We Are Witnessing History
What is a "Great Coaching Rivalry", in your opinion? Is it a rivalry between great coaches, like the one between Darrell Royal and Frank Broyles?
Or is it a great rivalry with close, exciting games, such as between Joe Paterno and John Cooper?
I was pondering this, because this is the 12th year of the Mack Brown/Bob Stoops rivalry, and I was wondering how historically significant it is. I love lists (who doesn’t?), and decided to list the greatest coaching rivalries. I was looking for rivalries that:
1. Lasted at least 10 games. This is a tough criteria, because only the best coaches last 10 years at a school, and we’re looking for guys that were both at their school for the same 10 years, minimum. This also eliminated two rivalries that lasted over a decade, but due to scheduling didn’t accumulate 10 games- Bryant/Dooley (18 years, only 6 games), and Leahy/Blaik (13 years, 7 games).
2. Involve great coaches. How do you measure this? Isn’t this something you know when you see? Generally, winning a MNC is a good measure, but not every MNC winner is recognized as a great coach (is Bobby Ross one?), and Bo Schembechler is a coach I consider “great” who never won a MNC. This one will have to be somewhat subjective.
3. Are competitive. I eliminated Broyles/Royal, Osborne/Switzer, and Paterno/Carr because they were just too one-sided. These rivalries may have had great games, but ended up as more dreaded than anticipated for one of the teams.
Here are the best rivalries I could find in history-
John McKay (USC)/Ara Parseghian (Notre Dame), 1964 – 1974. McKay got the better of this one, going 6 – 3 – 2, but Parseghian did OK, nearly winning 5. In this period, USC won three MNCs, and Notre Dame won two. These teams made their wins count. During this span, USC went 87 – 19 – 5 against all non-ND teams (80.6%), and Notre Dame went 92-11-2 when not playing USC (88.6%).
Bo Schembechler (Michigan)/Woody Hayes (tOSU), 1969 – 1978. Bo got this one, going 5 – 4 – 1 in this series. Neither team won a MNC (Woody had some from before, and Bo never won one), as this series was known for spoiling MNC chances more than supporting them. When not playing the Buckeyes in these 10 years, the Wolverines went 94 – 11 – 2 (88.8%). The Buckeyes went 84 – 15 – 2 in non-Michigan games.
Bobby Bowden (FSU)/Steve Spurrier (Florida), 1990 – 2001. This series had 14 games in 12 years, due to two bowl meetings. Bowden had the upper hand, 8 – 5 – 1. FSU won two MNCs in this period, and Florida won one (ironically, beating FSU in a bowl to get it). When not playing the Gators, FSU went 120 – 14 (89.6%), and Florida went 114 – 19 (85.7%) in non-Seminole games.
How does the Brown/Stoops rivalry match up? Pretty well, I think, but judge for yourself. From 1999 – 2009, Stoops is 6 – 5 over Mack. Each coach has won one MNC, although Stoops has played for three more, and Brown for one more (ironically, Stoops played for one in 2008 despite losing to Brown that year). When not playing Texas, Stoops has a record of 111 – 24 (82.2%). Brown’s record in non-Sooner games is 114 – 18 (86.4%).
I think this makes a good argument for the Brown/Stoops rivalry being one for the ages. Another interesting thing about the series noted above is that they weren’t really known for a lot of mutual love. Maybe that only happens in rivalries where one coach definitely dominates the other, or there aren’t high stakes in play. It's funny that the RRS is known for its great coaches (Wilkinson, Royal, etc.) but only has this as a great rivalry because when one coach gets the upper hand for a period, it tends to shorten the tenure of the losing coach.
Comments? Did I miss any rivalries of note?
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This was a great post. If we were to write a book about this rivalry, you’d use the 2008 season as the proverbial boiling point. The politicking and media frenzy between the two schools and their head men was epic. Lots of subtle and not so subtle barbs that flew back and forth between these guys. And you’re right, it’s doubtful we’ll see this type of coaching rivalry between the two schools in a long while.
by Trips Right on Jul 24, 2010 2:01 PM CDT reply actions
Great post.
I never considered Stoops/Brown in historic terms but it will clearly go down as one of the great coaching rivalries in history for its intensity, even play on the field, and significance.
The 10 year qualifier eliminates some compelling match-ups, but it makes sense.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 24, 2010 2:11 PM CDT reply actions
“Lots of subtle and not so subtle barbs that flew back and forth between these guys.”
Speaking of things that flew, what about planes with banners ripping each school? Who the hell has ever heard of that?
Trips, what, you don’t think Venables v Muschamp will be the redux? Ha, Muschamp will be the cause for much turnover in Norman, assuming he ever graces our sidelines as El Jefe.
by magnusbleuveigner on Jul 24, 2010 2:18 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks. I was impressed with how tough teams in the midst of these decade-plus rivalries were on other teams. Not very many let-down years.
by TaylorTRoom on Jul 24, 2010 2:53 PM CDT reply actions
USC-Notre Dame during that era was terrific theater, and ABC used it to great advantage for a late season ratings grabber.
Funny how Joe Paterno can coach for over 5 decades and not really have a singular rival. I guess it is because of all those years as an independent, which meant a revolving door schedule-wise — except for Pittsburgh, which was never good enough long enough to establish a true rivalry.
by srr50 on Jul 24, 2010 7:06 PM CDT reply actions
If both coach another 3-4 years…I think it will go down as an equal to the Bowden/Spurrier rivalry. Just need Coach Brown to hang around a little longer and have one more national title be garnered by a participating school (preferablly us).
by fear_the_cow on Jul 24, 2010 8:01 PM CDT reply actions
In 25 years at Alabama, Coach Bear Bryant coached teams to 6 national championships and 13 SEC championships. Ahem…not bad. For 18 of those seasons Bryant faced off against Auburn’s Ralph “Shug” Jordan. During that time, The Bear’s winning % in non-Auburn, non-tie games was 84.2% (149-28). (His career win % in non-tie games was 79.2%). Coach Jordan’s record during this 18 year face-off was a respectable 72.8% in non-Bama, non-tie games (123-46).
Those in them parts would argue this was the greatest college coaching rivalry…ever (bunch of homers). In all reality, Bryant “owned” Jordan. While Shug’s 1957 team went undefeated the season prior to their initial head-to-head meeting (unseemly plug – my step dad played on that team), he only managed 5 wins against the Bear.
Interesting that the Iron Bowl is fairly even since Coach Jordan’s departure with Bama winning 18 of 34 meetings. Also, Jordan-Hare Stadium bears his name. The first stadium to be named for an active coach.
by TXStampede on Jul 24, 2010 8:59 PM CDT reply actions
Right. Jordan was 5-13 against the Bear. Not a coaching rivalry. Even if the game is. Sort of like Broyles-Royal.
I need that game to be at least 60-40 for it to be a rivalry.
I was thinking about Bama-Auburn. The problem is that Auburn went through a bunch of coaches during the Bear’s tenure that Bryant completely owned while Pat Dye coached against three different Bama guys.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 24, 2010 9:11 PM CDT reply actions
These are tough standards, especially nowadays when a coach maybe gets five years. If the program has been turned around, maybe he gets another five. And you have to do that on both ends, at the same time.
I was surprised to find that Michigan and Michigan State qualify for the years that Bump Elliott coached the Wolverines (1959-68) against Duffy Daugherty. MSU won 7 of the 10 games, with one tie.
by Bob in Houston on Jul 24, 2010 9:34 PM CDT reply actions
Integrating Texas football sure screwed the Spartans.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 24, 2010 9:53 PM CDT reply actions
Texas-OU has been so intense a rivalry that coaches on both sides have had a hard time surviving the emotional swings of the series. Royal ran off his mentor — Bud Wilkinson, and then Switzer helped push Royal into retirement.
There was a ten-year run that almost qualifies under Taylor’s guideline.
Fred Akers and Barry Switzer faced off ten times with Akers holding a 5-4-1 advantage. Akers was 81-27-1 outside the series while Switzer was 91-17-1 apart from Texas. Akers more than held his own with an elite OU, but couldn’t survive the internal divide in the program and his own mis-steps against lesser opponents.
Switzer meanwhile was almost another victim to the series. Marcus Dupree pulled his ass out of the fire in 1982. Without that win, Switzer would have been 1-6 against Akers after 1983. That combined with 13 losses in from 1982-83 could have made him expendable.
by srr50 on Jul 24, 2010 10:10 PM CDT reply actions
I thought about Switzer/Akers, but does anybody consider Akers a truly great coach (see criteria 2)? I think he was done in college football by the time he was 50.
by TaylorTRoom on Jul 24, 2010 10:28 PM CDT reply actions
Which is why I said “almost”
This is a great post Taylor, I just think your list shows that the historically intense rivalries don’t let coaches survive the emotional swings over a long period of time.
by srr50 on Jul 24, 2010 10:52 PM CDT reply actions
Great post.
I’d like to revist this in 10 years. History tends to over/under play these personal rivalries. The “Ah, yes” moments are missing from the Brown/Stoops rivalry since it is still active.
I like the qualifications listed. Too bad Dr. Tom either owned or was owned by other coaches.
GBR
Bob
by bnahusker on Jul 25, 2010 1:02 AM CDT reply actions
It’s really amazing that Brown can tie Stoops this year at 6-6, considering that Stoops had a 5-0 run in there. And after the 03 and 04 games, I was pretty much convinced that Mack would never beat Stoops again.
by nordberg on Jul 25, 2010 1:07 PM CDT reply actions
Fred Akers and Barry Switzer faced off ten times with Akers holding a 5-4-1 advantage. Akers was 81-27-1 outside the series while Switzer was 91-17-1 apart from Texas. Akers more than held his own with an elite OU, but couldn’t survive the internal divide in the program and his own mis-steps against lesser opponents.
Switzer meanwhile was almost another victim to the series. Marcus Dupree pulled his ass out of the fire in 1982. Without that win, Switzer would have been 1-6 against Akers after 1983. That combined with 13 losses in from 1982-83 could have made him expendable.
I had forgotten some of this, srr. Really interesting.
Great stuff as usual, TTR
by Sailor Ripley on Jul 25, 2010 2:00 PM CDT reply actions
It fails to meet your criteria, but Fulmer-Spurrier has to be the most entertaining rivalry of the last 20 years.
by Matt Cotcher on Jul 25, 2010 6:47 PM CDT reply actions
My favorite coaches’ rivalry is Royal/Bryant. Coach Royal owned Bryant.
by MrPhlegm on Jul 26, 2010 2:22 PM CDT reply actions
I agree that Akers was not a great coach. So, how come . . . Fred could hold a series edge on Switzer when Barry was Hall-of-Fame caliber when it came to dispensing Ben Franklins beneath tables?
by edsp on Jul 26, 2010 6:55 PM CDT reply actions

by 
























