jones Top Ten - Week Eleven - 2011
Conference re-alignment has not completely dulled my enthusiasm for college football, just partially. Roughly about to the same extent the Transportation Safety Administration has dulled my enthusiasm for air travel. I maintain some appreciation for the theatre of the absurd, like the ten-team Big 12 and the 12-team Big Ten. But that’s easy pickings. What’s more interesting are events like Saturday’s, where TCU and Boise State embarked on an epic conference rivalry, which will last exactly one game. Boise State got to host, since the Mountain West needed to punish TCU for leaving for the Big East (lucky them, the Big East won’t get to punish TCU for anything: Uhm, yeah, well, we like basketball, too and we appreciate the available BCS bid and all of that, but the thing is, well… gosh this is embarrassing, but the Big 12 kind of asked us out and, well, you were being all weird about it and all and so we kind of decided…).
Boise State has also endured all kinds of cruel and unusual punishment, not the least of which was to move into the Mountain West only to find that vandals had stolen all of the copper plumbing and the huge Mormon community was no longer interested in patronizing the neighborhood businesses. Oh well. One indignity that would not happen was for a perfectly tuned and talented Boise State squad with Kellen Moore at the controls to lose to a rebuilding and defensively erratic TCU. Justice would be served. The common man would assert his value for all the BCS hegemony to see. TCU, with this kick, you will be reminded of our shared struggle that you have so cavalierly left behind.
Damn.
TCU 36
Boise State 35
To be fair, Boise State’s attempt at a game-winning field goal was made possible by a pass-interference call that only Ian Johnson’s mother could love. But, also to be fair, the field goal was only necessary because of a courageous (stupid?, it’s a pretty thin line) decision from Gary Patterson for TCU to go for two after cutting the lead to 35-34 on a brilliant Casey Pachall pass to Brandon Carter. All in all, great college football. And we may never see this match-up again.
I have consistently ranked Oregon ahead of both Stanford and Oklahoma State this year and, when criticized, have offered a very easy response: because Oregon is better. Now, dear readers, I don’t get everything right, and the archives of my greatest idiotic hits are available on the internet for anyone to surf, but this one…
Oregon 53
Stanford 30
You have two choices. You can load the box against Oregon’s running game and hope to God that your defense doesn’t make a single mistake and your offense can keep pace if it does. Or, you can field 11 NFL players on defense, the way LSU did. The latter option was not available to Stanford.
Texas A&M fans are being subjected to a season so heart breaking, they might as well be watching The English Patient every Saturday. Ralph Fiennes would play Bill Byrne. The part of head coach Mike Sherman would be touchingly brought to screen by Kristin Scott Thomas. This week, the Aggies lost their fifth game of 2011 in the first quadruple overtime game in Big 12 history. Kansas State presses on, 53-50, for an unlikely win that included an end-zone fumble recovery that kept them alive in the first OT frame.
From week one:
Oklahoma State totaled 666 yards of total offense, which concerns me because wouldn’t Satan dress like Mike Gundy if he returned to Earth?
I ask you again, if Satan were to return to Earth, wouldn’t you expect him to look and act a lot like Mike Gundy? Oklahoma State 66, Texas Tech 6.
Missouri thwarted Texas, 17-5, by proving that one-dimensional space is still one-dimensional space, even with the optical illusion of a passing game. The Longhorns basically ran out of skill position players after Fozzy Whittaker joined the ranks of the wounded in the first quarter. Missouri, for their part, played smart football and also lost Henry Josey, the Big 12’s best tailback. The turf at Faurot Field could make the old Vet in Philadelphia look like a garden spot.
Clemson had to rally, but a last-second field goal lifted them past Wake Forest and into the ACC title game, no Clemson moment this week. 31-28, Tigers.
Virginia Tech went to 9-1 with a 37-26 win over Georgia Tech in the Thursday night game and will likely be Clemson’s opponent. Although UVa, of all teams, may have something to say about that. The Wahoos are 7-3 (4-2, ACC) after a win over Duke. I had no idea, which is fairly embarrassing for someone who writes a weekly football column. No lacrosse jokes, please.
LSU rested up after their arduous 9-6 battle in the Greatest Game Ever Played by taking the day, well most of the first half anyway, off against Western Kentucky. 42-9, Tigers.
Alabama actually played a real opponent, defeating Mississippi State, 24-7, by holding the Bulldogs to 131 yards of total offense. Dan Mullen’s agent wept.
The second tier of the SEC was more interesting. Arkansas got back to looking like their old selves by thrashing Tennessee, 49-7. The Save Mark Richt Movement picked up steam in a 45-7 Georgia win over Auburn. The Bulldogs will be the likely SEC East champs. South Carolina, one game back in the East loss column, handed Florida its fifth defeat, 17-12.
What’s worse? Getting ripped by 30 by an improving Vanderbilt? Or getting embarrassed by 20 in a home pay-to-play game against Louisiana Tech? I am guessing the latter, if only because fans of the former at least have a top five basketball team to look forward to.
In the Big Ten, the two Michigans won games I thought they would lose. State beat Iowa on the road easily, 37-21. UM went to Illinois and did the same thing, 31-14.
Wisconsin pummeled Minnesota and I still can’t believe the Badgers have two losses.
Nebraska made enough plays in the ground game and then kept Penn State at bay late, despite a strong rally by the Nittany Lions. 17-14, Huskers. That is what happened between the lines. What happened outside of them has been rolling around our brains for days, causing our heads to shake in disbelief and anger. I will comment about this later in the week.
Houston and Tulane combined for 90 total points on Thursday. Guess how many Houston had? It’s more than 70.
I am obligated to report that Southern Miss is now 9-1 after a 30-29 squeaker over UCF. The Golden Eagles are good, and will likely finish 11-1.
Finally, if Tom Osborne taught Turner Gill anything, it is apparently that ties are for losers. Kansas had Baylor on the ropes before a furious RGIII-fueled comeback led to overtime. Baylor scored a TD; Kansas answered. Gill went for two. The stakes were smaller than when he was actually throwing the pass…but the result was the same. Baylor 31, Kansas 30.
Impressive Showing of the Week: Oregon
1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oregon
4. Oklahoma State
5. Stanford
6. Arkansas
7. Oklahoma
8. Clemson
9. Boise State
10. Wisconsin
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Pac-12 does not have a single win over a decent out-of-conference team. Not one. Two of their teams in your Top 5?
Oregon has lost every game it has played against an out-of-conference foe with a good d-line for the past three years: Auburn, LSU, Ohio State, and Boise State twice. They’re Georgia Tech with better athletes. Scary with a mismatch, dangerous with only a week’s prep, and relatively docile against size and speed in the defense with any extra prep time.
I’ll believe it until they prove me wrong.
by G.O.F. on Nov 13, 2011 10:58 PM CST reply actions
I think you are right about the devil and Mike Gundy.
by ChemEinCO on Nov 13, 2011 10:59 PM CST reply actions
Game Day at Cougar High next Saturday, who woulda thunk it?
by Juice on Nov 13, 2011 11:11 PM CST reply actions
G.O.F. —
Good points all…but you are also describing the SEC. LSU has a blocker win against Oregon, which I obviously honor. Other than that? LSU over WVU and ‘Bama over an overranked Penn State. That’s it. Yet I have two SEC teams in the top two. If that’s your metric, then the Big 12 is by far the nation’s best conference (a point I agree with, actually).
But it’s irrelevant. The question is can Oklahoma State beat Oregon? Can Arkansas? Can Clemson? Can OU? I think the answer is no. The match-up I would like to see is Wisconsin, actually (Rose Bowl?). But given what Oregon did to Stanford that might not work out so well for the Badgers.
These are the only teams I can rank. I can’t invent BIG State U with NFL Caliber D-line and rank them ahead of Oregon. The two teams that fit that description are already ranked ahead of Oregon.
I would much rather watch an Oregon/LSU rematch than watch LSU play Alabama again. Oddly enough, I am sort of pulling for Okie State (God, what have I become???)
(Oh, and let’s not compare Oregon’s horrific performances against BSU with the current team. Chip Kelly didn’t coach one of them and was in over his head in the LeGarrette Blount fiasco. He’s got a much better machine going now).
Thanks for the well considered comments.
by jonestopten on Nov 14, 2011 7:55 AM CST reply actions
Enjoyable stuff, jones.
I’d just move OU ahead of Hog and Cardinal. That’s it.
by ColoradoAg on Nov 14, 2011 8:24 AM CST reply actions
Fair enough. I’d move Oregon behind Oklahoma, both ahead of Arkansas, and back Stanford to 10, or perhaps drop them for Georgia or Kansas State – but that’s just me. I get where you’re coming from.
by G.O.F. on Nov 14, 2011 8:36 AM CST reply actions
I know this stuff usually works itself out with a couple more season-ending surprises. That being said, what say you about the chances of OU sneaking in to the MNC game?
It appears as if the perfect storm could occur in that OU gets brownie points by potentially beating the #2 team in the BCS (Okie St.) while Bama and Oregon play crap games that nobody cares about.
The computers love OU – especially if they beat Okie St. The voters may want to vote against a Bama/LSU rematch. Hell, they may vote against an LSU/Oregon rematch as well. I can sort of see a split there with some voters going for OU to avoid a rematch. This, coupled with the computers could put OU over the top.
by Ty on Nov 14, 2011 11:15 AM CST reply actions
Ty: That’s insightful stuff about voters and rematches. The thought occurred to me after 9-6. I think voters DO want to avoid remaches. Much the same thing happened with Michigan after 42-39 (to Ohio State) a few years back. Right after the game, there was talk of a rematch. but Michigan, which was No. 2 the week after its loss, eventually slipped to 3 or 4.
The human polls sometimes seem overly robotic — don’t lose, you keep moving up. Lose, doesn’t matter to whom or how, and you’re cooked. Especially if it happens late in the season. Sometimes, though, the human element shows through. It does on potential rematches. (And when Mack Brown campaigns against the Cal Golden Bears on national TV.)
Jones: Great stuff on Oregon, and the TCU write-up. I’ve had Oregon pegged ahead of Stanford for six weeks. And I’ve had OU pegged ahead of OSU for 15 weeks! Sure, you gotta rank the Cowboys higher at this point. Could somebody ’splain to me what has happened to Texas Tech?
by edsp on Nov 14, 2011 11:42 AM CST reply actions
UO looks like a 4 × 100 relay team in pads and watching them against Stanford just re-enforced to me as you noted that the level of athletes LSU has on defense is scary.
Watching TCU it struck me how TCU has almost been setting up for the Boise game all season. They normally hit the short to intermediate routes in the passing game. Four of Pachall’s touchdown passes came off a double move where the set-up move was a common route they run and the Boise secondary jumped it.
Almost a reversal of the start of the year how Baylor attacked the overly aggressive TCU corners.
Will finishes his first season in the SEC 3-5 with a game against Furman and FSU left. Would beating Furman qualify the Gators for a bowl slot or would they have to beat FSU in the season finale in Gainsville?
by Davey O'Brien on Nov 14, 2011 1:20 PM CST reply actions
Oregon vs. Alabama: Who wins?
As phenomenal as the Bama defense is, it’s designed more for Pro-style offenses. When we spread them out and made their safeties cover in space they could not handle Shipley and he almost single-handedly beat them. I wonder how Lester, Barron, and their LB’s would handle having to play in space against the Ducks.
LSU and Auburn beat them by having DT’s who could blow things up before they got out of hand. Not sure if Bama has that. I like a defense like our own a little better. We’re more used to dealing with it and are designed to get penetration at the DL rather than funneling and controlling their skill players.
by Nickel Rover on Nov 14, 2011 2:32 PM CST reply actions
Personally, I think Shipley was vastly underrated as a receiver in college. His movement in and out of breaks was unreal. Oregon has no one like him, and Thomas simply does not hit windows with much precision. In other words, I think our success against Alabama had far more to do with the unique talents of Shipley than something systemic in the spread versus Saban’s defensive philosophy. Alabama owned Florida’s spread that year.
Personally, I think Alabama would do to Oregon what LSU did – wear them down and get separation in the 3rd quarter. LSU did nothing fancy at all in that game, and they were short Jefferson, who is starting for them now. An underrated component of LSU’s and Alabama’s defenses, especially against an attack like Oregon’s, has to be their athletic depth on defense. Oregon’s O is not going to leave those teams gassed.
Kelly said it after the LSU game – “they have guys we don’t see too often,” or something to that effect.
If you check the Oregon boards, a contingent of their own fans do not want to LSU or Bama in a bowl game. They’re afraid one more loss will leave them with the same perception issues Ohio State had in the aftermath of their back to back MNC losses. They want Wisconsin, to which I would respond, be careful what you wish for.
by G.O.F. on Nov 14, 2011 9:26 PM CST reply actions
You would think a Big 10 or 12 education would allow for some creative thinking on league names.
by 55f100tx on Nov 14, 2011 10:00 PM CST reply actions
The turnover margin in the Oregon-LSU game was also huge. If I remember correctly, LSU won by exactly the number of points scored off of turnovers. Personally, I’d be interested to see a rematch where Oregon holds onto the ball better.
If nothing else, I just don’t want OU anywhere near the MNC, but the football gods always seem to smile on them just enough for them to get their asses kicked on a big stage…
by vortic on Nov 15, 2011 2:07 AM CST reply actions
Does anyone else feel like LSU has some how managed to mask heavy steroid use by their defensive players over the past 5 years. How do the always have NFL sized defenders at every meaningful positon on D?? It’s not normal.
by UT-Rav on Nov 15, 2011 5:58 AM CST reply actions
UT-Rav,
Any more than say Wisconsin with their offensive lines?
Is it possible? Yes, but what impresses more about their defense is not their size, but the speed and athletic ability. Their defensive backs really aren’t that big, they have one linebacker over 240, one defensive end over 270, and two defensive tackles over 300 (one of which is Brockers who is 6’6").
In all honesty their defense looks like the defenses in the South have done so for at least the last decade.
by Davey O'Brien on Nov 15, 2011 6:59 AM CST reply actions
RE: LSU and steroids. Maybe, but the fact is that tremendous muscle growth is possible for young men who are eating and working out all the time. It’s not like Tyrone Mathieu is 220 pounds and as quick as he is. He’s like 185 but just has a physical and aggressive mindset. I don’t think their level of athleticism on defense is far out of proportion from what you would expect from a major university with access to every Lousiana kid plus pipelines from East Texas. When we recruit well we have NFL-sized defenders at every position.
Alabama vs. the spread: It wasn’t just that Shipley is an exceptional freak that made him hard for them to cover. They are deep defensively and Saban has tons of personnel packages but that still doesn’t allow them to have perfect anti-spread and anti-prostyle personnel on defense. Their big stars aren’t anti-spread guys.
As far as getting worn out by the pace, who knows? They don’t have to defend 100 plays on a regular basis. Auburn has given them some trouble defensively the last 2 seasons using a quicker pace. The trick is having the ball enough to run a hurry-up at them by stopping their ground game and avoiding turnovers.
by NickelRover on Nov 15, 2011 10:19 AM CST reply actions
I agree with the observations. The hurry-up limits their situation subs and keeps them in a base defense more, which they attack out of far less than they do situational packages.
I’m just not as high on Oregon and Stanford as you are. We both agree LSU and Alabama would beat Oregon, since you have Alabama ranked higher. Thanks for taking the time.
by G.O.F. on Nov 15, 2011 8:17 PM CST reply actions

by 























