Connect with your Facebook Account

Contact

46

Vince Young dreams of being Tim Tebow

Posted by BRAGGonUT on August 15th, 2008 under Football


If we were Aggies, we would boycott

OK, this Tim Tebow shit is really getting out of hand.

First, Urban Meyer said in July to a Miami alumni group that Tim Tebow ”is the greatest player of our era.”

And now, we have this gem from Men’s Fitness.

“When you look at who the biggest star among [the NFL or college] is, the answer was very simple,” Men’s Fitness magazine Executive Editor Roy Johnson said. “It was Tim Tebow. Because of his combination of physicality and skill, he was a natural selection for us.”

Johnson said football fans will see more from Tebow than being the type of specimen that “Vince Young couldn’t become in his dream.”

You have got to be fucking kidding me.


Oh no you di’n't!

More from this Barker


Share This

  • StumbleUpon

46 Responses

  1. The Emerging Harris contingent said:

    August 15th, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    If you cant beat out Chris Leak for the sole starting job then you need to sit the f**k down

  2. Mr. Johnson still can’t explain to me why we needed the riding crop, saddle and chloroform for the photo shoot, which he did personally, although he didn’t know to take the lens cap off the camera.

  3. Tim Tebow is much better than Vince Young at losing games. That’s about it.

  4. Black Scholes said:

    August 15th, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Never really been on the Tebow bandwagon. I think he’s one of the Heisman ‘winners’ in the sense that they had to give it to someone that year.

    The kid can’t hold VY’s jock. Anyone who says otherwise is either a homer (Meyer) or a hom - er, severely misguided - (Johnson).

  5. I’m pretty sure that only hom - er, severely misguided people read Men’s Fitness.

  6. In other news, Andre Jones dreams of being Ronnie Wilson.

  7. This thread is not going to end nicely. I’m waiting for CA’s rant unless his head already exploded.

  8. ChrisApplewhite said:

    August 15th, 2008 at 7:30 pm

    This is ridiculous. I can’t fucking handle shit like this . . . anym . . . I can’t do it. He’s just too dreamy.

  9. Men's Health said:

    August 16th, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    Men’s Fitness? Never heard of it.

  10. Rowdy Gaines said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 7:17 am

    Tim Teabag can swim in my pool any time! Tell that guy Huckleberry he can come too.

  11. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 9:13 am

    I can’t believe people are getting indignant because Tebow is being hyped more than Vince Young.. Not only is Tebow ten times the passer at the same age.. Tebow is a better passer right NOW. Vince Young is bouncing passes to his receivers as we speak? Are you guys watching Vince play? Vince Young is abysmal.

    Vince couldn’t even win the Heisman in college period. Tebow did it as a sophomore for the first time in history. Go look back at Young’s performance in the heat of the Heisman race with Reggie Bush. Vince Young had one of his worst games against one of the worst teams and dfenses in college football that year - Texas A&M. That’s why he lost the Heisman. Tebow couldn’t have that poor of a game against that weak of a defense if he tried.

    Vince Young just isn’t on Tebow’s level. No QB has had the options Tebow has. Tebow is a true runningback with an elite QB’s arm. Vince Young is a wide receiver trying to be forced into the QB position.

    That might have flew when running QBs were still a novelty on college football a couple years ago.. But everyone is prepared for them now. An even being prepared Tebow is still running them over.

  12. Facebook User said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 9:32 am

    Vince couldn’t even win the Heisman in college period.

    You’ve sold me.

  13. That might have flew when running QBs were still a novelty on college football a couple years ago..

    That is so stupid that I cant believe I did’nt right it.

  14. Lionel Hutz said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 10:16 am

    VoiceOfReason posted that? This is the greatest case of false advertising I’ve seen since I sued the movie The Never Ending Story.

  15. In yet OTHER news, Mad Dog dreams of eating at the same table as Mangino!

  16. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 11:33 am

    Let’s put it this way.. if Tebow had had as poor a game against as weak a team as Texas A&M last season he wouldn’t have won the Heisman.

    Tebow had more people gunning for him than anyone in the history of college football. Not only was he being hyped like crazy last season but he was accounting for 70% of his teams entire offense for the season. Something Vince Young had never done. Something no one has ever done.

    Yet never did Tebow have as poor a running game as Vince Young in that Texas A&M game. In that game Vince Young’s teammates carried him. That’s why Tebow has a Heisman and Vince doesn’t.

    And that’s why VY isn’t in Tebow’s league. Tebow’s ability to function as a true runningback and his superior passing ability put him on a completely different level than VY.

  17. TaylorTRoom said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 11:50 am

    Tebow is a poor man’s Paul Hornung.

  18. Stuck in MN said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 11:54 am

    Yep Vince always disappeared in the big games, that’s how he’ll always be remembered. Like that -15 yards rushing he had in the loss to Georgia last year.

    One other thing, Tebow did all this with Meyer calling the plays, VY did it with Greg freaking Davis as his OC. That is like breaking the 100m world record wearing ankle weights.

    Seriously are you messing with us and I was dumb enough to take the bait? I picture CA typing away while cackling at my responses as his dog sits on his lap growing more nervous with each reply.

  19. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 11:55 am

    Vince Young is poor man’s Ben Roethlisberger.

  20. Vince had 8 carries for 52 yards (6.5 ypc) in the A&M game plus 3 sacks with 32 yards lost. Statistical total of 11 carries for 19 yards.

    Against Georgia last year Tim Tebow had 7 carries for 25 yards (3.6 ypc) plus 6 sacks with 40 yards lost. Statistical total of 13 carries for -15 yards.

    And your “carried by his team” argument is so full of shit it’s funny. As though Vince Young didn’t carry his team to multiple victories including two BCS bowl wins.

    Finally, the argument that teams geared themselves to stop Tebow is just plain dumb when you’re using it to argue against Vince Young in college. Seriously? Your 70% figure is obviously based on the fact that Florida gained 5943 yards of total offense last year while Tebow threw for 3286 and ran for 895. 70.35% of the team yardage.

    In 2005, Texas had 6657 total yards (what a shock, a better offense) while Vince ran for 1050 and threw for 3036. A piddly 61.38% of the team yardage.

    Meanwhile, Tim Tebow was responsible for 66.04% of Florida’s plays last year. Vince was responsible for 51.01% of Texas’ plays in 2005.

    So, brainiac, in 2005 Vince Young either ran or threw the ball on 51.01% of our team’s plays and was responsible for 66.04% of our team’s yardage.

    In 2007, Tim Tebow either ran or threw the ball on 66.04% of the team’s plays and was responsible for 70.35% of their yardage.

    Plays in 2005 where Vince was responsible resulted in 8.51 yards per play. Plays where Vince was not responsible resulted in 5.58 yards per play. Vince being responsible for the play resulted in 52.64% more yards per play than when he wasn’t. And this doesn’t even take into account the huge holes he opened for Charles and Young on the zone read.

    Tebow plays resulted in 7.47 yards per play. Non-Tebow plays resulted in 6.12 yards per play. So Tebow’s involvement increased the average yards gained per play by 22.03% compared to other UF players.

    Looks to me like 2005 Young was 2.39 times better than 2007 Tebow. Are you sure stupid stats like 70% of the team’s offense are where you want to go with this? Anyone can be all of their team’s offense if the team’s offense is only about the one guy running or passing.

  21. You can see Tebow’s charisma from outer space.

  22. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    “”"Yep Vince always disappeared in the big games, that’s how he’ll always be remembered. Like that -15 yards rushing he had in the loss to Georgia last year.”"”

    Are you drunk? Te bow had a poor runnign game while severely injured against arguably the best defens ein the league.. with no defense of his own. Vince Young had a terrible running game and 2 turnovers against arguably the worst defense in the league.Not only was he dominated that weekened by Reggie Bush.. causing him to lose the Heisman.. he wasn’t even the best Qb on the field that day against 5 and 6 texas A&M that year….

    “”"One other thing, Tebow did all this with Meyer calling the plays, VY did it with Greg freaking Davis as his OC. That is like breaking the 100m world record wearing ankle weights.”"”

    When Vince was playing just a few seasons ago running Qbs and the spread offenses were nowhere near as well prepared for as they are today. All of college football is running their QBs. If you really think about it that says more about the strategy of running your Qb than it doies about how good vicne Young was. It actually shows how Vince was helped by simply using that strategy.. more so then than now because teams are much more prepared for it.

    Vince also had a much more well balanced running game and a light years better defense.. and he was facing weaker competition on a regular basis.. and still didn’t perform as well.

    “”"Seriously are you messing with us and I was dumb enough to take the bait? I picture CA typing away while cackling at my responses as his dog sits on his lap growing more nervous with each reply.”"”

    Are you messing with me? Have you seen Vince Young play outside of college?

    Vince Young is turning out to be the first Alex Smith.. rather than the first Tim Tebow..

  23. You gonna addresss Huck’s post there, champ…? I’m kinda doubting it because he tore you three new assholes.

  24. Stuck in MN said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    “When Vince was playing just a few seasons ago running Qbs and the spread offenses were nowhere near as well prepared for as they are today.”

    Yep, Vince running really took DC’s by surprise- it was like they had no idea what he was up to. Only the most well scouted programs were ready for it. I’m also amazed at the sea change in defensive personnel and philosophy that has occurred between 05 and 07. It is a credit to the defenses that they were able to recruit for, devise and install this defense during that time.

    “Are you messing with me? Have you seen Vince Young play outside of college?”

    I kind of assumed this whole discussion was about college, since, well, Tebow is still in college and the Heisman seems to be one of the main criteria you are citing. We could bring in pro and high school if you like.

  25. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    Huckleberry… Texas A&M was the 126th ranked defense that seaosn.. Georgia had one of if not the best defense in colelge football! LOL

    Tebow couldn’ have that poor a game agaisnt that poor a dfefens eif he tried. And if he did he wouldn’t have a Heisman right now. Which is definitive proof that Young isn’t on tTebo’s level. You can bury your head if you like but it’s a fact. Vince Young was nowhere near the level of QB is at Tebow’s age.. neither throwing or running. Vince Young was juts very fortunate to be on a very well balanced team facing weaker competition. Even USC had no defense that year..

    And I love it when people post stats that suppport the opposing persons argument and then act like it refutes their argument.. as if you are going to blind someone with numbers..

    Fact is Vince never accounted for the percentage of his team’s offense that Tebow did. And Tebow was facing tougher competition and a league far more prepared for running QBs. And he was hyped much more and less experienced. And he won the Heisman over a better player than the one Vince Young lost his Heisman to.

  26. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    And I love it when people post stats that suppport the opposing persons argument and then act like it refutes their argument.. as if you are going to blind someone with numbers.

    “”"You gonna addresss Huck’s post there, champ…? I’m kinda doubting it because he tore you three new assholes.”"”

  27. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    “”"And I love it when people post stats that suppport the opposing persons argument and then act like it refutes their argument.. as if you are going to blind someone with numbers.”"”

    “”"You gonna addresss Huck’s post there, champ…? I’m kinda doubting it because he tore you three new assholes.”"”

    ++++

    I stand corrected! lol

    There’s a sucker born every minute. Or more like people see what they want to see…

  28. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    “”"I kind of assumed this whole discussion was about college, since, well, Tebow is still in college and the Heisman seems to be one of the main criteria you are citing. We could bring in pro and high school if you like.”"”

    If you are only going to include Tebow’s college performance to date and Vince Young’s performance to the same age then there is no contest whatsover. Vince Young was nowhere near Tebow’s level at the same age.

  29. Okay, now at least I know he’s joking.

    Texas A&M was the #44 rushing defense in 2005 (#107 overall - their passing defense was 104 efficiency wise).

    Of course, I would have figured it out from the contradictions he has in a single response:

    Young was juts very fortunate to be on a very well balanced team…

    Fact is Vince never accounted for the percentage of his team’s offense that Tebow did.

    So apparently Tebow is better beacuse he accounted for a higher percentage of total yards even though he took a much higher percentage of total plays to do it. All while playing on a less balanced offense than Young, which would, of course, artificially make him a higher percentage of the offense.

    That could have been a good one if he hadn’t blown his cover.

  30. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    Tebow had no decent running game to suport him or take pressur eof him.

    Tebow was both the rpimary running back runnign between the tackles as well as filling the role of an elite caliber QB. Tebow had the second highest passer efficiency..

    Tebow was filling 2 of the toughest and most valuable roles on his tema by himself.

    Vince Young had a very solid running group to take pressure off him to allow him to run outside the tackels. This is why Young had bigger runs and why Tebow had shorter runs per posession.. as well as Tebow being focused on more because he accounted for so much of the offense.

    Not only didn’t Vince Young fill the same role for his team.. he couldn’t if he wanted tp. He’s not durable enough. which is why he wa sunable to run on such a poor defense at Texas A&M.

    And I like how you try to pretend a 44th ranked run defense is an excuse for such a poor running performance. LOL Now that’s desperation. You don’t have a leg to stand on in this debate.

    Are you arguing against VY being an elite running QB?

    That game also shows how one dimensional Vince was.. put him against a slightly better than horrible run defense and even with one of the poorest pass defenses in the league he still couldn’t pass at a very high level.

    Tebow would have ran and passed better against that team.. which shows why Tebow is so special.. legendary really.

    Being better at both those aspects of the game combined makes Tebow exponentially better as a QB. It also shows how soft VY was compared to Tebow. Which is why Tebow will translate to the pros so much better than VY and why VY is struggling in the pro game so much.

  31. I must have multipull personalaties.

    I don’t remember posting as VoiceOfReason.

    But,

    I keep passing out and then waking up in pools of my own slobber sirounded by copies of Mens Fitness and the Universaty of Florida Media Guide.

    And then I read a post by VoiceOfReason that sounds just like something I would post with all the absurdaties and selective use of only self-serveing statistics.

    What is going on.

  32. Tebow had no decent running game to suport him or take pressur eof him.

    Tebow was both the rpimary running back runnign between the tackles as well as filling the role of an elite caliber QB. Tebow had the second highest passer efficiency..

    This is fucking hilarious.

    If I thought this was real I would wonder if any human being could be so stupid as to not understand that arguing that Tebow was the only good weapon Florida had actually devalues the fact that he accounted for a high percentage of the offense. If Troy Smith had played with 10 peewee players at Ohio State he would have been 100% of the team’s offense. Same with any decent player.

    By the way, Vince Young was #3 in passing efficiency in 2005. And he averaged two-and-a-half more yards per rush than Tebow.

    And you know what happened when Vince faced the #1 rushing defense in the nation in 2005? He ran for 76 yards, threw for 270, and we won.

    You know what happened when we faced the #4 rushing defense that year? He ran for 45, threw for 241, and we won.

    You know what happened when we faced the #11 rushing defense twice that year? He ran for 58 and 57, threw for 336 and 193, and we won twice.

    For the record, Georgia had the #16 rushing defense last year. They held Tebow to -15 rushing yards. In case you forgot.

  33. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 1:17 pm

    Self serving statistics?

    Statstically There is absolutely no contest between Tebow and VY.. The only thing VY has going for him are his team accomplishments and some timely personal performnaces.

    But those timely performances also hurt VY’s reputation.. because it appears when the pressure is on him, and he isn’t the underdog, he can’t perform, as the Texas A&M game indicates.

    Talk about self serving though.. these same people that tout his team successes in college ignore his team failures in the pros.. that’s the very definition of hypocrisy.

  34. So in 4 games against Top 20 rushing defenses, Vince averaged 59 yards rushing, 260 yards passing, and the offense averaged 45.5 points in FOUR WINS.

    In 2 games (that’s right, only two) against Top 20 rushing defenses, Tebow averaged 26 yards rushing, 197 yards passing, and the offense averaged 27 points in TWO LOSSES.

    Average rushing defense faced by Vince in 2005: 47.4

    Average rushing defense rank faced by Tebow in 2007: 59.8 (and I didn’t even count D-1AA Western Kentucky)

    Yep, that schedule was much tougher on a running quarterback.

  35. Yeah, but the SEC has a bunch of running QBs so they’re more prepared for it.

  36. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    “”"This is fucking hilarious.

    If I thought this was real I would wonder if any human being could be so stupid as to not understand that arguing that Tebow was the only good weapon Florida had actually devalues the fact that he accounted for a high percentage of the offense. If Troy Smith had played with 10 peewee players at Ohio State he would have been 100% of the team’s offense. Same with any decent player.”"”

    But he would have the top ranked offens ein the league genius.. lol

    Seriously.. this is the poorest use of logic I have ever seen.. then to pretend to be condescending on top of it? It’s beyond sad.. You have lost all credibility..

    “”"By the way, Vince Young was #3 in passing efficiency in 2005. And he averaged two-and-a-half more yards per rush than Tebow.”"”

    hahahahaha So you are comparing VY redshirt Junior years to Tebow’s true sophomore year… keep losing credibiltiy.. I didn’t think it was possible to lose more credibility..

    VY only passed for 100 yards his first year as a true sophomore. VY was nowhere near Tebow’s league as a passer…

    “”"And you know what happened when Vince faced the #1 rushing defense in the nation in 2005? He ran for 76 yards, threw for 270, and we won.

    You know what happened when we faced the #4 rushing defense that year? He ran for 45, threw for 241, and we won.

    You know what happened when we faced the #11 rushing defense twice that year? He ran for 58 and 57, threw for 336 and 193, and we won twice.

    For the record, Georgia had the #16 rushing defense last year. They held Tebow to -15 rushing yards. In case you forgot.”"”

    And yet he couldn’t run more than 19 yards on the 126th ranked defense in CFB..

    Those good gasmes you point to just show you how a good team can raise the level of a player and make them overrated. But there is absolutely no excuse for the performance VY had against such a poor team in Texas A&M.

    That they won that game even with VY poor performance shows how that team was carrying them.

    VY didn’t deserve the Heisman over Reggie Bush for the same reason that he isn’t on Tebow’s level right now.

    But of course.. you will now tout his Longhorns team successes and ignore his current teams failures..

  37. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 1:37 pm

    “”"Yeah, but the SEC has a bunch of running QBs so they’re more prepared for it.”"”

    Yep.. because these defenses are even facing these running QB’s and offenses in heir own practices..

    Bill Bellicheck was even consulting with Urban Meyer a couple seasons ago in the off season boning up on the spread offense… no doubt to learn to use it and defend against it and running Qbs.

    Oh wait.. why would he need to do that if everyone was already prepared for it when VY was on the Longhorns?

  38. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    Hey Huckleberry.. are you still comparing Tebow’s sophomore season to VY Redshirt Junior seaosn? LMFAO

    My god this is sad..

    Wow.. talk about self deluding statistics.. LOL

  39. TaylorTRoom said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    I get it. VOR is just screwing with us. Nobody can be that stupid. We all know that if VY came back in 2006, Texas would have one more MNC and Florida would have one less. Good one, VOR.

  40. Gino Toretta said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

    VOR makes a valid point- Tebow won the Heisman, VY didn’t.

  41. Chris Weinke said:

    August 18th, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    I agree.

  42. VoiceOfInsanity said:

    August 19th, 2008 at 4:50 am

    VoiceOfReason, sit down… You have been taken to the woodshed and beaten.

  43. VoiceOfReason said:

    August 20th, 2008 at 1:05 am

    NO.. Vince Young’s passing ability is in the woodshed getting beaten right now.. but apparently the fools who overrated him have their heads buried too far in the sand to see that.. LOL

    Vince hasn’t figure out the bounce pass is allowed in basketball but not football.. maybe he’s trying to make a career change. haha

    With his physique he should be a Bball player not trying to be a runningback.. obviously he didn’t have enough talent to play Baball though.. he’s got the softness down though.. lol

  44. Paul Ferguson said:

    January 28th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    I think most of you forgot what it looked like when Vince played in college. Get on Youtube, watch some highlights. And how bout we keep in mind that Vince has been in the NFL for two freakin’ years, and in one of those he won rookie of the year. Look, Tebow’s a great player, but he doesn’t stack up to Vince. Do any of ya’ll morons realize Vince went down as the #10 college football player of all time? I don’t care what you think, it don’t get a whole lot better than that. Guess where Reggie Bush sits. #25. You can’t say Vince not winnin’ the Heisman means somethin’ when they guy who did win sits 15 players under him. And believe me when I say that it won’t be long before we’re arguin’ about whether or not Colt McCoy’s Better than sam bradford and Tim Tebow. He is. Hands down Colt McCoy is the absolute best college football player out there.

  45. Paul Ferguson said:

    January 28th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    One last thing to say. “VoiceOfReason”, (There’s some irony for ya, calls himself voiceofreason and he doesn’t know the difference between a quarterback and a brick). Anyway, you’re a douche bag.

  46. Paul Ferguson said:

    February 4th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    (CBS) And he unleashes that stuff on the field. Last year, he set the rookie quarterback record for rushing with 552 yards. He’s the first rookie quarterback ever to play in the Pro Bowl, and in a game against the Giants he staged the biggest rookie comeback ever. Down 21-0 with less than 10 minutes to play, the Titans won, 24-21.

    Ring a bell?

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Activity

  • dick commented on the blog post Lines We Care About (Week 10) ago

    sailor should pay you guys for taking this dude off our hands

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • kuoirad commented on the blog post Post-Mortem: Texas Tech 10 minutes ago

    travis:

    C’mon, minus the UT game, you don’t think we could run the table if Todd and the offense wake up, with the defense playing like it’s been the past two games?

    KSU – more schizophrenic than Missouri. Got *LIT UP* by Tech, then turned around and *LIT UP* aTm, who turned around and *LIT UP*

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • The General commented on the blog post Vince Young is really good 2 hours, 16 minutes ago

    Seen. Michell Pfeiffer is not a verb, yet.

  • The General commented on the blog post Vince Young is really good 2 hours, 16 minutes ago

    Has anyone Michelle Pfeiffer lately? This might already be happening.

  • The General commented on the blog post Defensive Stats: Texas Longhorns @ Oklahoma State Cowboys 2 hours, 20 minutes ago

    “Our defense has sucked balls for pretty much a decade. I don’t know what the stats are, but any year-to-year improvement is probably attributable to scheduling.”

    The light has gone out of dedfischer’s eyes. Somebody, QUICK! Pop in the tape of the 2008 Texas game in Lubbock! NOW! Trips, give him mouth-to-mout.

  • HenryJames commented on the blog post The Good, The Good, and The Goodly – Texas 41, Oklahoma State 14 3 hours, 4 minutes ago

    How’s having him over on Atomic Teeth working out for y’all?

  • ChrisApplewhite commented on the blog post Defensive Stats: Texas Longhorns @ Oklahoma State Cowboys 3 hours, 7 minutes ago

    “ChrisApplewhite texted me (in tears) that our inability to stop OSU’s big 4 yard runs would lead to our defeat. But I wasn’t worried because 1) someone on our defense seems to always come through if you have to drive on them and 2) one incompletion will kill the drive.”

    Oh that is just hilarious. I

  • Triston27 commented on the blog post Lines We Care About (Week 10) 3 hours, 22 minutes ago

    I like that OU line. The OU defense going against a freshman QB who was very mediocre against Baylor. Could get ugly. Will be interesting to see how much that line moves during the week. Also like mu at home but not sure that I’ll take it. Seems like I’ve

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Phenomenal Smith commented on the blog post The Good, The Good, and The Goodly – Texas 41, Oklahoma State 14 3 hours, 25 minutes ago

    You won’t believe this one, but MNC still thinks the Longhorns suck.

  • D W commented on the blog post Strategy is overrated 4 hours, 1 minute ago

    Here is a sampling of other teams who had better gameplans than Greg Davis: White Oak Fighting Gophers; Austin Junior Varsity; Waco Sonic Store Number 23 Powderpuff C League…

  • Triston27 commented on the blog post We’re All Sooner Fans 4 hours, 37 minutes ago

    Plenty of time to get inhebriated before kick-off.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Tim’s Bleeding Vagina commented on the blog post The Good, The Good, and The Goodly – Texas 41, Oklahoma State 14 4 hours, 37 minutes ago

    the officiating has been much better in the big 12 this year as compared to years past and comes nowhere close to the atrocities committed to keep florida undefeated against arkansas and miss st. and to keep iowa undefeated against indiana.

    anyone claiming so clearly has an axe to grind against texas.

    same goes for the guy

  • kuoirad commented on the blog post We’re All Sooner Fans 4 hours, 39 minutes ago

    But we’re back in the 11:30 slot that we were 4-0 in for the battle with the kitties this week…

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Hiphopopotamus commented on the blog post We’re All Sooner Fans 4 hours, 47 minutes ago

    Well, we’ve had so much luck in the 2:30 ABC time slot these last two weeks, that we’ll be there again on the 14th against Nebraska.

    In a highly televised week for the league, the schedule goes…

    FSN 11 or 11:30 – Texas & Baylor

    Versus 11:30 – Missouri & K-State

    ABC 2:30 – NU @ KU

    FSN 6:00 –

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Hiphopopotamus commented on the blog post We’re All Sooner Fans 4 hours, 47 minutes ago

    Well, we’ve had so much fun and luck in the 2:30 ABC time slot these last two weeks, that we’ll be there again on the 14th against Nebraska.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Sailor Ripley commented on the blog post Vince Young is really good 4 hours, 48 minutes ago

    Does Virginia Clemm jump a shark?

  • Bob Along commented on the blog post jones Top Ten – Week 9 – 2009 4 hours, 49 minutes ago

    “Our two most famous caricature ducks are supporting actors, second bananas, and unimpressive ones at that.”

    Whooooa there!
    Donald, sure. But calling Daffy Duck “unimpressive”? That’s just…. dethhh-picable!

    Oregon vs. Boise State = the Donald Duck of Ducks…
    Oregon vs. USC = the Daffy Duck of Ducks – at least in terms of

  • Nate Heupel commented on the blog post Strategy is overrated 4 hours, 49 minutes ago

    There’s a valid point here, but strategy can also be used to make a decent team play WAY over its head. Exhibit A: 2002 Oklahoma Sooners. This was NOT a great football team. The defense got punked by anyone who could throw over the top. Jason White was busy blowing out

  • Sailor Ripley commented on the blog post Vince Young is really good 4 hours, 52 minutes ago

    Does Virginia Clemm jump a shark?

  • EyesOfTX commented on the blog post Defensive Stats: Texas Longhorns @ Oklahoma State Cowboys 4 hours, 55 minutes ago

    That’s a hard 3.1.

    That’s what she said.
    ==============================

    HJ: Are you really sure you want to brag about that?

    Hook ‘em!!!

  • Doperbo commented on the blog post Vince Young is really good 5 hours, 6 minutes ago

    Woody- I’m rethinking the K.S. “Bud” Adams stationary that I bought you for Kawanzaa.

    srr50- It’s hard for me to believe a dude would tank a season that badly just to get fired. There are so many other ways to get there. We let Scipio go last week for texting pictures of Trip’s junk to ‘allBCstaff’,

  • BatesHorn commented on the blog post Defensive Stats: Texas Longhorns @ Oklahoma State Cowboys 5 hours, 8 minutes ago

    I finally learned not to argue with him, but it took me a while to realize that you can’t argue with somebody who doesn’t or won’t work with basic facts (or intelligence).

  • EyesOfTX commented on the blog post The Good, The Good, and The Goodly – Texas 41, Oklahoma State 14 5 hours, 9 minutes ago

    We don’t need any help from the refs, and we didn’t get any help from the refs on Saturday. Comparing a couple of extremely marginal calls that could’ve gone either way to the atrocities that led to two straight undeserved wins for Florida is frankly idiotic, and does indeed make me wonder about

  • Gene Claude commented on the blog post Post-Mortem: Texas Tech 5 hours, 29 minutes ago

    Also, isn’t it interesting how much misery (not Missouri, jackasses) loves company? Can you imagine how sad MU / KU fans would be if NU was playing great? The fact that all 3 teams totally suck makes everyone a little bit happier than they otherwise would be…until KSU sneaks up and wins the

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • HenryJames commented on the blog post Road Trip 5 hours, 29 minutes ago

    Fantastic preview.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Gene Claude commented on the blog post Post-Mortem: Texas Tech 5 hours, 30 minutes ago

    Mangino’s and Pinkel’s coaching philosophies are so maddeningly different…you guys will rotate a set of bodies through a trouble position, which I’m sure is tiring. Pinkel will stick the same guys out there over and over again because he doesn’t trust anybody until they have “proven it in practice.” Both are annoying.

    The Big

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Triston27 commented on the blog post We’re All Sooner Fans 5 hours, 37 minutes ago

    I feel as though I have wasted a lot of time and energy defending the North earlier in the season. I regret that.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Hiphopopotamus commented on the blog post Post-Mortem: Texas Tech 5 hours, 43 minutes ago

    Mangino says Todd will start.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Hiphopopotamus commented on the blog post Post-Mortem: Texas Tech 5 hours, 43 minutes ago

    Mangino says Todd will start.

    Oirad: We have a pretty decent amount of 2 back sets. However, we use them about as often as we fake punts.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • BrickHorn commented on the blog post Defensive Stats: Texas Longhorns @ Oklahoma State Cowboys 5 hours, 48 minutes ago

    Think of football as intercourse. Time of possession matters to women, but guys don’t care no matter what they say publicly. If you can ’score’ in under two minutes, it still counts. And it counts more than ‘driving’ six minutes and coming up with nothing.