Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Texas-Iowa State Post-Mortem: Defense

Disheartening to see the one unit of the team we've come to expect anything from under perform and not play to their standard. They didn't play with intensity throughout the game, didn't force turnovers, and caved late to allow a crucial 4th touchdown (though they held ISU to 26 total yards on their next four possessions).

Star-divide

Although statistically the defense wasn't that bad in aggregate (ISU had 68 plays for 335 yards, 4.9 yards per play - acceptable on its face), and the offense pulled their typical act with four turnovers and zero support for three quarters (including enabling two short field TDs of 40 and 37 yards, respectively), the Longhorn defense crumpled in the red zone like Michael Spinks against Tyson.

Iowa State was 4 of 5 in the red zone, all four scores touchdowns. That can't happen. And two of those 6s came on drives of 80 and 89 yards. We dominated them completely on 75% of their possessions and caved on the remainder. That's weird. And it suggests to me some issues between our ears and the cohesion of the team itself.

Our red zone generosity explains why Iowa State was able to create 28 points out of an output that typically would get an offense 17.

Consider this amazing statistic:

ISU had 16 possessions.

On the 4 drives they scored four touchdowns (37, 40, 80, 89) they ran 31 plays for 246 yards. 7.9 yards per play.

On the other 12 drives they ran 37 plays for 89 yards. 2.4 yards per play. Including 9 possessions that went 3 and out.

That's an incredible divergence in performance - not really how offense is typically distributed in a football game. Basically, when things were going well for us our defense completely dominated. When Iowa State made a big play to continue a drive or converted a couple of 3rd downs, we collapsed. Shades of OU and UCLA.

Iowa State schemed for our personnel very specifically and it showed on the field. Automatic runs when Kheeston wasn't in the game, recognizing Earnest as a starter and attacking him, and exploiting the safety position relentlessly (both in coverage individually and what our lack of ability at safety forces us to do in terms of scheme predictability for our corners/linebackers) were all part of Tom Herman's game plan and hats off to him for earning his paycheck.

DB

Some of the stuff Iowa State did formationally was very specifically targeted at Gideon and Scott and highlighted our inability to use Blake as anything but Deep Guy Who Must Be Shielded or Freelance Blitzer Who Doesn't Blitz Well. I'd bunch receivers on his side of the field every time to dictate coverage and run rub plays underneath or clear out our corners and then hit a RB or TE in the flat. Which ISU did. Gideon also had a toe dive whiff tackle after which he did not celebrate. Breaking down at the goal line twelve yards from a runner is also not desirable.

Christian Scott has poorer lateral movement than Gideon and though he will come up and hit you (8 tackles), he's a bad complement to Blake's skill set. Basically, we're starting two strong safeties, and one of them supports the run like a corner. Neither can man up and our coverage options are narrow. Earl Thomas covered up a lot of deficiencies.

Vaccaro played hard and better than his counterparts and the 3rd ISU TD was mostly on Scott, not him.

Curtis Brown and Aaron Williams played better games than I perceived watching it live. Williams was avoided completely and Brown was too except for the 40 yard Arnaud prayer where Curtis mysteriously lost the ball. Chykie was Chykie - allowing a red zone score on a nice play where ISU dialed in our coverage like they were in our headsets - but again, to place blame on the corners for ISU's key TD plays in the red zone forgives a total absence of safety play. We ask a lot of these guys.

LB

Earnest had his worst game as a Longhorn despite leading us in tackles. He was targeted in the running game and ISU made sure to keep our bigs covered, satisfied that they could still get a 4-5 yard run even if Earnest was unblocked. I guess Norton was too hurt to play, because this was a game where he could have really helped us out a lot.

The total absence of Jordan Hicks is inexplicable. Hurt? Being disciplined? Forgot the playbook?

Robinson had a nice interception, but was otherwise quiet for his standard of play.

DL

Kheeston Randall played fine, but this was his first game where I saw him content to be blocked on some occasions. Not blown off the ball, by any means, since I've yet to see that happen, but just content to lock up and watch. Kind of like how you'd expect a seasoned starter to play in a Wednesday live scrimmage. In fact, that description holds for a few of our starters on Saturday. I thought Okafor was OK despite giving up 60 pounds inside.

Sam Acho played well and Eddie Jones did too, but we got lost between choosing containment or mounting a pass rush. Pick one. Arnaud hurt us with his legs when we didn't honor pass rush lanes and when we took a chance with some free form rush, we didn't get it done enough by inflicting big negative plays. Both guys hustled and had some nice pursuit tackles.

Final Thoughts

What can I say? This defense is the team's only hope and if they don't play their absolute hardest, we will lose every game on our schedule, except perhaps Florida Whatever.

This is a joyless football team with very little motivation for the game and that has infected the defense too. As evidenced in the statistical drive breakdown above, they also have a bit of front runner in them. It's as if they've realized that if the offense and our staff are going to keep mailing it in, why bother?

I saw this same phenomenon play out back in 1991 when we paired a high quality defense with a spectacularly bad offense and eventually, the guys on the defense just started playing for each other - damn the losses, damn the offense, forget the scoreboard.

That team went 5-6, but the defense never really quit and they played to their standard finishing the year ranked as a Top 10 defense. They kept their own scoreboard tallied by bent face masks and broken quarterbacks. Maybe it's time some of those guys come and talk to this defense.

If the coaches and the offense won't make this a team, create your own. Play hard, set a unit standard, and have fun. We'll appreciate you, no matter the final record.

Comment 65 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was a freshman and got to see that 1991 defense in person. It was better than the current unit.

It was also involved in a home loss to Baylor (21-11 as I recall; it was 7-3 and on like two plays Baylor blew the game open). Ugh.

by spit and tears on Oct 25, 2010 5:33 AM CDT reply actions  

If the defense doesn’t play with fire against Baylor, then we’ll know that they’ve given up.
Muschamp must be having a hard time keeping them focused given the level of “don’t-give-a-shit” being displayed elsewhere on the team.

by LurkerintheDark on Oct 25, 2010 5:37 AM CDT reply actions  

I remember that 91 defense – much much better than their stats showed since our offense was so awful.

I also remember the “hold’em, horns, hold’em” chant when the offense took the field late during that Baylor game when the score was still close. The offense immediately turned the ball over.

Back to the post – I think you hit the nail on the head with the description of a joyless football team. Do these guys want to be out there?

by Fritz on Oct 25, 2010 6:27 AM CDT reply actions  

We saw the same game.

ISU hammered us up the middle with Kheeston getting no help, Acho and Norton sidelined and Earnest doing what you described, With our offense a no-show, ISU was able to get a lead and continue to pound the ball.

Agree completely on our limitations at safety. Missing Earl Thomas more than any loss besides McCoy and Shipley.

by hopefulhorn on Oct 25, 2010 6:43 AM CDT reply actions  

The offense has rubbed all the fuzz off the bunny.

by Sad Monkey on Oct 25, 2010 7:05 AM CDT reply actions  

The Gold Standard for a defense responding to a crappy offense-

http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.com/sports/m-footbl/archive/stats/83/ut-tcu.htm

At the half, TCU had less than 50 yards of offense, held the ball for 11 1/2 minutes out of 30, was 0 for 7 on 3rd downd, and led 14 – 3 (Pick 6 and fumble return for TD). The story is that Leiding slapped an offensive player on the head at halftime, telling him that the offense needed to get their $/!* together. In the 2nd half, the defense continued to stifle the Frog offense, and Texas eked out a win.

by TaylorTRoom on Oct 25, 2010 7:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Greg Davis would be the perfect offensive coordinator for Fred Akers

by utstudboy on Oct 25, 2010 7:26 AM CDT reply actions  

I thought of ‘91 too. ET has the same number of int’s for Seattle (4) as our entire secondary. Safe to say we miss him.

by Savage Henry on Oct 25, 2010 7:43 AM CDT reply actions  

I watched the pieces of the post game comments that they posted on Texas Sports. My observations were this:

Mack Brown appeared pissed, but not sure what he was pissed at.

Muschamp looked sick, like someone had killed his old dog.

Davis looked ready for a snack.

by jinx on Oct 25, 2010 7:44 AM CDT reply actions  

91 defense was amazing group that was totally wasted after the “shock the world” season. Very low time that was.

by Princeton Horn on Oct 25, 2010 8:06 AM CDT reply actions  

Muschamp will have them healthier and ready to play saturday but the offense is incapable of scoring 3 touchdowns in a game and usually give up turnovers that lead to two. Not sure mack would know what to do if he wanted to make changes. GD too. I agree the game has passed them by and with the talent available on offense i’m not sure there are any changes we can make.

at this point they need to play young guys but they won’t. this season will be a waste and we’ll have nothing to show fo it next year in terms of getting younger guys playing time.

we have a guy that averages 10 ypc and the coaches don’t know how to get him the ball. they’ve admitted this. that’s really all anyone needs to know about MB and GD.

by Savage Henry on Oct 25, 2010 8:14 AM CDT reply actions  

But… but…

The Statesman gave Earnest a “horns up” for leading the team in tackles.

Hard to get more insightful analysis than that.

by gazmorida on Oct 25, 2010 8:28 AM CDT reply actions  

“Iowa State schemed for our personnel very specifically and it showed on the field. Automatic runs when Kheeston wasn’t in the game”

What is this sorcery you speak of? I have it on good authority that it is hard enough to call plays that specifically scheme for you own personnel’s strength’s and weaknesses, but to scheme for the weaknesses of your opponent’s players? Guffaw.

by stuckinmn on Oct 25, 2010 8:40 AM CDT reply actions  

I noticed Keenan Robinson guessing badly several times, ending up getting pinched inside.

by Turn the page, Fred on Oct 25, 2010 8:41 AM CDT reply actions  

2010 Longhorn Football plays with the same joy as the 2009-2010 Longhorn Basketball team.

by Rex Chapman's Black Girlfriend on Oct 25, 2010 8:46 AM CDT reply actions  

I think we have a “shadow effect” going on. Statistically, this defense is one of the best in the nation.

  1. in Total Defense
  2. in yards per play allowed
  3. in scoring defense (would be better if not for offense/special team turnovers in our own red zone)

They’ve had lapses and issues, but those stats are very impressive when you consider the lack of DTs and how often the offense has spit the bit.

Now, I think the defense is experiencing a “shadow effect.” Many Longhorn fans see the spectacularly bad offense and are not capable of separating the two units. And conversely, the defense can’t muster the mental strength to step out of the shadow of the oblong simpleton that has trouble cobbling together long, time consuming drives (with TDs) to get the defense a chance to rest & discuss strategy. (I’d be curious to know our average drive length compared to years past)

Finally, the most telling stat is that UT is #2 in fewest yards per play allowed. Our opponents are not getting easy yards. What better barometer is there? Our defense can’t prevent our punt returner from fumbling on our own 5 yard line, or offense from turning the ball over in our red zone, but they have don’t a GREAT job of making the opponent earn every inch of turf.

I have little doubt that if UT had actually found a respectable running game during the spring and summer practices, this defense would be #1 in the nation, and we might be undefeated.

by Texoz on Oct 25, 2010 8:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Saw the exact same things. When Randall sat they ran it right at us. When Randall played they went after the Englishmen. Very nice game plan by ISU. Can’t remember when we actually picked at a defense’s weak point. We admittedly don’t even know who we have in the game at any given time so matchups are meaningless to our offense.

They attacked our light skinned duo of weakness about as well as a bunch of crappy players could. Matched their crap on ours and were able to make enough plays to win.

Muschamp is an idiot for not trying different personnel in the secondary and for not trying something different at MLB. There, I said it.

by Bartoncreek on Oct 25, 2010 8:51 AM CDT reply actions  

that should read, “but they have done a GREAT job of making the opponent earn every inch of turf.”

by Texoz on Oct 25, 2010 8:53 AM CDT reply actions  

There did seem to be a strange lack of accountability from Muschamp this week. If your D is laying down, why not give Jordan Hicks a chance? Adrian Phillips? Hell, maybe even try to plug Calvin Howell or pull the shirt from Bible just to add the second run-stuffer? It was pretty obvious that with the lead, ISU was content to hand the ball off to Robinson, and he was still getting 5+ yards a pop.

The Blake Gideon phenomenon is even starting to mystify me. Kenny Vaccaro looked like he had a decent game out there. You’re telling me this team wouldn’t be better with Vaccaro + one of Gideon or Scott?

The thought of this D next year is a little scary. We lose Acho, Eddie Jones, and Curtis. Some may call losing Chykie addition by subtraction, but AJ White and Byndom have gotten almost no run. Williams is almost definitely gone. Outside chance of losing Randall and Robinson. So we return E. Acho, yes. Gideon and Scott, ugh.

by jc25 on Oct 25, 2010 8:59 AM CDT reply actions  

those guys would be dumb to leave early. very good chance there will be no nfl played next year.

by Savage Henry on Oct 25, 2010 9:43 AM CDT reply actions  

I saw the 7-inch man tackle Kirkendoll.

by dedfischer on Oct 25, 2010 9:46 AM CDT reply actions  

I disagree with all of the excuse-making for Muschamp and his defense. “But Ransom, the offense is so bad that our defense gets its feelings hurt and gives up” Seriously? Then, what was the excuse against A$M last year when we had everything to play for? When Bama essentially ran at will with the NC on the line? On the opening drive of the second half against Ucla [an absolute horrible team]? On Saturday against a team that is not good enough to beat Lake Travis? I call BS.

What is emerging is that Will can scheme the hell out of a one-dimensional offense like Nebraska but if the offense has any ability at all to pass and run, he can and does get outcoached.

by ransomstoddard on Oct 25, 2010 9:46 AM CDT reply actions  

Muschamp is literally the very last thing we need to be worried about. We’ve got a defense with some personnel holes that’s ranked 6th in total defense. Find something else to bitch about ransom. I’m sure it won’t be hard.

by nordberg on Oct 25, 2010 9:51 AM CDT reply actions  

I’m struggling to understand why Muschamp is allowing players like Gideon to continue playing when there seem to be other, better options available (e.g. Vaccarro & Scott at safety).

Either he’s being forced to get certain players into the lineup (by decree from Mack), he’s hung up on the notion that “good practice always means good game play”, or maybe he’s got some deficiencies that the “cult of Will” can’t / won’t acknowlege. I have to admit that I’m puzzled by some of his schemes at times this year and I can’t explain what I’m seeing.

In any event, the spread of malaise from the offense to the defense is a big problem.

by Levander Williams on Oct 25, 2010 10:04 AM CDT reply actions  

I’m not convinced that Scott is all that better of an option.

by nordberg on Oct 25, 2010 10:07 AM CDT reply actions  

As the Nebraska game ended, one of the announcers said “Texas won’t lose another game this year.”

At the time, I thought he was absolutely right.

by parlin on Oct 25, 2010 10:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Agreed, nordberg. It’s hard to play great defense when you’re missing one DT, a LB or two and at least one safety. I will agree we should be letting some of the younger guys get experience, since this season is now officially in the toilet.

by Blueshorn on Oct 25, 2010 10:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Please go review your revisionist history. National Championship game 2nd half Bama drives:
1. 3 and out (5 yds)
2. 3 and out (-4 yds)
3. 3 and out (-1 yd)
4. 10 plays, 60 yds, missedd field goal
5. 5 plays, 28 yds, punt
6. 3 plays, 3 yds, TD
7. 3 plays, 27 yds, TD

Alabama had 263 total yards for the ENTIRE GAME. Defense was not the problem in that game. They are obviously not the same unit this year as last, but to say that they bear an equal amount of the blame as the offense this year is asinine.

by Ransom Stuttererererer on Oct 25, 2010 10:12 AM CDT reply actions  

This was a team loss. Allowing four touchdowns to ISU at home is unforgivable.

That said, Muschamp’s been dealt a pretty weak playing hand this season. He’s handcuffed by the dearth of players at tackle and safety.

In a way, I feel that we, the Texas fans, are the true victims of Andre Jones’ armed robbery.

by BrickHorn on Oct 25, 2010 10:12 AM CDT reply actions  

I have to see an explanation on what is going on with Hicks. I saw on BC that he had 11 tackles last week and I dont know if he even played this week.

Whats the story there?

I dont understand the amount of give up I am seeing on this defense and it is definitely there. Second half of the Bama game they fought like lions and kept us in it when any other team would have rolled over. Is it just as simple as DT depth?

by bullzak on Oct 25, 2010 10:20 AM CDT reply actions  

Is it just as simple as DT depth?

That certainly doesn’t help.

The loss of Earl Thomas’s epic ballhawkery has been huge, as well. After glancing at the game stats, I am convinced we lost this game almost entirely because of turnover margin. Texas out-gained Iowa State, but -3 in turnovers led to a 7-point loss.

If the offense eliminates a couple of those turnovers, or if the defense generates a couple, Texas wins this game 28-14.

by BrickHorn on Oct 25, 2010 10:27 AM CDT reply actions  

nordberg – I meant that Vaccarro & Scott are a better combination than Gideon & Scott. Vaccarro isn’t an ideal free safety, but he’s better than either of the other two. Scott has shortcomings, but he brings more intensity on run support than Gideon, which is why I think he’s an upgrade. I don’t see Gideon adding much value unless you can put him in deep Cover 1 and let him play center field (not much of an option these days).

For that matter, let’s see some of the younger guys at safety and see who can play.

by Levander Williams on Oct 25, 2010 10:27 AM CDT reply actions  

Bill Little:http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/102410aaa.html

Nuff said. Lol!

by Willow01 on Oct 25, 2010 10:36 AM CDT reply actions  

All BC Tailgates are on hold until further notice. We’re 0-2, featuring two of the worst home losses in the mack brown era. This is the only explanation.

by Vasherized on Oct 25, 2010 10:49 AM CDT reply actions  

re: Bill Little.

- "In the world of human behavior, Mack Brown has called it ‘responsibility without control.’ "

- “It doesn’t help much to remind yourself that this kind of thing is happening all over America. In fact, things are so topsy-turvy in college football this season that after Nebraska’s defeat of Oklahoma State and Missouri’s win over Oklahoma, the Longhorns – with two defeats – are still mathematically in the race for the Big 12 South Division title.”

- “What is important here, as the team and coaches try to figure out how to get there from here, is to appreciate the great run Texas has had.”

- “In the locker room following the game, Mack was as stern with the team as he was with the media. Now, he had said, is not the time for finger pointing. It’s a time for soul-searching.”

- “That is the supreme challenge for the coaches and the players, and that is the most frustrating part of being a coach, when what seem to be good parts are not working. You are looking for answers, but first you have to define the question.”

My God – these guys are priceless. Let me know when it’s over.

by Levander Williams on Oct 25, 2010 10:57 AM CDT reply actions  

Paging Fake Ken Tremendous

by stuckinmn on Oct 25, 2010 11:00 AM CDT reply actions  

“what seem to be good parts are not working. You are looking for answers, but first you have to define the question."

This is all I had to read from mr. little,what dribble. Someone said it best earlier, this staff along with deloss is “stale and old” and complacency will keep them from making any major changes for a couple of years. It’s exactly the same in the corporate world when good ol boys are running things, their buddies who aren’t performing somehow get shielded until the shit finally hits the fan and then someone wakes up.

by ballrific on Oct 25, 2010 11:12 AM CDT reply actions  

if we lose to ucla, isu and baylor at home shit has to change…but it won’t.

by Savage Henry on Oct 25, 2010 11:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Given that we’ve got some decent evidence that Vaccaro can cover competently (That TD against OU, he had great coverage, it was just a great throw) there is a pretty good chance you could slide him into the Free Safety spot. He was all over the underneath part of that double team on the 3rd TD.

Which is why he was pointing at Scott after the catch.

Scott’s a mess, but Scip is spot on: We are starting two strong safeties right now. Scott’s better in run support. Ergo, Gideon should sit.

by Bateshorn on Oct 25, 2010 11:30 AM CDT reply actions  

I just watched Mack’s Monday press conference. He said they showed the team pictures of Iowa State’s campus and their colors and mascots because they just don’t know who they are, being up north and all. That’s high-level preparation of a kind not every program provides.

by Blueshorn on Oct 25, 2010 11:31 AM CDT reply actions  

I was hoping your post-mortem would shed light on the mystery of why Hicks didn’t get any snaps. I smell “it’s only Iowa St. so let’s let the loyal senior start and play the whole game.”

by trkhorn on Oct 25, 2010 11:32 AM CDT reply actions  

“What is emerging is that Will can scheme the hell out of a one-dimensional offense like Nebraska but if the offense has any ability at all to pass and run, he can and does get outcoached.”

Was thinking the exact same thing on Saturday. And when Nebraska did put the ball in the air, our defense gave them huge opportunities to be successful.

I understand he is dealing with attrition, injury issues and offense and special teams that look like they are coached by me, but he is the highest paid DC in the country and I don’t think is it too much to ask to see a little “doing more with less” out of that side of the ball.

by Horncasting on Oct 25, 2010 11:38 AM CDT reply actions  

Scipio — Regarding the “issues between our ears”: Don’t mean to stump for another site here (especially one on which the seas were a little stormy recently), but I thought Ross Lucksinger had a very sharp take on the mental aspect in this piece:
http://insidetexas.com/news/story.php?article=2765
(That’s subscriber-only I think, so you may or may not be to read it. But worth the time if you can.)

by Editionshield on Oct 25, 2010 12:05 PM CDT reply actions  

stuckinmn – I thought that was Fake Ken Tremendous’ parody at first.

by Phenomenal Smith on Oct 25, 2010 12:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Scipio:

After Texas took it away, then gave it back, I’d swear ISU ran the same play four times and got it in the endzone. What the hell was that simple inside play? Texas never seemed to have an answer for it.

by spider on Oct 25, 2010 12:30 PM CDT reply actions  

“I just watched Mack’s Monday press conference. He said they showed the team pictures of Iowa State’s campus and their colors and mascots because they just don’t know who they are, being up north and all. That’s high-level preparation of a kind not every program provides.”

It’s a sad state of affairs on the 40 acres that after reading this statement I have no idea if you’re being sarcastic or not. Truly – deeply – I hope you are.

by TxZen on Oct 25, 2010 12:37 PM CDT reply actions  

TxZen, I wish I was joking but I’m absolutely serious. You can watch the video of the press conference on Mack’s site.

by Blueshorn on Oct 25, 2010 1:09 PM CDT reply actions  

You pay Mus-chump how much for that kind of bullsh*t defensive “coordinating”? A cool mill $??? To get run over by Slick Rick and passed silly by the Cy-clowns? And he’s the leading candidate to retire “Mr February”?

And you get commits from how many “All-World” Tex-ass HS players, always just after LOI Day ???

Erf! Erf! Erf! Start recruiting PA and CA and Ohio, THEN maybe you can glory in another “close-but-no-cigar” attempt at a MNC under the Chump & Feb-Champ regime!!

by Earl T on Oct 25, 2010 1:13 PM CDT reply actions  

WM after beating the Huskers: “I’m the same idiot who’s going to call the Iowa State game.”

by Spawn of Cthulhu on Oct 25, 2010 1:23 PM CDT reply actions  

I’m married to an ISU grad and we have had a struggle for the hearts and minds of our 2 children. I’ve been chipping away, subtly pointing out to my children that if they want to be a winner they better choose wisely.

After several years of lobbying and even taking a trip to Lincoln with my 7 year old girl so she could enjoy the excitement of Longhorn football, she finally begs me to paint her room burnt orange (my victory here was probably also helped by the fact that my wife, as an ISU grad, just does not give much of a shit about college football).

So after going to Home Depot on Friday to pick out the perfect shade of orange and staying up late to complete the paint job, this is what I get. I could still smell the fumes of paint wafting through my house as I watched this steaming pile of shit Saturday morning.

Screw you Mack.

by stuckinmn on Oct 25, 2010 1:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Didn’t O Giles anchor the DLine during that 1991 season? I was a junior at the time and I can’t remember if he had already graduated or not. Whatever the case, he was definitely there during the shitty offensive years and he needs to light a fire under his guys to play with passion regardless of what the village idiot in the pressbox does.

I woke up this morning immediately terrified about Saturday. That’s a very sad state of affairs that I’m actually considering skipping the Baylor game on TV because I can’t bare to stomach a loss to the Baptists. Here’s hoping these guys find some pride over the next 5 days.

by Mr. Orange on Oct 25, 2010 1:28 PM CDT reply actions  

I’m confused. When did Earl T(homas) turn into a dog that talks like Steve Harvey?

by Garry Crowbar on Oct 25, 2010 2:35 PM CDT reply actions  

I may be overreacting here.

Scip alluded to it and Bateshorn mentions the play but no one else really mentioned it, but HOW THE F IS IT OK TO POINT AT YOUR TEAMMATE IN THE ENDZONE AFTER GIVING UP A TD????

I don’t care if Scott had good coverage or took a dump at the 5 yard line and watched ISU score, Vaccarro CANNOT point fingers on the field of play. That right there was the act that stuck a fork in the season and maybe the whole Mack era for me. And it was the unit that’s supposed to be the strength of this team? Quick to assess blame and not accept results AS A TEAM? I was more disgusted by that single act than anything that GDGD touched, if only because I expect Muschamp to have those guys on the same page AS A UNIT. I don’t care that they gave up the TD, I really don’t. Shit happens and frankly after the first half I knew we were watching UCLA redux.

I just really didn’t expect a Muschamp/Mack unit to point fingers at each other.

by Dude on Oct 25, 2010 2:53 PM CDT reply actions  

And let me just say that Will Muschamp is the only good thing we have going right now. echeese I am not. On a day when there was absloutely nothing positive to talk about, that reaction stuck out to me as the lowlight of the day.

by Dude on Oct 25, 2010 2:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Dude -
 
Overreact much?
 
Vaccaro didn’t point at him and dance around screaming “It was on you!” He pointed at him while saying, “Hey, you’re supposed to have me covered up top.” He gestured.
 
Frankly, we need more people on this team calling each other out. Not less.

by Scipio Tex on Oct 25, 2010 3:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Not to beat a dead horse but Greg Davis needs to go. The only reason he has a job is because of a couple teenagers(namely VY, Colt, and Ricky Williams). I love Mack and he as done a tremendous job reviving us from the Macovic(sp?) days but his loyalty to our inept OC is killing us. Colt and VY were elusive enough to create plays whenn the sh*tty plays Davis called broke down. Ricky was just a good running back so all we had to do was call off tackle run right and off tackle run left then throw in a play action here and there. Gilbert has a ton of talent but without a running game or a well defined offensive scheme, he is going to continue to struggle(I mean can you imagine what a kid like that would do in a Mike Leach-esque system). I love the Horns and will always support them but why is it all the fans can see the problems with the coaching but the athletic dept can’t? So frustrating………….

by Jeev on Oct 25, 2010 3:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Yea I know, Scip. Maybe we more people on this blog calling each other out!

by Dude on Oct 25, 2010 3:16 PM CDT reply actions  

I have a general rule that if I have to open or close a statement with “I’m not echeese” or “I’m not a racist” to defend myself before anyone even responds, I generally do not speak/type that statement.

by ut-06 on Oct 25, 2010 3:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I would let vaccaro point at anyone he wants. he’s likely to kill a dude. so i’m not going to tell him what to do.

by scally on Oct 25, 2010 3:55 PM CDT reply actions  

Vaccaro is half of a quality pair of safeties. I haven’t seen the other half. Earl Thomas covered his part and half of the other guys.

Scott seems like a linebacker to me. Gideon is a left fielder. I’d like to see more of the freshmen corners who flash their abilities on kick coverage get a shot at free safety. Especially when we leave the free safety in man coverage at the line of scrimmage.

by ultralight on Oct 25, 2010 4:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Blueshorn said:

October 25th, 2010 at 9:31 am

I just watched Mack’s Monday press conference. He said they showed the team pictures of Iowa State’s campus and their colors and mascots because they just don’t know who they are, being up north and all.

Holy f-ing shit. Just when I think Mack can’t stoop any lower…

He daring UT to fire his ass.

by Joetx on Oct 25, 2010 4:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Mr. Orange – pretty sure Giles was a senior in ’90. The ’91 line, I think, was Jeter, Patton, Dronett, and Robinson. The offense was decent in ’90. I thought that Hadnot was going to go onto NFL riches at the time…

by Fritz on Oct 25, 2010 4:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Fuck this shit……it ain’t that hard.

by derryl on Oct 25, 2010 6:59 PM CDT reply actions  

I didn’t understand the “find something else to worry about besides the defense” sentiment after the UCLA game. or after the OU game. and I sure as shit don’t understand it now.

yes. we all have eyes (presumably). we all understand the offense sucks. that greg davis sucks. that there’s no good reason that dj monroe isn’t playing. that garrett gilbert probably wasn’t as good as most of us thought. the offense is the “primary reason” that we suck as a football team.

but I just can’t be happy with this defense. point to “emotional pressure” or whatever the fuck you want to. they’ve played like shit in our two “most embarassing” games in recent memory. if you’re ok with that, I don’t understand that.

mushchamp’s “scheme” on saturday was about as good as GD’s. ditto on the in-game adjustmentments.

really…it’s ok to have standards for muschamp. he’s not a demigod!

by sa on Oct 25, 2010 7:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Haha, you asshats thought you could defend my legume-based offense!

by George Washington Carver on Oct 26, 2010 11:43 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Link2_small BrickHorn

Propeller_helmet_small Huck L Berry

Picture_016_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Billlittle0_small Fake Ken Tremendous

Authors

Williams_ranger_dugout_small WWMcClyde

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Small ColoradoAg

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover

Small John Kocurek

Thumbnail_small Drew Kelson

Barker Emeritus

Tn_homeimage7_small Parlin

220px-henry_james_by_john_singer_sargent_cleaned_small HenryJames

Small Doperbo