Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Preakness 2012: News, Odds and More

Expected yield from the corn harvest

Football:

Today I wanted to examine the schedule and pick out Texas' trouble spots but first there was a Huckleberry post that warrants mentioning. If you've read my recent NBA stuff you know I've had a lot of interest in the use of regressions to make conclusions about sports statistics and what really correlates to winning.

Unfortunately I have the mathematical abilities of a neanderthal, but then that doesn't matter because we have Huckleberry. In addition to finding that forcing fumbles have a low correlation to winning and aren't consistent from season to season, Huck demonstrated that passing the ball effectively and stopping other teams from doing the same should be the number one priority.

You know, like the ancient wisdom of football recounted to us every weekend by the experts.

Well, thankfully it appears that Muschamp grasps the importance of stopping the passing game by his employment of speed over power at various position and the coverages he calls.

Now, for many offenses the killing blows are administered by the passing game but enabled by having a consistent running game that can stay ahead of the chains and force to defense to react in ways that allows for the kill shot openings on the deep pass. The 2010 Texas offense is expected to be such a unit.

All that to say, Muschamp's strategic aims are right on target where other coordinators here have struggled to grasp wisdom. Like Gene Chizik emphasizing how Texas needed to stop the run to win in Lubbock...that twit.

Trips Right already peeked at the non conference schedule for the men's program, now I'm going to examine the football schedule this year looking for the dangerous teams with the following attributes:

1). Teams that can stop the run with an honest front: This is where Scipio's nightmare scenario comes into play where the receivers are locked up by deep safeties while the defense ignores the blocking/receiving dangers of Smith/Matthews. Or you could see my nightmare where Texas is playing 4 and 5 wide all the time and Hix and Mitchell are being asked to stay in front of Von Miller and Jeremy Beal unassisted.

2). Teams that can run ball-control offenses: Teams that can either pound the ball down the middle and try to draw in Christian Scott into making a mistake or teams that can spread it out and pick on Gideon or a corner if one of our big 3 is injured (ala A&M last year). Ultimately I don't think this defense will have many holes likely to be exposed by anyone on the schedule but to have success against the newest Muschamp Virus program then having either a real running game or short-passing game will be essential to accomplish anything. It takes a deep offensive roster to spread Muschamp's legions out enough to hit the weak points.

Now we go down the schedule:

Rice: That's a negatory on both counts

Wyoming: yeah moving on...

at Texas Tech:

Attribute 1: The heart of this defense is in linebacker/end Brian Duncan and NT Colby Whitlock. I think they are a stronger bet to handle the Texas running game without an 8 man front than many of the other Big 12 defenses.

Attribute 2: Ball control? Texas Tech? Even last year's Muschamp defense couldn't totally stamp them out. If its necessary to keep them under 20 to win that could be a tall order. They have Lewis and Leong back at receiver, Batch at RB and either Teen Wolf or Sheffield at quarterback. Combined with one of their better looking lines it's a enough overall quality to hit some soft spots.

Factor in that the game will be in Lubbock and comes early in the year for a new line/quarterback and I think you have a strong candidate for 1st loss.

UCLA:

Attribute 1: Uh, I don't even really know. They were 7-5 last year and this is a home game. I'm not really worried.

Attribute 2: From what I can tell they employ the kind of running-heavy pro-style offense that Texas has struggled against when run by teams with talent. UCLA lacks a ton of talent still and is transitioning to the zone-running game...let's make this one a negative.

OU:

Attribute 1: While their new linebackers seem more like the kind that dominated the Big 12 in the early 00's than the kind that have successfully navigated the spread they should be pretty capable of handling the Texas running game if that is Stoop's objective. Last year they based their whole scheme and approach to stopping Shipley and the short game and Texas still barely ran the ball effectively enough to win. I don't see good things for this contest if stopping the run is how Texas is best handled.

Attribute 2: They do have Ryan Broyles but I'm guessing that their offensive line minus Stephen Good and Trent Williams isn't any better this year and consequently I very much doubt that Landry Jones has much control over the ball or his bowels.

So it's a toss up like last year's contest with D/ST carrying the way. I'm going with Gilbert making enough plays and the Texas D/ST creating the crucial opportunities again to swing this our way.

at Nebraska:

Attribute 1: Alright, the Nebraska D is getting a lot of credit heading into the season essentially because of Pellini's reputation and last year's accomplishments. Well they lost a good linebacker in Dillard, they lost a guy that routinely beat double teams and enabled them to beat the run with only 5 or 6 guys, and they lost 2 starting safeties.

That last one is an underrated blow as having experienced safeties makes a huge difference in this league and often marks the good defenses from the bad. They have a guy named Hagg who played a lot as a nickel last year starting at safety now and still have players like Amukamara, Crick, and another Steinkuhler...but it seems highly doubtful they will replicate last year's success. Were I a husker I would have little confidence that this defense can stonewall the Horns again.

Attribute 2: There is a lot coming back on a solid offensive line and some very strong skill position talent. If I were Pellini I would go zone-read with the quarterback not named Zac Lee and have a unit that might cause problems. They have running back depth and the athletes at quarterback to be a spread-style option team but they'll probably opt for a stupid SEC "pro-style" offense again with their 4.7 receivers and noodle-armed QB.

When you weigh in factors like Nebraska's question marks in big places, the Lincoln crowd/weather, and then that Texas will have just played Tech, UCLA and OU I think you get a strong case for Texas 2nd loss. Of course, I don't even remember the last time NU prevailed against Texas in that stadium.

Iowa St.

...

Baylor:

Attribute 1: After losing Jordan Lake, and more importantly Joe Pawelek, I very much doubt there is much left here to do anything but try and get in the way in Baylor's various shootouts. Certainly NT Taylor can try to get in someone's way.

Attribute 2: With a guy like Robert Griffin calling all the shots there are always numerous options for chunks of yards. If OU had Griffin they would actually be legit National Champion frontrunners. Even as it is I think this will be one of the best 4 offenses Texas faces. Check mark.

Of course it's still a home game and it's still Baylor. It might be a scare but it won't be a loss.

at KSU:

Attribute 1: This is supposed to be a depleted front 7 although we can assume that Snyder will be cunning in their placement against Texas. Assuming Texas has any kind of balance on offense that should prove far beyond any Robert E. Lee chicanery in covering up gaping holes in the line.

Attribute 2: The running game looks strong for KSU but not exactly Alabama strong. 4 returning OL to pave the way for Daniel Thomas is a better start than most of the Big 12's programs so there is only just enough here to be antsy given our history with this program and the location of the game but still not enough to forecast a loss.

Oklahoma State:

Attribute 1: Orie Lemon is being talked up like he's Achilles returned from the underworld and padded up in Cowpoke orange and their D coordinator Young keeps getting attention for accomplishing less than did his predecessor Beckman who frequently gave Colt fits. I don't see anything more here than what they usually trot out and Young will insure that their approach is based on getting in the way more than trying to actively confuse and attack Gilbert like Beckman would have.

Attribute 2: They are transitioning to some version of the Air Raid rather than trying to maintain the physical running game that gave them an edge in every conference game the last several years. In defense of this decision, I suppose they couldn't find more Pettigrews and Okungs to build on that tradition, but spreading out Texas and trying to throw all day is a bad decision if you don't have the horses on the line and the system strength Leach had at Tech.

I will be very surprised if this game is an actual challenge for the Horns, I think it gets ugly in stillwater.

Florida Atlantic:

Trap game with big bad Florida athletes...is what Mack will sell to the team and media before the turkey day contest. Unless this is another inaugural opening of a new stadium it's going down as a W.

Texas A&M:

Attribute 1: Negative. No dominant tackles or All-conference level inside linebackers to handle a strong running game. They should be better against the pass with Hunter and Miller (safety and OLB) back but their transition to a faster defense will come at the wrong time to take a punch in the mouth up the middle from Huey-Snow-Allen.

Attribute 2: Depending on how Tech transitions under Tuberville this could be the best offense Texas faces. They have 4 receivers back who created headaches last year, 2 backs that look better than anyone on the Texas roster, and Jerrod Johnson who wanders from retardation to savantism from game to game. Sadly we can always count on the Aggy savants coming out against Texas.

That's a negative and a check. If this game came at a more grueling part of the schedule or were in college station I would be concerned but Texas could be playing for the conference title game at this point after taking it easy against Florida Atlantic and the offensive unit under Gilbert will have found its feet by this point.

This might be a tougher schedule than the one that brought down Texas in 2008 and killed the title chance as the new 4 pack of brutal contests comes early in the season. I'll disagree with many and call the Tech and OU games the toughest on the schedule. I'll look wrong when Nebraska pulls out a win cleaning up a tired squad in front of a rabid home crowd but then vindicated when a 10-2 season puts Texas in the conference title game and they make Tom Osborne cry one more time for good measure.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think Gene Chizik did pretty well against Tech in Lubbock.

Ok St is in Austin this year.

Did OU lose Stephen Good?

Great writeup, nickel. 10-2 sounds right, hopefully that means conf title game and BCS bowl wins to get to 12-2

by dick on Jun 29, 2010 11:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Good read. After the last few weeks, I’ve been hoping that we put up some where in the neighborhood of 120 total points on NU this year. 70-3 would be the perfect going away present.

by UT_06 on Jun 29, 2010 11:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Good read, but one quick correction: The Okie Lite game is in Austin last year, it got ugly in stillwater last year.

by Tallahassee_Horn on Jun 30, 2010 4:16 AM CDT reply actions  

*The Okie Lite game is in Austin THIS year.

by Tallahassee_Horn on Jun 30, 2010 4:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Good was a redshirt freshman last year. I wasn’t aware he was gone.

I agree with most of your points although I still have no idea what Tuberville is planning on doing with Tech on the offensive side so that one is tough to forecast.

by t1climb1 on Jun 30, 2010 7:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Of course, I don’t even remember the last time NU prevailed against Texas in that stadium.

1933?

by parlin on Jun 30, 2010 7:34 AM CDT reply actions  

Agree with you that the Tech game is problematic, largely due to it being early in the year and in Lubbock.

I don’t see the Nebraska game as being so scary. Suh did so much for them, allowing them to sit in dime coverage pretty much all the time. Crick is solid, but won’t do near as much for them as Suh. So we agree that their defense may be more suspect than people think. On offense, I just don’t see them scoring enough points to win. They were bad last year, and I don’t see a quick turnaround. 24-10 Texas.

by lazer2280 on Jun 30, 2010 8:33 AM CDT reply actions  

As long as I coach the Nebraska Offensive line you can guarantee we will be worthless.

by Barney Cotton on Jun 30, 2010 8:34 AM CDT reply actions  

It’s important to note that the low correlation for fumbles and forced fumbles is probably driven by their relative randomness. It’s not that a fumble or forced fumble can’t be a game-decider when it happens, it’s that their occurrence is more random than people want to believe. When something happens in an important situation, human tendency is to ascribe blame or believe that it’s because of a failure or great play. Sometimes it’s just chance.

Jamaal Charles had a hugely important fumble against Oklahoma. There’s no denying that. He has henceforth been considered a fumbler by a large portion of our fanbase and some scouts. He fumbled a grand total of 5 times that season on 258 carries (one fumble per 51.6 carries). Meanwhile Darren McFadden fumbled 15 times on 325 carries (one fumble per 21.7 carries) on his way to the Doak Walker, Maxwell, and Walter Camp awards and a runner-up Heisman finish to Jesus himself. One of those two runners had a fumbling issue. The other happened to have one of his random fumbles occur in an important situation. For the record, the average fumble rate is about one per 33.5 carries although I include receiver catches as carries in that calculation for my stats. I have to because box scores include receiver fumbles in the totals.

by Huckleberry on Jun 30, 2010 8:46 AM CDT reply actions  

I see Tech being early in the season favoring the Horns. New coach inheriting an offense he doesn’t really like and a mediocre defense he won’t have much time to turn around. Plus they may still not be completely settled on a starting QB.

by Horncasting on Jun 30, 2010 9:53 AM CDT reply actions  

What do we really know about Tubs offensive plans in Lubbock? Will he try to keep a good thing going? SEC-style rush-based “attack”? A mix of both?

At this point, I think it’s a stretch to say that Tech’s offense will be better than A&M’s. JMO though.

by Matt Cotcher on Jun 30, 2010 10:00 AM CDT reply actions  

I believe Tech’s new OC is from Troy and they ran a similar offense to the one we have seen in LBK over the past several years. I personally think they will utilize Batch more, whether it be running plays or screen/ swing passes. Other than that I think it will be pretty close to the same, maybe 40 pass attempts as opposed to 60.

by Fico on Jun 30, 2010 10:28 AM CDT reply actions  

Didn’t Tubs bring in a spread guy as OC at Auburn, and it turned into a complete disaster? I know that may not be comparable situations, but still…

Just can’t see Tuberville putting his defense into the same types of situations and having them on the field for 75% of the TOP.

He may have a coronary over the OL splits.

by Horncasting on Jun 30, 2010 11:06 AM CDT reply actions  

“They do have Ryan Broyles but I’m guessing that their offensive line minus Stephen Good and Trent Williams isn’t any better this year and consequently I very much doubt that Landry Jones has much control over the ball or his bowels.”

Stephen Good is back for this year. And Trent Williams’s loss, for all his talent, may be addition by subtraction in a sense. The coaches often lamented his negative influence on the rest of the OL. His talent level allowed him to work half as hard as everyone else and get twice the results. It’s like when young guys with the 90’s Chicago Bulls tried to imitate MJ’s style of prep and practice. They didn’t understand that it wasn’t what he did; it was who MJ was. Don’t get me wrong, we’ll be taking a big step down in blindside protection. But I think we’ll also see improvement everywhere else. OU also didn’t have one OL last year, we had 10 different combinations of starting OL due to injury. We get that under control, and maybe Landry doesn’t get his stool pushed in by Acho ocho uno as often.

by NateHeupel on Jun 30, 2010 1:10 PM CDT reply actions  

If you really think Baylor at home is a scare then stay away from the stock market or anything else requiring a decision.

by Newy25 on Jun 30, 2010 1:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Crap. I knew the game was in Austin I don’t know why I did that. Brian Simmons graduated/left Stephen Good remains.

Tech has some real quality in their interior line, at the skill positions, and in either starting quarterback. If they end up running the ball considerably more they can do it, if they keep throwing it all day they’re still well equipped for that as well.

It’s easy to say that Tech will be trouble because the game is early and in Lubbock but they also have perhaps their best team save maybe for the 2008 squad since Mack has been here. I’m not saying we are a lock to lose but I think it’s the toughest game.

The Nebraska game I really see trouble for mostly because of the timing after playing UCLA, Tech and OU.

by Nickel Rover on Jun 30, 2010 1:19 PM CDT reply actions  

“And Trent Williams’s loss, for all his talent, may be addition by subtraction in a sense. "

We all know Kevin Wilson will surely label it his best line ever come August.

by Houstonearler on Jun 30, 2010 1:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Houstonearler,

That’s no shit. He’ll try to have the world convinced they’re a brick wall and that every single one is an All America.

by NateHeupel on Jun 30, 2010 2:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Great stuff.

“Teams that can stop the run with an honest front”. Mack is making GD focus more on running this season but I’ll be happy if the horns run well enough to force opponents to play the run straight up.

by Kafka on Jun 30, 2010 4:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Excellent writeup, NR

Now, ‘splain to me how we go 10-2 — losing to Tech and OU — and get into the Big 12 title match. Sooners play Tech in Norman; how’s OU to lose twice? Aggies? Colorado? Wish it could be . . .

by edsp on Jun 30, 2010 4:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Don’t worry about the Cornwhiners, we have an off week after OU to prepare for Lincoln.

We’ll be rested and will give ’em a final reminder as to why they are fleeing the conference they built.

by We own them on Jun 30, 2010 4:47 PM CDT reply actions  

I should add, with a new QB I expect a 3-loss season, including an ugly upset. But we’ll win in Lincoln, even if it is our only win.

by We own them on Jun 30, 2010 4:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Barney Cotton is sadly correct – he may be the worst position coach in D1, and his resume is replete with endless failure.

by Ojnab Bob on Jun 30, 2010 4:59 PM CDT reply actions  

I went to HS with Barney. I didn’t know him well enough to dislike him, but my wife can’t stand him.

by Bob in Houston on Jun 30, 2010 5:06 PM CDT reply actions  

The outcome of the Alabama game didn’t have shit to do with us stopping the pass…..

by derryl on Jul 1, 2010 12:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Yes derryl, thank you. You found one game 2 seasons where not stopping the run cost the Longhorns a victory.

Didn’t notice the bye week before the Nebraska game, I still think we drop 2 overall.

EDSP: you’ll notice I had Texas losing to Nebraska and Tech while beating OU. Maybe a 3-way tie would occur but I bet OU drops 2-4 conference games.

by NickelRover on Jul 1, 2010 2:56 AM CDT reply actions  

So you think your poor running game and sub par running backs are a sure thing against A&M’s interior line? A few more things to consider:

You need to do some research on Garrick Williams. He’ll be an all conference candidate.

If you haven’t abandoned the “run first” scheme by the A&M game with 3-4 losses already, I’ll be surprised.

Tim Deruyter will have this defense turned around. If he can scheme to slow you down any, I know A&M’s offense will be good for at least 35 points this year in Austin. I don’t think your new run first scheme will net you that many per game in conference, and you’re looking at a lot more close games than the Cart/VY era.

Coupled with first year starter at QB and the nations best pass rusher breathing down his neck, I think A&M will outscore you in Austin. 41-24 or something like that.

by reality_not _allowed on Jul 1, 2010 7:49 AM CDT reply actions  

“but I bet OU drops 2-4 conference games”

I can see three (UT, A&M in College Station, @Mizzou), but who’s the 4th?

That said, if OU comes out of their non-conference undefeated, I’ll go ahead and predict wins over UT and Missouri. If they win all of the OOC games by 10+, I’ll take the Phil Steele route and pick OU to run the table. A lot rides on the development of the offensive line and Landry Jones. Needless to say, I’m not yet convinced that OU will win all of its OOC games.

by NateHeupel on Jul 1, 2010 9:14 AM CDT reply actions  

“If he can scheme to slow you down any, I know A&M’s offense will be good for at least 35 points this year in Austin.”

Babalugats, got a bet here!

by il cativo on Jul 1, 2010 9:53 AM CDT reply actions  

Nate, you still believe in Landry Jones?

by dick on Jul 1, 2010 1:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I haven’t seen anything yet to convince me that we are going to reverse the trend over the last 6 or 7 years and actually want the T-Day game as much as A&M wants it.

We still win most of them based on talent and close-game experience, but it’s been awhile since we’ve won that game because of determination. In a year where the talent gap (read: experience) and productivity are closer than normal, I’ll take the aggies to win that game.

by Nero on Jul 1, 2010 2:06 PM CDT reply actions  

dick,

“you still believe in Landry Jones?”

I’m on the fence. I think OU will see very solid improvement on the OL between the fact that we’ve now got about 9 guys with at least two games of starting experience in conference. But as for Mr. Jones?

On the one hand, Stoops & Co. are notorious for underdeveloping the backups. This is not at all concerning, especially considering our good luck with injuries. So when a Heisman Trophy winning QB goes down in the first game, I can automatically assume his backup will be utterly and completely unprepared to run the offense. In addition, the receivers not named Ryan Broyles were dropping passes hitting them in the hands, and his OL was a patchwork quilt of any five healthy guys we could find who weighed more than 270 pounds.

On the other hand, his supposed best game was against Stanford. He threw an atrocious interception to a very mediocre DB, and failed to see open WRs downfield. So I’m in doubt if he’ll have the same high ceiling that Bradford had.

by NateHeupel on Jul 1, 2010 2:46 PM CDT reply actions  

Nate, where do you play Tech this year? I think Baylor could have been an upset last year had Griffin been healthy although I’m sure beating OU in Norman is probably beyond his powers. You may be right if you’re suggesting that OU has the clearest path to the Big 12 title game in the south. I would think your OOC would kill you in the tiebreaker this time though.

Reality-not-allowed: please post more often…

by Nickel Rover on Jul 1, 2010 5:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Nickel:

Tech is coming to Norman. Home team has won that game since 2004. We play Baylor in Waco and Oklahoma State in Stillwater. I do think OU has the clearest path to the Big 12 title game. But I think 2008 would be what kill us in the tiebreaker. Wouldn’t you agree?

by NateHeupel on Jul 1, 2010 5:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Perhaps, Fox did show a particular delight in announcing OU in 2008 welcoming former Hitler’s youth Barry Switzer on their program to make the announcement.

Sounds like y’all have a better draw though, even if we win the RRS. Tech and Nebraska makes for a tough road schedule while OSU is gonna have a down year.

by NickelRover on Jul 1, 2010 9:41 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Link2_small BrickHorn

Propeller_helmet_small Huck L Berry

Picture_016_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Billlittle0_small Fake Ken Tremendous

Authors

Williams_ranger_dugout_small WWMcClyde

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Small ColoradoAg

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover

Small John Kocurek

Thumbnail_small Drew Kelson

Barker Emeritus

Tn_homeimage7_small Parlin

220px-henry_james_by_john_singer_sargent_cleaned_small HenryJames

Small Doperbo