Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Drug Testing, Alistair Overeem & UFC 146's Potential Legacy

Texas Basketball: 2010 State of the Union

Without even knowing it back in 1872, Friedrich Nietzsche penned some prophetic thoughts on the 2009 Texas basketball team in his first book The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings:

Star-divide


“The strange mixture and duality in the affects of the Dionysiac enthusiasts, that phenomenon whereby pain awakens pleasure while rejoicing wrings cries of agony from the breast. From highest joy there comes a cry of horror or a yearning lament at some irredeemable loss.”

Thanks, you pedantic asshole. Texas went 17-0 and nearly missed the tournament, Fred! A 'yearning lament at some irredeemable loss' sort of understates the issue, don't you think? When a special year turns into a reenactment of Oedipus The King as soon as Texas A&M Corpus Christi slowed the Horns down with a triangle and two -- that's tragedy.

So what was the real cause of the Horns’ downfall last season? I think the collapse can best be explained in three parts, in order of impact.

First and foremost, the staff miscalculated the driver of the teams’ early success—depth and athleticism. This was a team that didn’t win by out-executing, outshooting, or outplaying opponent -- regardless of talent -- it simply outlasted them. It was typed on this very blog that the secret to our success was to look like shit for 35 minutes and then go on a 10-0 run against a gassed opponent en route to a 8-12 point win. It didn’t matter if it was TAMCC or Michigan State.

Conventional college basketball wisdom tells you to shorten your bench as the season wears on and play your best 7 or 8 to maximize efficiency and Rick Barnes did just that. The only problem was that with shortening the bench, Barnes minimized his teams’ lone advantage against most teams—depth. Unwittingly, he also set up his team for failure by playing into the scouting report revealed by Coastal Aggie.

Secondly, by shortening his bench, Barnes went away from his open court advantage and allowed teams to implement the foreshadowed scouting report: play a half court game, keep help honest, and make the Horns execute their half court offense. Allocating help from non-shooters like Balbay and forcing young players like Brown, Bradley, and Hamilton to create for teammates was the perfect antidote for a Longhorn squad that would run teams into submission in a full court open floor game of attrition like they did against UNC and Michigan State in December. Decisions made in the context of 94 feet of space are much easier to make than in a triple threat position just outside the arc when you can't handle, shoot, or pass.

Which leads us to the third and final issue that ties into the preceding two: No facilitators. With the lack of a playmaking point guard or point forward, the two best Longhorn offensive players were neutralized. First round pick James couldn’t get his own shot for the most part, and the pivot advantage that Dexter Pittman enjoyed in 2008 (and will in the NBA, ironically) was suffocated by dishonest help -- guys that weren't threatened by honest to goodness basketball skill.

As for Chemistry issues? They were a function of points 1 through 3 and the ensuing losses those problems delivered.

Looking forward

Keeping with the Greek theme, this season's Longhorn squad rates to be a collection of Heroes. Unfortunately they're all named Achilles. This mythological hero was dipped in a magical river by his heel making him invincible everywhere but from where he was held. Oddly enough, this Longhorn squad will endure deficiencies that would make one think they've been dipped in the River Styx, only some have been held by their Nikes while others have been thrown in the magical waters wearing floaties as their weaknesses are above the neck.

The Guards

Cory Joseph headlines this group and ultimately the team. As CoJo goes so does Texas. Rick Barnes' best teams featured maestros at the Point: TJ Ford and DJ Augustin. Joseph doesn’t really need to improve on anything from a skills standpoint. He can handle, shoot, and he has plus size. What Joseph needs to do is get a handle on the nuances of the point guard position at the college level.

The psychology of running a team as such a young player is tough, especially when you’re ordering talented upperclassmen all over the floor. It’s one of the reasons I pointed out last summer that J’Covan Brown wouldn’t be successful as a point guard early on in his career at Texas. Brown didn’t have the maturity or experience necessary to run a show that included talented players with more seniority.

Fortunately, Joseph has run some point at the highest levels of the summer AAU circuit and at Findlay Prep, but he’ll still have to deal with psychology of the position where there’s certain to be some growing pains.

Another concern is that Joseph isn’t going to blow by above average on-ball defenders without the benefit of a screen so he’ll need playmaking help from other positions. If you’ve got your second or third best on ball defender on Brown or Hamilton then it makes sense to run offense through these two.

Speaking of J'Covan Brown, I hope that Coach Barnes has loosened the reins on the young man allowing him some freedom to operate and create. But if what we’re hearing about practices is true, that’s not the case. Brown has done his part by dropping weight and getting into Todd Wright shape, we just hope the staff meets him halfway and allows him to grow into the creator he can be.

As far as Jordan Hamilton is concerned, he has all the skillset you need to facilitate offense as a point forward. Grant Hill essentially ran the point for Duke in 1994 and while Hamilton isn’t Grant Hill, he can certainly be Draymar Green in that capacity, the Spartan forward who facilitated offense for Tom Izzo after the MSU lead guard position was racked by injury late in the season. I’m not asking for much, just some 1 - 4 lows with Jordan creating from the top of the key against a 3-man who’s used to chasing opponents along the baseline away from the ball.

Dogus Balbay is a specialist in my mind unless the staff is willing to go uptempo and open-floor to mitigate his lack of credibility as an offensive player in the half court set. If this staff puts Balbay on the floor with Joseph, we’re setting young Cory up for failure. Brown would be a better tandem at shooting guard.

Lucas is best served scaring away the winter trolls and nymphs that plague Austin gardens. He just needs a pipe and a conical hat, imo.

The Frontcourt

Much like Cory Joseph, Tristan Thompson’s production will be the biggest frontcourt determinant in how this team fares. He’ll be asked to play big minutes (don't be surprised if he starts from day one), be a force as a screen and dive guy, and rebound where Damion James left off. The good news is that he’s taken to Todd Wright’s workout program and is downright CHISELED. The bad news is that he’ll be under siege in the pivot given the inability of our perimeter to stay in front of ballhandlers. He’ll need to play smart and play sound positionally to stay out of foul trouble.

Gary Johnson gives the Horns experience and effort, but word on the street is that he might be able to give Texas the pick and pop dynamic of Brian Boddicker and Connor Atchley. If Johnson has indeed extended his range to beyond the arc, he gives Barnes some interesting lineup options including a frontcourt of Shawn Williams, GJ, and Thompson with Hamilton and Joseph up top. This unit would provide terrific length to play zone on one end, as well as 4 credible shooters/scorers on the other to the extent they can rebound. Keep in mind the Horns are going to be a horrible rebounding team regardless of who they roll out, so Barnes should at least give zone some thought.

I love Shawn Williams as a shooting/rebounding specialist infinitely more than the WangChapHill three-headed monster of mediocrity. I get that in some games we’ll need size, but I’d rather roll with Williams and play some zone, than watch three different people help to Cory Joseph on ball screens. Plus, flanking Thompson with Williams and Johnson enhances Tristan’s face up game and opens the floor for Texas’ skilled players. The only downside is Rick Barnes’ head exploding when Texas only wins 85 to 80 instead of 70 to 65.

Outlook

There’s still a bunch of talent on this squad even if most of it is scoring-centric. Rick Barnes would be wise to embrace this fact and find a way to mitigate defensive deficiencies much like Scott Drew did with his Baylor team by playing some zone. If that’s unpalatable, then emulate Coach K, who changed his spots and went away from pressure man-to-man to a Pack Line (heels on the arc) defense that accentuated his teams' strengths.

Either way, there’s going to have to be some give and take in terms of offense vs. defense to maximize talent. When Myck Kabango or LJ Rose gets to campus then roll out a defensive minded squad and let Myck manufacture offense. Cory Joseph isn’t that type of player. But he can be a hero if Barnes finds a way to protect the team's collective Achilles heel.

The goal is always make the tournament and hope you make it out of the opening weekend. If this team is still dancing into the Sweet 16, Barnes will have done a heck of a job and restored some goodwill after a tragic year in 2009.

Comment 45 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

first time i ever wanted bb to take my mind of football.
jcovan brown for mvp!

by wisconsinhornybadger on Oct 26, 2010 10:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Good writeup, Trips. I love the idea of Jordan at the two, Shawn at the three, GJ at the four, and Tristan at the “five.” It’s nice having three 6’7" versatile at the 2-4 that can all run, shoot, and rebound. You can put JCB or CoJo at the point. This lineup absolutely requires zone, but that seems like the optimal defensive alignment with this group anyway.

Shawn Williams at least becoming a viable player on this team is absolutely mandatory. It allows Jordan to interchange between the 2 and the 3, instead of just staying at the 3, giving us both increased size in the backcourt and depth that isn’t solely comprised of a guy who shoots at an elementary school level and a garden gnome.

Run and gun is this group’s style. That doesn’t mean we have to play man; just utilize an aggressive, trapping zone and get down the court quickly. Hell, even take some bad shots in the halfcourt to get the tempo of the game up. I really hope Rick can let this team open it up like he did with the Kevin Durant squad. Those guys never stopped anybody on defense, but they had a shitload of fun playing the game and gave the fans a hell of a season to enjoy. Last year’s team had all the pieces on its surface, but Rick overcoached to the max and ruined the team.

Parlay a solid regular season into a five or six seed going into the tournament. Crush the first round opponent and beat the second. Make it competitive against the one seed in the Sweet Sixteen and carry that momentum into the next season. If CoJo, Tristan, JCB, and a newly selfless Hamilton can form a solid young nucleus that can mesh with Myck, Julien, McClellan, Holmes, and hopefully Daniels and a big like Pelle, I can see us getting back on track in time to start picking up commits from guys like Cameron Ridley, L.J. Rose, Rashaad Sulaimon, Julius Randle, the Harrison twins, etc.

by Blake B on Oct 26, 2010 11:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Good stuff. Sweet 16? I’m lowering my expectations to please qualify for the tourny.

Someone posted on another board that they got to watch practice last Friday. Said that Chapman wasn’t participating. Why is that?

by Texoz on Oct 27, 2010 12:22 AM CDT reply actions  

02/19/11: BEAT NEBRASKA!

by Magnificent Bastard on Oct 27, 2010 8:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Still scarred from last year. Apparently. Having a hard time getting up for this season (first time in years).

Appreciate the effort, Trips.

by tearaway20 on Oct 27, 2010 8:17 AM CDT reply actions  

So happy to have basketball and Trips’ write-ups to look forward to.

I also just got DirectTV and ESPNU, so I’ll get to catch a few more games than I did last season. Hopefully they will be more fun to watch this year.

Hook ’em!

by uthookem on Oct 27, 2010 9:25 AM CDT reply actions  

best college basketball writer on the internet…welcome back

by jonestopten on Oct 27, 2010 9:26 AM CDT reply actions  

Nice review, Trip ! Thanks !

by torre on Oct 27, 2010 9:30 AM CDT reply actions  

Great writeup Trips, color me mystified on this years group. After being horrible last year and losing 3 players to the NBA, one would think we would be Greg Davis bad this year. Chemistry is a funny thing, though.

Defining roles and playing to them is key. That is where I am lost. What are the roles? What should they be? Obviously, we (as fans) need more data to determine that, but Barnes better have it figured out better than he did last year or that seat could get warm.

From what I have seen of CoJo, he is the x-factor. It is an immediate upgrade at the 1 over the craptastic 3 headed monster of Brown, Balbay and Travelocity. Brown is a creative 2, not a 1. Not in any way, shape or form. Can CoJo defend? Can anyone on this team other than Balbay? Speaking of, if he plays anything other than defensive stopper 10-15 mins. a game, we are in trouble. His role is easy. Play D, give CoJo a rest.

Brown and Hamilton’s development are the y-factor. If they have improved, and they would have by leaps and bounds in any other program but ours, then we could be good. They certainly have the talent and each brings a unique skillset that poses matchup problems on the offensive end. Of course, they present matchup problems for us on the defensive end. Hopefully, their IQ on d has gone from a 7 year old equivalence to a 12 year olds. Brown has the ability to be a decent on ball defender at the 2. Hamilton has the ability to be an above average off ball defender at the 3 with his length. But both of them have to commit to learning how.

As far as the bigs, Chapman for all his talent has just not developed. Recurring theme, imo. I don’t doubt GJ has extended his range to 3 land, his shot improved tremendously last year, but his ability to be a defensive liability is severely underrated. At least Brown and Hamilton have the ability to get better on that end. I’m not sure GJ does. Tristan? Don’t know, I haven’t seen much tape. I hope he can board.

All in all, anywhere from 15-25 wouldn’t surprise me. We could be a 4 seed or miss the tourney completely. I would be happy if we just played better basketball than last year record be damned.

by Bartoncreek on Oct 27, 2010 9:37 AM CDT reply actions  

That’s “anywhere from 15-25 wins wouldn’t surprise me.”

by Bartoncreek on Oct 27, 2010 9:41 AM CDT reply actions  

Great review of last year and our prospects this year. And why it is so.

The collapse last year, the trend in Barnes’ tactics (OK, some are not trends, simply facts in how he will coach come hell or high water … or talent… or offensive scheme… or coaching to win vs developing players for the NBA…) It’s hard to get too excited about the season. But at least it got my mind off Mack Davis for awhile. Thanks.

by Spastic Synapse on Oct 27, 2010 9:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Love the hoops posts, Trips, but I don’t see Jordan as a guy who can run an offense.

I don’t remember Draymar Green’s game, but you say he facilitated the MSU offense at times. Why do you think Jordan can do that? Most of his drives last year ended with him forcing an awkward shot, and almost none of them ended with him creating an easy shot for a teammate. He has good ball handling skills for a tall kid, but he struggles to get past his defender.

I also don’t remember how Grant Hill was really used in college, but I can see how Jordan would be able to bring the ball up and force his man to pick him up at the 3 pt line hopefully opening up room for teammates to move and Jordan to hit cutters/guys popping off screens with a pass, but that doesn’t sound like our offense at all.

Like I said, I haven’t seen a lot of point forward skills from Jordan, but it’d be great if we could use him like that, so tell me what you’re seeing/thinking.

by Bobby Time on Oct 27, 2010 10:33 AM CDT reply actions  

I love Hamilton as a shooter, tolerate him as ball handler, and hate him as a defender. He’s not shown me the effort and to be honest we need his scoring so much I don’t want him pressuring the ball and getting in foul trouble.

That’s one thing I’d like to get rid of on the team, the on ball pressure that results in players being blown by or picking up cheap reach-ins when we don’t have enough scorers on the bench.

Most young college players are in love with their own jump shot and will take in time and time again if you let them. I say we play zone to help with rebounding and to protect our scorers, problem is that is not the style of play Barnes likes and i’m not optimistic he’ll adapt.

I’ll be happy with making the tourney and winning a game and getting so momentum back. I hope we start ok but not too hot as the expectations will grow again for a team that isn’t that great.

by Biznesstime on Oct 27, 2010 11:14 AM CDT reply actions  

I’m a Dogus fan, and he can operate in a half-court offense as long as he surrounded by scorers (and not Mason and/or Pittman). Force-feeding Dogus/Mason with Pittman was like [insert colorful war blunder reference here].

by Eskimohorn on Oct 27, 2010 11:52 AM CDT reply actions  

If Johnson really can make threes, he would go on the list of players who have developed and expanded their games under RB. Johnson was layups only when he got to Texas.

by Bob in Houston on Oct 27, 2010 12:05 PM CDT reply actions  

With Jai & Nkwopara, we probably have the best multi-sport garden gnome tandem in college sports, IMO.

by marqroid on Oct 27, 2010 12:42 PM CDT reply actions  

After last year I thought I would never give a shit about our basketball program again – then the football season happened.

Thank god for basketball and Rick Barnes!

by NY Horn on Oct 27, 2010 1:48 PM CDT reply actions  

After last year’s sharp fall from grace, I cringe whenever I even think about Texas Basketball this year. This after being extremely excited for it last year. 2010 has been the worst Texas sports year we have had in a while.

by Monahorns on Oct 27, 2010 2:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Bob,

Johnson has absolutely developed under Barnes. When GJ got here, he was so uncoordinated and awkward you had to wonder how he ever made a high school team… On top of that, as you mentioned, he couldn’t shoot… Yet, due to a lack of intelligence, he was a black hole on offense.

Now he’s got some good moves in the post, he can shoot from just about everywhere, he passes, and he’s still the max effort guy he’s always been. Gotta love the guy at this point.

by texasengr on Oct 27, 2010 2:19 PM CDT reply actions  

NY Horn- that made me laugh. So true

by Mysterious Package on Oct 27, 2010 3:21 PM CDT reply actions  

texasengr: And he appears to enjoy playing defense.

by Bob in Houston on Oct 27, 2010 3:41 PM CDT reply actions  

I think the more appropriate Nietzsche quote for the basketball program – hell, for the athletic program pretty much in general these days – is: “if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”

I am greatly appreciative of the dearth of posts regarding how studly our guys look out on the practice/intramural courts this year.

by CrazyJoeDavola on Oct 27, 2010 4:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Oh, also, between Nkwopara and Lucas, we’re 2/9ths of the way to completing the Fellowship.

by CrazyJoeDavola on Oct 27, 2010 4:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Hey Trips, good to look up BC and find the best BB writer still at it but put the greek shit on the back burner. Leave that crap to Sailor/Scipio/and Henry etc.
Keep that great edge that you have to explain what is happening on the court.

Interesting year coming up. A year that will either cement Barnes at UT or start the process of burning Barnes at the stake. This team is long on talent but not used to running Barnes schemes (or lack of one). If RB stays true to his patterns of running a tight ship and skull frigging (I will be kinder and gentler this year) then we will add another year to the past two years of BB frustration.
A couple of things for Barnes is that the team can run at least 10 players up and down the court, maybe only 7-8 quality college players if one of the wangChapHill trio starts to produce. The team has scorers, 5-6 shooters and length but I just do not see RB running a zone.
 Mano to mano and half court pick and roll is his method of operation and he is stubborn. Maybe someone talked to him about being a little more flexible and play to the players strengths and minimize their weak points.
If Johnson is hitting 3’s at a good rate then this is another weapon for RB, oh! GJ will also be maybe the 7-8th player that Barnes has produced to his catchy phrase " be all you can be"…..

A package of Tristan, GJ, Williams, Hammy, Joseph will run into some substitution problems.
Tristan and GJ will have the WangChapHill gang
Williams gets tired Hammy moves to the 3 and Brown goes into the 2 spot.
If RB uses Dog with Joseph I will streak the Drum the first game after he does it and piss on his leg
Joseph goes out then Dog should play with Hammy or Brown at the 2 spot..

All the roles will be changing and I think the team is versatile enough to hang with it but then I thought that last year we could handle it
I think that Barnes is going to use his seniors Chapman/Hill the first 10 games to see if they can produce .
I am thinking that we run out Chapman ,GJ, Hammy, Brown, Joseph.
Tristan first big in, Dog in for Joseph if RB learned anything about Dog/Mason last year.
Brown out Hammy to the 2 and Williams at the 3 spot.
GJ out Wang in.
Having Tristan,Wang, Williams, Hammy, and Dog is an interesting package, An up tempo package.
Tristan, GJ, Hammy, Brown, Dog is up tempo also, Hell as I look at it your right this should be an up tempo team 75% of the time and a zone 50% of the time if not more. Same thing we should have had last year to cover our behinds.
 We will see what Greg D., oops I mean RB will run out .

by skymonkeyhorn on Oct 27, 2010 4:59 PM CDT reply actions  

If RB uses Dog with Joseph I will streak the Drum the first game after he does it and piss on his leg

All games are televised, so I can hardly wait.

by Bob in Houston on Oct 27, 2010 6:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Trips -

Not trying to poke a stick in your eye but you were very high on Jai Lucas transferring here.

How did so many smart hoops guys (you, Billy Donovan) miss? Or can he perhaps improve dramatically?

As always, great stuff.

by Nike on Oct 27, 2010 6:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Someone with more basketball X’s and O’s knowledge than myself please explain the harm in occasionally playing Dog and Joseph together. Joseph has combo-guard skills, no?

by nordberg on Oct 27, 2010 9:56 PM CDT reply actions  

Most combo guards can hit a 16 ft jumper.

by Vasherized on Oct 27, 2010 11:00 PM CDT reply actions  

I also think people need to kill all this “we are so talented” talk. We have mayber 3 future NBA players 2 of which are freshman. None of them are considered high ceiling players (all-star quality).

I’d place us as the 4th best team in the conference talent wise with no low post game to speak of.

by Biznesstime on Oct 28, 2010 9:58 AM CDT reply actions  

I think we need a post from Clipper Cooper about his “thoughts” on the upcoming basketball season…

by spdr3350 on Oct 28, 2010 10:12 AM CDT reply actions  

The only person saying that is Huckleberry. Most rational people know this team has a quantifiable ceiling of 8¥~^7* (solve for *).

by Vasherized on Oct 28, 2010 10:15 AM CDT reply actions  

hey tripps any chance of posting a few football picks this week?

by 3teamer on Oct 28, 2010 11:49 AM CDT reply actions  

“Most combo guards can hit a 16 ft jumper.”

Compare and contrast with Avery Bradley please. I’ve only seen a few clips of Joseph, and I’m ridiculously uninformed. Last year killed a part of me, I’m afraid.

by nordberg on Oct 28, 2010 2:39 PM CDT reply actions  

nordberg: There is nothing wrong with playing Joseph and Doge. At least, nothing more wrong that usual that involves Balbay being present on the court.

Bradley and Joseph have similar shooting abilities and range. Avery is better coming off screens and catching fire, but he’s terrible when he’s not feeling it. CoJo is better shooting off the dribble and creating his own space to shoot, but he’s less dominant when he’s feeling it. He’s also less prone to disappearing, IMO.

Joseph is similar to AB defensively—same height, same body type, same breakdown stance, good lateral quickness, great effort.

Avery is more athletic, but Joseph can still get up pretty well and dunk without too much effort. He’s not as fast…well, nobody is other than Wall, Rose, Westbrook, LeBron and that level of player…but he’s a much more natural basketball player and I doubt he has the psychological issues that Bradley did with Barnes’ “tutoring.”

Cory’s best facets are his steadiness, versatility, and ability to run a pick and roll or pick and pop. The latter is obviously a requisite component for a well-run Barnes team.

Similar skillset to Chauncey Billups, IMO, though I’m not sure you’d actually see the comparison just from watching him play. More of a technical comparison than an empirical one, if that makes any freaking sense at all.

by Blake B on Oct 28, 2010 3:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Someone with more basketball X’s and O’s knowledge than myself please explain the harm in occasionally playing Dog and Joseph together. Joseph has combo-guard skills, no?

I’ll give this a shot. Balbay can’t shoot a lick and everyone knows it, including Balbay. (If Balbay didn’t know it, it might actually be better for purposes of this discussion, but that’s probably for another post, if necessary.)

Last year, it was confirmed that you could play off Balbay and cripple dribble penetration, thereby killing the drive-and-dish option from the offense. Texas reached the FF and EE with this (Ford and Augustin). People played off both Balbay and Mason, which was a major reason why it was so painful to watch Texas on the offensive end last year.

Since Joseph may need screens to get to the basket, Balbay can’t be the screener because the defender will ignore the pick and follow Joseph, at least until his man can recover. If a forward screens, Balbay’s man can still clog the lane and reduce the likelihood of Joseph reaching the point at which he would be a threat to score or dish. Any other guard would be a better option for a screen, because the opponent would have to honor the pick and pop.

HTH.

by Bob in Houston on Oct 28, 2010 3:52 PM CDT reply actions  

nordberg,

See for yourself.

by Vasherized on Oct 29, 2010 12:04 AM CDT reply actions  

BIH and Blake hit the nail on the head. The only way you can effectively use Balbay to play real honest to goodness half court offense is to use him as a screener AWAY from the ball.
It’s the only way you can truly force DB’s defender to guard somebody, or at least be there to hedge or bump the cutter off the screen.

The problem is this has to be done in some motion game or set that doesn’t involve ball screens which is what Cory Joseph does best. CJ is the kind of player that’s going to need a bump to get the basket off the dribble against a solid on ball defender. Hence, we can’t play them together for long stretches or we’ll see a lot of what we saw last season which is stagnation in the halfcourt.

As for Jordan Hamilton and why I think he can facilitate offense as a point forward like MSU’s Green? JH doesn’t need to be curly neal to run offense, he just needs to curly neal vis a vis his defender. Watch tape of Green in the tourney, and he’s able to create offense by getting an iso at the top of the key, back down/or blow by his defender, and then make plays against the helping defense. Hamilton can do that to the extent he’s willing to be a playmaker and not just a shooter.

by Kevin Berger on Oct 29, 2010 9:17 AM CDT reply actions  

I like the idea of Hamilton as a facilitator some of the time, but I don’t think this team has enough firepower for him to do it full-time. He is going to be relied on as the top scorer on the team—probably around 15-16 points a game. And there are going to be numerous…I mean NUMEROUS games where he will have to do his Kevin Durant impression and score five or six possessions in a row/get to the free-throw stripe (hope he’s improved there, BTW) just to keep this team in the game.

Many point to the Okie State game as his best game last year, but that is incorrect. While he did score a lot, the shot selection was abysmal and on most nights Barnes would have pulled him after the second attempt. His best game was against Missouri on the road, when he got into a scoring duel with star SG Kim English. Hammy understood the team was struggling and he needed to carry them. He didn’t take bad shots and played within the offense, but still understood he needed to make plays for his team. I was betraying my own university by wearing a UT shirt, and leaned over to the guy next to me to say they should just take the rest of the players off the court and led Hamilton and Kimmie go one on one. He laughed and agreed. Great back and forth to see live.

I doubt anybody remembers it, but I threw him out last season as a suggestion to play PG. We had a bunch of guys who “could” score or jack up shots, but no real discipline or understanding of team roles (entirely on Barnes). I thought playing Jordan at the one would keep him in the frame of mind that A) his coach was counting on him and trusted him B) he needed to be less selfish with the ball and C) his teammates were reliant on him to make an effort to facilitate. I hoped this kind of trust in guy from the team and coaching staff would galvanize his focus and intensify his desire to work within the confines of the offense. But now that we are down James and Bradley, I think we really need Hamilton on the wing to get up some shots. Still think it would be a great idea to tinker with, just not as something to rely on.

Obviously, Trips’ suggestion comparing Hamilton to DrayMOND Green is different than mine to put him at the point. The main problem here is we’re taking away the responsibility we hope CoJo or JCB can take on at least toward the middle of the season and into the tourney.

by Blake B on Oct 29, 2010 11:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Blake, for me Hamilton would be a halfcourt, part-time solution asa facilitator to manufacture some points. We’ll butter our bread with CoJo running the show for the most part, but allowing JH to create will take some pressure off CoJo and guarantee JH gets involved in the game for if Barnes needs to play psychologist at point.

by Trips Right on Oct 29, 2010 12:29 PM CDT reply actions  

How much does Varez Ward’s transfer hurt the team? He only showed glimpses of talent here, but I still remember that Duke game from the Tourney two years ago when he was the best player on the court.

by tjarks on Oct 29, 2010 3:11 PM CDT reply actions  

tjarks: None, other than from a depth standpoint. His injury last year was a poor scapegoat for the problems on that team—he would have been a mildly improved version of Mason.

I laughed last year every time we’d lose another game and somebody would blurt, “If only we had Varez! His leadership and diverse skillset would have been invaluable on this team.” Uh, Avery Bradley was the 19th pick in the draft and even he struggled under Barnes. What the hell was Ward supposed to do? He couldn’t shoot. He couldn’t handle. He couldn’t pass. He played one good game against Duke’s horrible defensive scheme (16 points on a bunch of layups) and slow-ass backcourt and all of a sudden he was relevant. Eh. Could have done better with that recruiting choice, in my opinion.

by Blake B on Oct 29, 2010 3:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Agree with Blake. I’m sure they liked him because he was willing and able to play defense, but he would not have solved the problems they had last year.

Draymond Green became one of my favorite players to watch last year. He has an impressive basketball IQ without having exceptional skills. He’s big and he’s a load, but not a leaper or quick. He doesn’t really shoot that well. But he had the best A-TO ratio on the team, and was within 20 assists of leading the team. Really like that guy. If Texas had a guy like him, we wouldn’t be talking about possibly missing the tournament if things go bad.

by Bob in Houston on Oct 29, 2010 7:48 PM CDT reply actions  

The 1st game is Nov. 8th vs Navy in Austin.

Here is hoping that J’Covan and Jordan matured quite a bit in the off season (especially J’Covan).

The horns have 2 bona fide guards: J’Covan and Cory. Depth at guard is a problem. It would be nice to have the the pre injury Varez that was athletic, could defend, could penetrate, handle, and rebound some, was tough, and was not a total loss shooting the ball. Balbay could be useful if Barnes ran a motion O but that is even less likely than Barnes running a zone D. Maybe Balbay has developed a shot in the off season.

The only way to play Jordan at shooting guard is if Barnes plays a zone (great idea but probably won’t happen much) or Barnes works some matchup magic that does not require Jordan to guard a shooting guard. Lucas is so small, not fast, weak, and not aggressive that it is really going to be a challenge for Barnes to play Lucas against a serious opponent (Barnes will probably meet that challenge, unfortunately).

If Barnes does not coach well, this season could get ugly. One problem with developing guys for the NBA is that it forces Barnes to focus on man D. This makes it tough to hide on D those players with good O skills but poor D skills. On O, the way you hide a guy with good D skills but poor O skills is to play a motion O. I’m not sure what Barnes has against a motion O.

I’m trying to be optimistic but haven’t got there yet.

by Kafka on Oct 30, 2010 12:17 AM CDT reply actions  

We all know Rick can mindfuck the best of them, how the fish hold up to Rick’s mental beatings will show how this team goes. If after 15 games the team is playing fast and confident then we are headed in the right direction but that is just about the time when Rick goes to work on young confident souls…

by Merhorn on Oct 30, 2010 10:44 AM CDT reply actions  

I missed on Jai Lucas because he played X-box with my kids. Seriously, I was probably too close to the situation. He’s a great kid, with a great basketball IQ (ask Rick Barnes) he just doesn’t have the physical attributes to be a difference maker at the guard spot.

by Kevin Berger on Nov 4, 2010 10:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Link2_small BrickHorn

Propeller_helmet_small Huck L Berry

Picture_016_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Billlittle0_small Fake Ken Tremendous

Authors

Williams_ranger_dugout_small WWMcClyde

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Small ColoradoAg

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover

Small John Kocurek

Thumbnail_small Drew Kelson

Barker Emeritus

Tn_homeimage7_small Parlin

220px-henry_james_by_john_singer_sargent_cleaned_small HenryJames

Small Doperbo