blake still doesn’t give two shits about Brandon Williams. I’ll play bigdukesix advocate since he’s been MIA. I like that cat for the record.
QB-I like Walsh as well. We have Ash, OK. It looks like Wood is the real deal. We’re fine.
RB-I only slightly covet Malcolm Brown over Williams. Luckily Brown wants to decide early, we’ll land Williams if we don’t land Brown. I’m indifferent on Green.
WR-Eh, last years class allowed us to sleep through this process. Lil Ship is an obvious take. Every camp he’s been to, the so called stud wide-outs, read Metoyer, say that he’s unbelievable. Onyegbule, is a fine take. A case of, who’s coming out next year?
TE-I’m cool McFarland, especially with us reaclimating ourselves to the allowed use of the position.
OL-Forget Hegarty. Six is plenty. Not much of a stretch to annoint the top three as difference makers, but what I do like is the seperation in classes. With our tackle deficiencies, our game ready takes will have seperation from our projects. Time will tell.
DL-I’ll watch the Westfield v Klein Forest game with earnest this year. I want to see the prize of our DL class collapse the pocket. The true DL class will determined years down the road, with swing down players. As great as Cedric Reed is, he’s not a huge need. I’m not sure how he projects on our line anyway.
LB-Studs. I wouldn’t have offered Chet that early, but whatever. Who wants to knit-pick? That spot would have landed Wallace or Vaughters, so, if that doesn’t upset you, you know where we stand.
DB-real conversation between me and a person in the know-“magnus, where do you live?”
“About 60 miles North of Angleton, what took so long on Diggs?” Enter look of ‘sheesh.’ The staff was torn, imo. We’re good here, but Turner would be the mohawk on top of the fade.
Not sure I added much different, but, if you’re hearing it twice, it must birth some relevance.
by magnusbleuveigner on Apr 15, 2010 10:48 PM CDT reply actions
Didn’t Mike Williams or Leonard Davis start at DL for one year?
Nate, I keep hearing the same thing about Millwood and OSU.
by dick on Apr 15, 2010 11:06 PM CDT reply actions
Nate -
I thank you, sir. I’ve only been to your fine state twice and Stillwater was not on the itinerary. Loved the green and the mountains though!
I was definitely thinking of Jammal Brown. And don’t forget scrappy Frank Romero.
Blake –
I differ with you a bit. Though I definitely like the idea of two true RBs. Your refusal to acknowledge the greatness of Brandon Williams pains me.
Regarding OL, OL that don’t pan are fat dudes who sit around eating, don’t transfer, and sit like a lead weight of entitlement on your program. They have no other use on your team.
A LB that doesn’t pan may just be a spindown starter at DE. Or a special teams demon.
Also, when we do the Class of Beef thing, as I already mentioned in my post, the results aren’t usually all that great. Heard from Roman Reeves lately? I don’t want to pitch bodies at a position. I want a plan.
The rest of your dudes work for me.
magnus –
Agree on the OL. We’ll have three ready to play as freshmen, three to shirt. That gives you some balance and restores a normal 3-4 OL per class cycle moving forward.
Cedric Reed is a future DT for a team like us or a 3-4 DE. I don’t see true DE in his future unless it’s part of another LSU jumbo front.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 15, 2010 11:07 PM CDT reply actions
dick –
Leonard Davis definitely logged snaps at DT under Mackovic. He didn’t start.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 15, 2010 11:10 PM CDT reply actions
“this isn’t Somme”
I disagree. Oline is a battle in the trenches, just like million plus that died there. What, too soon?
by Eskimohorn on Apr 15, 2010 11:53 PM CDT reply actions
You are mustard gas in the lungs of my metaphor.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 15, 2010 11:55 PM CDT reply actions
“Loved the green and the mountains though!”
Scip, do you think I’m from Colorado? Shit, man. I define a mountain as something that a 40-something who qualifies as grotesquely obese couldn’t summit with a nice pair of Timberlands and a few Powerbars. You saw something like that in Oklahoma? I’m dying to know where.
As for the green, I’m presuming you made it to the lovely parts of far Northeast Oklahoma (Grand Lake). Beautiful up there. That or you found one of our numerous selection of marijuana dealers with great variety and reasonable prices.
by NateHeupel on Apr 16, 2010 12:00 AM CDT reply actions
“I don’t want to just throw bodies at this problem – this isn’t Somme.”
Stalingrad, imo.
by NateHeupel on Apr 16, 2010 12:01 AM CDT reply actions
Here come the historical military references again. I can’t keep up.
Their airport is actually called Will Rogers International Airport.
by Balltastic Motivization on Apr 16, 2010 1:21 AM CDT reply actions
One of the best races in the country is in Poteau, OK. It is called the world’s tallest hill because it is like 10 feet or something from being classified a mountain.
by Newy25 on Apr 16, 2010 6:34 AM CDT reply actions
Scipio:
This is getting ridiculous. At what point does our defensive recruiting begin to match the FSU juggernaut from 88-04 (with the special interchangeable NFL defensive ends option)?
I would argue that we are no more than a class away. FSU, of course, had the advantage of knowing exactly where Papa Bowden (and Mickey Andrews) would be year after year. Can we keep this going through whatever transition is ahead?
by jonestopten on Apr 16, 2010 6:37 AM CDT reply actions
With our line last year, particularly against OU and Nebraska, it was more like the Battle of Tannenberg.
by ghostofagroundgame on Apr 16, 2010 9:26 AM CDT reply actions
Mmm…recruiting snapshot…
I’m working off of memory, but this was sounds a helluva lot more positive than last year. There’s now but one hole, and if Malcolm is going to commit early (ish) as planned, then we could be gravy going into the actual football season.
But if we lose out on Brown, Green and B. Williams, is this class considered a failure? It sounded like coming in the only two requisites for this class was a stud RB and quality depth at OL. Well one box is checked.
Mack seriously has a gift. His recruiting machine is unlike anything I’ve ever seen.
by jc25 on Apr 16, 2010 10:24 AM CDT reply actions
jc25,
Not a total failure but certainly a failure at that position. I would also say if we fail to land a single one of those targets, we need to take a real hard look at our RB coach and decide if this is working out or not.
by t1climb1 on Apr 16, 2010 11:07 AM CDT reply actions
Yes, yes, everybody knows I’m not high on Williams. I don’t think taking Hegarty as a 7th O-Line is exactly just throwing stones at the position…we’ve been courting him for a while now.
by Blake Borron on Apr 16, 2010 11:42 AM CDT reply actions
Think he is confusing him with C. Griffen who was from San Antonio and in the same recruiting class.
by Horncasting on Apr 16, 2010 1:12 PM CDT reply actions
jones -
We’re nearly there. This class will be three in a row of over-the-top D quality across the board if we can land 1-2 more guys. A lot of it hinges on Muschamp, I agree. No way to know if that falters if he gets the main gig at Georgia or LSU.
jc25 -
Last year’s class was extraordinary, but we also finished very strong. We’ve got exactly what we want right now. We haven’t lost a battle that matters and we’re owning the ground wherever we have need.
I expect last year’s class to be better overall, but the state overall had better talent top to bottom.
Would the class be considered a failure if we lose out on our RB targets? No. But RB recruiting would be considered a failure. If you can’t get your guy from this year’s crop, you’ve got deep issues there.
shock & Horncasting -
Corrected. Thanks, I hate when I do that.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 16, 2010 2:10 PM CDT reply actions
We only need one fucking running back. We have 7 already
by Mysterious Package on Apr 16, 2010 2:41 PM CDT reply actions
Scipio—-thanks for the outlook post. We have definitely put back to back classes together but I’m still not ready to move VY’s bunch off the top of the totem pole yet.
Still can’t judge QB’s until I see them operate with live bullets going off around them—-not sure if it’s because of my playing days or walking the sidelines but I’ve seen can’t miss prospects choke the chili once bone chilling wrecks occur in the pocket. They all remind me of Clipper till they stand tall on the front line and then their talent shines.
We continue to look for a sure blocker at RB and it helps if he can find the alumni stripe from midfield a time or two each week so that we can give clinics that put whatever scheme we have adopted that season on display for the masses. I’m not as convinced as some as to our best bet for our staff—-I like Green best this season but I think Aledo’s Gray is the best back in the state right now.
Yea, two more good WR’s.
David Thomas and J’Mike Finley spoiled us and we haven’t recovered—-course we have recruited/signed somewhere around seventeen possible TE’s since those two departed for pay.
Won’t argue a damn thing about the OL segment but will add that I really like Cochran’s makeup and all around game—-turning DL’s into OL’s is gold in my opinion.
Our DT is a blue-chipper.
Dangerfield has always had our kind of defensive players and Mr. Ed can play the game. Practice field, game field, or parking lot doesn’t matter to this middle backer—-tee it up and let the fur fly. Moss is a program player that will be dependable and responsible—-taking Chet Moss and Dustin Earnest is a winning decision in my book. Thompson will probably be a pass rushing demon before he’s done.
Scott is a first-rounder period. I love the speed at safety—-not afraid to fill the alley just raises Evan’s stock that much more. Diggs is just a football player——he will make his own place in time. You know how I feel about Huff’s contribution that season—-we aren’t playing for the ROSE without Huff covering up a barrel full of mistakes along the way. If MKK can portray the Michael Huff character in our secondary we have won the damn lottery—-anything resembling Huff’s game would be fantastic.
Thankee Scip….
by TexasFootball on Apr 16, 2010 2:47 PM CDT reply actions
A great write up btw. Just how good is McFarland, and are we just pumping him up because he’s a Longhorn? Who are the 5 stars in this group do you think??-Thanks
by Mysterious Package on Apr 16, 2010 2:49 PM CDT reply actions
Mysterious -
We’re not married to them. Transfers, position changes, position changes that trigger transfers.
TexasFootball -
Always great to hear from you, friend. You’re right on the QBs. No position is more contingent on live fire reps to know what you’ve got.
That’s why I always want four on campus at any given time.
Scott is a winner for the reason you cite – when you’ve got a track guy who will stick his head in there, you’ve got something special. Throw in the fact that he’s 6-1 with long arms and you’ve just covered your back half with a blanket.
Thankee, sir.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 16, 2010 3:28 PM CDT reply actions
MP,
Lock for 5 stars are Westerman and Jackson.
Possibles are Flowers and maybe Evans, Edmond, and Scott.
by magnusbleuveigner on Apr 16, 2010 3:50 PM CDT reply actions
“do you think I’m from Colorado?”
There are few states with less in common with Colorado than Oklahoma. I’m reminded of the old joke:
Hey did you hear Colorado and Oklahoma were combining into one state?
Yeah, then Oklahoma could have some mountains and Colorado could have a football team.
by roach on Apr 16, 2010 5:53 PM CDT reply actions
I’m suprised that no one has mentioned
that B. Williams is a track stud. I wonder
how his speed compares to Green. Williams definitely runs tougher and has the ability to break tackles better than Green. I would much rather take Williams over Green.
by Rob-oh on Apr 16, 2010 6:11 PM CDT reply actions
MP, you are only looking at numbers. I look at those “7 guys” and don’t see any superstars or possibly even a good RB that I would want for a team that is supposed to be chasing Ships every year. When you have a deficiency that glaring, you address it. It’s as simple as that. Why be lazy and only take one guy (even if he’s legit) at RB when there are numerous other options as well. Then we take 3 project OL? It’s just simple insanity!
by Blake Borron on Apr 16, 2010 6:54 PM CDT reply actions
" Turner would be the mohawk on top of the fade. "
incredible.
by borat on Apr 16, 2010 8:04 PM CDT reply actions
As great as this class is shaping up, without a RB, you would have to classify it a failure. Even taking one real RB in Brown is risky as any number of things could happen to him. We need two real RBs in this class to cover our bases and ensure we have no weaknesses going forward.
by fear_the_cow on Apr 16, 2010 9:22 PM CDT reply actions
“dick –
Leonard Davis definitely logged snaps at DT under Mackovic. He didn’t start."
Scip, I meant start as in start his career. Not start a game, my bad.
I don’t think you could call this recruiting class a failure if we don’t land one of the big 3. If we are still winning titles, then who cares. We got Newton (Jr), Whaley (So), Shead (Fr) and DeMarco Cobbs (Fr) in Fall of 2011 at the RB position. If we get J Gray, then nobody would care about missing out on the Big 3 this season and we can still win NCs with the group we have (thanks to the rest of our recruiting classes from 2008-2011)
by dick on Apr 16, 2010 10:23 PM CDT reply actions
scip, you’re on a roll.
Mysterious Package said: Just how good is McFarland, and are we just pumping him up because he’s a Longhorn? Who are the 5 stars in this group do you think?
Scipio Tex said: Mysterious – We’re not married to them. Transfers, position changes, position changes that trigger transfers.
it took me a while to figure out that you were responding to a previous comment from ‘the package’.
then you said scott and meant evans. my head is spinning.
forgiveness is no task, though, because these little dimples on giselle bundchen’s butt cheeks do nothing to harm the product. thank you for the great write-up.
by hal's roach is dead on Apr 16, 2010 10:54 PM CDT reply actions
Really hard to complain about anything in recruiting. Any comments I have are really nit picking. That being said, I am concerned about taking Onyegbule at WR. Honestly I would have been tempted to just take one receiver and have Diggs as an athlete for possibly playing there in the future.
All things being equal, I would rather have one extra defensive/offensive lineman than an extra receiver. We could have used that scholarship for Hegarty or Nathan Hughes. But again not upset at all with how things are going.
Really glad the staff has realized you need to take a QB in every class. This should be our plan every single year from here on out. Take a QB in every class and let competition sort of who stays on the roster.
by Newy25 on Apr 17, 2010 7:36 AM CDT reply actions
I don’t see how anybody could call this class a failure, no matter what happens going forward. Seriously? You’re going to call domination a failure. Because that is what this class is. DOMINATION. We cherry picked who we wanted at all of the positions for the top of the top, and got EVERYBODY except for at running back. We do have 7 or more guys at the position now and if we miss this year, we have targets next year. It won’t cost us a NC, but it shows something needs to change in regards to the position. I feel a major writing piece on our running backs coming on.
That being said, we are going to get either Brown, Green, or Williams or more when it is all said and done. I just don’t see the 3 of them, without any significant favorites in other schools, all turning down the opportunity that our current team/recruiting class is. If they did, we would put the word out and probably pick up another good RB this year late in the game.
by Balltastic Motivization on Apr 17, 2010 7:46 PM CDT reply actions
Sheroid Evans dropped a 10.34 100 and 20.91 200 the other day.
Both FAT.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 18, 2010 12:33 AM CDT reply actions
“Sheroid Evans dropped a 10.34 100 and 20.91 200 the other day.”
Michael Huff 2.0
by Newy25 on Apr 18, 2010 7:31 AM CDT reply actions
what is insidetexas saying about matt hegarty in their insidescoop
by john on Apr 18, 2010 10:13 AM CDT reply actions
“Sheroid Evans dropped a 10.34 100 and 20.91 200 the other day.”
Know what the wind reading was here, Scip? Even if it was 2.0+, that’s still an insane time for a HS junior.
by NateHeupel on Apr 18, 2010 11:29 PM CDT reply actions
I don’t know. If he had a Hurricane gale at his back, I’m still impressed.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 18, 2010 11:42 PM CDT reply actions
So much for Brandon Williams…..he dropped Baylor and is now committed to OU
by Hookemlc on Apr 19, 2010 9:20 AM CDT reply actions
Former sorta UT target WR DeAndrew White also won his district 200M race. A full 1.6 seconds slower than Sheroid. If you don’t understand track, 1.6 seconds in the 200 is a HUGE difference. I have a bad feeling he will be running track professionally before his 4th year of eligibility is up at Texas.
by dick on Apr 19, 2010 2:13 PM CDT reply actions
dick -
That is a problem. However, and forgive me for being sneaky and plotting against him, but if Sheroid wants to realize his track potential in the 200M he won’t let his weight break 185.
If he lifts and eats with football, he should hit 200.
He may alternate between football and track shape, but there’s my hope.
by Scipio Tex on Apr 19, 2010 3:47 PM CDT reply actions
dick,
Re: Sheroid running track full time
I honestly doubt it. I think your train of thought is perfectly reasonable, but being a football player at a place like UT, OU, or any other major football school is like being a god among men. Cedric Benson said as much about living in Austin.
Scip,
I’m honestly shocked about picking up Brandon Williams. I thought Herschel Sims was our #1 target.
by NateHeupel on Apr 19, 2010 4:10 PM CDT reply actions

by 
























