BlogPoll - #1 - 2010
Barking Carnival Ballot - Week 1
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio St. Buckeyes | -- |
| 2 | Florida Gators | -- |
| 3 | TCU Horned Frogs | -- |
| 4 | Alabama Crimson Tide | -- |
| 5 | Texas Longhorns | -- |
| 6 | Oklahoma Sooners | -- |
| 7 | Iowa Hawkeyes | -- |
| 8 | Boise St. Broncos | -- |
| 9 | North Carolina Tar Heels | -- |
| 10 | Arkansas Razorbacks | -- |
| 11 | Nebraska Cornhuskers | -- |
| 12 | Wisconsin Badgers | -- |
| 13 | Miami Hurricanes | -- |
| 14 | USC Trojans | -- |
| 15 | Georgia Bulldogs | -- |
| 16 | Oregon Ducks | -- |
| 17 | Pittsburgh Panthers | -- |
| 18 | Virginia Tech Hokies | -- |
| 19 | Auburn Tigers | -- |
| 20 | Penn St. Nittany Lions | -- |
| 21 | Missouri Tigers | -- |
| 22 | West Virginia Mountaineers | -- |
| 23 | LSU Tigers | -- |
| 24 | South Carolina Gamecocks | -- |
| 25 | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | -- |
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings "
This is a ranking poll. Not a power poll.
It’s generally not a good sign when you find yourself chuckling at your own selections before you’ve left the Top 10, but the beauty of all preseason polls is their utter wrongness. I take solace in the fact that your contribution would likely be as bad as mine.
I have zero idea who will the MNC. Ohio State has the most straightforward road to the title game and a rejuvenated Big 10 may even allow them to reach that game with one loss. The Buckeyes have a three game schedule: Miami in the Shoe, @ Iowa, @ Wisconsin. I’m also assuming that Tressel will stop squatting to pee when it comes to unleashing Pryor in big games, if the Rose Bowl against Oregon was any indication. That’s a dicey assumption, admittedly.
The notion that the defending national champion should be the default #1 in the preseason poll is as idiotic as it is pervasive. I don’t trust Saban teams with new secondaries and the Tide offense is limited. I admire their big body New England Patriot-style 3-4 philosophy and the contrarian smash mouth attitude on offense is a good way to secure wins in the Age of the Spread, but they will have an experience gap in running the schemes Saban wants. Arkansas slices up that young secondary in Fayettenam.
The Pac 10 has seven teams ranging from mediocre to pretty good. That should keep all of them out of the Top 10. Those discounting USC because of probation are forgetting that probation teams are generally quite good in their first year before depth problems set in down the road. Guess what? Teams that cheat have a lot of talent. See Bowden’s undefeated Auburn team. See Slocum’s undefeated A&M team. Lane Kiffin is the slimy X Factor and that’s why they’re out of my Top 10, despite an extraordinarily favorable home schedule.
The SEC is the best league in college football, with seven good to very good football teams. So I ranked them all. That would require things to fall just right, but luck and ESPN lapdoggery to all things poorly educated and humid guarantees the success of this outlandish prediction.
Why Are They Here? And What Are They Doing Ranked There?
Missouri returns 16 starters, a talented QB, an experienced OL, and they play in the Big 12 North. They have four seniors in the secondary, a pass rushing impact player at DE, and even a modest improvement over their weak 2009 defense will guarantee them 9 wins. Of course, this is the team that lost to Baylor last year.
The hardest thing to do in football is to look at a team with new eyes after a seemingly endless pattern of disappointment. Meet Notre Dame. I’m a Brian Kelly believer. The defense will be improved, special teams will no longer be a disgrace as they were under Weis, and they have major weapons at TE and WR.
South Carolina seemingly returns everyone, they have an elite secondary, and though Stephen Garcia is yet another punk-ass SEC QB (Masoli, Garcia, Cameron Newton form a troika of misdemeanors, felonies, and general assholishness unseen since the Oklahoma Sooner two deep circa 1988) I think we’ll finally see a year where Ball Coach doesn’t mail it in from the golf course. 9-4, OMG! Parades in the Palmetto State! Then it’s back to 7-6 again, Gamecocks.
Black Santa Blake has made sure that North Carolina is loaded on defense and it’s not unreasonable to believe that an offense returning 10 starters can manage more than 23.8 ppg as they did last year. The Heels demonstrated an embarrassing ability to lose to inferior talent in 2009, but they’re a Top 10 team if they’ll play up their potential and spend less time preening for the NFL Draft. Four senior studs in the secondary and 4/5 returning on the OL spells 10 wins.
Who Don’t I Trust?
Nebraska has the right feel for a dark horse MNC contender - a palpable feeling of resurgence, a good defense, an easy schedule, a momentum-building bowl pounding of a hapless opponent - but something is missing. A quarterback. It’s difficult to handicap just how much of Zach Lee’s ineptitude was attributable to nagging injuries or his own intrinsic suckitude. And how to factor the loss of Suh? A crash and burn would be most pleasing, but I still see a good year.
North Carolina has the stink of scandal and underachievement and DT Marvin Austin is the poster boy for both. Losing to NC State and Virginia last year with their loaded roster is a gross offense to the notion of human potential. UNC has the talent, but character and coaching are in question.
Where Is?
Florida State is not ranked because Florida State is a dumb football team. I need to see them not be dumb in order to rank their Top 15 talent in my Top 25. Jimbo Fisher and an end to Bowden’s calcified nepotistic ways should help, but it may take a year to get there.
Georgia Tech won 11 last year and returns 14 starters, but a raw OL and an early NFL entry from deep threat Demaryius Thomas, signals decline.
Top 25 dark horses Texas Tech and Texas A&M fall victim to a Big 12 South with two established lead dogs, their own head up match-up, and an upset foisted by Baylor on one of them. RGIII will not be denied 6-6 and a spot in the Tampax Comfort Fit Bowl in Piscataway, New Jersey.
Washington is a popular dark horse choice for the Top 25, but has a terribly unfavorable schedule and many of the arguments that favor their advancement could also be said of Stanford, Oregon State, Arizona, UCLA, and Cal. Isn’t it more likely that they all trade round robin losses and create a bunch of respectable teams ranked between 26-40? Is Washington just a more telegenic Texas A&M?
Your thoughts? Care to make me defend any of my dubious prognostications?
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Looking at last year’s adjusted stats drives home what an explosive offense the Pigs had last year. They’re a solid darkhorse pick.
by Huckleberry on Aug 20, 2010 11:03 PM CDT reply actions
What is this? Where’s Northwestern?
Kidding aside, you’ve got all the players listed. In looking at many a draft blog poll the last several days, the divergence is amazing. What does that mean? Looks like a “Jimmy the Greek” kinda year. You know, intangibles. Like key injuries and depth, kicking game, unique under-the-radar athletes, etc. There has already been some injury attrition on the two big teams on our schedule. Don’t see a lot of talk about those types of things and their potential impact on rankings.
You are one of few giving Auburn and South Carolina some juice. I’m high on both as dark-horse contenders.
Not sure about Miami in top 15 though. Harris just seems prone to making too many mistakes.
Too many are discounting the Pac-10. I think at least 2 teams finish in the AP top 8.
CFB would be better off if Notre Dame were in the conversation. Sadly they currently don’t belong.
by TXStampede on Aug 20, 2010 11:21 PM CDT reply actions
Scipio:
I don’t trust Iowa for the same reason that you don’t trust Nebraska.
Iowa started out 9-0 last year but it was fool’s gold. They should have lost to Northern Iowa and struggled against Arkansas State. Their QB Ricky Stanzi made some spectacular 4th quarter plays — after stinking up the field to put Iowa in a hole. His TD/Int ratio was 17/15.
I’m headed out to Vegas tomorrow and the Hawkeyes are gonna be a team circled on my under card.
by srr50 on Aug 20, 2010 11:48 PM CDT reply actions
My new aggie coworker is going to question your judgement on his beloved old army. (especially after I irreversibly rig this site as his home page).
After all, as he told me with all seriousness today, they return more starters on defense than we do and therefore will have better defense than us.
by bob on Aug 21, 2010 12:05 AM CDT reply actions
Huck, why do you think they are a solid dark horse? They had an explosive offense last year, and the only reason they were a respectable 8-5 instead of 7-6 is because ECU wasn’t allowed to pull any one of the dozens of 5’7" white middle class soccer players out of the stands to make a field goal. Besides that terrible game, what I remember about the Hogs was that they didn’t seem to do much against Ds with a pulse like Florida, Ole Miss, and Bama (A&M, 2 WAC schools, and some d2 scrub don’t count). Do your adjusted stats show that their offense was actually good adjusted for the level of D they were playing? The memory can be a bit selective about things like this after a year, so I’d believe you if you said yes. I just have those 4 games stuck in my head.
Is it because you are expecting a big step forward in their defense? I haven’t paid too much attention to them. Do they actually have talent on D, and they are just waiting for it to mature a little?
by UT_06 on Aug 21, 2010 12:10 AM CDT reply actions
A quick look at Arkansas’ Division 1 opponents (not counting Missouri St) shows:
5 losses to teams that averaged 10.6-2.8 w-l. So they lost to average (1 8 and 2 9 win teams) and very good/great teams (13-1 UF and 14-0 Bama). Fair enough. Can’t read too much out of that either way.
7 wins to teams that averaged 6.3-6.6. They didn’t beat anyone with 10 wins. If you throw out 0-12 E Mich their opponents were still roughly 7-5.
So they had an average record by beating a bunch of average teams. A good team that could beat anyone on a given day yes (could also lose to anyone), but i’m not big on the dark horse nominations or the top 10 rankings. Maybe I’m missing something.
by UT_06 on Aug 21, 2010 12:38 AM CDT reply actions
Top to bottom, I like the poll quite alot; however, I would venture to say that Florida is about 2-4 spots too high. I would have them at 6 and move everyone else up.
by Kasey on Aug 21, 2010 12:40 AM CDT reply actions
Three comments:
1) I am very drunk and thusly did not read very carefully.
2) FSU seems like they have the players to be good. It will be very interesting to see what the new coaching does.
3) Texas Tech scares me.
by misterloki on Aug 21, 2010 1:05 AM CDT reply actions
“RGIII will not be denied 6-6 and a spot in the Tampax Comfort Fit Bowl in Piscataway, New Jersey.”
still. laughing.
by scagnetti on Aug 21, 2010 5:14 AM CDT reply actions
Yeah, that was funny, but would have been funnier if the location of that bowl was Cheney, Washington.
And, really, if Baylor is 6-6 you know they’ll be slotter higher than a 9-3 Mizzou. Damn Big 12….
by Phenomenal Smith on Aug 21, 2010 11:46 AM CDT reply actions
1. I expect Lane Kiffin to continue Pete Carroll’s trend of having USC play their best in their most important games and then lose at least one WTF game.
2. Your point on the Big 12 South is very close to what I’m thinking. Texas vs OU, TxTech vs A&M, BU vs OkStU…..those 3 games could mirror how the division finishes.
3. With much trepidation, I am more optimistic than you about the Hokies. So long as they beat Boise State, I really am indifferent about the rest of their season. If Tyrod Taylor can improve a little more, him plus their running game (and a solid D and ST) should be enough to win the ACC.
by Matt Cotcher on Aug 21, 2010 11:55 AM CDT reply actions
TCU over Texas? That has to be your attempt to get lots of web hits. “Dude, even the TEXAS website has my TCU over Texas.”
by Orangechipper on Aug 22, 2010 2:43 PM CDT reply actions
Capt Obvious/Orangechipper -
Read the first line of my post:
“This is a ranking poll. Not a power poll.”
When BYU was ranked #1 and won the MNC back in the mid 80s, they couldn’t have beaten half of the Top 20.
I went through and tried to predict likely season outcomes and anticipate AP jackassery. This is not a betting crib sheet.
by Scipio Tex on Aug 22, 2010 3:15 PM CDT reply actions
I guess I failed to realize what a ranking poll is, then. My bad. I think of a power poll as a poll where a 3 loss LSU could still be ahead of a 1 loss Boise. (for example) A ranking poll would have Boise ahead of that LSU because of record. Given that EVERYONE is undefeated right now, i just didn’t think you were predicting everything based on final record.
You must think REALLY highly of Miami, then. Given that they have to play @ #1 Ohio State, @ #17 Piit, @ Gtech, Home vs. #18 Vtech, #9 Ncarolina, and FSU.
That might be the toughest schedule in the NCAA on paper.
I’m in complete agreement with you concerning ‘Bama. THey’ll lose a minimum of 2 this year. Defense lost 13 multi-year contributors and 6 teams have that bye week advantage against them. I’d probably have Arkansas top 5 and bama around 10 if this were my poll. :)
I can’t argue with TCU going unbeaten. When SMU is likely your 2nd to 3rd toughest game… that says something.
by Orangechipper on Aug 22, 2010 4:22 PM CDT reply actions
Yep, you’ve got it now.
Miami has a brutal schedule and I do believe that voters will take that into account when they split those six games with a 3-3 record. If they go 5-1, they probably deserve a shot at the title game, assuming no other blemishes.
by Scipio Tex on Aug 22, 2010 4:28 PM CDT reply actions
I would love to see Les Miles try to handle Boise’s offense. He’d spend the whole week preparing for the trick plays they used against OU five years ago and get caught completely off guard by the fact that BSU is basically a downhill running/play action pass team. Then BSU would pull out some the the wacky new trick plays they came up with just to exploit Les and the Tigers defense would be in total disarray.
Basically what I’m saying here is Les Miles is an idiot.
by hodad on Aug 23, 2010 10:04 AM CDT reply actions
This is a real fantastic resource that you are providing and you give it away at no cost. I like to see sites that understand the significance of offering a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your article. Appreciate it!
by Northern Virginia Bathroom Remodelers on Nov 16, 2010 5:18 AM CST reply actions

by 























