Ink
It's sort of entertaining listening to Herbie trying to calmly discuss the potential implosion of the Ohio State Buckeyes football team this bowl season.
I fear for his children. And couches.
Rumor goes like this, a bunch of players traded signed merchandise for free tattoos at some tats parlor around campus and the taxman stumbled across it. My man, TPeezy disputes this saying he used booster's money to pay for his tattoo. Kidding...
Wouldn't this Jerseys For Ink deal be a violation of NCAA Bylaw 114455355335222555333535-00987778. It's written down in the bylaws manual DCCCXC, the one that is stored behind the Holy Grail.
You know how the NCAA is about athletes getting a little something without the NCAA getting their cut actually taking all of it.
Cecil and Cam Newton were unavailable for comment.
I also wonder if Jim Tressel has a scale model sweater vest tattoo, because that would be awesome.
Stay with the Eleven Warriors for updates.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agreed. One of the few bowls this season that doesn’t blow goats.
Idiots.
by Juan Beniquez on Dec 23, 2010 1:29 AM CST reply actions
“Jim, why don’t you relax a bit, it’s a pool party. Take off that damn sweater vest and go for a swim… …. "
Sweater vest tattoo – gold!
by Canuck Horn on Dec 23, 2010 1:54 AM CST reply actions
So getting free tattoos or lying about talking to Deion Sanders results in a suspension for a bowl or multiple regular season games.
I was about to compare this story to Cam Newton but ……..
How about the NCAA is a money grubbing fraud. The OSU players are allegedly idiots but this sYstem is broke. And I’ll tell you why for $180k.
by Salt Pillar on Dec 23, 2010 2:48 AM CST reply actions
If the players are out whoever got Arkansas +3.5 got a steal.
by maninblack on Dec 23, 2010 4:11 AM CST reply actions
I paid for my tattoos. GoBucks
If the tweet denies, you must empathize.
by parlin on Dec 23, 2010 4:40 AM CST reply actions
Tatoos aren’t inexpensive (notice I didn’t use the word cheap). Hasn’t anyone else wondered where they get the money?
by VirginiaLonghorn on Dec 23, 2010 7:37 AM CST reply actions
whenever i see a tat i fast-forward to when the youth today are rest home denizens and the youngsters of that day who despise the old even more than those of this day sit around and try to guess what the tats were meant to represent.
by ugh on Dec 23, 2010 8:15 AM CST reply actions
unless those tats cost more than 180 grand the ncaa shouldn’t care.
by Savage Henry on Dec 23, 2010 8:32 AM CST reply actions
I still to this day can’t figure out where all those hipsters in South Austin who work 10 hours a week at a coffee shop find the money for the color full sleeves.
by Bateshorn on Dec 23, 2010 8:50 AM CST reply actions
I heard that sexual favors were also traded for free tattoos. Tit for tat.
by nordberg on Dec 23, 2010 9:05 AM CST reply actions
I heard the dads have stepped up to say that they accepted the deals without their sons knowing anything about it. They tatted the boys while they were sleeping.
NCAA says, sweet!!! Play on.
by Texoz on Dec 23, 2010 9:15 AM CST reply actions
I’m squeaking and taking the Bucks to the mat, Rat-a-tat-tat.
That one’s for you, nordberg.
by Rat-a-tat-tat on Dec 23, 2010 9:19 AM CST reply actions
Would it be an issue if they just got free tats without autographs?
by Savage Henry on Dec 23, 2010 10:17 AM CST reply actions
Savage:
Yes, unless they can convince the NCAA they were just “test driving” the tats a la AD.
by roach on Dec 23, 2010 11:10 AM CST reply actions
Nice. They get suspensions next year but let them play in the bowl game because
“The players are eligibile for the bowl game because the NCAA determined they did not receive adequate rules education during the time period the violations occurred, Lennon said. "
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5950873
Wonder if any of these juniors plan on staying next year now.
by someone on Dec 23, 2010 11:11 AM CST reply actions
Did TPeezy write the espn article on this too?
“All of the players be eligible for the Jan. 4 Sugar Bowl, however.”
by Texastough on Dec 23, 2010 11:12 AM CST reply actions
Summary of the NCAA’s even handed enforcement:
1.) Bust Ohio State in tat for signature?
2.) Reinstate Cam Newton when his own father admits to shopping him for money and the FBI apparently has wiretaps of Auburn boosters discussing pay for play.
3.) Take five years to investigate USC for giving houses to the families of players. Note the only reason the NCAA ever came calling is because of the fine reporting done by Yahoo and the fact that Bush screwed his “agent”
4.) Allow street agents to control basketball recruiting and apparently football now too. Thank you SEC and Oregon.
5.) Refuse to allow Jeremy Bloom to play NCAA football while legitimately accepting sponsorships for skiing. It would have been better for him and CU had his father just accepted cash under the table.
6.) Force OU to dismiss Bomar and another no name while allowing Adrian Peterson to continue playing after accepting a car from a car dealership.
I’m sure there’s more, but I just don’t care to look. The NCAA is completely reactionary and capricious. They are clearly more interested in maximizing profitability at the expense of the student athletes.
by roach on Dec 23, 2010 11:21 AM CST reply actions
So you’re telling me that college football players at State U get favors from local businesses? Sorry I don’t believe you. That sounds completely implausible to me. If these guys GASP got free tattoos!??!?!! I cannot watch them play a game of football it totally ruins it for me; I will only support true amateur scholar/athletes.
by tjarks on Dec 23, 2010 11:41 AM CST reply actions
Is there any chance amateur athletes one day sue the NCAA for antitrust infringement? The incentives here are just too far out of whack. Schools, ESPN, merchandisers, and the NCAA all make a killing off of these kids. Kids deserve adequate compensation, and trying to regulate against that is a fool’s errand.
by Sundance01 on Dec 23, 2010 11:56 AM CST reply actions
I think it a bit spineless of the NCAA to not put the kibosh on their Sugar Bowl appearance as well. Why the hell even bother? All the more reason for the USC-faithful to be pissed.
by TexasTomek on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 PM CST reply actions
It’s part of the gig. They get free shit from businesses. Is the NCAA gonna crack down on every free drink and egg McMuffin? I’ve personally seen UT players get free drinks on 6th street over 5 times. One night in ’04 half the team was drinking for free. This stuff goes on in Austin and every other big college football town yet Cam can still play. NCAA is amazing.
by Savage Henry on Dec 23, 2010 12:09 PM CST reply actions
Is Ohio State charging TPeezy a licensing fee for use of their trademark?
Didn’t Ed O’Bannon sue the NCAA?
Guys, you’re not really helping the scales fall from our eyes. We know it happens everywhere. I just want that bowl game to go on.
What system would you like to see tjarks?
by Sailor Ripley on Dec 23, 2010 12:33 PM CST reply actions
The ncaa has pretty much ruined college football for me. I have zero issues with rules, but lots and lots of issues with random enforcement.
Free tattoos gets you suspended but openly solicitng for hundreds of thousands is okay? Two of the dirtiest programs in the championship? Street agemts everywhere?
At this point I’m starting to lean towards the nfl. At least there every team has a almost fair shot.
by Bob on Dec 23, 2010 1:19 PM CST reply actions
Sailor,
Ed did sue the NCAA, but I am too old to remember the result and too indifferent to do the research.
I am not an attorney and my stays in Holiday Inn Express is usually limited to 1-2 hours so I am not sure how much residual legal knowledge I absorb, but I am curious if someone like AJ Green could file suit for damages to his future earnigs for the NCAA failing to uniformily enforce their rules and regulation.
It would seem to me that if the players are not being punished for the failure of THE Ohio State University to properly educate it’s players on the NCAA regs wouldn’t that construe a lack of institutional control by the University and the ahtletic department and wouldn’t that make THE Ohio State University a serial violater of NCAA rules and regulations?
Maybe someone should ask Dr. Gee?
by Davey O'Brien on Dec 23, 2010 1:37 PM CST reply actions
Sailor — I like the system as it is now. I just wish the NCAA had no enforcement power whatsoever. Everyone cheats, it’s all under the table and no one is really hurt by it. If the players got paid for real, we’d have to pay the non-revenue sports and the female athletes which would be ridiculous. So let’s just keep it as is and look the other way.
by tjarks on Dec 23, 2010 1:40 PM CST reply actions
Nothing says ‘loser’ like self-graffiti.
by This will piss off the losers on Dec 23, 2010 1:44 PM CST reply actions
I was looking forward to watching Pryor vs. Mallett in the Sugar Bowl; that would have been a cool match-up. Now I can’t because TP is getting tatted up? Who cares? This is entertainment, and the NCAA has robbed me of an entertaining night of football. That’s all that really matters.
I’m not going to pretend like I care about these guys as anything more than gladiators; I just money on a Philly/Pittsburgh match-up in the Super Bowl! And Mike Vick and Big Ben … well they’ve done FAR more morally dubious things than get some free tattoos that’s for sure.
by tjarks on Dec 23, 2010 1:44 PM CST reply actions
tjarks,
they aren’t suspended for the bowl. just the first 5 games next year. that’s what really makes this laughable. delaney can’t have one of his teams lay an egg in a BCS game again.
by Savage Henry on Dec 23, 2010 1:58 PM CST reply actions
Bo Pellini and Dr. Tom approve this NCAA ruling.
by Confused and Dazed on Dec 23, 2010 3:59 PM CST reply actions
Oh wow that is absurd. That’s kind of funny — they’ve totally stopped trying to even pretend anymore. I kind of like that.
by tjarks on Dec 23, 2010 4:49 PM CST reply actions

by 























