Spring Evaluations
Football:
Diaz and 2 perceived leaders of the team (Gideon and Okafor) met with the media the other day, you may have read about it and noticed Oak's comment that seemed to imply that we were no better than a mid-major team last year.
Much more interesting to me was the evaluation by Diaz of Okafor as a defensive end, and not a tackle. Muschamp clearly thought that his eventual playing weight might settle around 280 and that he belonged inside in this league, I'll be a little surprised if we never play him inside like we did with Acho but there you go. My theory of Texas building their 3-tech tackles in the future by anticipating growth in high school DE's has suffered a serious blow, although that was more of the expecation for Muschamp's strategy.
Oak's claim that he was having difficulty adding weight as a tackle is an important bit of news, he was never going to dominate inside at 262 at the level we expected him to achieve on the outside when he came in as a freshman.
So, we've got most of the DL starters figured out since I believe we can be very confident that Jeffcoat and Randall will also find the field. That suggests also one of the young tackles looks like someone worth starting to Diaz and Davis. Since we'll be using multiple fronts and aggressive packages, you can expect a lot more of the Muschamp method of finding assignments players can handle and then packaging guys according to the requirements of the situation.
Okafor seems to have elevated himself into the rank of guys who stay on the field, like Acho, and wear a few different hats. In his case, defensive end in either the 3-4 or 4-3. I'm going to venture that Jeffcoat plays Buck and vascillates between 3-4 OLB or 4-3 right end.
Diaz also addressed our situation at linebacker, which I would summarize as "we have 3 dominant outside linebackers in a league where you usually only field 1 or 2."
We're looking for leadership out of [Emmanuel] Acho and Keenan Robinson. Jordan Hicks is a guy who I think has really impressed through the first three days. And we are not really worried about who is in what spot. We have flexibility in that we can play our best three.
Translation: In this scheme you are often either attacking or dropping into a short zone so traditional attributes for the linebacker positions are less essential. Hicks and Acho can both stunt inside or outside with the best of them and Robinson isn't terrible either. Really, they offer him perfect versatility since any of them can drop back and diagnose with the speed to reach a play or stunt inside or out and get into the backfield. The lack of a true Mike linebacker can be offset by the creation of 8-man fronts and penetration that leads to runners having to bounce outside.
All of this was pretty interesting and pretty much expected...as was the unfortunate decision to have Gideon speak and support him as a leader on this team. They are cross-training Phillips at corner and you can be sure that the demands of this scheme will be moving us back to a 4-corners philosophy in general. Gideon is not a corner and could never play corner. If I could pick the two most desirable attributes for safeties or corners in the Zone-blitz defense they would be coverage and open field tackling. 0-2.
This reeks of when Mack asserted Kirkendoll into leadership roles, or Greg Smith. Sometimes your leaders aren't your experienced seniors, and if those guys can't hold the jockstraps of the younger guys behind them it's going to be difficult for the underclassmen to be lead.
Prospects:
Last year I ridiculed national pundits who placed Gerald McCoy of OU on a similar or higher plane than Ndamukong Suh who I argued was one of the best defensive tackles ever to play the college game. This year we're going to build on that success.
Sam Acho is an absolute lock to be an impact player at the next level and his draft rankings in the 2nd and 3rd round are totally beyond my comprehension. The man played multiple positions, had upstanding character, had a nose for the ball, and put up fantastic stats in consecutive healthy seasons. There was some question about him being athletic enough to move outside to 3-4 linebacker, then he ran a 4.6 and set a record in the shuttle. Some are questioning whether he has the strength to play defensive end in the league...the man played defensive tackle here!
Aaron Williams didn't run an amazing forty and Peter Bean says his coverage drew some criticisms from former greats. His coverage at Texas, however, was always excellent and he has the versatility to play the run as a nickel, blitz, and cover the slot receiver that is becoming essential to defense at both levels. Uh, essentially a nickel rover if you will, which has evolved from Roy Williams' dominance to becoming the new Mike linebacker for defensive schemes (where you must place a badass).
They are easily the class of our draft prospects and I think both have obvious value in the league and each had a lot more to do with the 2009 defensive excellence than has been attributed to them in the media.
As for the Big 12 in general, Amukamara and Von Miller are being labeled the best in the league and I can't really argue the point. Acho, I suspect, could have the same impact as Miller but the latter's speed and pass-rushing abilities could put him in the NFL's elite tomorrow. I think Colby Whitlock could suprise a team as a 3-4 end or 3-tech tackle, I like Jared Crick a lot and I'm from Missouri on Nate Solder whom I never watched once. If Gabbert is a top 10 pick it's because some team is desperate for a QB, not because he's a guy you can't afford to say no to.
Of our 13 committed prospects so far I think we've managed to land a couple of standout guys:
Curtis Riser, though maybe not a tackle, was a must have and exactly the kind of guy I would make an exception for in chasing mostly tackle prospects.
Connor Brewer, I'm very suspicious that he is Harsin's expected starter for the future. Kid loves coming here, was taught the Boise offense in high school, and has the skill set desired for the system. Granted, so does Gilbert, Wood and Ash. But Brewer clearly has the advantage with the system. Which is cool, he looks pretty good.
Peter Jinkens, great weakside linebacker prospect. He's excellent in pursuit and takes the right angles, plus he's quite fast and is listed at 4.5. It's essential against modern offenses to have guys who understand how to pursue laterally AND have the speed to do so effectively. Can't have too many of these.
Alex Norman: Fantastic find, his tape looks like Desmond Jackson's, which I learned upon review made him one of our 5 best (at least) committments in 2011. Leverage and rip away, and he plays mean. The clips of him at offensive tackle look better than the highlight tapes of some tackles we've brought in.
Thomas Johnson, Cayleb Jones, in our new offense we shouldn't have any more trouble finding and developing receivers. The failed efforts of bringing in shifty guys and trying to make them into extensively complete recievers have gone.
Hassan Ridgeway, not the best edge guy we've ever brought in but he has a pretty good first step. 6-5 says he may grow into a good strongside end.
Bluiett, De La Torre, and Thomas are interesting takes to me that remind me of classes like 2008. I just don't see a ton of upside.
Basketball:
Blah.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I had Miller rated as a puma before the Combine. Nice to see Acho test well. He made a lot of money. Solder is the most overrated OT I’ve seen in a while. He’s way too tall to play in the NFL and built more like a basketball player. He’ll get his ass tossed around. I see Whitlock as a 3-tech in Seattle, Indy or Tampa. He might be a guy that’s better off as an undrafted FA.
by dedfischer on Mar 2, 2011 6:35 PM CST reply actions
Three posts…
Three posts…
Three posts in ONE! Well, four if ya count basketball.
by OldTimeHorn on Mar 2, 2011 7:04 PM CST reply actions
Tech is up by 23 at half on OU. The flip side is we’re down 23 in the Billy Gillespie sweepstakes.
by dedfischer on Mar 2, 2011 7:26 PM CST reply actions
I am glad Okafor is back at defensive end. Texas really missed a defensive end on the strongside that could handle the double-team and hold the edge. After fighting inside last season you would have to think he is up to that task and I think he will be better in pass rush than expected.
It will be interesting to see what type of players Diaz wants to fill his fronts. Will wanted smaller, faster guys which is interesting when you consider than Saban and Smart really have gone for a bigger, more physical front at Alabama. Might Diaz be following suit with Ridgeway and Bluiett?
Thanks for the right up Nickle.
Now that we have had a review on Spring events when can we expect Henry James’ review of Spring Awakenings?
by Davey O'Brien on Mar 2, 2011 11:41 PM CST reply actions
Actually Acho’s sterling reputation and academic credentials may end up hurting him as I recall reading a few years back where certain teams/scouts apparently [i]want[/i] their DL/Pass rusher’s to be as dumb as a brick and future repeat offenders, somehow believing that by combining low Wonderlich’s and a felonious disposition, the bastard son of Mike Tyson and Lawrence Taylor would result. Though times have probably changed.
by Arriviste on Mar 2, 2011 11:58 PM CST reply actions
Great write-up Nickle…I’m interested in how the remainder of the class fills out. I’m in the serious minority on most boards, but I think both MB2 & Cole will be UT commits when it’s all said and done…Eternal optimist, I am!
by D.C. Horn on Mar 3, 2011 7:28 AM CST reply actions
I love it when Nickel Rover makes the offseason appearance.
I’ve gotta think that the Blake Gideon representation, combined with the news that they’re crossing training BOTH Vaccaro and Phillips at corner, means that Gideon is all but assured a starting safety spot. Vaccaro I expected, I think he’ll play in the “nickel rover!” role similar to ET. I thought Phillips would make a run at a starting safety gig as the ballhawker to complement the hard-hitting Scott or Gideon (not and, Mack, dammit). I’m also concerned that this means our young corners aren’t as up to snuff as we’d hoped.
The second DT was equally as puzzling in the last year of the Muschamp regime. I think Will fell a little overly in love with the Acho spindown and thought he could replicate that with Okafor. But that was without giving Okafor the benefit of excelling at DE first. What’s your take on who the starting DT will be opposite Randall come opening day?
Great news on Hicks. I expect him and Reggie Wilson to be stout sophomore contributors this year.
Don’t give up on basketball just yet. The really important games start March 17.
by jc25 on Mar 3, 2011 9:23 AM CST reply actions
I think Gideon could be one of our BEST players ….. on special teams.
by Mitch Cumstein on Mar 3, 2011 9:51 AM CST reply actions
I don’t care if he graduates, so long as his eligibility ends.
by Tipsy Gypsie on Mar 3, 2011 10:13 AM CST reply actions
So who are your DT’s going to be in the 4-3 look? Is Gideon a Sr?
by KilgoreTrout on Mar 3, 2011 11:27 AM CST reply actions
No thoughts on the offense? Apparently Irby has impressed and Mack thinks we are further along than us Internet trash realize.
by Mad Clapper on Mar 3, 2011 12:44 PM CST reply actions
Somehow Gideon will start all 4 years here. Mack make it stop
by Mysterious Package on Mar 3, 2011 1:49 PM CST reply actions
“That suggests also one of the young tackles looks like someone worth starting to Diaz and Davis.”
Not necessarily. It may be less of a choice and more of a lack of options. Okafor himself said he was having trouble putting on weight. OU proved at the end of last year that there’s another way to deal with the issue of having not enough DT’s and more than enough DE’s with the 50 front.
by NateHeupel on Mar 3, 2011 3:54 PM CST reply actions
Word has it Dorsey has separated himself at the second DT spot.
by cmdr on Mar 3, 2011 6:20 PM CST reply actions
cmdr,
That is good news, but in part not surprising. Two years ago when Klein Collins played John Tyler they really had no answer for blocking Dorsey. He was easily the best defensive lineman they face that year and that included Nathan Hughes and Desmond Jackson as juniors.
by Davey O'Brien on Mar 3, 2011 7:11 PM CST reply actions
Dorsey was a beast at the Under Armor practices and game as well.
by bigdukesix on Mar 3, 2011 7:27 PM CST reply actions
Nate, you realize we’ve been using the 50 front the last few years and that it requires a 3-tech? It’s only called an odd front because the 9-tech defensive end will play standing up, like Kindle frequently did. It’s not really an answer for a lack of true D tackles, you need a true 3-4 with an awesome Nose Tackle and big defensive ends to accomplish that. Either way, Okafor is not really playing on the edge.
Mad Clapper; I was mostly going off the Diaz press conference and news that was released by the coaches on the defensive side. If Irby is truly playing up to the level he had reached as a sophomore than we should all be getting excited.
On Dorsey, I thought he was going to be more of a 1-tech or nose tackle here but he didn’t really look like a plugger as a freshman (than again, who does?) and his quick first step is what you want there. Bible looked like an awesome 3-tech and then he ballooned to the size of a humpback. Still at 310 according to the roster. We’ll have to wait for the spring game and see what we see I guess.
by Nickel Rover on Mar 5, 2011 12:42 PM CST reply actions
Why are the BC bloggers afraid to use their real names?
Show some guts. Stop attacking the paid sites while hiding behind a screen name.
by 50 Years Watching on Mar 8, 2011 9:03 AM CST reply actions
50 Years Watching
I’m curious. What have you been watching for the past 50 years inside your colon? Whatever it is, 50 years is a long time to have your head up your ass.
by Black Shipley on Mar 8, 2011 10:38 AM CST reply actions
Paying the tiniest amount of attention could reveal to you the names of most of the writers here, 50 years watching.
by Nickel Rover on Mar 8, 2011 1:11 PM CST reply actions
50 years, you wouldn’t want your mind blown. People who choose to charge you for their opinion better damn well be scrutinized and upfront. That doesn’t in any way make them more valid nor does it make those who choose to protect their privacy less valid. Read the content. If you want names, go read the Statesman. It’s free online and super insightful.
by Saltshaker on Mar 9, 2011 10:53 AM CST reply actions
pretty ironic stuff from 50 years watching seeing he’s spammed this site for a year now with five different handles.
its only a matter of time before he starts bragging about his net worth.
by Vasherized on Mar 9, 2011 11:17 AM CST reply actions
NR,
I don’t know if you will be able to see this, but I read your all your articles. The BC bloggers are very knowledgeable, talented, entertaining, and have impressively clear intellects. Except EOT. However , I have missed their real names. Links please?
I think the value of this site would be enhanced if the bloggers used their real names. (Jesus S is probably an exception since his content seems to be more source sensitive.)
V,
We are worth a few million. More than that if we count undivided family real estate. Thanks for asking.
Spam? I seldom post. All are brief, and most are no more outrageous than many of your more frequent visitors.
by 50 Years Watching on Mar 9, 2011 12:20 PM CST reply actions
50 years, go get a copy of Peter Bean’s “Eyes of Texas” and do some deductive reasoning. At least 3 of us have written for it that I can remember.
by Nickel Rover on Mar 10, 2011 1:48 AM CST reply actions

by 























