Big 12 Games Preview - 11/12/11
Time for the weekly look at the upcoming Big 12 games based on ratings and adjusted stats to date. Keep in mind that personnel matchups, coaching decisions, injuries, etc. will not play into the numerical predictions and are all important information that will still need to be considered. One housekeeping note is that based on what I did for the high school ratings, I have updated the team pages to show every team's full schedule including matchup analyzer links where applicable as you can see on the Texas page for example. Winning percentage, both raw and unadjusted, will continue to display results against other FBS teams only but the team page and ratings tables will show a team's overall record, including games against FCS teams. The same theory applies to point calculations and the PF (Points For) and PA (Points Allowed) columns in the tables.
Some of you may be familiar with my matchup analyzer, which predicts a final score based on the power ratings of each team as well as specific stats for the game. What it doesn't yet have, but may be added soon, is a second final score prediction based on the adjusted stats it shows. As discussed in the Adjusted Stats Year in Review, regression analysis can be used to estimate points scored against rushing, passing, and turnovers. I have chosen to use 2011 stats to update that regression weekly based on the season so far. For 2011 through the games of 11/5/11 that regression is currently 3.28*TPPA + 2.65*TRPC - 235.73*TVPP, which is used for the below analyses.
Also note that my power rating predicted scores below will differ from the analyzer because I'm using a standard 3 point homefield advantage while the analyzer uses the season results to date. Additionally, the official picks published later in the week may differ from the Other Games of Interest section because standard deviations aren't considered here.
Oklahoma St. (-17) @ Texas Tech - 11:00 ABC
Power Rating Predicted Score - Oklahoma St. 57, Texas Tech 32
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Oklahoma St. 44, Texas Tech 23
Matchup Analyzer Link
It did not take long for Tuberville to ruin the good graces he found himself in only two weeks ago after the shocking win over Oklahoma. If they weren't entirely gone after getting crushed at home by Iowa State, he took care of that last Saturday as the Red Raiders got run right over by Texas. Things don't figure to get any better this week as the undefeated #3 Cowboys come to Lubbock. You would think that Gundy would have their attention heading into this one after the scare that a highly ranked yet large underdog Kansas State team put in them last time out. As I'm getting lazy, I will straddle the two models and call it 51-28 in favor of Oklahoma State.
Texas (-1) @ Missouri 11:00 FX
Power Rating Predicted Score - Missouri 25 (24.9), Texas 25 (24.8)
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Missouri 30, Texas 26
Matchup Analyzer Link
The models call for a narrow Texas defeat, but something they don't take into account is that the Longhorns have been trending upward in every meaningful statistic the past few weeks. The Tigers are a very consistent team across the board, ranking in or near the top 40 of most major categories, and they have taken care of the ball very well considering their competition to date. Despite a 3-5 record against FBS teams, Missouri is #17 in the standard power rating. Probably the SEC rubbing off on them already. I'm a Texas fan so I figure the improvement to continue as we see a 34-24 Texas win and deafening chants of Big12!Big12!Big12! from our hearty road fans.
Baylor (-20) @ Kansas 1:00 No TV
Power Rating Predicted Score - Baylor 52, Kansas 34
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Baylor 48, Kansas 34
Matchup Analyzer Link
Baylor won a good game against Missouri last week while the Jayhawks dropped a close one to Iowa State. So each team is coming off at least a moral victory, but the Kansas offense has been subpar to be kind the past two games. And on defense while they were able to keep a weak Cyclone unit in check, Baylor's offense will finally be facing a team they out-athlete in most matchups. Baylor 56-21.
Texas A&M (-4.5) @ Kansas St. 2:30 ABC
Power Rating Predicted Score - Texas A&M 32 (32.4), Kansas St. 32 (32.1)
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Kansas St. 29 (29.4), Texas A&M 29 (28.6)
Matchup Analyzer Link
The Aggies limp into Manhattan after two consecutive losses and without Christine Michael, who is out for the year with a knee injury. A&M continues to rate well in nearly every statistic and the power rating, but they can't get a stop when they absolutely need it against good teams this year. Meanwhile, the Wildcats are extremely good at the one thing the Aggies are bad at - turnovers. With a game this tight and an injury to one of the two Aggie backs, an edge like that is enough for me. Kansas State wins this one outright 30-27.
THE FOUR GAMES WHERE THE MODELS DISAGREE WITH THE CONSENSUS SPREAD BY THE LARGEST NUMBER OF POINTS
I renamed this section with a more accurate title. Should help.
North Texas (+8) @ Troy
Power Rating Predicted Score - North Texas 23, Troy 21
Stat Regression Predicted Score - North Texas 26, Troy 23
Matchup Analyzer Link
That's a big disagreement this late in the year. I'm going to assume there's an injury or coaching change or something I don't know about. Or the fact that it's North Texas and Scott Bakula ain't walking through that door.
Tennessee (+14) @ Arkansas
Power Rating Predicted Score - Arkansas 29, Tennessee 23
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Arkansas 35, Tennessee 30
Matchup Analyzer Link
The Razorbacks have some good games on their schedule, but they beat Troy by 10, Ole Miss by 5, and Vandy by 3. Betting on them to cover two touchdowns against an adequate opponent with a solid defense seems risky.
Virginia Tech (-1) @ Georgia Tech
Power Rating Predicted Score - Georgia Tech 23, Virginia Tech 17
Stat Regression Predicted Score - Georgia Tech 38, Virginia Tech 27
Matchup Analyzer Link
Every time the Yellowjackets pop up on here it reminds me I need to add some sort of pace component to the stat regression model. Then I forget to do it so it totally screws with the totals number. Anyway, the computer continues to like the Fighting Paul Johnsons. And it's not a Beamer Ball fan. Those two things have to win eventually. Bet it all on the Rambling Wreck. But not because I said so because I don't want any blame later.
Navy (+8.5) @ SMU
Power Rating Predicted Score - SMU 33, Navy 30
Stat Regression Predicted Score - SMU 37 (36.8), Navy 37 (36.6)
Matchup Analyzer Link
I don't like this play that much because the Mustangs stop the run very well this year. But I just report the output, so here it is.
That's it for this week.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That the line? Texas by 1.5? Okay, I’m in.
by Fong the Merciless on Nov 8, 2011 1:18 PM CST reply actions
What’s the over/under on how many plays into Saturday’s game does it take for Sheldon Richardson to get pancaked and have a Longhorn O-lineman standing over him asking “Who’s overrated now, BITCH!”
by Magnitude on Nov 8, 2011 1:36 PM CST reply actions
Probably the SEC rubbing off on them already.
Missouri Fan could read this two ways.
by parlin on Nov 8, 2011 1:49 PM CST reply actions
I expect the Texas fans to chant “Pac 16!” when they win.
I was most surprised by A&M being favored in Manhattan. And by plenty, too.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 1:58 PM CST reply actions
Phenomenal -
Will the Border War refer to Illinois non-conference games or to Arkansas in the future? I guess you could claim Kentucky as a bordering state.
by Huckleberry on Nov 8, 2011 2:02 PM CST reply actions
The same number of plays it took for Fangupo to “surrender.”
by txgeotech on Nov 8, 2011 2:06 PM CST reply actions
A&M getting that many points in Manhattan can only mean one of two things.
1) Snyder is dead and K State is flying Jonathan Silverman and Andy McCarty in to film Gameday at Bernie’s, but nobody knows but Vegas.
2) There is a critical tapioca and Depends shortage in the Midwest.
by The General on Nov 8, 2011 2:13 PM CST reply actions
Missouri isn’t as bad as their record would indicate.
They played Oklahoma tough, and have played well on the road. Their only home loss was to Oklahoma State by a good margin.
Also as an aside, they’re averaging 35 points per game, and 33 ppg in conference play.
I’ll be happy with a one point victory.
by Orangeblood79 on Nov 8, 2011 2:13 PM CST reply actions
Huck, the Border War will refer to MU/KU in a few years once KU has cooled off. It’s such a financial windfall that KU would be reckless to not play the game. Everyone likes money.
And, as you noted, Mizzou is lucky to have lots of bordering states. 8. UK, Tenn, and Arkansas can all be our new border war team. Maybe Nebraska or Iowa in non-con. It’s good to have options.
I loved the Sheldon Richardson quotes. He was smirking and trying to get a rise out of his linemates. Now all of Texas is pissed. Saturday will be fun in CoMo.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 2:17 PM CST reply actions
the matchup analyzer predicts that missouri wins, right?
by brucebond on Nov 8, 2011 2:23 PM CST reply actions
Yes, they’re heavily favored to win 50.3% of the time by the analyzer.
Phenomenal -
I find it subtly humorous that Missouri is counting on money to overcome the way they acted without concern for Kansas as they try to get keep the rivalry alive. Not that I think Missouri administrators have an absolute moral obligation to act in Kansas’ interest, but after all the whining about how unfair the Big 12 is from other places and Texas is greedy, it’s kind of funny.
Great conference partners you guys are. “Yeah, we’ll screw ‘em over if we have to but they’ll come back because of the money.” Welcome to the dark side.
by Huckleberry on Nov 8, 2011 2:26 PM CST reply actions
Orangeblood, you’re right – Mizzou’s not bad. Lost some tough games. Made a lot of dumb mistakes at inopportune times (at OSU 5 down by 14 early in the 4th quarter – inexplicable fumble…). Had some costly untimely injuries (against Baylor lost starting FS Braylon Webb (Gilmer, Tx) and brought in Matt White (Keller, TX) who quickly got burned for three TDs). That kind of thing. All American FG kicker went south – missed game winner at ASU, missed two at OU, missed two at KSU….
It’s been a rough year, but I’m not down on the team.
Reminds me – I happened to watch the Mizzou/A&M game at a bar in KC that was hosting an A&M watch party. Didn’t talk to them much, but at halftime one of them asked me if Mizzou fans were calling for Pinkel’s head. I laughed. No, not at all.
In my “what are the chances of Mizzou winning out” analysis I did this morning, I put Mizzou’s chances of beating UT at 47%. I expect it to be close, but also recognize that UT is getting better and has tons of talent. Would be super sweet to beat the Longhorns after beating OU last year.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 2:29 PM CST reply actions
Huck, I don’t know what you’re talking about. I have no idea what Mizzou is counting on. I’m saying that I want Mizzou and KU to play again and my KU friends and I agree (just had this discussion) that they’ll play again after the hard feelings have warn off and the realization that there’s a lot of money to be made. Also, my KU friends disagree with Bill Self and his “don’t give a flip” comment – and they want him to stop talking like Roy Williams.
I have never said Texas is greedy, so please don’t find me subtly humorous.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 2:34 PM CST reply actions
I would think there’s more to overcome than an emotional off the cuff comment from a single coach. Their AD issued a release basically saying they wouldn’t play Missouri anymore.
I think it’s likely they schedule you in the future, but there was some thought put into declaring that they wouldn’t. And who knows? Maybe the other ADs are colluding, either directly or in effect, to not play schools that leave the conference. That’s something that they can afford to do as long as the conference is still high profile. I doubt you see A&M popping up on too many Baylor or Texas Tech schedules in the near future, and they need the money more than Kansas does.
by Huckleberry on Nov 8, 2011 2:43 PM CST reply actions
Oh, I know KU is hurt right now. The AD and Self make that clear (although I guess Self was saying KU fans don’t care about that rivalry anyway – he’s a strange dude). I don’t like that KU is hurt. I like KU – without a doubt KU is what I’ll miss about the Big 12. Lawrence is a great place to be. For the most part the KU people I know are sad that Mizzou is leaving, but also understand it and concede that if KU had the chance, it’d leave too. That’s just the way it is. They also believe KU will play Mizzou again in the not so distant future (5 to 10 years is the estimate) once the dust has settled.
I really hope they play again. I don’t care about money – I mostly just care about my own good times.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 3:03 PM CST reply actions
I can see why Kansas is pissed. Without Texas essentially guaranteeing the Big 12 they could very well be looking at life in Conference USA. (I understand Texas is not acting benevolently toward Kansas, we’re all about establishing and preserving the LHN). Missouri, more than any other school precipitated the downfall of the Big 12 first in their attempt to get into the Big 10 and now with the SEC.
Unlike Nebraska, who really did have a legitimate gripe about losing their rivalry with OU during the formation of the Big 12, as well as a bunch of ridiculous whining, what they hell did Missouri have to complain about?
Kansas should be pissed, and I have a feeling it will take a change in administration at KU AND solidification in a new BCS conference before they will play Missouri again.
by roach on Nov 8, 2011 3:06 PM CST reply actions
Huck, the Border War will refer to MU/KU in a few years once KU has cooled off. It’s such a financial windfall that KU would be reckless to not play the game.
I think you’re wrong.
by Hiphopopotamus on Nov 8, 2011 3:07 PM CST reply actions
Sheldon Richardson should be pleased w/ the move to the SEC b/c the number of his teammates from TX will drop.
The same will be said of Mizzou’s fortunes.
by Joetx on Nov 8, 2011 3:14 PM CST reply actions
Joetx, Sheldon won’t be at Mizzou then.
Hiphop, really? Forever?
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 3:17 PM CST reply actions
Forever is a long time. But in the near and/or intermediate term, absolutely.
by Hiphopopotamus on Nov 8, 2011 3:28 PM CST reply actions
I would just like to commend Hiphopopotamus on being a good fan. Seriously, he’s a Kansas guy and he apparently still clicks on the weekly Big 12 games preview I post. Meanwhile last year I completely stopped running my ratings and stats after too many embarrassing losses.
by Huckleberry on Nov 8, 2011 3:31 PM CST reply actions
Phenomenal—
My simple question for you:
Can Missouri stop the run?
by Orangeblood79 on Nov 8, 2011 3:33 PM CST reply actions
I hope forever is a long time….
I agree that it won’t happen any time soon. Some of that is just based on who KU wants to play in noncon with just a three game noncon schedule. I can dig that. I’m hopnig in five years Mike Leach has the KU program peaking and we’ll all be able to get back together for Armageddon VI. In basketball any MU/KU game at the Sprint Center really just benefits Mizzou because KU can fill that place up and make a ton of money scheduling Emporia State. So, there’s no need there.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 3:34 PM CST reply actions
@ Hiphopoptamus – Perhaps you or Triston27 can write a “Why KU Won’t Play MU” article (a la http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2011/10/19/why-texas-wont-play-am/)?
by Joetx on Nov 8, 2011 3:35 PM CST reply actions
Orangeblood, not too long ago I would have said Mizzou could stop the run. Before Okie State, Mizzou was one of the best in the conference at stopping the run. Okie State ran well and then last week Baylor averaged more than 7 yards a carry. Everything kind of went to hell in that game. So, the short answer is, not really.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 3:41 PM CST reply actions
P. Smith &the orangeblood….
in regard to past and present. Yeah Missouri played OU tough but that was weeks/injuries ago.
Game plan on offense will be simple with dinged up linebackers/defensive backs (sounds familiar-last week)… so just run the hell outta the ball until the backers and backs inch forward so you’ve got ship crossing and Davis/white running deep.
In regard to our defense …… well lets see. Josey (running back) has bad shoulder so let vacaro put a couple good licks on him. Gatti (starting OK) is out for the rest of the season. And last but not least, Franklin (QB) has a hip pointer so just sig jeffcoat, Dorsey, hicks, and school after him and serif he’s a step slow…. I’m bettin he is.
Texas 45
Missouri 14
Oh, and by the way…. the kicker struggled last week because of a bad leg….. expect sub-par or no-show from him ergo my score prediction.
Hook’Em
by jet on Nov 8, 2011 3:57 PM CST reply actions
Excuse the typos as this new smartphone is editing everything and I mean everything.
Above should have been Gatti(starting OL )
HERE’S a great sight to keep up with injuries…. enjoy.
by jet on Nov 8, 2011 4:04 PM CST reply actions
The starting kicker (All American Grant Ressel) hasn’t played in a couple weeks due to a hip flexor problem. The backup kicker has made a couple short FGs, but missed a 46 yarder at the end of regulation at A&M. I’m sure he’s unreliable, but so was Ressel.
Gatti is out for the year, but he’s never started a game. Not even sure he was on the two deep.
The starting center, Travis Ruth, is hurt. Not the end of the world there.
by Phenomenal Smith on Nov 8, 2011 4:24 PM CST reply actions
I will be happy with a victory, but i expect the longhorns will kick the dog snot out of em.
When you get good at something, its hard to stop.
by 55f100tx on Nov 8, 2011 4:28 PM CST reply actions
Huck,
I am pretty sure I know the answer before asking the question, but for persona interest what is the projections of Boise -TCU?
by Davey O'Brien on Nov 8, 2011 8:53 PM CST reply actions
Power model has 40-22 and the stat model has 35-23. About a 12% chance of a TCU win according to power but 20% according to the stats.
by Huckleberry on Nov 8, 2011 9:02 PM CST reply actions
That Arkansas/TN spread is high due to the QB situation and the fact that the Vols couldn’t run on Kansas if they had to. Arky will score points. They’ll give up a few but I think they cover.
by Ty on Nov 9, 2011 8:19 AM CST reply actions
I will take Diaz over Muschamp any day. Our defense has improved tremendously—and we are playing with a lot of youth on defense which is also amazing. Diggs is our next super star d back.
Texas wins this one on the road because our defense has improved and because our running game looked so strong. Oline is playing so much better.
TX wins 33 to 21.
by staylucky on Nov 9, 2011 8:53 AM CST reply actions
Great points altogether, you just received a logo new reader. What could you suggest in regards to your post that you just made some days ago? Any certain?
by mit der webcam geld verdienen on Jan 10, 2012 8:06 PM CST reply actions

by 
























