Big 10 -- Ohio St. vs. Michigan Could Be Twice As Nice
The Big 10 announced its divisional spit this afternoon, and as expected, they put Michigan and Ohio State on opposite sides.
When Nebraska joins the league in 2011, the Big 10 + 2 will have a conference championship game, addressing the problem of having their champion finish their season in mid-November -- and then waiting for as long as six weeks before playing again.
One side will consist of Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue and Wisconsin while Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska and Northwestern will be in the other division. Each school will play the other five schools within its division and will also play three teams from the other division, including one cross-division matchup guaranteed on an annual basis. The first championship game will be played December 3, 2011, at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis.
By putting Michigan and Ohio State into different divisions their centerpiece rivalry might be showcased twice in a season.

The Michigan-Ohio State game will continue to close out the regular season - so the two might meet again in the conference championship game the next week.
Newcomber Nebraska will play Penn State every year. Other yearly cross-division contests will include Illinois-Northwestern, Wisconsin-Minnesota and Iowa-Purdue.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ha. I hated playing Nebraska twice. And I hated playing Colorado twice.
And I bet, whenever Michigan pulls their head out of their ass and they and Ohio State both have a lot riding on a game, they will hate playing each other again a week later.
by Sailor Ripley on Sep 1, 2010 7:55 PM CDT reply actions
Hmm…I like this. It just helps solidify the inevitable that Texas will be the winning-est college football team of all time soon enough.
by Kasey on Sep 1, 2010 8:04 PM CDT reply actions
Yeah…I can’t count the number of ways that this sucks.
Just imagine: We’ve just beaten the aggies on Thanksgiving to secure a 12-0 regular season and a spot in the CCG. Meanwhile, the aggies, having been placed in the other division, have already secured their spot in said CCG because they played in a weaker division.
A week later, we have to face them again as a final gauntlet before we can advance to the MNC game. WTF? Didn’t we just prove a few days earlier that we were the better team? Now we have to go out and do it again?
Yeah, sign me up for that. With leadership that idiotic, I’m glad we didn’t end up in the Big 10.
by adt2 on Sep 1, 2010 8:22 PM CDT reply actions
The more I think about this, the more I am sure one of these Big Ten guys losing to another will cost the Big Ten an MNC chance and watching Delaney and Tom Osborne should be good fun.
Meanwhile Stoops and Brown/Muschamp keep beating each other up and ending up with chances to go for the Gold.
Not rushing to get to ten years in the future but it will be interesting to look back then and see if the Big Ten has more dough but fewer trophies.
The Texas Ten Pack.
by Sailor Ripley on Sep 1, 2010 8:25 PM CDT reply actions
@Sailor Ripley -
Agreed….I think this ends up costing the Big 10 MNC appearances more often than it helps them garner one. It’ll be interesting to add up the pros and cons with the benefit of hindsight in about 10 years.
by Andrew Taylor on Sep 1, 2010 8:29 PM CDT reply actions
Didn’t a lot of Huskers moan that the SWC-Big 8 merger had wrecked their delicious rivalry with the land thieves? Didn’t they resent Texas for ‘causing’ that?
Because, you know, now they’re the home wreckers.
by Woody Bombay on Sep 1, 2010 8:57 PM CDT reply actions
To paraphrase the first episode of Treme:
Play for that money.
Play for that mother fucking money.
by bateshorn on Sep 1, 2010 9:08 PM CDT reply actions
Wisconsin really got screwed. Lost some natural rivals and even though they are more “west” they are put in the east division. Hell they border Michigan. (both are in other division.) They border Minnesota (in other division) They border Illinois. (Northwestern in other division)
Strange. They need two more eastern teams to have a more balanced geographical landscape. Its like they said competitive balance is first and screw the rest of the considerations.
by Orangechipper on Sep 1, 2010 9:39 PM CDT reply actions
I had more than a few cocktails in Treme a few weeks back.
by Sailor Ripley on Sep 1, 2010 9:46 PM CDT reply actions
Playing the same team two weeks in a row is idiotic.
by RomaVicta on Sep 1, 2010 11:46 PM CDT reply actions
i just heard theyll move up tOSU and UM to the first saturday on October…
whats that sound like?
by scagnetti on Sep 2, 2010 2:45 AM CDT reply actions
i just heard theyll move up tOSU and UM to the first saturday on October…
whats that sound like?
Nope — at least not for the near future. The game is scheduled for the last Saturday in November in 2011 and 2012.
by srr50 on Sep 2, 2010 8:26 AM CDT reply actions
This is so idiotic. If you want them to play every year for the last game of the season, put them in the same damn division. The only reason they’re putting them in opposite divisions is for the chance they could play in the Big 10 Championship Game against each other. But if they’re going to do that, they SHOULDN’T play the last game of the regular season against each other. For some reason, the Big 10 is actively TRYING to arrange this scenario. /facepalm
by czarcw on Sep 2, 2010 1:52 PM CDT reply actions
That was a dumb decision by Delaney. Neither tOSU or Michigan wants to move their game from the end of the season. By doing this they’ve essentially forced their hands to move it forward.
In the end Delaney’s quest for Notre Dame will ultimately screw that conference.
by maninblack on Sep 2, 2010 3:24 PM CDT reply actions
This sounds to me like posturing on the part of the Big Ten +1 + Cornholers . . . matching Nebraska and Penn State for a big TV guarantee, and putting Michigan and Ohio State on opposite sides of the ball could mean — as others have pointed out — meetings in back to back weeks. But on a competitive level, it figures to attract big TV bucks. Bet that changes after the next big TV deal is signed.
BTW: Nebraska losing Big 8 rival OU because Texas joined the league? Not hardly. It was because FOUR Texas teams joined, and it was geography that dictated Nebraska and OU be in different divisions. If they’d pushed for it, I think Texas would have been just fine with a cross-division rivalry for Nebraska-OU, an every-year meeting . . . as long as our cross-division rival was Kansas or Iowa State.
by edsp on Sep 2, 2010 5:04 PM CDT reply actions
steve-
just read a shift in everyone’s schedule after 2014, to possibly putting The Game in early October to more replicate a rematch/OU-UT polls potential scenario in lieu of a late season matchup, which very well might happen anyway
by scagnetti on Sep 3, 2010 2:57 AM CDT reply actions
I know this isn’t precisely on subject, but i have a web page using the same program as well and i get troubles with my comments displaying. is there a setting i am lacking? it’s attainable you may help me out? thanx.
by SENuke X on Feb 5, 2011 6:14 PM CST reply actions
Thanks for taking the time to debate this, I feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic. If attainable, as you achieve expertise, would you mind updating your weblog with additional info? This can be very helpful for me.
by Ruthie on May 29, 2011 12:34 AM CDT reply actions
Certifications possess over time become a minimum commonplace of entry to many roles in the info technology arena. The Cisco certifications especially receive develop into a normal meant for means and network directors; a CCNA (Cisco Licensed Network Affiliate) is a de facto requirement nowadays used for HR to even look at your resume, and even many jobs lower on the tech totem pole, like desktop assist analysts, are starting to see CCNAs as required or advisable on job postings.
by ccna practice exam answers on Sep 11, 2011 10:04 AM CDT reply actions

by 






















