jones Top Ten 2010 Season Preview
Ponder South Carolina. I use "ponder" as a verb here, not as reference to some mythical Conroy-esque small southern town. To be precise: meditate with me on the South Carolina Gamecock football team; for I believe they are the greatest program the sport has ever known. The ‘cocks—whose fans sport the best baseball caps in the game—play impressively in Williams-Brice Stadium, the stadium being the impressive part, not the play. Williams-Brice is stunning, ain’t no doubt. South Carolina also offers one of the great player entrance traditions in the game, to the imposing opening chords of the dawn scene from 2001: A Space Odyssey (Also sprach Zarathustra, if you remember your music appreciation class; Nietzsche, if you took introduction to philosophy; 1970s Elvis, if you did neither). Inarguably, this is a great atmosphere—even compared to their SEC brethren. 80,000 screaming fans take in this show every Saturday. Big Time College Football, baby.
But greatest program ever, you say? You bet. Those 80,000 fans come to see the most average team in college football history. Since 1892, the Gamecocks have won 535, lost 535 and tied 44. Washington State is also exactly .500, but 80,000 folks sure as hell don’t come to watch Wazzu. NC State, Cincinnati, Vanderbilt and Baylor are all also within a few games of .500, lifetime. Not exactly environments on par with South Carolina. Gamecock fans come win or lose. They were there for the one conference championship—the ACC in 1969—and even put in Astroturf and expanded the stadium the very next year, presumably so that more people could watch their boys go 4-6-1. The crowds showed up the one time South Carolina won ten games, in 1984, and kept showing up 15 years later to watch Lou Holtz go 0-11, averaging 78,273 for a team that never won. Can you imagine? Despite the outlier years, the coin flip record has not been built on stretches of greatness/stretches of stench. Rather, the Gamecocks have an uncanny ability to win between 4 and 6 games a year, regardless of circumstances, finishing in the AP rankings five times in the last 73 years. Their last two coaches—both no-brainer picks for the hall of fame—have burnished their greatness to the tune of 68-54 over the past decade (14 games above the historical average, to be fair).
You will never buy this, but I mean South Carolina no disrespect. I’d take in a game at Williams-Brice in a heartbeat, and I will, some day. I grew up a Texas fan; then had the pleasure of going to school there. Any idiot can be a Texas fan, which I do my best to prove—in writing, no less—every Monday morning during the fall. Do 80,000 folks show up to watch Texas play mediocre football? Uhm…do the words "win or else" mean anything to you? Texas fans sometimes don’t even stick around for great football. I once watched half the crowd at a Texas game fail to return for the second half after Vince Young ran up a 56-0 lead on Kansas. The Longhorn fans had seen enough…of their national championship team…after one half of football…on SENIOR DAY for the love of God. So I must give it up for the Gamecocks, the finest group of American sports fans this side of Wrigley Field. The difference being, of course, that South Carolinians desperately want their team to win (this is the SEC after all), while Cubs fans, I have always suspected, kind of like losing.
And so it goes on these fall Saturdays. The Gamecock fans show up, as do thousands of others who cheer like mad even when their team goes 5-7. We go back to school and start another cycle and celebrate all that is good about life, its language, its textures, its flavors, its customs (which unapologetically include cockfighting—God bless the south).
Welcome back, friends, to season sixteen of the Jones Top Ten: the truth about college football since 1995.
I might as well write about South Carolina while we are here. The Gamecocks will rely on a fine defense and the always entertaining exploits of quarterback Stephen Garcia, assuming he’s not suspended, under arrest or otherwise in the Spurrier doghouse. They also add a potential superstar freshman tailback and feature an offensive lineman named Rokevious and a linebacker named Toquavious. This is one of the best 25 teams in the country. That’s clearly worth a trip to Williams-Brice.
So what else will happen this year in the only possible sport that could create a 12-team entity and call it the Big Ten and a ten-team entity and call it the Big 12? Let’s start at the top:
1. Florida: There are two first-time quarterbacks who I believe will be among the ten best in the nation by mid-season. One of them is John Brantley (the other one plays for #5, below). Not only do I believe Florida will be better quarterbacked than Alabama, but I also think their skill position players are rough (albeit less-hyped) equals, the lines are a draw and the Gators will field better defenders, especially in the secondary. Quite frankly, other than the loss of Jesus Tebow and an ugly 2009 SEC title game result, I don’t understand why Florida isn’t a consensus top three pick. I have never bought the argument that a defending college football champ should be #1 until proven otherwise. Welcome to 2010. Although…
2. Alabama: I would be happy to go along with the rest of the world and rank Alabama #1 if I didn’t think Florida was better. The 2010 SEC is a nasty place and I am not sure either of these teams will finish undefeated. ‘Bama’s two returning defensive starters should be cause for alarm, but that would be a lazy analysis that doesn’t take into account the talent of the new nine who will line up alongside them. Second-ranked is nothing at which to be sneezed. If the Tide quarterback was great, instead of just good, it would be easier for me to buy into the 55 out of 59 first place votes in the coaches poll.
3. Ohio State: THIS time, the Buckeyes are serious. If you buy the proposition that Terrelle Pryor will make a Vince Young-like evolution as a junior, then this pick is easy. I don’t quite buy that proposition, although I think Pryor will be improved. Certainly great talent plays around him. I wish Ohio State had a great tailback, rather than some very good ones. A game-breaking wide receiver would help—perhaps DeVier Posey is one, but I am not convinced of that, either. The defense is highly experienced and talented. A soft #3, but nonetheless, the Buckeyes will contend. Far too much has been made about the ugly and unfocused loss to Florida in 2006 and the honorable loss to a better LSU in 2007. This year presents their best shot at redemption.
4. Oregon with Jeremiah Masoli: This team actually doesn’t exist, although it will be fun to watch Masoli play for Mississippi.
5. Texas: Whatever. I am not really sure that the Longhorns are one of the best five squads for 2010. On the other hand, I think the only 85-man rosters in the game comparable to the Horns are Florida’s and Alabama’s, and then comes everyone else. Garrett Gilbert will be the new starter at quarterback. Horn fans shouldn’t lose any sleep. Gilbert might, however, because the right side of the Texas line (and on some days the left…) will hold up like spaghetti versus an angry toddler against any good defense. Texas counters by throwing their own best defense in the nation at their opponents. The whole could lead to 12-0…or 9-3, but opposing offenses better bring a lunch.
6. Oklahoma: The Sooners lost five games last year, but other than the bizarre give-up against Texas Tech, all of them were easily winnable. OU didn’t exactly field the team it expected in 2009; if it weren’t for bad luck, they would have had, as the song goes, no luck at all (it’s a Hee-Haw reference; trust me, the Oklahoma fans get it). You can play winning football with Landry Jones, a better quarterback than most Texas fans think, leading a very solid offense. A healthy DeMarco Murray—an heroic assumption—takes them beyond very solid to borderline terrific. I rate the Texas/Oklahoma game as a toss-up. If the Sooners had better cornerbacks, they’d be the conference favorites.
7. TCU: The common condescending refrain from the village elders to those teams outside of the Big Six goes something like this: "TCU (or Boise State, or Utah…) can win a one-shot bowl game, but if they had to play a tough conference schedule week-in-and-week-out, then no one would mistake them for a top ten team." I agree with that, but it doesn’t apply to this TCU squad. For starters, their schedule last year was the equal of some in the Big East or ACC (or any of the Big 12 North teams that skipped Oklahoma and Texas, for that matter). This team is better than last year’s undefeated squad—more good football players, whose above-average talent coming out of high school is greatly accelerated by a sublime S&C program. Would TCU run through the SEC undefeated? No, but several top ten teams wouldn’t accomplish that. Would I take TCU straight up against LSU? How about Virginia Tech? Iowa? Yes, I would. We will get some relative indication of whether I am right or wrong on September 4, when the Frogs play Oregon State.
So now I have to talk about Boise State, the press darling and the team that beat TCU in a BCS game last year. I love watching the Broncos play. They are disciplined, creative, exciting and have a knack for scaring the bejeezus out of BCS teams…of which they have played five in the last five years. Twenty starters return from an undefeated team, including all the skill position players from a dynamic offense and a highly underrated core of defensive players. I would take a flyer on Boise State as a top five team if this were NCAA basketball and attrition was not a significant success variable (they are the football equivalent of Butler). I would also put them there if I thought they would beat Virginia Tech in the opener. I don’t. But if Boise beats Va Tech, escapes Wyoming with a win (don’t laugh; it may be their third-hardest game) and beats Oregon State at home, then the rest of the schedule is a walk—no disrespect to Nevada and Fresno, but Boise is in a different league. Then we will get Boise State in a one-shot, winner-take-all with a month to prepare for, let’s say, Ohio State (coming off a 50-day layoff). Boise State could be the BCS champs. Long shot? Yes. Inconceivable? No.
8. Georgia: Somewhat forgotten in the new FloriBama SEC is the talent level of the Georgia Bulldogs. UGa is one of only four teams to have had consensus top ten recruiting classes in each of the past five years (USC, Florida, Texas—not Alabama, Saban has made up for this by signing 43 players a year and running off the chaff). That means Georgia has more quality players roaming around than almost any squad in the country. If any team breaks through the Meyer/Saban hegemony, it will be the Bulldogs. Problems? Well, their quarterbacks are highly unproven, their defense has been disastrously deployed over the last two years and Mark Richt is a very good coach in a world where two great ones have set up shop. It hasn’t helped matters that their best left tackle played less than a game in the last two years because of devastating knee injuries. This year, a new defensive coordinator, perhaps the best offensive line in the nation and absolutely sick skill-position talent, including wideout A.J. Green, might turn the tide (not to mention the Gators…).
9T. Virginia Tech: It makes me chuckle that Virginia Tech is now tagged, year-in and year-out, as overrated. As if Virginia Tech is a traditional major power fishing in a fertile sea of big-time recruits. The Hokies in the last six years have won 10,10, 11, 10, 11 and 10 games. Living up to expectations that you have solely set yourself through past excellent performance is an "unfairness" of life (it got Dan McCarney fired at Iowa State). I like this squad to win ten again, behind the nation’s two best tailbacks who don’t play for Alabama and a quarterback, Tyrod Taylor, who finds himself in the enviable situation of being lambasted as overrated for so long, that he is now probably underrated. Perfect for his program.
9T. USC: The news of the Trojan’s demise is greatly exaggerated. Yes, a slow degradation of their talent level will soon commence, courtesy of le Affaire d’ Bush (and Rick Neuheisel will jump at the chance to put UCLA on a better talent footing because of it). None of that has much bearing on this season (well, Seantreal Henderson might have looked pretty good at right tackle, but work with me). If you believe Lane Kiffin is a jackass, that’s fair game. If you think he can’t coach, you are mistaken. His father certainly can and he has a passel of nasty defensive players at his disposal to prove it. USC—of all teams—will be one of the early surprises of 2010, including posting a win over Oregon Without Jeremiah Masoli. The downside? Even though no big time stars defected (other than the true freshman Henderson), they did lose five or six solid players when the NCAA’s probation terms released juniors and seniors from the transfer rules. Troy will only play with 70 scholarships players this season. It will make a difference, especially down the stretch.
10. Nebraska and North Carolina: I am not cheating; this is the same team. Both have top-notch defenses capable of making even the best teams miserable. Carolina has more NFL-ready players (even if the NCAA suspends Marvin Austin), but Nebraska’s not far off and is exceptionally well schemed. Beyond that, both teams return virtually their entire starting offenses. Although that’s somewhat of a problem, since both offenses were atrocious bordering on nauseous last season. For Nebraska, just a few more points could be the difference between 9-3 and winning the Big 12 championship, especially if they beat Texas at home on October 16 and start rolling. For North Carolina, the task is more difficult. The defense will have to win at least two out of three in a murderous stretch at Miami, at Florida State and hosting Virginia Tech. I think they are capable, but I slightly favor Nebraska to have the special season.
The Spinal Tap Slot: Any number of teams could go to eleven, but I give the nod to Oregon Without Jeremiah Masoli. Chip Kelly knows what he is doing and will get much better line play this year than last. He has a great tailback and will get at least competent QB play. They could win the Pac Ten, but I think USC is being written off too quickly.
The rest of the second ten finds plenty of squads who could easily trade places with the ten teams above. Outside of Florida/Alabama/Ohio State/Texas, talent in college football is relatively well dispersed. The SEC has the most overall. If Mark Richt coached LSU, then I would put the Tigers at #8, instead of the Bulldogs. Arkansas is explosive (and better on D than you think) and could possibly upset Alabama in late September. Auburn exceeded expectations last year and should be better this time around; I have already mentioned South Carolina. And you seriously don’t want to play Mississippi with Jeremiah Masoli running some bizarre Houston Nutt concoction you have no film on, nor do you want to play Dan Mullen’s Mississippi State. Tennessee, on the other hand, may completely implode.
Iowa is the fashionable Big Ten dark horse pick, but I don’t trust their re-built offensive line (although they will be very well-drilled by Kirk Ferentz) and I don’t trust Ricky Stanzi any farther than I can throw Seantrel Henderson. I like Wisconsin better, especially on offense with John Clay and the underrated Scott Tolzien. For that matter, it wouldn’t shock me if Penn State won the Big Ten, but that depends mightily on the talents of a new quarterback, Kevin Newsome, doing his best Daryll Clark. The Nitts play only four road games, but three of them are at Alabama, Ohio State and Iowa. Yikes.
I don’t buy for a second that Michigan will be greatly improved.
The Big 12 has three excellent teams…and nine other teams play in the Big 12. Texas Tech won’t slip much under Tommy Tuberville and one would expect the defense to be better. Texas A&M will score lots of points with a skill position line-up equal or better than Texas and Oklahoma. Then, unfortunately, the defense will take the field. Is there a surprise team in the house? Missouri? (not a bad bet, really), Kansas State?, Baylor with a healthy Robert Griffin?
The ACC is far more interesting. Miami is borderline top ten. If we look up in October and the Hurricanes are 5-0, then they will be easily in the top five, having won at Ohio State, at Pittsburgh, at Clemson and at home versus FSU. The ‘Canes have the talent to do this, but do they have the depth? Will they get the breaks? They could go 2-3 and still be one of the best 20 teams in the country.
When Jimbo Fisher walks out on the practice field at Florida State, he is surrounded by (allegedly) great players who have chronically underachieved in the waning days of the House of Bowden. This is the anti-Virginia Tech, losers of 6,4,6,6 and 5 games over the last five seasons. The Seminoles should be ACC contenders, but it is, quite frankly, a crapshoot guessing if this is a 10-win, or a 7-win team.
Georgia Tech remains dangerous and Boston College will shockingly upset at least one team that goes to sleep on them. The best candidates are probably Virginia Tech or FSU.
But I don’t think BC will beat Notre Dame. I don’t think many teams will, actually. I am just afraid to write that in large type. The Irish should have won ten games last year; they might this year with better coaching, which they will get.
Pittsburgh is the class of the Big East, unless West Virginia is. This is the battle of the pocket rocket tailbacks: Pitt’s Dion Lewis and WVU’s Noel Devine. It will be quite a show most Saturdays. Skip Holtz takes over a pretty decent roster at South Florida.
The Mountain West, fighting the Big East for style points, should have one top 25 team in addition to TCU: Utah. Brigham Young is probably top 40 and could be even better depending on a talented, but completely unproven, freshman QB.
The other non-BCS team to keep an eye on is Houston.
Finally, out west, almost anyone could win the Pac Ten. USC and Oregon Without Jeremiah Masoli are the most talented teams, but Arizona could give them both fits. Stanford is not an easy out, either. The Cardinal quarterback, Andrew Luck is the most NFL-ready passer in the game. Oregon State is my pre-season most underrated pick, followed likely by UCLA, which needs one more recruiting class to cause the conference some real problems. Finally, there’s the most intriguing team in the entire country: Washington. I’ve never been more interested in the fortunes of a returning 5-7 squad than I am about the Jake Locker-led, Steve Sarkisian-coached Huskies. Their variance between spectacular and disastrous is huge—play-by-play, forget game-by-game. That’s why we watch.
The best player you have never heard of is Michigan State’s linebacker Greg Jones. He, of course, has no shot at the Heisman. That award will go instead to LaMichael James of Oregon, who will rush for 2000 yards and beat out Boise State’s Kellen Clemens Moore and Ohio State’s Terrelle Pryor in the most bizarre Heisman race ever as accusations fly that the Nike corporation has unduly influenced the voters.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I still haven’t figured out why people think Nebraska will lose less than 3 games. Last season, they were an offensive abortion with Ndamukong Suh. This year, they are an offensive abortion without Ndamukong Suh. I couldn’t honestly rank Nebraska in the Top 10 without ranking Tech in the Top 5, and I don’t believe that’s accurate either. The Huskers are a fringe top 20-25 team at best with a soft schedule that avoids OU and Tech. That might get them in the Top 15 with only 2 losses.
by dedfischer on Aug 17, 2010 6:57 AM CDT reply actions
ded… i think the reasoning for Nebraska is their offense can’t help but get better. Even minor improvement will make major strides. I’m with you, however. Not only do they lose Suh, they lose 5 of their top 7 tacklers. Ouch. The other reason for the optimism is ‘recency bias’ Their last game they killed Arizona and ALMOST beat Texas. That’s all anyone remembers… how quickly they forget the abortion of a game versus Iowa State.
by Orangechipper on Aug 17, 2010 7:53 AM CDT reply actions
Texas is over-rated as it faces too many grudge games this year to win them all with an inexperienced QB. Likely losses are UNL, TT, OU and a$m. The D just cannot be expected to carry us thru all 4 of those hate matches.
by Whistling on Aug 17, 2010 8:25 AM CDT reply actions
OU, aggy and TT are grudge matches every year. Please, name the last time we lost to ALL 3 in one year. Crazy prediction.
by Orangechipper on Aug 17, 2010 8:31 AM CDT reply actions
Whistling, you’re not fooling anybody. I’m guessing you’re an Ag, as I don’t see any other reason to include a home game against the Ags with the other three you note.
by TaylorTRoom on Aug 17, 2010 8:36 AM CDT reply actions
Texas doesn’t face any more “revenge” grudge matches than Bama, Florida or any other top 5 2009 team — and each of these has their own warts or rebuidling projects.
by Mocking Bird on Aug 17, 2010 8:42 AM CDT reply actions
My Maroon Koolaid has our defense playing significantly better this year under DeRuyter. Going off practice reports is always dangerous but they doing much better relative to the offense compared to previous years if that is any measure of success. Then again, our offense might suck this year you never know. To me on offense it will come down to our freshman O-line guys and that could be scary (even though they are talented). On defense, Safety and ILB are where we need guys to step up.
by Kilgore Trout on Aug 17, 2010 8:44 AM CDT reply actions
Good to have you back, jones.
Now let’s get football season started.
by jc25 on Aug 17, 2010 8:53 AM CDT reply actions
Trout, I expect the Ags to be improved. I just don’t expect Johnson to repeat his career performance at DKR. One of the toughest things for a college QB to do is play well at a top 10 ranked opponent’s stadium.
A big mistake fans make in forecasting is basing their predictions off merely one game. Dismissing NU because of the ISU loss, or pumping TAMU due to the near UT upset is as wrong as dismissing TT due to the TAMU loss or pumping KSU due to the TAMU defeat.
by TaylorTRoom on Aug 17, 2010 9:08 AM CDT reply actions
There is a serious dropoff in speed for the Huskers from Phillip Dillard to Will Compton. It should also be noted that more than half of Crick’s stats that are referenced were racked up against Baylor. I just don’t see Nebraska’s defense being able to carry them like they did last year, which brings us to their biggest issue. No one beat out Zac Lee. Mizzou and Washington/Gabbert are the class of the North, if there is any.
With the lack of OTs in the conference to match the edge talent on defense, QB and OL play will make the difference this year in the South. I see Baylor and OSU being down on defense. UT should field an elite unit. OU will be good as always, but Stoops/Venables’ 4-3 has lost its luster to a degree and I read somewhere that he’s caving with a Buck LB. Tech and A&M should both be improved on that side of the ball. Most likely from already respectable to arguably good for Tech. A&M should go from Von Miller & 10 cold bodies to respectable. Lucas Patterson, Garrick Williams and Trent Hunter are solid. That might be all the Aggies need with Johnson & Co. on the other side. UT will take the crown with consistency and talent. 2nd place will go to the best road team between OU, A&M and Tech.
by dedfischer on Aug 17, 2010 9:19 AM CDT reply actions
Been to Williams-Brice – great time & it is as bizarre as you imagine. Very much like a Texas high school stadium that has been expanded, then expanded again a few more times. When all 80K get to crowing, it really feels like the stadium is shaking….in an unsafe way.
As for the fans, their support is impressive. They do have a queer sense of entitlement though. Walking around on a Fall Saturday left me with the impression that USC (as they like to call it) had won 4 of the last 6 SEC championships. Entitlement abounds, which is the norm in any SEC town, but as you point out, the ’cocks have no reason for it.
by Matt Cotcher on Aug 17, 2010 9:26 AM CDT reply actions
Great stuff, especially the part about the South Carolina fans.
One question, shouldn’t “le Affaire d’ Bush” be “l’affaire de Bush”?
by Kafka on Aug 17, 2010 9:28 AM CDT reply actions
Probably, but I don’t speak French.
I would respond to many of the other points raised, but I do not have to. My friend and associate TaylorTRoom has written most of what I would have written (and done it more intelligibly—this guys is good!).
I will note, on Nebraska and others, that one of the dangers of a top ten is that once you get past the obvious, no one really thinks ANY TEAM deserves to be in the top ten. Folks hate on Virginia Tech or the TCU/Boise monster or Iowa or Oregon Without Jeremiah Masoli…
We all have our warts.
I like Nebraska’s defense partially because of how well they execute with above average talent (and a couple of excellent players). I like North Carolina’s defense because eight or nine of their starters may play in the NFL. Will either team score enough points to be the difference between 8-9 wins or 11-12? Beats the hell out of me. But I am certainly going to watch.
Matt: Thanks for the comments. I can’t wait to see game day at Williams-Brice. Not this year, though—my annual men’s football trip is going to Tuscaloosa for Penn State-Alabama.
by jonestopten on Aug 17, 2010 10:03 AM CDT reply actions
TTR – I personally am not dismissing NU, but my lack of confidence in them is based on more than just 1 game. Besides the terrible ISU game, they were also crushed at home by TTech. They only averaged 25 ppg, and that average includes 49, 38, and 55 point wins over FAU, Ark St, and LaLa. In their 5 straight wins from BU to CU, NU scored less points against those teams than they averaged giving up.
I think they will be a good team, but I think they will have 3-4 losses and don’t belong in the top 10
by UT_06 on Aug 17, 2010 10:21 AM CDT reply actions
How much of Nebraska’s offensive woes were really do to injuries in the last third of the regular season (and Big 12 champ game). Keep hearing this as a reason the offense should be better this year.
Also – question for the Aggies – Is OL Scales really moving to DT? I know the L. Patterson move in 2008 was a decent success, but the move rarely ever works in that direction.
by Horncasting on Aug 17, 2010 10:41 AM CDT reply actions
No it’s l’affaire d’Bush, the rule of D’Brickashaw Ferguson trumps normal french elision practice here.
by Fray Marcos on Aug 17, 2010 10:56 AM CDT reply actions
From wikipedia:
“Ferguson is named after Father Ralph de Bricassart, a fictional character in the 1977 novel (and on the 1983 television mini-series) The Thorn Birds, played by Richard Chamberlain”.
Awesome on a couple of levels. Sounds like D’Brickashaw’s mom might have seen the TV series but never read the original novel. In any event, D’Brickashaw is a great name.
by Kafka on Aug 17, 2010 11:38 AM CDT reply actions
We are 2-2 with aggy over the past 4 years. One of those losses might have been in Austin, but I try to blank out such dreadful memories.
by Whistling on Aug 17, 2010 12:21 PM CDT reply actions
“A&M should go from Von Miller & 10 cold bodies to respectable. Lucas Patterson, Garrick Williams and Trent Hunter are solid. That might be all the Aggies need with Johnson & Co. on the other side.” – Ded
-—————————
Not a bad analysis, Ded . . . .except for your take on the aggies. They do have some great skill talent. But they’re starting two or three frosh on the OL. I don’t care how good the skill guys are, Johnson is going to get killed – a bunch – this year. He may not even make it to the end of the season.
And – - – -in spite of the unbridled preseason optimism that grips most programs/fans this time of year, their defense goes from Von Miller and 10 cold bodies to Von Miller and 7 or 8 cold bodies – with a few lukewarm in the mix.
I’ll be anxious to see Tech this year. I think your pirates might surprise some folks – just hopefully not Texas. Tommy T is a quality coach.
by Cimarrones on Aug 17, 2010 12:25 PM CDT reply actions
Oh yeah . . . great read as usual, Adam. Notre Dame will be intriguing to watch this season.
And, I think USC’s slide begins pretty hard this season. That’s my only bone with your top ten.
by Cimarrones on Aug 17, 2010 12:30 PM CDT reply actions
Whistling, can you think of any reasons why 2010 is different from 2006?
by TaylorTRoom on Aug 17, 2010 12:55 PM CDT reply actions
Such as:
Muschamp upgrade over Chizik
Sherman downgrade from Fran
by TaylorTRoom on Aug 17, 2010 12:57 PM CDT reply actions
Yes, Cimarrones, but the Horns and maybe OU are the only teams on their schedule with the personnel to make them pay for it. I won’t be convinced we’ll be a sack machine until I see some games played. They can most likely scheme around Beal and Aldon Smith. OU draws Tech in Norman, so I suspect we’ll be battling the Aggies for 3rd.
by dedfischer on Aug 17, 2010 1:01 PM CDT reply actions
Ded – Nebraska isn’t going to roll over just because they’re playing the aggies @ Kyle. in fact, the “great” ag fans are rarely filling up that venue these days. So, that’s probably another loss for them.
Arkansas should be even better this year on defense, especially on the Dline. And they smoked the aggies last year 47-19 with a pretty mediocre Pig team.
Tech has a much better in-conference schedule. So, I think you’re safe @ third or better. The ags will be battling it out with Baylor and (maybe) OSU for the bottom spot once again.
by Cimarrones on Aug 17, 2010 1:48 PM CDT reply actions
Jones Top Ten – Based on your summation here – “We all have our warts.” – would you agree with others who say this is a down year for college football? Is there really no single strong contender? Is it parity? Is it lack of talent? Is it too many teams rebuilding?
I personally prefer having all these questions about all these teams. Makes for a fun and unpredictable year, and reminds me of (I think it was) 2007.
by TXinDC on Aug 17, 2010 2:15 PM CDT reply actions
TTR – I don’t necessarily believe Jerrod will have a repeat performance – my assessment is that he will perform at a higher level throughout the season than last year. He had great games and some really bad ones last year. I realize we have to true freshman OT’s but the schedule lets them break in over the 1st 3 games. Matthews isn’t a starter yet, but give him a couple of weaks and he’ll probably be starting at RT.
On defense, we are thin at Safety and inside backers – but overall talent level is significantly improved. The scheme will be much less predictable as last year everyone knew when we were blitzing and where we were coming from. Arkansas will be better but so will we. At home I think we have a much better chance to handle NU than OU just because NU’s offense is 1 dimensional.
As far as Tech is concerned, better defense but more predictable offense and I’m not sure what that is going to get them. The OL has lost enough weight to make 2 whole other people it seems, but can they run block and pass protect? I see them coming back a bit until they get the recruits Tubbs wants for his system.
As for Texas, I only see them losing their tough games if they give up a lot of turn overs or have special teams lapses. Their defense will keep them in most games. If they can’t run, however, that will put a lot of pressure on Gilbert and we’ll have to see how he responds.
by Kilgore Trout on Aug 17, 2010 2:43 PM CDT reply actions
Norman, OK – – >
Population – - 100% Douchebags
…….Sal-Louuuuuuu!
by Lulu on Aug 17, 2010 2:45 PM CDT reply actions
I don’t know guys, I think Whistling might be a fan of another school. I’m very skilled in art of picking out trolls, and y’all are going to think I’m crazy, but there’s a chance that he may not actually be a Texas fan. Just food for thought.
by nordberg on Aug 17, 2010 3:21 PM CDT reply actions
“– would you agree with others who say this is a down year for college football? Is there really no single strong contender? Is it parity? Is it lack of talent? Is it too many teams rebuilding?”
TXinDC - Actually, I think most years are like this. The Super Team Battle Royale between Texas and USC in 2005 really isn’t the norm. I don’t think it is a down year at all, but I do think the game lacks returning star power (Mark Ingram doesn’t exactly capture the public’s imagination-some folks think he is the second-best tailback on his team).
Quick: Who is the most charismatic player in college football?
Jake Locker? (plays for a .500 team)
Terrelle Pryor? (poster child for potential)
A.J. Green (wait, he’s a wide receiver, right?)
The 85 scholarship limit has brought some parity, but I think what has brought more is that there are a lot more good football players to be had. Teenagers are a hell of a lot more sophisticated about their athletic pursuits. That means upstarts are more common and if the big programs do a poor job of evaluating and coaching, they fall on hard times. Think FSU likes having three more Division I teams in its back yard?
Mostly, I think the audience knows far more about college football than we ever have before. More things to dissect, more information to parse, more forums (like this one) for criticism—intelligent or otherwise = “nobody is any damn good anymore.”
My thoughts. Anyone elses?
by jonestopten on Aug 17, 2010 3:38 PM CDT reply actions
Always a fun read.
Your Georgia fixation is odd. Are you operating on the broken watch eventually being right theory? Isn’t this the third year in a row you’ve had them pegged for big things?
by Scipio Tex on Aug 17, 2010 4:22 PM CDT reply actions
Yep. Of course everyone had them pegged for big things in 2008, so that hardly counts.
There are only so many times you can throw that many good football players out on the field and not win ten or eleven games. Unless Mark Richt has forgotten how to coach, which is possible, I guess. If he has, then Auburn (of all teams) will pass him by. Wither LSU? That’s the question of the SEC season.
If I am wrong, I promise I will never put them in a pre-season top ten again.
Unless, of course, Will Muschamp is their head coach…
by jonestopten on Aug 17, 2010 5:26 PM CDT reply actions
Jerrod Johnson is excellent but UT, OU, NU, and maybe even a Tubbs coached Tech are going to abuse the aggie OL (and Jerrod, too). Sherman is a smart O coach so it will be interesting to see how he schemes to deal with this problem.
Tubbs is smart to get his OL (relatively) lean, it should really help on pass blocking and screen/downfield blocking. Nearly everybody plays at least one game where their OL gets whipped. When that happens (for UT that might happen vs OU and NU), the short passing game and screens plays become much more important in the O because those plays don’t require that the OL beat the opposition DL. It will be interesting to see how well Tech runs screen plays now that Leach is gone.
by Kafka on Aug 17, 2010 11:00 PM CDT reply actions
We are all hoping that Mark Richt does well. If Mark gets canned before Muschamp succeeds Mack, that might be a job that Muschamp could not turn down.
by Kafka on Aug 17, 2010 11:10 PM CDT reply actions
TTR,
A much better aggy O.
An improved aggy D.
A very suspect LH O with a very raw QB.
No LH DTs or TEs.
And MB has always had a hard time firing up our team for the gomers.
But thanks for conceding the other losses I predicted.
by Whistling on Aug 18, 2010 5:39 AM CDT reply actions
Two or three freshmen on the aggie offensive line equates to a better O? ROTFLMAO !
That’s a good one. And there’s no evidence out there that the aggie defense will be better, either. Every HS coach I’ve spoken with who has seen practices up there this spring and summer has said that they suck even worse than last year. 62 points @ K State is going to need a lot of “improvement”.
Get back with us after Arkansas whips your ags, Whistling. Assuming you all don’t already have two losses by then. But – - – - look at the bright side: At least there’s no Arkansas State on the schedule. Y’all did almost beat them @ home.
This is going to be fun to watch. I appreciate the little joy you brought to my morning coffee.
by Cimarrones on Aug 18, 2010 7:36 AM CDT reply actions
Texas has four threatening games- UCLA (because they have talent and are unfamiliar), @TT, OU, and @NU. However many losses Texas has at that point will be the number of losses we finish the regular season with. Undefeated and we are in great shape. One loss, and we are doing well. Two or more losses will be disappointing.
It’s tempting to say that Jerrod Johnson does well at home and poorly on the road, but that’s not quite true (see his performance at TT). What is true is that he plays great when his running game is rolling. Sherman gets in a playcalling groove, and Johnson isn’t asked toassume the full offensive responsibility. When the running game struggles, and he is asked to win the game with his passing, he struggles.
by TaylorTRoom on Aug 18, 2010 8:16 AM CDT reply actions
I am noobie in blogging and have just built my own blog and right now I ‘m doing my best to learn as much as I can about this kind of thing. I really like your blog layout, may I know what template is this? Is it custom design or is it paid one? But I can’t afford to buy paid design nor have the ability to custmozied design myself. I’m sorry for this newbie question, thanks.
by Randall Patton on May 9, 2011 10:03 PM CDT reply actions

by 























