Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Eden Hazard In London For Medical, According To Reports

Is the Football Biased Against Texas?

So I received an e-mail today from a certain blog operator whom you might have heard of. Does the handle "Sailor Ripley" ring a bell? Yeah, that's right. We exchange e-mails occasionally. Impressive, right?

Anyhoo... good old Sailor sends me a link to a post on Corn Nation in which some anonymous internet dude outlines the statistical evidence for his theory that officials are biased against Nebraska. It's pretty sophisticated stuff, so I won't bog you down with the mathematical mumbo-jumbo. All you really need to see are these two pictures:

Whoa. Pretty compelling, right? In one case, the line slants down. In the other case, it slants up. Which is which? Who knows! Crazy math. Regardless, I think those graphs paint a pretty clear picture: the refs are out to fuck Nebraska over. There's no other way to read the data.

Not convinced? What, you don't believe The Dots? Who are you to question Them? Very well. I'll indulge your blasphemy. Consider these numbers, then:

Long story short, Nebraska is penalized more than the mean. On average, the Huskers have been penalized 1.2 times (or, 18%) more often per game than were their opponents' other opponents.

How can this happen? Well, there's only one possible cause: a grand conspiracy of college officials spanning across a diverse array of conference affiliations, religious faiths, sexual preferences and cola brand loyalties. This is frightening stuff, indeed.

And that got me to thinking: if there's a conspiracy against Nebraska, could there be a conspiracy against Texas as well? After all, Texas has been penalized roughly 13% more than its opponents' other opponents. That alone is grounds to suspect treachery. But there's more. Texas has done really poorly in the turnover margin department. We're almost inexplicably bad in that category, especially when it comes to fumbles.

So bad, in fact, that I'm beginning to suspect the sinister hand of a conspiracy may be at work here.

Take a look at the numbers, and see for yourself:

See! Texas's defense has recovered only 25% of the fumbles it caused this season. Texas' offense, on the other hand, has lost 65% of its fumbles.

This can mean only one thing: footballs are biased against the Longhorns. That's right. They don't like Texas. Because of bias, footballs are now conspiring against the Longhorns, purposefully bouncing away from Texas players and landing in the arms of our opponents a statistically-anomalous percentage of the time.

It is unclear at this point whether other participants are involved, but no possibilities should be ruled out. I suspect, but have no firm evidence, that the turf may be providing material assistance to the cabal of anti-Texas footballs. It is also possible that with Colt McCoy's graduation, the Man Upstairs has turned against the Longhorns and started assisting the footballs in their campaign of transparent bias through His power to create almost-imperceptible low-atmospheric disturbances.

Make no mistake about it, this is a coordinated effort by a vast conspiracy of inanimate objects to screw the Texas Longhorns out of a winning season. Barking Carnival will continue to update you as further details become available.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

That 1.2 penalties… is it a 5-yarder, a 15-yarder, or a half-the-distance? More research is needed.

by Bob in Houston on Nov 23, 2010 6:28 PM CST reply actions  

Did you mean to forward this to Huck?

by Davey O'Brien on Nov 23, 2010 6:32 PM CST reply actions  

See the outlying dot far to the ride side of the second graph?

I like to imagine it as fat aggy sitting on a teeter-totter wearing surgical gloves.

The dots to the top left are Bo and Carl, who have been suckered into teeter-tottering with fat aggy, and are now flying through the air hollering with rage.

That’s how I read the chart.

by parlin on Nov 23, 2010 6:41 PM CST reply actions  

you win again fat aggie…

by Bo and Carl on Nov 23, 2010 6:49 PM CST reply actions  

Forward this to Huck? No. That’s bringing a chainsaw to a midget-fight.

by Dagga Roosta on Nov 23, 2010 6:56 PM CST reply actions  

Oops, I meant midget-toss.

Sorry if I’ve upset any midgets out there.

by Dagga Roosta on Nov 23, 2010 6:57 PM CST reply actions  

Dagga,

Just wanted to see the Huskers get one more ass kicking before they head for the Great White North.

by Davey O'Brien on Nov 23, 2010 7:06 PM CST reply actions  

Brilliant piece.

Just goes to show you – there are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

by Voice of Reason on Nov 23, 2010 7:51 PM CST reply actions  

So, what you’re saying is that we’re actually a 9-2 team except that the ball has bounced away from us, and toward an opponent, a statistically impossible number of times.

I feel better. I’ve been thinking it was because we didn’t recruit O-linemen for 3 years, Greg Davis is calling the plays, and we had to turn to a player four months out of high school to NOT DROP punts.

by edsp on Nov 23, 2010 7:55 PM CST reply actions  

Davey – Awww, there’s time to kick their ass a little more. I’m hoping they get a bowl match vs. TCU.

by Dagga Roosta on Nov 23, 2010 8:12 PM CST reply actions  

I think this Nebraska fan’s way of saying, “Below the hard deck does not count.”

So who are you, Maverick or Goose?

by Trips Right on Nov 23, 2010 8:13 PM CST reply actions  

Good job btw – this is hilarious.

by Dagga Roosta on Nov 23, 2010 8:16 PM CST reply actions  

In the first scatter chart, if you relax your eyes long enough I believe you’ll see an image of Pelini kissing Dr. Osborne’s ass. At least that is what I see. When I read that today, I fell asleep about half way through.

by TXStampede on Nov 23, 2010 8:33 PM CST reply actions  

Fuck you Brickhorn. This was the missing piece of evidence that Mack needed to keep GD around. If GD stays, I am hodling you and your damn mathematics responsible.

by jinx on Nov 23, 2010 8:52 PM CST reply actions  

“I think this Nebraska fan’s way of saying, "Below the hard deck does not count."

So who are you, Maverick or Goose?"

Pretty sure everyone in the state of Nebraska looks like Anthony Edwards.

by nordberg on Nov 23, 2010 9:18 PM CST reply actions  

You can make your jokes, but Nebraska’s Opponent’s Opponents are 6.6 worth of Mean. That’s really a lot.

by Farmer Ted on Nov 23, 2010 9:37 PM CST reply actions  

If I were a football, I’d bounce away from this Texas team, too. The other team almost always puts the ball to better use than this year’s Longhorns. Even footballs have pride. I guess.

by LurkerintheDark on Nov 23, 2010 9:38 PM CST reply actions  

Pat Forde addressed this today in his Dash article and the Cornhole’s number of penalties this year falls in line with their previous two years under Pelini. I’m thinking the Huskers are Slider – a guy along for the ride who talks a lot of smack to others as long as the guy doing all the work for him is winning. As a Navy pilot let me just say – backseaters are douche bags.

by Professor Professorson on Nov 23, 2010 9:38 PM CST reply actions  

Hey, I’m no statistics genius, no genius at all really, but could it be that Nebraska is just not a very disciplined team?

PTSD imo

by roach on Nov 23, 2010 10:07 PM CST reply actions  

Professor, I <3 Community.

Anyway, having an asshole undisciplined coach who draws penalties is correlated with having players who are undisciplined and draw penalties? Shocking! I prefer the hypothesis that all teams are the same and should have the same amount of penalties so it's obviously the refs at fault.

by Canuck Horn on Nov 23, 2010 10:55 PM CST reply actions  

NB: Corn was screwed on some calls, but the above average is pretty understandable.

Anyway, did y’all see Sherm on his player fisting the Corn guy?

“I don’t have time to look at YouTubes and what not, but I heard something about it, I asked the player about it, and he said there was some extracurricular activity on the pile, and I said ’That’s not what we’re about, that’s not what we coached you to do,’ and he agreed,” Sherman said. “He’s really remorseful about it, and I said I don’t want to see it again. The results and the consequences of that are between me and that player. It’s been addressed.”

I also don’t have time to look at those youtubes

by Canuck Horn on Nov 23, 2010 11:03 PM CST reply actions  

Scipio predicted this. If you read the ancient writings (Hornfans circa 2000) there is a passage about ‘more pigskin flying away from me than an Orthodox Rabbi on mescaline’ buried in a description of the 3-4 defense. It was foretold.

More importantly, how did you get an actual picture of fucking Huckleberry (Fuckleberry?) on the lead in/ tagline?

by Doperbo on Nov 23, 2010 11:07 PM CST reply actions  

I thought I heard that the officiating crew that did this game, the Texas game, and one other nebraska contest had penalized Nebraska heavily without penalizing their opponents in those games. The number was damning, I can’t remember what it was of course.

I’m pretty sure most of the penalties on nebraska were legit, but the absence of penalties on their opponents is disturbing. And the pass-interference call was a pretty ticky-tack call to suffer such consequences from.

by Nickel Rover on Nov 23, 2010 11:13 PM CST reply actions  

“and we had to turn to a player four months out of high school to NOT DROP punts.”

Don’t worry, he is ONLY four months out of high school, we’ll coach that right out of him by next year.

by tdwalsh on Nov 23, 2010 11:26 PM CST reply actions  

Canuck,
I figured the conspiracy theories wafting out of Nebraska dovetailed nicely with this past week’s Community – I won’t be using this name again.
 
Cornhole is about to be the most junior member of a conference where most of the programs have a century of history together. I hope Jim Delaney likes whining.

by Professor Professorson on Nov 23, 2010 11:39 PM CST reply actions  

Nebraska just isn’t a dominant team anymore. All Nebraska had to do in each of it’s most important losses for the past couple of seasons is squeeze out 3-8 points. That would’ve won the Big XII, and both losses vs. teams from Texas this year. Screw job calls matter a whole lot less when you can do better than 13, 13, and 6 points. Other losses like Tech and Iowa State last year were also distinctly tied to bad offensive performances. I’d worry about that instead of officiating. You’ll have different officiating crews next year anyway, but you’ll still have mostly the same team and staff. Sounds like you’ve got bigger problems frankly. Texas fans at least have the good sense to worry about that.

Likely or not, I am amused at the idea of Texas going to a Pac-16 and then meeting Nebraska in a Rose Bowl when you thought you’d escaped with the move to the Big 10.

by Gate_of_Horn on Nov 24, 2010 2:10 AM CST reply actions  

I attended the UT-Okie-State game in ‘02. I was sitting on the east side around the 40 yard line. I remember noticing, on several occasions, an OSU lineman grabbing Cory Redding’s jersey from behind to keep Redding off the QB. What surprised me the most was Redding’s reaction when he didn’t see a flag. He didn’t seem upset at all — business as usual. I inferred that O-linemen are not taught to avoid holding at all costs but, rather, to recognize the conditions under which holding is unlikely to be called.

It seems to me that Pelini has an aggressive stance when it comes to penalties. Play to win and don’t worry too much about infractions. He attempts to compensate for the increased likelihood of flags by working the officials hard. He probably goes beyond just defending his players’ actions. He also points out to the officials what the opponent is concealing and getting away with.

Before the ’09 CCG, the story goes that one or more NU coaches spoke to the officials about our O-linemen getting away with chop blocks in prior games. I believe that our team was penalized for chop blocks on two occasions in the CCG, at rather inopportune times. . A video I saw after game suggested that the called chop blocks were far from flagrant. Thus, one can infer that Pelini had succeeded in working the refs to his advantage — an impressive accomplishment given the ongoing anti-NU, pro-UT conspiracy in the Big 12.

I can imagine the officials getting fed up with Pelini’s efforts to control the officiating. The last thing they want to do is reinforce his efforts.

by jmanh on Nov 24, 2010 7:09 AM CST reply actions  

I am unsure of how to read dots on this site if they don’t move.

by what it do on Nov 24, 2010 10:10 AM CST reply actions  

Nah, couldn’t be that Korn commits more penalties. No way.

by Johnnymac on Nov 24, 2010 12:38 PM CST reply actions  

Carefree to run out of methods that obviously function, perception again!

by Kelly Sheriff on Jul 5, 2011 9:37 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Link2_small BrickHorn

Propeller_helmet_small Huck L Berry

Picture_016_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Billlittle0_small Fake Ken Tremendous

Authors

Williams_ranger_dugout_small WWMcClyde

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Small ColoradoAg

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover

Small John Kocurek

Thumbnail_small Drew Kelson

Barker Emeritus

Tn_homeimage7_small Parlin

220px-henry_james_by_john_singer_sargent_cleaned_small HenryJames

Small Doperbo