Rebuilding the Barnes Corp
Basketball:
Rick Barnes is rebuilding his army in a typically impressive fashion targeting a 6'11" face-up big man from UTEP who PB at BON notes is just the right fit for the Texas high screen offense.
Barnes, or at least his players, frequently like to compare the Texas offense to the Phoenix Suns which revolves around heavy use of the high screen with Nash and Amar'e Stoudemire that frees up Nash to dribble in the paint and find layups and particularly open 3 pt. shots. They also use the high screen with any pairing of mismatches they find on the court with their small-ball lineups that punish slower bigger defenders trying to guard slashers and perimeter shooting bigs.
The best Texas lineup, as we can see from previous seasons of success from either Texas or Phoenix, would be built like this:
PG: Tremendously skilled offensive player who can dribble anywhere on the court, find teammates, and shoot 3's or punish teams off the screen. TJ Ford is the best PG Barnes has had but DJ Augustin was a perfect match for the system with his ability to score from more places on the court.
Future prospects: Joseph? Myck Kabongo.
SG/SF: The most important thing here is shooting. To afford the right spacing and punish teams that are often larger and unadept at defending multiple perimeter threats these guys have to be good shooters. 3 pt shooting then, and then some length and defensive abilities (Texas needs one perimeter stopper who can defend the most dangerous opposing creator) should characterize these guys.
Beyond that having another slasher/creator from this pair who can take over when the PG needs rest as well as some turnover creating ability would be beneficial at this spot. While the PG can be tiny like Augustin, the wings should not both be sub 6-3 and be vulnerable to teams with both size and athleticism. Hamilton and Bradley are two of the better examples that Barnes has had for these spots.
Future prospects: Jordan Hamilton, Shawn Williams, Varez Ward.
PF/C: Damion James is an ideal PF for this offense. He can finish at the rim against slower bigs, hit open 3s and jump shots, and still give fantastic rebounding on the other end. If you don't have your primary high screen partner in the pick'n'roll at Power Forward then obviously you want him at center. If you do, another screener who can play pick'n'pop and be your defensive rebounder and shot blocker. Connor Atchley is a good example.
Future prospects: Tristan Thompson...maybe this new guy Arnett Moultrie if Barnes nabs him. Johnson isn't really a strong fit although he's still clearly useful. Chapman with a huge leap in screening, consistent shooting, and defense.
All in all if you prioritize the right traits, namely 3 pt. shooting at most positions, it shouldn't be hard to build an offensive juggernaut with this system so long as you find that crucial piece at the point guard/wizard position. No one else on the team needs to be a superstar save perhaps for his primary high screen partner. Finding that point guard has been somewhat difficult but those guys are out there in strong enough numbers to continue featuring this offense. Especially since Texas can offer them one of the better situations in college basketball.
It may seem like I'm just explaining the reasoning behind the popular opinion "Barnes can't win without a great point guard" because I am, but if you can get other guys on the team creating shots off the screen for their teammates that can work just as well, which I think this team can do through a combination of a decent point guard plus Hamilton.
Football:
NateHeupel has a retort to the drafted OU players ripping the program in which he throws Trent Williams under the bus, understandably easy after an 8-5 season, and makes some interesting comments about Strength and Conditioning at Texas.
His argument basically goes,
1. No one improves in S&C at Texas cause Jeff Madden sucks
2. Brian Orakpo improved by a great deal
3. Thus, Brian Orakpo used steroids and Jeff Madden sucks.
Compelling reasoning. As bad a deal as Jeff Madden gets we do see some significant physical development from willing players. Lamarr Houston built himself into an All-conference level DT after playing, what, runningback in high school? McCoy obviously is another example.
A look at the starting lineup from last year reveals a large number of guys who improved a lot under the Texas S&C program. McCoy, Shipley, Charlie Tanner, Houston, little Earl, etc. John Chiles is a strong example of what the S&C program looks like.
As a quarterback floundering behind McCoy he put on a lot of questionable weight and lost the speed that made him a prospect. Now, as a more dedicated and focused receiver he's finishing blocks in practice and slimmed down back to the size where he poses a danger. The Texas program is very solid for guys who give a crap and are willing to devote themselves to improvement. It's not an as elite a program as you might hope for from a program of Texas' caliber but it's clearly not the worst in the country either.
Which team wore down in the 2008 and 2009 contests again?
Soccer:
I love the big international futbol tournaments but I couldn't tell you what the different positions in a soccer game are primarily responsible beyond a very superficial level, much less what Team USA should be looking for to match their personnel to their style. However, this guy probably could and he's not excited about the 30 man roster.
Charlie Davis is out, because he hadn't recovered as hoped, and the result is another Team USA without a ton of firepower. That might be remedied through team-oriented system offense but I've been led to understand that the USA style is isolation/individual matchup heavy which already makes scoring seem like a lost cause against international teams that should match up very well with US soccer players.
When he left, Bruce Arena cursed the team to not finish better than they had seen with him and I'm not sure that changes in this tournament. Hopefully they can at least escape group play and make some kind of showing against England.
Art/Culture:
Shia Lebouf is promising a better product from the Transformers series in round 3. Evidently they will get back to the "relationships" that the first movie was built around. Judging from that and his other comments you can read that Michael Bay is going to kill several humans on screen before panning to Shia turning away in emotion as the newest Linkin Park song blares a message of hopeless frustration.
In another words, potentially a worse movie even than we saw from "Revenge of the Fallen." Michael Bay is the Creed to James Cameron's overdone but drastically better Pearl Jam. A few popular hits but nothing with staying power like Aliens, Terminator 2/Ten, Vitalogy.
The Zande yum yums beat the empire building Jaguars in the latest Deadliest Warrior. I would have guessed that the Atlatl, which allowed Inuits to bring down woolly mammoths with pointed sticks, would have been a deadlier long range weapon. Roman Centurion vs. Rajput is the fight I'm interested in although I'm suspicious of how successful the Roman will be. The Legions were superior to their opponents mostly as a unit, having smaller units and commands that allowed for flexibility and maneuvering.
This also depends on which Rajput they choose as that title applied even to Indian troops that were recruited and trained by the British and used muskets. I'm betting anyone with a firearm destroys a Legionnaire.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Moultrie would be a great get. The notion that we run the Phoenix Suns offense makes me chuckle. I suppose we have CONCEPTS of the Phoenix Suns offense, but no desire or teaching to actuall y execute them.
The Sepoys, for the gunpowder era Indians. The Rajputs will be the 10th century dudes. Goddamn I love Deadliest Warrior. Too much, really. Did you see the total Guidos they had for the Jesse James vs. Al Capone face off? Hilarious.
by Scipio Tex on May 14, 2010 1:11 PM CDT reply actions
I know nothing about the Rajputs, but I am very excited to see the legion. I too thought the atlatl would have been more effective. I still think it would be in group vs group battles.
by 06_UT on May 14, 2010 1:24 PM CDT reply actions
The show kind of frustrates me with it’s focus on weapons, basically making the assumption that each warrior class is elite / highly trained. I get that each sim is supposed to represent an average warrior of that class, but look at the Spartans. Their weaponry was very standard, but we all know they kicked a bunch of ass because of how much they practiced.
by Nero on May 14, 2010 1:41 PM CDT reply actions
The Phoenix Suns & the Indianapolis Colts – causing fans angst in Austin. If the Longhorns would just run those schemes, they would be unstoppable. Peyton Manning & Steve Nash have nothing to do with it.
That’s not aimed at you, Nickel. It’s the mindless, drooling ones with unrealistic expectations that read at a 2nd-grade level and believe that Texas will mudhole everyone in every sport because they are now running the same offenses that are run in pro leagues.
by Matt Cotcher on May 14, 2010 1:54 PM CDT reply actions
Cotcher, you are probably right but on the other hand Texas can build with better athletes than most other teams in the country. It’s not a terrible idea for Texas to mirror some pro-schemes where it is feasible.
Also, the beauty of the small-ball offense is that it works without loads of super talent provided you have plenty of shooters and a pro-level magician at point.
Scipio: yeah well I was just focusing on the players necessary to make it work. Last year’s team was full of talented players who just all lacked the basic skill of shooting. If you have loads of 3 pt shooters and a guard who can find them you will have success in college basketball no matter how simplistic you are in scheme or development. If they weren’t so tiny the DJ ‘horns could have been in the final four (or if they hadn’t been paired against Memphis).
And I was very satisfied with the Jesse James episode, it had everything that makes that show great. I love when they find enthusiasts for some backwards or evil group of people (like the ninja) who are living vicariously through these non-existent identities. The unintentional comedy takes it to another level.
Watch the look on the former Canadian special forces guy’s face when the jackanape with the golden chain tells him how the brass knuckles makes him a match for the special forces guy. “uh huh, let’s maybe see a demonstration of that.”
by Nickel Rover on May 14, 2010 2:14 PM CDT reply actions
In an attemp to see what was coming up for the rest of the season, I found out that they did a sort of winner’s bracket encore to season 1. Hopefully they’ll do a replay soon.
I’m with you Rover. The unintentional comedy brought on by the chest swelling and trash talking is the best part of the show. The second best thing is the impressive use of skills that are obsolute and completely useless to destroy pig carcasses and body molds that have everything from blood to bones.
Zu – lu. ZU – LU! ZUUUU — LUUUU!
by 06_UT on May 14, 2010 2:33 PM CDT reply actions
“Total Guidos”??! I think one of the worst forms of punishment is to just ignore.
by Jewish American Princess with boyfriend Tomasso on May 14, 2010 2:58 PM CDT reply actions
Cross “sepoy” off the list of things I thought I might know about and Scip didn’t. I learned about it as I learn about everything, by playing Scrabble. I’m that cool.
Oh, and that was the list by the way. Now I’m off to brush up on my obscure Norse mythology. I’m gunning for you Scipio Tex.
Can we get a thread that combines Deadliest Warrior and Conference re-alignment? I feel we’re really slighting the two topics.
The best thing USA soccer has going for it is our draw. I expect us to survive group, and then look really uninspired in group play. Just like the highschool team that finished third in district with a 6-4 record going up against a Lake Travis type.
by magnusbleuveigner on May 14, 2010 3:08 PM CDT reply actions
Well if yer a zulu who digs Pearl Jam or blog fer barkin Carnival or yer sum kinda noertic orickul psychic yer probly jussa terrrist. I am not capable of making that distinction.
by Dubya The "Yalie" on May 14, 2010 3:25 PM CDT reply actions
Sepoys didn’t look so good against the Chinese though. But yeah, bullets will stop a human phalanx.
As to the US team — I don’t like some of Bradley’s selections, but I understand his decisions. Except for Kljistens and Pearce — those are indefensible. The US team will play Bradley ball — we won’t hold possession, we’ll pack the middle of the field, and we’ll look to counter attack and score off of set pieces. Unfortunately, they style is more effective against stylish, technical teams like the Spanish (and yes, even Brazil) than it is against middle of the road teams like the ones in our draw. I anticipate the US team scoring less than 3 goals in the first round — and possibly advancing anyway. I think we can draw against England, beat Algeria, and lose to Slovenia. We could also lose all 3. A counter-attacking team is a wild card, but it can’t afford any mistakes. We will not do well if we do not score the first goal and we’ll do better if the other team presses. I think 1-1-1 might get us through. I’d be shocked, happily, if we do better than that.
The wild cards for the US team will be, in descending order: (1) whether Dempsey gets hot — he is a legit goal scorer and easily our most creative player but he can be very, very lazy; (2) whether Stuart Holden is healthy and ready to get stuck in — he can give us legitimate width and a good outside shooter, which we will need, if he’s back on top of his game; and (3) whether Donovan will actually track back and link up the forwards and the defensive center midfielders. I expect everyone else to be who they are — Bradley should be between Donovan and Edu, passing the ball and disrupting the other side’s play maker, Altidore should win headers and make a nuisance of himself up front with his speed and power, Gooch and Demerit need to win every header, Bornstein/Pearce will be regularly toasted on the outside, and Howard needs to play like Friedel. That’s the recipe for limited success and ugly football.
by Toadvine on May 14, 2010 3:35 PM CDT reply actions
The best part of Deadliest Warrior is definitely the purported weapons experts. They must troll obscure websites and Ren Faires constantly to keep those dudes coming.
by Toadvine on May 14, 2010 3:45 PM CDT reply actions
Pearl Jam’s best was No Code. I don’t get why everybody comapres Creed to Pearl Jam. That’s like comparing Def Leppard to Led Zeppelin.
by Eddie V's on May 14, 2010 10:09 PM CDT reply actions
Hopefully Joseph and Thompson help Texas offense run more smoothly.
Texas should have a very talented Basketball team next season on paper. I hope Texas team plays up to their potential and wins it all.
I also hope Texas gets that kid from UTEP.
by Petey on May 14, 2010 10:14 PM CDT reply actions
“Which team wore down in the 2008 and 2009 contests again.”
Exactly.
by Richie Brockelman on May 14, 2010 10:35 PM CDT reply actions
For the record I’m not a huge Pearl Jam fan but they are certainly better than Creed and clearly paved the way for that style. That’s probably a big part of why I don’t love them, I hate all the post-Pearl Jam bands.
Also, we’ll go ahead and say:
Terminator 2:Ten
Aliens:Vitalogy
and for Creed
My Own Prison: The Rock
Human Clay: Armageddon
Weathered: Pearl Harbor
by Nickel Rover on May 15, 2010 9:49 AM CDT reply actions
One thing that you can say for Mack Brown and just about anyone works for him, is that they are willing to adapt and improve. Say what you will about Mack, Madden, Davis, etc… they are better than they were ten years ago. I’m not sure you can say that about Stoops.
by holdem on May 15, 2010 1:52 PM CDT reply actions
Of course, ten years ago Stoops won a championship. While you might argue that Mack has improved and taken the edge neither have a great edge in overall accomplishment this decade.
by Nickel Rover on May 16, 2010 9:02 AM CDT reply actions
Rick Barnes running the Phoenix offense is one of the greatest fallacies repeated on the Longhorn interwebs. I commend Rick getting out in front and branding his lack of a system the “Phoenix offense” before the media started roasting him for his teams lack of offensive cohesiveness.
by The General on May 16, 2010 12:19 PM CDT reply actions
As usual with the Barnes program we are talking about the future and “next year” starting to sounfd like Cub fans.
by Roostrman on May 26, 2010 7:56 PM CDT reply actions

by 























