Bringing the storm clouds: Defense against the run
I'd like to zoom in on our defense's execution of Diaz's mantra of "Stop the run, hit the quarterback" in game 1. At first glance, it would appear that we failed miserably but given that we allowed only 9 points, we need to evaluate the performance more carefully than "they ran the ball and we didn't sack the quarterback!".
Against smaller squads like Rice I think it's particularly valuable to take note of how they handle the talent disparity in the trenches, where it is generally most stark. Rice cannot recruit the best 300 pound kids in Texas and they definitely cannot find the athletic ones you would find playing defensive tackle at Texas. Nor do they play against such athletes on a regular basis.
So while Longhorn Scott is going to talk about our offensive line's handling of their fronts, I'm going to discuss our defensive line and assist your psychological treatments for the trauma of seeing our defense gashed for 4.3 yards per carry and 130 total yards.
Let's begin with some bad news. We should really add several yards to that total because the bubble screen is part of their run game. In the early drives Hicks tended to stayed close to the tackle box and there were free 7 yard gains to be had by flipping it out to their "slot" receiver and blocking our corners with the WR.
Beyond that, their veer option and speed option plays were indeed gashing us for easy 5-10 yard gains in the early going. The QB read was generally to avoid running at our ends (and they never even attempted to read Okafor) and instead they would bounce inside and allow their massive WR to block our pursuing linebackers at favorable angles.

Vaccaro's play was enough to prevent any of those right hooks from landing on the button and then Diaz instructed Hicks to either line up on the slot or bail out at the snap to cover the screen. While he was unable to run over a 6'5" TE in the open field to make plays in the screen game on a regular basis, Hicks did some impressive things. While I expected great range in pursuit, his ability to read in pursuit and his coverage in zone were both better that I might have expected at this point. Consider that we're going to use him in many of the same ways that OU uses Tony Jefferson or Green Bay used Woodson last year and ponder the level of athleticism (and awareness) he possesses at 228 pounds to handle those assignments...
In all of this our defensive line was fairly quiet. It's exceedingly difficult for them to affect the play if the ball is being sprinted past the tackles from the pistol/shotgun and the ends are being read. You can tell from Rice's game plan that they had no interest in facing our DL's pass rush and having McHargue throw into a pass defense with 7 zone defenders, or read a Fire-Zone.
After Diaz adjusted with Hicks to take away the perimeter game it became a matter of whether Rice could do enough damage with inside-zone and sporadic completions to keep up in the game. Their passing attack was futile but it's worth examining what they were able to do with the running game for academic purposes.
Rice had zero negative plays with inside zone and even managed a few 10+ yard runs which you all probably remember and of which 1 or 2 was within a white safety-tackle from being a touchdown. They tended to target the interior A gaps on the cutback and that's where they found most of their success.
Given Gideon's proclivity for missing open field tackles (he nearly missed a key one on saturday), the success Rice found with their zone running game is rightfully disconcerting to the fan base of a team that will face Cyrus Gray and Christine Michael before all is said and done.
Consider that Rice, a team built to run, expertly ran inside-zone with solid running backs against Desmond Jackson playing heavy snaps (including at nose tackle), an OLB playing Mike, and a deep safety known for missing open field tackles...and managed 4.3 yards per carry and 130 yards overall en route to a 3 field goal effort.
More palatable? It gets better...
Jackson played quite well throughout the game, but there were various miscues in filling creases at all levels. The major issue was a failure by the linebackers to "run to daylight" against inside zone that allowed some cutback creases.
For instance:

Rice has found some success with the inside zone and were running it ad nauseam because McHargue is entirely incapable of finding targets against our coverage within the 2 second window that he was apparently instructed to throw within. On this play we are stunting Robinson at the center and playing a "double eagle" front with Randall (bottom) and Jackson (top) playing as 3-techs.
Things start to go wrong when DJ stunts up into the B gap across the left guards face and Acho heads for the same place.

Unless it was Diaz's intention for Robinson to 2-gap (guard the A-gap on either side of the center) someone has made a mistake and left open the playside A gap.

It's the duty of the linebackers in Diaz's defense to "make the DL right" after they stunt into creases, so it's curious that Acho is headed to the exact same gap which DJ has filled while being doubled by the guard and the tackle.
I'm sure that the purpose of stunting Robinson at the center was to take away the quick hitting holes up the middle Rice was exploiting and force them to find creases outside against our pursuit and ends. If Acho can get inside to that gap there is not a single lead block to cut him off, instead he plays it like he would in the Muschamp defense and stays in his base C gap.
Now they are playing inside zone outside-in (in other words, exactly wrong) by filling the gap between the halfback's trap block and the tackle while we have no one in position to reach the A-gap.

Jordan Hicks' impressive pursuit of the ball isn't enough here and there is grass for 15 yards with no one in position until Brewster finally cleans up.

Someone taking the wrong gap is a very fixable mistake. What might concern you would be if we couldn't handle the physicality of the Owl OL or if our linebackers were incapable of reaching the creases, but Acho was totally clean to make the play.
On the next play, DJ draws another double team as a 3-tech that allows Randall to fly into the backfield and frees Acho and Robinson to demolish the play.

It was curious of Rice to double Jackson and leave Randall alone but Jackson stands his ground and the play goes for maybe a yard and a half with the RB met at the line of scrimmage immediately.
Greg Daniels, Jackson, Howell, and Chris Whaley all saw heavy snaps in this game and they saw them early and often. From what I saw, Jackson and Whaley both have the burst and the body types that will be ideal for this scheme and I didn't watch Howell or Daniels closely.
Much like how Stoops used Tommie Harris or Gerald McCoy as 1-techs, it's not important that we have space-eaters in this scheme because when our tackles draw double teams it will be by virtue of quickness and no one is going to be asked to stand them up all day.
We have the right personnel to bring storm clouds where the running back is trying to "run to daylight" and despite Robinson's lack of tenacity inside what really matters is having linebackers who can reach run gaps that they aren't aligned into as Acho failed to do above. Hicks, Robinson and Acho are all very capable of handling that assignment and the defensive tackles were more than capable, at least against Rice, of filling their assignments.
I hate to target Acho because he had a great game (10 tackles, 1 TFL) so let's end on a play that highlights the exceptional ability he is finally able to bring this season as a weakside linebacker.

He's blitzing outside in a firezone on the bottom of the screen but Rice will run inside zone in the opposite direction.

Robinson and Hicks bounce off each other and minimize the impact of either attempted tackle on the running back who continues to get upfield. But Acho is in pursuit, having bailed out of his blitz once he diagnosed the play.

Our linebackers are going to swarm in this scheme as they eventually overcome their previous programming. Muschamp wanted to align his fronts to have perfect leverage against the run or pass, whereas Diaz is going to take advantage of speed everywhere to fill the same gaps from unforeseen angles.
As a result, our DL are going to get free into the backfield because of their stunts but our linebackers will be clean to fill in the gaps they vacated by virtue of their speed, deep alignment, and the fact that the opposing team doesn't know where they will be in order to block them.
Metaphorical rain is coming to Austin from our linebackers, let's pray for some of the actual wet stuff to come as well.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Looks like Diaz set up a fire zone around the BC photobucket account.
by ndawg on Sep 9, 2011 3:32 PM CDT reply actions
Why the fuck do you use photo bucket? If the images don’t load better from your own server, you need hosting help…
by I got a kweschum on Sep 9, 2011 3:49 PM CDT reply actions
An unfortunate choice of image host prevented me from viewing the pretty pictures, but otherwise a great write up. I’m really hoping to see some explosive play from the DL this week.
by slaw on Sep 9, 2011 3:54 PM CDT reply actions
Pictures working now I think, I can see them. Anyone else?
by Burnt Orange Wookiee on Sep 9, 2011 4:01 PM CDT reply actions
Pictures are on now. Seems like one of the impediments for our defense will be to deprogram from Will Muschamp’s defense.
by ehhombre on Sep 9, 2011 4:07 PM CDT reply actions
I can see them. Usually they take an annoyingly long time, today it was beyond annoyingly sllooowwwww.
by I got a kweschum on Sep 9, 2011 5:03 PM CDT reply actions
this is good stuff you and scott are doing. sure hope this series continues.
i guess it is no surprise that training from previous seasons is going to have to be undone, like ehhombre says. these first few games are just going to have some clinkers.
by yeh on Sep 9, 2011 5:06 PM CDT reply actions
good read. I have a few questions but they’ll bear out after tomorrow night. We’ll get to see the next step forward with how the dline and lb’s engage a bigger, more experienced offensive line. BYU’s rb position isn’t too scary nor is their qb so it should be a great next step.
by kemit on Sep 9, 2011 9:29 PM CDT reply actions
I remember that play where Acho and Robinson attacked the same gap. Another problem I thought was that all the LB’s were waiting too long to attack their gaps. On a couple of plays the Rice back was at the line of scrimmage before they attacked. It’s important in Diaz’s scheme for the LB’s not to attack too early and be snookered with misdirection in the backfield. But waiting too long is costly as well. That also may be residual timing and play reading left over from Muschamp, when they were closer to the line of scrimmage and were just occupying gaps rather than attacking space.
by burnt in ny on Sep 9, 2011 10:02 PM CDT reply actions
we’d be best served with moving Keenan to his more natural SLB, Hicks at WLB, and STEVEN EDMONDS at MLB. Acho, much like Gideon has no reason being on the field
by mjohn713 on Sep 10, 2011 12:19 AM CDT reply actions
Burnt in ny, I agree, certainly on the highlighted play Acho should have been aggressively stunting into the A gap where he could have cleaned up for little or no gain had he not hesitated.
mjohn713: I’m afraid I can’t agree at all. Hicks is great exactly where he is and if anything we would want to move Keenan to WLB, not SLB.
In a different scheme it might be more important to have a banger like Edmond inside but with Diaz’s stunts it makes perfect sense to have an athlete like Robinson at Mike. I think that as the season progresses this will be more apparent.
As far as Acho, you couldn’t be more wrong. He seems to be one of the more underrated players on this team for some reason but he’s one of our very best. Your assertion will look silly at the end of the year when he has over 100 tackles. nearly 20 tackles for loss, 5 sacks and a few turnovers. He is a terror on the edge, very solid in coverage, and one of the smartest guys on the team.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 10, 2011 5:40 AM CDT reply actions
Thanks Nickel. I think it will be a matter of learning new assignments and timing attacks of daylight gaps. I hope we have some quick learners at linebacker.
by I said I on Sep 10, 2011 6:43 AM CDT reply actions
I have to admit – I was really disappointed by the schemes of Diaz and the overall defense. To me, Hairsin delievered as promised. He was purposeful, creative, and persistent. He does not have the talent on O, is handcuffed by a shaky QB, but he really used Shipley, DJ, MB amazingly well. In addition, landed some haymakers with Davis. What disappointed with Diaz, I was under the impression that he would release his superior athletes to create havoc, and I just did not see any of that. It looked as if they were a “read” defense that was not dictating anything. Plus – it seemed like we were the antithesis of GD – where he consistently ran a bubble screen that didn’t work – we continually permitted a bubble screen that gave away 5-8 yards like candy.
by realmccoy on Sep 10, 2011 10:42 AM CDT reply actions
realmccoy: Rice is built to run the bubble screen (blocking on the edges with enormous TE/WR) and they did it fairl well early in the game before Diaz snatched it away. We are definitely not a “read defense” as the front 7 is constantly stunting into gaps and attacking the blocking assignments.
I’m not sure why you think we failed to dictate anything. The mere threat of our pass rush prevented them from attempting to utilize the vertical pass in any meaningful way and we made them try and beat us solely with inside zone. They were entirely incapable of doing so and with some better execution by our LB’s they would have been even less effective.
Save your criticism of the defense “not creating havoc” until after we play someone that actually tries to execute their playbook rather than throwing over half of it away in anticipation of domination. Let’s wait and see what happens when teams attempt 5 or 7 step drops and test our linebackers in coverage.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 10, 2011 10:58 AM CDT reply actions
This is great stuff, NR.
I hope people will change their tune about Keenan once we tighten up our run fits (which will take longer to get consistent at in this scheme than if we were just building a base D to start). And remember that in general if the D doesn’t get a perfect fit but they manage to confuse assignments and muddy reads then that’s a net win for the D most of the time because in a confused world the defense has better athletes.
As you point out, Rice played within 10 yards of the line the entire game and Diaz didn’t bite and tightened up to limit what they could do. I don’t think BYU will do the same… not with a brand new OC at a school that is known for putting up points.
The thing that still gives me the most concern with this scheme is an intelligent run scheme that uses a heavy dose of misdirection. With some of the long sticks and regular slanting that we are going to do, it puts additional pressure on the linebackers to make the right first read. If they are influenced then there are definitely some lanes that are going to open up. The question is how Diaz adjusts in that situation to keep the offense from exploiting the same ideas repeatedly and how fluid our players become in this scheme. I believe we are going to become really good football players in the front but it might take us 7 or 8 games to get there. In the mean time I’m happy if we can continue to have a learning process and be able to put the brakes on the offense in the redzone.
by LonghornScott on Sep 10, 2011 11:26 AM CDT reply actions
LS: thanks,
as far as misdirection run games go I’m thinking that Diaz will carry stunts and run blitzes into a game geared towards stopping the base plays of an opposing offense. If they unleash some misdirection plays on us they haven’t put on film before than that’s fine. Greg Davis tried that strategy for the last 10 years without seeing much in the way of results.
I think the key to Diaz’s stunts is that they are gap sound, and any disadvantage the linebackers have in reaching their fits is offset by the disadvantage the OL has in trying to keep a slanting Kheeston Randall or Okafor out of the backfield.
Maybe we get caught now and then but that’s why we’re 3 deep with lots of speed in the back 7. Okay you caught us, but you’ll have to do it again to score and this time maybe Randall finishes that arm tackle 3 yards behind the LOS…
by Nickel Rover on Sep 10, 2011 11:35 AM CDT reply actions

by 























