SB Nation BlogPoll Top 25: Week 4
Server problems all day yesterday and intermittent today (I just lost an entire post-mortem post). We're back online and regularly scheduled programming is back underway. We're in the process of migrating over to a new platform, and post-migration, this should happen less often and your load times should be substantially improved.
**
Let's talk polls. We now have some actual football under our belts and separation is starting to occur. Ha ha. No, it's not. It's all an illusion. We still don't know anything. As the ballots will quickly reveal.
Here's how all of the blogs collectively see it:
Results for Week 4
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Rankings 2011
Capable commentary provided by Andy Hutchins. You'll note that Barking Carnival won a Homer Award mention for ranking Texas #18 instead of the BlogBorg's average #20. WE ARE OUT OF CONTROL! Actually, the real reason is that the deviations get pretty small once you get past the Arkansas and Nebraska homers.
Here's how I see it:
Barking Carnival Ballot - Week 4
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LSU Tigers | 1 |
| 2 | Alabama Crimson Tide | -1 |
| 3 | Oklahoma Sooners | -- |
| 4 | Boise St. Broncos | 1 |
| 5 | Wisconsin Badgers | 1 |
| 6 | Oklahoma St. Cowboys | 3 |
| 7 | Stanford Cardinal | 4 |
| 8 | Arkansas Razorbacks | -- |
| 9 | Florida St. Seminoles | -5 |
| 10 | Texas A&M Aggies | 2 |
| 11 | Oregon Ducks | 3 |
| 12 | Nebraska Cornhuskers | -2 |
| 13 | South Carolina Gamecocks | -- |
| 14 | South Florida Bulls | 2 |
| 15 | Virginia Tech Hokies | -8 |
| 16 | West Virginia Mountaineers | 1 |
| 17 | Florida Gators | 1 |
| 18 | Texas Longhorns | 2 |
| 19 | USC Trojans | -- |
| 20 | Illinois Fighting Illini | -- |
| 21 | Michigan Wolverines | -- |
| 22 | Baylor Bears | 3 |
| 23 | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | -- |
| 24 | TCU Horned Frogs | -- |
| 25 | Houston Cougars | -2 |
| Dropouts: Arizona St. Sun Devils, Tennessee Volunteers, Michigan St. Spartans, Central Florida Knights, Ohio St. Buckeyes | ||
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings "
My primary bones of contention:
- LSU is my new #1 because they've beaten two solid to good football teams handily on the road and at a neutral site. They're also physical as hell. Now they play West Virginia and tackle a brutal SEC West schedule. Hats off to the Hat. LSU schedules like men.
- Oklahoma's win over FSU was good stuff, but you can't help but wonder if it revealed vulnerability (Landry's early performance wilt, OL play) as much as revealed OU's strength (defensive hitting, high quality of WRs).
- The BlogPoll, AP, and Coaches polls are all beguiled by Clemson for beating Auburn at home (Clemson rose 20 spots from last week's ranking in BlogPoll). I continue to have them unranked. First, as I've detailed, I don't think Auburn is all that good. They play zero defense. The Clemson Tigers are 3-0 with three home wins as follows: Troy (surged late), beat the dreaded Wofford Terriers by 8, and mediocre Auburn. I'll hold off on my crush for Clemson.
- If you counter my argument with "What about Baylor? Or "What about Texas?" I can only say...good point. Clemson is just very Clemsony. They reek of an embarrassing road loss just waiting to happen. Isn't that what Clemson IS?
- Everyone likes Nebraska and South Carolina more than I do. Nebraska's defense is surprisingly porous and South Carolina seems to struggle mightily with every opponent. I forgive all teams that struggle with Navy to some extent, but South Carolina REALLY struggled. They could have easily lost that game at home. They will ride a surprisingly forgiving SEC schedule to an inflated ranking for a few weeks longer.
- I ranked Houston out of sheer stubbornness though I dropped them two spots. Another weak performance, even in victory, will put them out of the top 25. Edging out Louisiana Tech? Really, Houston.
- I also severely punished Virginia Tech for its continued underachievement against a feeble schedule. The ACC feels like a giant confidence game. Virginia Tech has a real shot at building up a strong record on tomato cans, but a quality bowl opponent will provide an epic pantsing unless they can create some offensive focus. They have the tools. The offense just seems to operate with a natural governor on its speed. Governor Frank Beamer?
- Ranked Georgia Tech for the sheer wonder of a football team rushing for 600+ yards in a college football game. Poor Kansas.
Thoughts? Comments?
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Glad to be back. If 36 hours offline engenders this kind of reaction, I’m not looking forward to taking a vacation.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 20, 2011 3:34 PM CDT reply actions
I might have ranked Texas at 18 before I saw the Utah-BYU score. . . . I have sold all my share in the Cougars.
by cirque du salado on Sep 20, 2011 3:39 PM CDT reply actions
And so end the Belmont hacker conspiracy theories.
by tackchevy on Sep 20, 2011 3:42 PM CDT reply actions
wheh. been a stressful day. Lots of rumors being thrown around :)
Thanks for the fix can finally get some sleep (overseas poster who appreciates the afternoon entries).
by Mack Brown's Gut on Sep 20, 2011 3:44 PM CDT reply actions
“We’re in the process of migrating over to a new platform, and post-migration, this should happen less often and your load times should be substantially improved.”
Are y’all moving to the standard SBNation platform? Pretty exciting, if so!
by TXinDC on Sep 20, 2011 3:46 PM CDT reply actions
I agree on all counts, and would add that I believe that Florida State might be rated a little high. They looked undisciplined against OU and that usuallyl leads to a loss that shouldn’t happen.
by srr50 on Sep 20, 2011 3:48 PM CDT reply actions
“this should happen less often and your load times should be substantially improved.”
I love it when you talk dirty to me.
by nordberg on Sep 20, 2011 3:49 PM CDT reply actions
No ISU love? You think they couldn’t take UH?
I was right there with Steele Jantz and the boys — until he gacked it against U Conn. They may have won, but he was horrible (3 ints in his first 4 throws) and they will be a 6-win team with that kind of play from their QB.
by srr50 on Sep 20, 2011 3:50 PM CDT reply actions
And so end the Belmont hacker conspiracy theories.
Hacking? Ha. More like Vasherized trying to change out a hard drive using a pair of industrial-grade pube tweezers. Honestly, before today, I didn’t even know they sold such things. You learn something new every day!
by BrickHorn on Sep 20, 2011 3:51 PM CDT reply actions
I’m not putting too much stock into the BYU loss. I think that game was a bit of a fluke. No way Utah is 44 points better than BYU on any given basis. That game just got out of hand with turnovers, and BYU rolled over and played dead. Besides if we had executed against BYU the entire half like we did against UCLA ,we definately would’ve won by more than a point. JMO.
by TXPride on Sep 20, 2011 3:51 PM CDT reply actions
I agree with your Clemson analysis, but what are you seeing in Arkansas that you like more than the other blog poll voters? Troy is a good team but that wasn’t a very impressive win this weekend (38-28 Arkansas).
I realize this is largely irrelevant as we will know their “true” rank after the next two games (@Bama, A&M).
Also, since this is a UT blog and we’re allowed to say ridiculous homer statements, is it fair to say that UT is one of the more underrated teams in the country? I think the top 7 on your ballot are all rock solid right now and deserve their rank, but 8-19 could be in any order and I’d be OK with it.
by Kram on Sep 20, 2011 3:54 PM CDT reply actions
Eh, it was his first start away from home. I don’t think they are world beaters, and they probably won’t win more than 7 games, but I’d still pick them over UH. I think they (or the coach) deserves a little credit for taking the ….whitest?.. team to 3-0. Dude is competing with Marshall and Georgia Southern for his recruits.
by ut-06 on Sep 20, 2011 3:55 PM CDT reply actions
When it comes to keep it real I keep it really wrong
At the risk of sounding crass I would like to mention
That I am well aware of your wack intentions
To usurp my prose you so and so
It’s my primary bone of contention
by Young Williams on Sep 20, 2011 5:08 PM CDT reply actions
Most intelligent explanation who is/is not ranked, and where, I’ve ever run across. What a concept — requiring that teams beat SOMEBODY and maybe do it on foreign soil before getting deified.
I can’t seriously argue with anyone you’ve ranked, and you point out the obvious poor showings (UH, Clemson, W. Virginia, Iowa State) and why those teams are not getting the love others are offering.
I’m thinking Michigan might be too low, Illinois too high, and Georgia at 25 wouldn’t be out of line since you have the Bulldogs’ conquerors at 4 and 13. Could the best in the Big East finish better than anybody in the Big 12-2 (other than Kansas) if the leagues were merged?
by edsp on Sep 20, 2011 5:24 PM CDT reply actions
I know I don’t post mch, but I do rely upon you all to get my daily fix as you consistently have some of if not the best analysis on the games, recruiting, and all other things Longhorn. So, I really missed you all the last couple of days. It was frustrating, but I’m really glad to have you back.
As far as the rankings above, only little quibbles that are so small that they don’t make sense to even discuss.
Thank you all for all for our daily fix.
by Exiled in California on Sep 20, 2011 6:33 PM CDT reply actions
Yay! Content!
I noticed the Forums are gone from the site now. Thank God! Hopefully they can be bot-proofed and come back online soon.
Is Texas flying under the radar? Anyone think we’re better than our #18 ranking? Guess we’ll know for sure in 2.5 weeks. Assuming we don’t muff the Iowa State game. If we can stop Dr Rhoads, we have a chance…
by Alan Couchman on Sep 20, 2011 6:33 PM CDT reply actions
Vacations are for losers, by the way. It’s like 7 days of bye weeks. Don’t do it!
by Alan Couchman on Sep 20, 2011 6:38 PM CDT reply actions
cirque -
I watched a bit of the BYU game. I’ve never seen a team implode like that. Seven turnovers, most of them unforced. It was shocking.
TxinDC -
We are moving to SB Nation’s platform. Finally. It should make for a much faster site and relieve us of having to deal with engineering issues constantly.
ut06 -
Iowa State could barely take N. Iowa. Hats off to Rhoads and the Cyclones, but they could just as easily be 0-3.
Kram -
I have zero confidence in any team not named LSU, Alabama, and to a lesser extent, OU.
I like Arkansas and I tend to overrate them compared to the rest of the bloggers. That’s usually rewarded, as it was last year. Petrino is just a hell of a football coach and you can count on him to out coach the guy on the other sideline with regularity. Arkansas also has a ridiculous corps of WRs and they put a lot of pressure on defenses. I expect them to prove their mettle against LSU and Alabama.
edsp -
If Georgia were coached by anyone but Richt, I would rank them, but this is a Bulldog team as likely to swoon as to rally.
Exiled/Alan -
Thanks for the kind words.
Texas is exactly what we thought we were. Don’t go fooling yourself into thinking we’re great, even after a win in Ames.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 21, 2011 1:10 PM CDT reply actions
“Iowa State could barely take N. Iowa. Hats off to Rhoads and the Cyclones, but they could just as easily be 0-3.” ~ Scipio
Could be…..but they’re not. Really quality teams learn how to win the close ones. You’re referring to their close win over FCS #2 Northern Iowa, correct? Remember Appl.State and Michigan in 2007? Appl.State went 13-2 and won their Nat’l Championship. I’d take Iowa State’s (4-4) opponents over our three (3-5) any day of the week. Paul Rhoads knows how to motivate a team as evidenced by 2009 Nebraska, ‘10 Texas, 14-point win over last year’s TT team and 1-point loss to ’10 Nebraska.
by Bevosboss on Sep 21, 2011 3:56 PM CDT reply actions
Maybe too late or maybe duplicative to other barkers, but I am still interested in looking at the UCLA beat down through the Scipio View Master, particularly the defensive performance.
Incidentially, Scipio, good job at Zama. General H. had it coming.
by All The Pretty Longhorns on Sep 21, 2011 5:41 PM CDT reply actions
BevosBoss -
ISU is a really quality team? OK. We’ll see. I should pencil them in for 9-3 then?
Northern Iowa isn’t Appalachian State.
All The Pretty -
Part I of UCLA beatdown is up. Part II tonight.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 21, 2011 5:48 PM CDT reply actions

by 
2
-2























