Big 12 Games Preview - 11/5/11
Time for the weekly look at the upcoming Big 12 games based on ratings and adjusted stats to date. Keep in mind that personnel matchups, coaching decisions, injuries, etc. will not play into the numerical predictions and are all important information that will still need to be considered.
Some of you may be familiar with my matchup analyzer, which predicts a final score based on the power ratings of each team as well as specific stats for the game. What it doesn't yet have, but may be added soon, is a second final score prediction based on the adjusted stats it shows. As discussed in the Adjusted Stats Year in Review, regression analysis can be used to estimate points scored against rushing, passing, and turnovers. I have chosen to use 2011 stats to update that regression weekly based on the season so far. For 2011 through the games of 10/29/11 that regression is currently 3.33*TPPA + 2.58*TRPC - 223.99*TVPP, which is used for the below analyses.
Also note that my power rating predicted scores below will differ from the analyzer because I'm using a standard 3 point homefield advantage while the analyzer uses the season results to date. Additionally, the official picks published later in the week may differ from the Other Games of Interest section because standard deviations aren't considered here.
Texas Tech (+10.5) @ Texas - 11:00 FX
Power Rating Predicted Score - Texas 38, Texas Tech 23
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Texas 34, Texas Tech 19
Matchup Analyzer Link
In a result that shocked absolutely nobody, including Tech fans, the Red Raiders followed up their huge victory in Norman by laying an egg against Iowa State. They're still obviously a dangerous opponent if only because of their inconsistency, and Texas' defense will face quite a different animal this week than they did in the Jayhawks. On the other side of the ball, the Texas offense is still a work in progress and is still prone to struggling at times. Still, the Red Raiders have given up 34, 45, 41, 38, and 41 points in their Big 12 games, showing an ability to allow around 40 points no matter who they're playing. Texas will likely try to control clock as they did against Kansas, so I look for a 34-28 Texas win. And, to be honest, I will be happy about any win we can get in this game (or any other for the rest of the year for that matter).
Kansas (+14.5) @ Iowa St. 11:30 FCS
Power Rating Predicted Score - Iowa St. 46, Kansas 27
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Iowa St. 37, Kansas 25
Matchup Analyzer Link
Kansas' offensive performance was shocking last week in Austin. A group that had been an average one to date put out a performance that had only been matched in its futility 4 other times since the turn of the century. It was the fifth time since then that a team had gained less than 50 total yards and been shut out. The Cyclones, meanwhile, were busy blowing out Tech in Lubbock. It's hard to not view this game as one where a team whose will has been broken is now going on the road to face an opponent that has a new lease on life. Iowa State 48-17.
Texas A&M (+14.5) @ Oklahoma 2:30 ABC
Power Rating Predicted Score - Oklahoma 43, Texas A&M 26
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Oklahoma 37, Texas A&M 25
Matchup Analyzer Link
This is not a good spot for the Aggies. Their pass defense, while not nearly as bad as conventional wisdom based on raw yards per game allowed will tell you, has struggled to cover receivers when they have to. They have made up for that with a high sack rate (#8 in adjusted sacks per pass attempt), but this week they face the #2 team in fewest adjusted sacks allowed per attempt. Their only hope is controlling the game as much as possible on the ground against an average Sooner run defense. Knowing what we know about Sherman and the Aggies' play-calling to date, though, does anyone think they can stick to that plan for an entire game? Despite the media feel good story, Whaley hasn't been critical to OU success and so Oklahoma should win and cover, call it 45-27.
Missouri (+1) @ Baylor 6:00 FSN
Power Rating Predicted Score - Missouri 41, Baylor 35
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Missouri 41, Baylor 36
Matchup Analyzer Link
First thing I noticed is obviously the strong agreement between the two models that the Tigers should be favored here. The second thing I noticed this weekend that relates to this game is that Sagarin has the Tigers #11. And it's with fairly good reason, even if I think he has the Big 12 rated too highly overall (Texas #9?!?). The Tigers have the #14 standard power rating despite being only 3-4 against FBS teams thanks to one of the toughest schedules in the country. The numbers say this should break down as a matchup between Missouri's run game and Baylor's passing attack. In a purely model homer pick, I'm going with Missouri 41-35.
Kansas St. (+21) @ Oklahoma St. 7:00 ABC
Power Rating Predicted Score - Oklahoma St. 46, Kansas St. 26
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Oklahoma St. 35, Kansas St. 17
Matchup Analyzer Link
This matchup isn't actually that bad for the Wildcats as the Cowboys' defense is extremely strong against the pass while only decent against the run. The problem is that Oklahoma State protects Weeden well and Snyder's crew got absolutely zero pressure on Landry Jones last week. I have to think the Wildcats will show better this week, though, and try to eat clock so I'll take the KSU cover and the under. Okie State 38-20.
OTHER GAMES OF INTEREST
(Missouri @ Baylor is the #1 model/spread disagreement)
Michigan (-4.5) @ Iowa
Power Rating Predicted Score - Michigan 35, Iowa 20
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Michigan 40, Iowa 30
Matchup Analyzer Link
Yeah, so last week's pick where a Michigan team traveled to corn country didn't work out so well for the models. I haven't watched nearly enough of either of these teams to have an informed opinion of this game. I do know that Kirk Ferentz was once an extremely hot coaching commodity and he has now lost to Minnesota two years in a row. The same Minnesota that is 1-9 with an average score of 18-39 against other Big Ten teams in that time.
Virginia (-2.5) @ Maryland
Power Rating Predicted Score - Maryland 29, Virginia 26
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Maryland 28, Virginia 18
Matchup Analyzer Link
The models still like Maryland. Models are crazy. Insightful analysis. Free of charge.
Northern Illinois (+7.5) @ Toledo
Power Rating Predicted Score - Toledo 48, Northern Illinois 31
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Toledo 38, Northern Illinois 25
Matchup Analyzer Link
Northern Illinois escaped with a win at Buffalo last week despite allowing 6.2 yards per play to a normally anemic Bulls offense. Then there are fairly meaningless figures like Toledo being 7-3-1 against the spread in their last 11 games while winning this matchup against Northern Illinois 9-3-1 in the last 13 against the spread. Bet the house on the Rockets! It's the best way to enjoy Tuesday night football.
That's it for this week.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’d like to see you add a small recap with last week’s results. Just a thought.
by Alan Couchman on Oct 31, 2011 10:07 AM CDT reply actions
Think the obvious game of interest this weekend would be Lsu and Bama.
by andrew massey on Oct 31, 2011 10:14 AM CDT reply actions
Like this post every week, so thanks. Agree with AC, but would like to see how picks have done since season began. Track record has some validity in confidence equation.
by Buzz on Oct 31, 2011 10:15 AM CDT reply actions
Interesting to see the B12 models converging after a lot of dichotomy earlier in the year. Yay for more data points!
Bama-LSU isn’t an “other game of interest”?
by jc25 on Oct 31, 2011 10:30 AM CDT reply actions
Putting the Model aside, I suspect that there is a better than average chance of a KSU upset next week. KSU is basically us, with a better running game.
Randy Edsell thinks your models are swell.
by Bateshorn on Oct 31, 2011 10:32 AM CDT reply actions
Rechecked my stats. Never mind.
Still, Randy Edsell really wants to know what your models are doing later this week.
by Bateshorn on Oct 31, 2011 10:33 AM CDT reply actions
I look for OU to go full Stoops and torch the shit out of A&M, trying to run the score up in the 4th quarter since they no longer control where they land with the BCS.
by ut-06 on Oct 31, 2011 10:53 AM CDT reply actions
Who are LSU and Alabama?
The other games of interest section is only for games where the models have the biggest disagreement with the lines. I will rename it next week due to the continued confusion because of the crappy name. For those curious, the models say 27-24 and 27-25 Bama for that game (power and stat, respectively).
by Huckleberry on Oct 31, 2011 11:00 AM CDT reply actions
How does Sagarin have Texas rated so highly? I get that we lost to the number 3 and 4 teams, but our wins are over teams ranked 91, 82, 56, 55, and 45. Was it just because of the defensive effort against Kansas?
by asdf on Oct 31, 2011 11:22 AM CDT reply actions
So how accurately has the model picked winners and how close to the final scores has it been?
by texasengr on Oct 31, 2011 12:08 PM CDT reply actions
How does Sagarin have Texas rated so highly? I get that we lost to the number 3 and 4 teams, but our wins are over teams ranked 91, 82, 56, 55, and 45. Was it just because of the defensive effort against Kansas?
If I remember correctly UT was 24th last week (Mizzou was 26th). This week UT is 9th and Mizzou 11th. UT has the 14th toughest SOS – Mizzou’s is 1st. Sagarin just loves the Big 12 – see:
3 OSU
4 OU
8 A&M
9 UT
11 Mizzou
18 KSU
25 Baylor
39 TT
45 ISU
92 KU
by Phenomenal Smith on Oct 31, 2011 12:15 PM CDT reply actions
I hope your models are closer to the final result than your 34 – 28 prediction. I don’t know if my heart can take us being up by 6 late in the 4th quarter against Tech, even if the pirate has gone to Key West.
by Longhorn in Canada on Oct 31, 2011 12:44 PM CDT reply actions
Everyone knows that there isn’t a program written or a system created that can project any game involving the Mad Hatter.
by Davey O'Brien on Oct 31, 2011 12:47 PM CDT reply actions
texasengr -
It does fairly well, I guess. Obviously it doesn’t hit every score on the nose or else I wouldn’t be publishing it here. Ha.
The intent of the model is to put a final result on the predicted average score of many meetings between the two teams. Obviously games very rarely play out exactly as they should on paper, so it hits some almost exactly and misses others wildly. I’m a numbers guy but I enjoy watching the games as much as anyone else.
Overall the model has had a ridiculously good year (2008), a bad year (2010), a good year (2009), and we’re still watching 2011 unfold. I’m going to try to revisit everything in the future because I now have stats going back to 2000 to determine the best model I can. This weekly preview is more for getting the college football week started with a quick glance at the conference slate.
by Huckleberry on Oct 31, 2011 1:29 PM CDT reply actions
Any win by Texas by any margin against any opponent on our remaining schedule should be treated with joy and exuberance. That’s not because I believe a win is a win. It’s because this team is far too flawed for applying my preferred traditional standards.
Where has A&M showed the capacity for being blown out? OU has a long history of doing just that to people at their place, but I’m not comfortable laying 14.5.
Missouri-Baylor is a coin flip and I favor Mizzou slightly. Henry Josey will average 10 yards per carry. If our DL continues their play from last Saturday, I’m feeling better about our matchup in Waco.
OSU’s defense will continue to be sneaky good. All they have to do is rob KSU of a couple of possessions early and the game can get out of hand. On the other hand, KSU has to play pretty much perfect football to win. KSU will put up some points, in any event.
OSU’s ability to kill you with big plays in the running game when you double up on their WRs is driving their engine right now. Randle is at 6.2 per carry; Smith is at 7.5. They actually have a possession passing game paired with big play running game. A pretty unique creature.
by Scipio Tex on Oct 31, 2011 2:29 PM CDT reply actions
Where has A&M showed the capacity for being blown out?
In the second half? Ha.
I agree with you but I have a bad feeling about that game for them. I think the Sooners may come out primed for one of their early explosions and I noticed a lot of tendencies in the A&M pass routes in the games I’ve watched. Stoops eats tendencies up, as we know all too well. If they don’t stay committed to the ground game I think they could get in a lot of trouble.
by Huckleberry on Oct 31, 2011 2:35 PM CDT reply actions
Scip-
I guess that was the point of my erroneous comment about KSU’s defense: Under the right circumstances, KSU’sability to grind clock could be problematic for OSU, which wants the other team to try to get out and run with the Cowboys. But the Wildcats will need a lot of things to fall into place, including Weeden getting cocky and forcing the ball and somehow finding a way to hold the middle of the defense against big run plays, plus running the clock down to the 1 on every play from the first snap.
by Bateshorn on Oct 31, 2011 2:39 PM CDT reply actions
I was watching College Football Live before the season and they asked Matt Millen who he thought the best coaches in CFB were. The first name out of his mouth was Kirk Ferentz.
by Savage Henry on Oct 31, 2011 2:51 PM CDT reply actions
Will one of our Aggies explain why Jeff Fuller has been such a disappointment? I understand he was hurt for a while, but that doesn’t explain his refusal to fight for the ball.
by Scipio Tex on Oct 31, 2011 2:55 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks, Scip, I’ve noticed that, too. I wonder if he’s got the redass because Tanneyhill is doing a McCoy/Shipley type thing with Swope. He seems unhappy in a Roy Williams kind of way.
by Jake Lonergan on Oct 31, 2011 3:06 PM CDT reply actions
Fuller drew a lot of ire Saturday in the TexAgs meltdown.
by Bob in Houston on Oct 31, 2011 5:03 PM CDT reply actions
He looked like he was going through the motions on Saturday. Not just in failing to use that big frame to shield off the smaller corner back, but he had some simple drops.
by Davey O'Brien on Oct 31, 2011 5:08 PM CDT reply actions
Would not bother me a bit if Oklahoma had a breakdown like tech this weekend. You have to think A&M looked closely at the Defense Scheme Tech used against Oklahoma. Coach aggy needs to give up his OC job.
by 55f100tx on Oct 31, 2011 5:25 PM CDT reply actions
The Texas A&M psyche will be important to watch. They are a few bad things away from having the wheels come completely off the sheep wagon and if OU gets an early turnover or gets up 14-0 I predict very bad things for A&M. Like 59-17 kind of bad.
If I am A&M I come out and go Texas game plan on OU and run the ball 9 out of every 10 plays in the first half.
by Newy25 on Oct 31, 2011 5:40 PM CDT reply actions
“Where has A&M showed the capacity for being blown out?”
In Norman. Duh.
by CrazyJoeDavola on Oct 31, 2011 5:41 PM CDT reply actions
Great point Newy. The Ags were convinced they were going out of the Big XII in style with a conference title. Now those dreams gone it will be interesting to see how things hold together. Remember that a year ago at this time the Ags were calling for Sherms head.
by Davey O'Brien on Oct 31, 2011 5:53 PM CDT reply actions
Scip, the devolution of Jeff Fuller has been a mystery to all of us. Not running good routes, Db’s sitting on the come back routes as he doesn’t sell anything else. Last week was particularly bad vs. MIzzou with multiple drops. He’s in some sort of senior funk usually reserved for Aggie Qb’s. I think we need to learn to play 2 1st halves per game, then we would be undefeated. I think we can keep it close in Norman if we can keep our ground game viable, but early scores and or turnovers will end up with the usual result.
by KilgoreTrout on Oct 31, 2011 6:59 PM CDT reply actions
Where has A&M showed the capacity for being blown out? OU has a long history of doing just that to people at their place, but I’m not comfortable laying 14.5.
Average score of OU-A&M in Norman during Stoops’ tenure … 50-12.
That includes games of 51-6, 65-10 and the delicious 77-0 where backup Paul Thompson was taking a knee on first and goal in the third quarter.
Stoops has never scored less than 31 at home versus A&M.
I could have posted similar numbers about what Stoops has done to Tech in Norman, too, though. #sadface
by ponderos on Oct 31, 2011 7:02 PM CDT reply actions
The Ag’s are fighting multiple battles at this moment: 1) their traditional football season battle when optimism turns to disappointment; 2) the battle among themselves about the wisdom of their move to the SEC; 3) the battle to justify the move to the SEC to outsiders; 4) the fire-the-coach battle; 5) the withhold donations battle, and 6) the ‘smack down a player’ battle on Twitter.
I would say they are at DEF-CON 5 and counting. Scary.
by java on Oct 31, 2011 7:34 PM CDT reply actions
Fuller has made himself a lot of money by coming back.
by Hey Man on Oct 31, 2011 8:27 PM CDT reply actions
I was rooting last week for an 8 point Stanford win after a shoot-out with enough officiating issues for Lane to make an ass of himself afterwards. Given that success, I’ve been trying to figure out what outcome I most desire this week. A stomping of Tech? Another 4th quarter collapse for AM? A triple reverse on 4th and inches with the center picking up Jefferson’s fumble and rumbling 85 yards for the winning TD as time expires?
Then it hit me. None of the above. Lottery ticket.
by G.O.F. on Nov 1, 2011 12:54 PM CDT reply actions

by 
























