Establishing the run

Bob Stoops presents a different challenge to offensive staffs (staves?) preparing to play him. Most teams will try to establish something on offense to open up other, more productive avenues for themselves later in the game.

OU, however, charts your tendencies and builds their entire gameplan around it before you take even one snap against them. Much like our games earlier in the decade when teams would come out of the gate with 8 and 9 man fronts, our work in establishing the run is already done. Stoops has always relied on “guessing” your playcall and making prediction-based defensive calls more than reactive ones. He wants to get in your head and attack you on every play.

This is why, as Scipio put it:

Much of OU’s defensive effectiveness in this rivalry is predicated on OU’s defensive coaches being able to isolate tendency and give their guys a reasonable hunch where the ball is headed based on a tell. That’s how you end up with nine OU defenders running to a gap before the ball has reached the RB’s hands and them famously calling out our plays before the snap. And why they can be pantsed if you show that tendency and do something completely different.

Playing OU is less about watching their tape and more about watching your own. You have to be aware of what you’re doing, because you can be damn sure they will be.

We need to run our nameless counter to the zone read 6-7 times. We’ve run it so little that Stoops will never call anything to stop it — percentage-wise it wouldn’t make sense. This also means that we need to ditch the zone entirely (something we practically did last year, going heavy on the draw).

We are effectively a pass first team now, if not in philosophy then in application. We can’t trust ourselves to run for 4 yards on a 3rd and 3 or 4, and I’m guessing Stoops will show us the same thing he did last year and give us a steady diet of 2-deep, 6 man front nickel looks.

This means we can’t abandon the run entirely, but it also means we can’t be every-other-game Texas, because they are trusting their guys to recognize and destroy our plays even in an undermanned front, much like A&M did in 2006. This is why the draw worked last year, and will probably work again. This is why that goofy veer play will work, why the QB draw will work, why pulling guards on a quick screen will work.

This week won’t be about making them respect our bread and butter, they already do that. It will be about hurting them where they don’t see it coming then taking advantage of their less adaptive players in the open field.

If we come out of the gate with 2 zone runs out of our first 3 rushing plays, we are going to open with a punt and confidence will be low. We pass more early now than we used to so I’m expecting to see that again, but when we do run we need to start with the “exotic” stuff to take momentum early, and give OU LBs the “uh oh” face. Anytime you take yourself out of their wheelhouse, good things happen.

We need to be Katie Couric and ask OU what magazines they read, then laugh our way to victory.

  1. LonghornScott
    October 10, 2008 at 8:24 am

    I think one of the main thing our run and screen game needs to do is hurt OU for blitzing the right side (especially when we are lined up on the left hash. I fully expect to pressure Colt from the outside and count on collapsing the pocket straight through Chris Hall. When Colt scrambles they are going to want him to scramble left. We need to plan on attacking the right side early to open up some room for Colt to scramble right (where he is much more effective). That counter read along with a screen or two should create some hesitation.

  2. Nordberg
    October 10, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Good thing then that we have an OC with a history of calling plays that build upon each other as the game progresses.

    Sorry, no time for negativity, I know.

  3. Gimli
    October 10, 2008 at 9:01 am

    I have an offensive staff.

  4. RansomStoddard
    October 10, 2008 at 10:19 am

    Actually, we have an intelligent and creative OC that knows how to set a defense up and use his players effectively. LOL. Man, I cracked myself up with that one.

  5. sinless1
    October 10, 2008 at 10:31 am

    >I have an offensive staff.

    I’ll bet when a back hits the hole, you get pantsed.

  6. uthookem
    October 10, 2008 at 11:48 am

    I’m sure the Q package will be in full force tomorrow. If for nothing else, to at least allow us to clap. Then spit. Then rest our hands on our knees. It would be awesome to open the game with it. And by open the game, I mean Colt and Chiles either kicking or returning kicks.

  7. NateHeupel
    October 11, 2008 at 7:21 am

    “This is why the draw worked last year, and will probably work again. This is why that goofy veer play will work, why the QB draw will work, why pulling guards on a quick screen will work.”

    Those plays will work for a half, much like the TE pass last year. OU adjusted and closed it up at halftime.

    A more important question is this: how well will those plays work? Does UT turn a perfect play call into 7 yards or 7 points?

Leave a Comment

  • Duder: Take heart ChrisApplewhite, you now have 6 months to draw animated running plays...
  • mojohorn: 'Our' safety reminds me of Eric Hall with much more space to get lost. "Blit...
  • CrazyJoeDavola: Groundhog, regarding your direct reply above, your points are why I think we're ...
  • Groundhog Day: What about the abuse he took on their next possession during the TD run? And pe...
  • Black Scholes: I found it hard to fault Gideon for not catching the INT against Tech. There we...
  • Groundhog Day: CJD, Are you as concerned about our D next year as I am? You don't easily re...
  • CrazyJoeDavola: My biggest gripe with Colt had nothing to do with his throws, but rather his poc...
  • RolloTamasi: I don't know about giving up but we didn't pick up the blitz consistently well f...
  • Buzzard Lips: Rollo... I just don't understand our running game. We can blame it on execution...
  • Buzzard Lips: It's not in ESPN's interest to have a strong Big 12... and it lessens their inve...

Barkers