Bud Selig hates you. And you, and you, and definitely you.
In case you missed it, or have joined the millions of Americans who give news about our national pastime a quizzical look similar to bringing up the leg spinning prowess of Shane Warne in a bar, baseball spent the past week shitting all over its fans.
In very public blown call, Armando Galarraga's perfect game was broken up on one of the most misjudged close plays at first base since Don Denkinger saved Kansas City from a game 6 loss and elimination in the 1985 World Series. In a moment of grace and humility after the game, Umpire Jim Joyce admitted his error and expressed profound regret for the mistake.
The blown call was meaningless, as Galarraga easily retired the next hitter to preserve the 3-0 victory. In that regard, the screw up is different from Denkinger's boner, as it has no effect on baseball in the grand scheme of things, but for Galarraga the effect is profound. No spring chicken at 28, Galarraga has all the makings of a journeyman starter, having already been sent down once this season to the minors. June 2, 2010 is almost certainly the highlight of his career, and while he'll gain fame from the blown call and undoubtedly make money signing balls in perpetuity long after his rotator cuff has given out, it's not the same as having a perfect game.
Which is where Bud Selig comes into play in the first part of this post. Selig, while doing his best Greenspan impression, announced he would not overturn the blown call, and award Galarraga the honor of pitching only the 20th perfect game in league history. His justification amounted to a weak version of the "shit happens" defense. This is just garbage of epic proportions because the case is so cut and dry and no precedent needs to be set here.
The Commissioner of baseball can pretty much do anything he wants and while I understand the inevitable slippery slope argument that will follow, he can also emulate my parenting strategy: "Because I SAID SO, Goddamnit!!" If the commissioner can declare an All-Star game a tie or attach asterixs to records, then it's not much of a leap to give Galarraga his due place in history.
Of course, now the chattering classes are foaming at the mouth about instant replay. Which is really what the game needs: another mechanism to extend the already laborious game lengths. As anyone blessed/cursed to be a Red Sox/Yankees fan will tell you, their Homeric games are destroying productivity and REM sleep cycles across the New England and New York regions. Allowing umpires to stare slack-jawed at video monitor's to decide whether David Ortiz pulled a ball foul is not helpful.
So all fans are denied the amazing event of three perfect games in a season, something we can all rally around and celebrate, and are instead told by Angry Uncle Bud to shut the hell up and feel privileged to get to spend four hours on a Wednesday night taking in a Royals-Twins snooze fest.

"Stop belly achin'!! Everyone likes taking a nap in a $21 upper left field outfield reserve box seat. And get me another $7.50 Bud Light."
Today, Washingtonians will enjoy the spectacle of Walter Johnson pitching for the first time in nearly eight decades. Or as the rest of America calls it: Stephen Strasburg. Strasburg is a dominant pitching talent, although his minor league numbers are not really any better than Tim Lincecum or Mark Prior's, he clearly is ready for the show, and DC-ites are excited with his arrival. The Nationals recently slide below .500, which is outstanding for the modern day Senators. Strasburg's arrival is a bright spot in an otherwise dismal sports year for Washingtonians.

"Ty Cobb couldn't touch my slider"
What is not cool is how the Nationals have handled Strasburg's expected arrival. Using standard baseball business practice, they've delayed his call up in order to put off starting the contractual "clock" on his eventual ability to apply for arbitration and get expensive.
About a month ago, the National's publicly rearranged his starting schedule at Double AA Harrisburg to give him an extra day of rest, thus allowing prognosticators the ability to guess Strasburg's call up date: June 4, at home against the Cincinnati Reds. The date made eminent sense as the Nat's would be coming off a long road trip, in need of fresh arms, and Strasburg would be able to start again during the home stand against Pittsburgh.
The Nats PR and Coaching staff then began to play very coy with the media about the proposed day, neither denying or confirming, although unsourced comments from Nat's organizational staff appeared in the Washington Post indicating June 4 would be the big day. The Nats saw brisk ticket sales for the June 4 date, and also June 9th. With the game reaching sell out status, they announced Strasburg would not be called up on the 4th, but instead the 8th, which set off a firestorm of criticism and ticket sales for the 8th.
On my ride home on the fourth, the Metro was typically bereft of Nat's fans, with a couple of fat Reds fans talking about chili or Jose Rijo, or whatever they talk about, and a lot of tired commuters looking to get home. Tonight is expected to be a rough commute for the big game.
Again, where is the Commissioner? The Nats clearly bait and switched Strasburg's arrival to gin up ticket sales and did so in a decidedly callow fashion. Obviously there is a bit of caveat emptor to guessing an exciting prospect's arrival, but baseball, and the Nationals in particular, are not in a position to be acting like a Goldman banker given the sportwide downward trend in attendance over the last two years.
The commissioner needs to have the foresight to step in and brow beat the Nationals into treating their fans better "in the best interest of the game." Bowie Kuhn got into it repeatedly with Charlie Finley for acting like a horse's ass, so the precedent exists.
When the tone deaf commissioner decides to avoid the obvious solution to a grave injustice, it insults the fans of baseball, and gives us all another reason to watch a 30 Rock rerun on TiVo, go surf porn, or just do anything more entertaining, like watch paint dry.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yep, the best baseball around is being played in sixteen regional sites this weekend, and Omaha next weekend. The MLB is a joke.
by uthookem on Jun 8, 2010 1:16 PM CDT reply actions
Damn it!
sixteen regional = eight super regional
by uthookem on Jun 8, 2010 1:17 PM CDT reply actions
Is Selig the most detested commissioner of all major sports in the last 50 years? Hard to argue otherwise.
by Scipio Tex on Jun 8, 2010 1:19 PM CDT reply actions
Pete Rose would say Bartlett Giamatti.
Selig was dead to me when he turned a blind eye to steriods in the late ’90’s. Then he really pissed me off when he called that All Star game in ’02 I think it was. I was at a bar in Huntington Beach, really enjoying the sights and drinks, when all of a sudden the party was over. It was a good game. I can still remember Torii Hunter robbing Barry Bonds and Bonds then picking up Hunter and throwing over his shoulder.
by magnusbleuveigner on Jun 8, 2010 1:25 PM CDT reply actions
most detested, most incompetent, most pathetic, most socially awkward…
I guess he’s taller than David Stern.
by jonestopten on Jun 8, 2010 1:29 PM CDT reply actions
I always thought of MLB as that thing that wouldn’t die but should. One of those “well I’m at Pluckers & it isn’t football season so I wonder what it on the tv now.. hmm” sports.
by Currently in Rehab on Jun 8, 2010 1:44 PM CDT reply actions
I 100% disagree with you on the commissioner overturning a call. I don’t think a precedent should be set where MLB brass can step in “change” any aspect of a completed game. The game happened on the field when it happened. If the umpires overturned the call there, then fine. But once they’ve made the call, that should be it for 2 reasons.
1. This is the perfect storm of “overturnable” (last play that would have ended the game, clearly erroneous call, significant story b/c of the perfect game)…but what about all of the other plays that impact a game that umps get wrong? Would you have him overturn the call if it happened with only 1 out in the bottom of the 9th? And what about less historic outs that aren’t called correctly? Those outs were just as important to baseball as the “historic” ones. Making only these “perfect storm” plays reviewable changes the game on those plays, something I feel is not right. A guy gets screwed out of a no hitter in the 8th…well tough. It happens with 2 away in the 9th and all of a sudden it’s correctable. I don’t like that at all.
2. On a related point, umps should have incentive to get it right the first time (if it’s close and they know the review will come if they’re wrong, they will be more inclined to call it in such a way that the brass will correct them if wrong. But review of “landmark” plays could make the calls on those plays different. The umps have a job to call every play, and those calls should be made evenly throughout the game. Creating an incentive to call certain plays in a different manner is just not right in my opinion.
Don’t take the game out of the hands of the players and umps. Yeah, it results in an “injustice” once in a blue moon (like this one, the KC call, etc…), but I prefer that to the alternative. I don’t agree with Selig on much, but I agree with him on this – correcting this call is not his business.
by WeAreVince on Jun 8, 2010 1:45 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks for the update, bates. I couldn’t possibly care less what Major League Baseball does, but it’s nice to get an occasional reminder that it’s okay not to give a shit.
by Blueshorn on Jun 8, 2010 1:49 PM CDT reply actions
I guess we disagree. This is a perfect storm. Virtually impossible to replicate. If galarraga had given up a baserunner on the next batter, then I’m inclined to agree, but in this case, changing the call does not materially affect the game other than to erase the subsequent batter’s at bat from the record books.
In the long run, rather than having replay installed in the game, the umpires should just look at the jumbotron for a second after a particularily vigorous objection and make a snap decision, like in soccer. Zinedine Zidane got tossed from the last World Cup final because the referee looked up after missing the head butt, and basically went “Hey, you can’t do that….”
by bateshorn on Jun 8, 2010 1:53 PM CDT reply actions
Horseshit, WeAreVince.
First of all, MLB has overturned calls before. Ask George Brett.
So this wouldn’t set a precedent, and even if it did, so what? The next time there’s a situation where a clearly incorrect call prevents the end of the game from immediately taking place then the Commissioner can overturn the call again. There is no hypothesizing about what would have happened in the game if the correct call had been made. There is no need to replay the rest of the game from any particular point, as they did in the Pine Tar Game, because the game would have been over.
by Huckleberry on Jun 8, 2010 1:54 PM CDT reply actions
Shouldn’t the Nationals and Jim Joyce be taking the heat on this? I know it is popular to bash Selig, but I just don’t see it here.
Jim Joyce and Armando Galarraga handled this between themsleves like straight up good dudes. It wasn’t a playoff game. It is what it is, and it is over.
Not to mention the precedent argument has merit because you know that the media would bang him over the head with it every time there was a prominent questionable call.
On the Washington side, they have to pay for that signing bonus somehow. I also think that this is attributing Machiavellian intelligence to baseball front office guys, who are more likely to be biting their fingernails about pitch counts.
Anyway, I don’t think either is in Seligs’ domain or is Selig’s fault in any way.
by The General on Jun 8, 2010 2:24 PM CDT reply actions
Perhaps not Selig’s fault or domain. His continuing to keep replay at a distance is, IMO.
Jayson Stark over at ESPN wrote a decent column about expanding replay in limited ways in baseball when this happened – http://lnk.nu/sports.espn.go.com/1bi0
And Huck, thanks for bringing up the Pine Tar Incident – if you hadn’t, I was gonna…
by kuoirad on Jun 8, 2010 2:40 PM CDT reply actions
I’m in agreement on the dump that baseball takes on the fan. Like I’ve been saying, after already experiencing 2 WS wins with one occuring in spectaculr fashion what motivation do I have to sit through 162 4-hour snooze fests in the hopes of a playoff appearance and even less likely final victory.
The cost-reward analysis says I’m happier doing just about anything else.
by Nickel Rover on Jun 8, 2010 2:42 PM CDT reply actions
Concur.
MLB blows for a litany of reasons that I don’t have the energy to recount here. Bud Selig’s petulant ‘no’ on Joyce’s blown call is just another example of how the life has been sucked out of a great sport.
I can’t stand to watch MLB anymore – I watch the Horns when on TV and my son when he plays. That’s it.
by Levander Williams on Jun 8, 2010 3:04 PM CDT reply actions
I kind of liked the Nats bait and switch. I was able to get 6 tickets on Friday for the game that night for 99cents each!
I think the Nats should pay me to go to their games… a rough guestimate tells me that they are 24-1 when I have been to their games over the past 3 years. Friday night was my first game of 2010.
by DCHorn on Jun 8, 2010 3:54 PM CDT reply actions
Whether it’s Selig’s domain or not is irrelevant. His defense that “it’s okay to make mistakes because we’ve always made mistakes” is what rankles.
by Matt Cotcher on Jun 8, 2010 4:07 PM CDT reply actions
If you want to make the case that this is why you should have expanded instant replay, then fine. But, this call did not effect the outcome of the game like Brett and the Pine Tar call did.
I think this would have 100% been used as a precedent by teams and the media to bitch about an ever expanding assortment of calls that tend to even out over the 162 games
I think shitting on Selig is just the lazy way to bitch about baseball.
by The General on Jun 8, 2010 5:36 PM CDT reply actions
100% agree on the Selig thing. Amazing how that dude snatches defeat from the jaws of victory every time.
As for the Strasburg call up, if there was a firestorm of controversy, I never heard it in DC. Folks have been speculating the 8th for a while here, given that they would probably want a Tuesday sell out and didn’t want the added pressure of a weekend game (drunker, rowdier fans).
by Sugarpants on Jun 8, 2010 9:14 PM CDT reply actions

by 























