Coming up for Air after Wyoming
We started a conversation a week ago about some key areas to watch going into the season. Let’s resume.
Offense
Vertical displacement on combo blocks
This went better than I initially thought when viewing the game live. Our combo blocks between guards and tackles were consistently very good throughout the game. The combos with Espinosa and a guard were also fairly successful. Espinosa did struggle sealing the nose out of the Power play several times, letting the nose compress the hole. He's doing a good job with footwork but he's often getting too high on defenders and giving up leverage that allows them the shrug off his block and close on the play. Overall the tackle to tackle play on the offensive line was very good for game one and Donald Hawkins is absolutely an asset in drive blocking, setting the edge, and pass protecting. Overall the starting five is light years ahead of where it was this time last year. A sub note here would be that I loved the up tempo approach early in the ball game. When you look at our team as a whole and consider the depth we have on the defensive line and the physical nature of our offense, it makes a ton of sense for us to push pace and wear teams out.
Tight Ends in the run game
This wasn't quite as bad as I thought it would be. Greg Daniels battled to a mixed performance and DJ Grant has improved some in the offseason. The improvement at offensive tackle may allow us to get away with a more open ended approach to the edge as long as the tight ends learn to ride the defensive ends whichever way they want to go and our players get adept at reading those blocks. However, I feel strongly that without more diversity in the approach to the defensive ends on the Power O, Inside Zone, and the Pin N Pull, we will experience problems with our tight ends getting pushed into the backfield and congesting the play. This is compounded by the problem of not having a clear enforcer at the fullback position who could potentially kick a defensive end on a regular basis to free us up schematically. Still I think a combo of base blocking from the tight end with kicking and trapping from the fullbacks and guards along with some read plays would serve to help the tight ends be more effective from play to play. I also hold out hope that one of the fullbacks will play into form as Cody Johnson did through the first half of last season.
Pass protection
Communication, footwork, and involvement from the running backs looked better in game one that at almost any point last season. Very encouraging.
Recognition and execution from the QBs
David Ash progressed quite a bit in the offseason. He is seeing the field for the first time presnap and he even showed the ability to use his legs to buy time and make a few off schedule plays. Once you start checking out of bad situations with regularity, the act of checking into good situations inevitably follows. That's the progression I'm looking for in Ash from before the snap over the course of this season. After the snap, I think it's a matter of game reps to get the action to slow down a little more for him and get to the stage where he can make a throw based on anticipation rather than solely on what his eyes are seeing that moment. I was definitely also encouraged by his execution in the short passing / screen game.
How much are we cutting?
Much, much less. And wide receiver blocking has improved, Mike Davis included (although I'd like to see it go from passable to assertive).
Defense
Alignment and audibles
Definitely had a few ugly moments in terms of alignment and assignment adjustments to motion from unbalanced passing sets. Really you almost thank Wyoming for showing all the exotic stuff because it gives you a lot of teachable points in the film room and encourages the defense to get used to communicating on the field.
Run Fits
I thought fits looked pretty good from the linebackers but Wyoming really only ran outside zone blocking and there wasn't much misdirection in the running game. Still we did a nice job of not getting outflanked or over running the stretch play and that's not easy to do over and over again.
Edmond's snaps
Edmond apparently will stay in on nickel but not in the dime/prowler package. I thought Edmond was at his best when he was stalking the tailback and he has some work to do when he's playing in a drop underneath zone (as do all of our underneath defenders).
Physical Dominance on the line
The defensive ends played winning football all night long. The defensive tackles were more of an up and down group and specifically I thought Moore struggled with aggression in game one. It's crucial that the defensive line attack blockers in this defense and reset the line of scrimmage. I have confidence that things will click for Moore as they did for our defensive linemen last season who were new to the scheme and hopefully on a little faster schedule.
Reaction on the throw
We weren't bad in this area but we weren't great. Phillips, Cobbs, Edmond, Okafor and Thompson all had moments in the game were they could have taken away opportunities from the offense by getting a better jump on the QB's weight transfer and having better awareness of threatening receivers in their zones. This is actually a crucial area of improvement as the defense builds toward the West Virginia match-up that is only weeks away.
The Film
Since this was game one and there was so much ground to cover, I spread the commentary over a lot of plays and kept the format simple this week. Going forward I expect to cover many fewer plays and move toward a more user friendly format with graphical layers. In short, if you are a diehard, enjoy the insanely long and possibly droning breakdowns. If you are overwhelmed by the length and bored by the format, better things are on the way.
And nobis, the music was selected special - just for you.
87 comments
|
Add comment
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The bearded one speaks!
hush, hush, children! Gather round.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 12:18 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
First off
Thank you for all the hard work.
Second, I like the insanely long and possibly droning breakdowns.Context matters, and there is loads of it in those videos.
Greg Davis... Gone!
by Crimson Fog on Sep 6, 2025 12:34 PM CDT reply actions
Great stuff man, love these
First of all, the defense video is blocked. Copyright business.
But I watched the offense video. Really enjoyed it (don’t mind the length at all…that’s what she said). Confirmed my impression of Hawkins that game. Really strong in setting the edge. What an addition. The clogging on the inside looks correctable, rather than the initial fear that Espinosa just got manhandled every snap.
The FB situation looks troubling. Maybe someone develops on the Cody Johnson curve, but I’m not sure that’s likely. The spacing looked better when we went 3 WRs instead of having a fullback. Think that’s probably Harsin’s fix? Or could we just be looking at using more H-backs for the DE blocks, and stick to using pulling linemen as lead blockers inside?
Hook 'em! @michaelpelech10 on Twitter
by The Audit Horn on Sep 6, 2025 12:41 PM CDT reply actions
annoying
I will have to do another edit later tonight.
Sorry for the blocked content. I’ll get it cleared up later.
by LonghornScott on Sep 6, 2025 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Not a problem
Just hate to see your work get censored by The Man.
Free LonghornScott!
Hook 'em! @michaelpelech10 on Twitter
by The Audit Horn on Sep 6, 2025 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions
FB
. Clearly a lot of work and a little distressing that mentally he looks like a freshman. Seems his biggest problem is upstairs. Hesitates in the hole as he digests his assignment. I am not sure he is a lost case, because not much about his physical abilities can be garnered from his play.
by codaxx on Sep 6, 2025 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Great write-up. A blocker like Swaim showing up on this offense will have worth beyond his face value.
And Smythe probably won’t suck either. So what if they’re green. 2013 is looking good.
by WreckerTex on Sep 6, 2025 12:57 PM CDT reply actions
It really shows why our GD-versions of TE can't hack it in this O
Still somewhat mystified why we didn’t go after a JUCO TE in last year’s class.
by Rickyspub on Sep 6, 2025 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Maybe we wanted to
JUCOS self-select a bit.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions
But usually one of the sites will get a whiff of something...
Not saying you aren’t right…it could also be that they didn’t see anyone they liked or liked enough to try to figure how to get him eligible. Resident know-it-all Closetojumping over at the Shag was certain that Hawkins would never get in. It was relief that he did!
Didn’t we make a stab at a kid out AZ who ended up at FSU or was that the year before? Not sure he would have had much impact as a freshman anyway. I wonder if ASJ, who tore things up at UW last year as a fish, would have given us a chance under the new regime? He would probably be wreaking shop by now. There’s no way Harsin would have let Bruce Chambers say, AUSTINS SEFARIAN-JENKINS, YOU SO MUCH AS POO POO IN YOUR PAMPERS AND I SEND YOUR FAT ASS STRAIGHT TO SEARELS!
by Rickyspub on Sep 6, 2025 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions
I will miss all the talking, but I'm looking forward to the graphical layers.
I’m sure you’ll get a lot of this, but thanks for all the effort you put into these. I really enjoy them.
Big picture, just going off my crappy memory, if this is year 3 of the “downhill” experiment, we are getting significantly better blocking at OT, RB, and WR compared to the openers in 2010 or 2011. Plus Harsin seems to have a better feel for what he can get out of the team compared to last year.
Question I have been pondering: are any of the more potent offenses in the big xii paired with a defense that is well suited to stopping the Texas offense (assuming Texas shows a reasonable amount of improvement by the time conference play starts)?
by Alphahydro on Sep 6, 2025 1:23 PM CDT reply actions
this will come up later today
but OU usually plays good run D, it’s the lifeblood of their defense.
I think ISU could give our O problems, KSU and OSU are the other better defenses in the conference.
OU is probably the most troubling combo, I don’t think the other’s offenses will particularly challenge us.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes.
I only caught the tail end of the UTEP game. What happened to OU’s offense in the first three quarters? (I can wait for your post later today if that’s what it’s going to cover).
by Alphahydro on Sep 6, 2025 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions
I guess I should just wait until 9/22
before i start fantasizing about an inept OU offense. . .
by Alphahydro on Sep 6, 2025 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Nickel - I will ask you again
What did you see of OU, last week, that distresses you? Sure, they won the game, but they really looked mediocre to me. Their OL was godawful and I saw nothing from Jones OR his receivers to strike fear into us. Of couirse they will have all their layers back before the RRR – Stoops won’t jeapordize his rep over a few suspensions.
But, even if they do, I still feel WVU is the real team to reckon with this year – ourside of ourselves, of course!
"When someone says you're a hybrid, that just means you're fast for your size." Manny Diaz
by Snide Aside on Sep 6, 2025 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions
I wrote on it
you can check it out here.
I’m not sure why Longhorn fans persist on deluding themselves into thinking that OU won’t be a threat every year. I think this is a key factor in the bitchfest that inevitably occurs when they don’t perform to our silly expectations in Dallas.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 7, 2025 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Potentially OSU
if they eschew their heavy zone commitment and choose to man up Brown and Gilbert on our WRs and outnumber us at the LOS. Brown is incredibly strong and would do a pretty good of rerouting Shipley early. Gilbert would probably completely dominate Mike Davis. The game in Stillwater looks to me like a potential low scoring dogfight.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions
they also have
a wide variety of zone blitzes they could throw at us, try and get us behind the chains.
That’ll be one of those games where Ash actually has to give us something in order to win. Unless the defense has a particularly good Lunting trip.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Good Will Lunting
starring Will LB Jordan Hicks.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Will Muschamp
as Professor Lambeau, Diaz as Sean Maquire.
Mike Gundy as the Harvard d-bag at the bar.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions
does mike gundy like apples?
Karate? The Dane Cook of martial arts?
by Rocket94 on Sep 7, 2025 3:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
I’m anxious to get a better sense of how good OU and OSU are on offense this year.
And how much Ash and the WR core has improved in the intermediate-deep passing game.
by Alphahydro on Sep 6, 2025 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Just adding some comments as I watch
Great points on the availability of the weakside cutback on a couple of our power runs (particularly Gray’s instincts there), but I think Run #1 is a bad example. The defender isn’t overcommitted and he’s positionally perfect to prevent Bergeron from cutting back. You’re basically asking Bergeron to eschew hammering it up in there for positive yardage – as he has been told to do all week – in exchange for trying to make a ESPN highlight play on a guy in good position that probably results in -2.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 1:27 PM CDT reply actions
agreed.
I think I had it on the brain from the other clips I was working on. Overemphasized on the whole.
by LonghornScott on Sep 6, 2025 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh c'mon
For once I wanted to pick a fight with you.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Well for what it's worth
I think Mike Davis put more effort into blocking than you gave him credit for. You damn charlatan.
by LonghornScott on Sep 6, 2025 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Agree here. Effort looked good....execution was bad several times
I was encouraged to see him run across the field and knock a DB down on Shipley’s reverse field run, and to keep another DB off of Bergeron 30 yards downfield on his big run in the 4th quarter.
by Horncasting on Sep 6, 2025 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Our fullback wears #24
That’s how you pick a fight.
by Young Williams on Sep 6, 2025 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions
That's cause people from Dallas suck. Fact!
by The General on Sep 6, 2025 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Cutback
That cutback lane is beautiful when the LB overplays, but on the Gray play where he does make that cut, how else would Walters play that LB trying to run through? It seems like Walters makes the right play there by trying to shuck the LB away from the play side. Inevitably, though, that makes garbage for the cut back. I guess I’m just having a hard time visualizing how Walters can protect the play side from the LB’s run through while still leaving the lane open for the cutback. Any help there?
by Katfid54 on Sep 7, 2025 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Ideally the combo moves toward the Will
So there isn’t such a big gap for a run through. Walters does the right thing though.
Another option when a running back is a badass at that read is just to let the RB handle the WILL and have the double team be the complete focus… that allows you to really start planting that DT on his ass and the RB and WILL are playing a chess match every time.
by LonghornScott on Sep 7, 2025 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Walters didn't do the wrong thing
However, I don’t think he did the BEST thing. What I know about the play is from LHS and it sounds like the cut back is an intentional part of the play. If that is the case, I would prefer that OL do their best to keep both run lanes open.
How do you do that? As LHS was going through that play I was think about what else Walters could have done that would have helped the playside hole without affecting the cutback. It looks like Walters could have just fired off and put his hat on the LB. If he does that Gray has a much better chance on that play. If Walters simply puts a hat on the LB it at the very least engages the defender and forces him to expend time and energy fending off the block. Best case is that Walters drives him another yard or 2 downfield which is perfect regardless what lane Gray chooses.
So I hope Searels pats him on the back for a good job and then whispers into his ear, “next time see if you can push the LB 2 yds downfield”.
by Monahorns on Sep 7, 2025 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Roberson basically confirmed all of my preseason concerns at FB.
Very poor game. I guess we’ll give Alex De La Torre an audition against the Lobos.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 1:28 PM CDT reply actions
Is Moss a lost cause?
Just a big body? He’s bigger than DLT . . . sadly, I agree on Roberson. But, Cody was a fifth-year senior, too, and he got it after a few games.
by edsp on Sep 6, 2025 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions
I know I’ve been (blindly?) hoping Moss would be a revelation at the position.
The De La Torre move in the depth chart is a worry. I trust he’s smart enough to know where to be. But I really doubt he’s strong enough now to get any movement on someone he’s going to need to put a body on.
Hook 'em! @michaelpelech10 on Twitter
by The Audit Horn on Sep 6, 2025 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions
We don't need big at FB necessarily
Just good decisions and some pop. See Jameson Berryhill. Cody took time to get good at FB, but there’s a chasm in performance level between Roberson and early Cody.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions
You were unfortunately prescient on that one
I could live with him getting physically stalemated at times, but seeing those kinds of consistent assignment busts from a senior is really disappointing – and, given the lateness of the hour, could indicate a processing problem that won’t get fixed this season.
Come on, ADLT.
by nobis60 on Sep 6, 2025 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Fold blocks
Wonder if they start using fold blocks in place of some of the FB leads. similar concept to pin and pull with the OG pulling around into the vacated hole left by the down blocking OT.
by ShinerCHE on Sep 6, 2025 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions
My favorite part of the long Bergeron run
is the 10 yard+ piggy back ride he gives the Wyoming defender who finally made the tackle.
by CMDR on Sep 6, 2025 1:30 PM CDT reply actions
cant view it on my work computer.
doing a search for LonghornScott will yield the Droids (video) im looking for? yes?
If You See Kay, Oh You
by texfan23 on Sep 6, 2025 1:32 PM CDT reply actions
Really pleased by our basic protection
If we don’t lose physical battles, our pass protection looks to be about 50% better than last year.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 1:36 PM CDT reply actions
this has been noted before
but Searles was one of the best hires Mack made.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions
totally agree
best example was Hawkins picking up the blitz from the field. Could not believe that one of WRs didn’t run any type of hot route to the vacated zone on that play.
by ShinerCHE on Sep 6, 2025 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Really like Hawkins
Massive upgrade at tackle there. If we could only pair a functional blocking surface at TE next time him it would give us a lot more options on the edge. I assumed it would be Matthews but Daniels is showing early promise.
by Vasherized on Sep 6, 2025 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Me too
It’s no coincidence that we got the running game going by outside running. There was an edge that just wasn’t there when Tray Allen was out there.
by Monahorns on Sep 7, 2025 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions
FB and TE blocking definitely lacking
really must get better understanding, leverage and aggression from these positions. would love to see more aggression from Hawkins on the pin block. with the angle he has on the 3-tech he should be burying that dude. Searles was a very good hire.
by ShinerCHE on Sep 6, 2025 2:06 PM CDT reply actions
Great stuff, and consistently epic music choice
I really liked some of what I saw from Daniels going head-up on the DE without any real angle/leverage advantage and at least stalemating him on a number of plays. If he can continue to grow that will be huge, considering how much our offense seems to ask the ‘end’ TE to accomplish that task. One thing I don’t think I had taken away from some of your Power O diagrams last season was how the play has the flexibility to go outside if that DE ‘wants’ to be ridden in – of course, the fullback has to realize that as well.
Great analysis of how quickly Jon Gray spotted the over-pursuing WLB and cut the ball back. Vision is probably the most often under-appreciated attribute in a great tailback, but the primary reason that the Cowboys’ Lead Draw may have been the most dominating base run play in NFL history was Emmitt’s ability to turn it into about five different plays based on his vision and cutback ability. And, like Ginger Rogers doing everything Fred Astaire did but backwards and in high heels, Moose Johnston was able to make the proper read and get to the right spot with three yards less room to figure things out.
Espy was definitely a mixed bag – I liked seeing the power he showed on some plays to push the nose or at least deny penetration, but he got beat a few times as well. I’m kind of encouraged by the fact that he was beat mainly when he got too high – I think his struggles were with correctable technique rather than the baseline strength deficit that plagued him last year.
A couple of general questions that popped into my head while viewing:
On a typical combo block, is one lineman typically the ‘designated’ guy who peels off to get to the second level, or do the players go by feel based on which way the DL they’re engaging is going/trying to go?
Is the pulling guard on Power always going to turn upfield inside the TE, or are there instances where he’d go all the way around and kick out whoever’s there or turn up?
by nobis60 on Sep 6, 2025 2:12 PM CDT reply actions
The pulling guard should be
pulling for first daylight. So if the DE gets collapsed, he should wrap wider. His assignment is the declared Mike but any trash in the hole gets first priority.
On the combos its usually a feel thing on who peels to the next level which is why they rep the hell out of the zone and gap combos in practice… to establish that rhythm with each other. On IZ and Power combos the 2nd level defender should come to the blocker more than the blocker peeling off for the defender.
Great questions.
by LonghornScott on Sep 6, 2025 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions
I disagree on the combo.
99.95% of the time, both of you know who is peeling off based on the intended play hole and defensive alignment.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Agree
typically the covered lineman stays with the combo and the uncovered moves to the next level. Only time its different is if the DL has stunted toward the uncovered lineman.
by ShinerCHE on Sep 6, 2025 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
well
practically it may be true that the players have a feel for what will happen. But the fact the defender may slant means that it can’t be expressly pre-determined
by LonghornScott on Sep 6, 2025 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions
Turf war!
Scipio reasserts playground dominance.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
No, LHS bitch-slapped there easily
FightFightFightFight
by tx2step on Sep 6, 2025 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Fold blocks instead of FB leads
Wonder if we try some outside fold blocks instead of FB leads. Similar look to the pin and pull with the OG leading into the hole vacated by the down blocking OT.
by ShinerCHE on Sep 6, 2025 2:16 PM CDT reply actions
Holding
First, I enjoyed every second of it. Don’t change a thing, unless you want to.
On 3 of those good running plays there is egregious holding. On the Bergeron 54 yarder Hopkins cleans up the hole by pulling the DT out of it. On the Bergeron TD, Daniels holds the DE allowing the hole to open up inside. And on DJs TD run, Hawkins is setting the edge with a fist full of jersey. On that one I don’t think it mattered because DJ was going to outrun the DE anyway. I am glad we didn’t get called but I hope they all get better at footwork and body positioning so that this doesn’t happen. Just think if Hopkins gets called for holding. A 54 yard back breaker turns into 1 and 20 from inside the 5 yard line and the pressure stays on Texas.
by Monahorns on Sep 6, 2025 2:40 PM CDT reply actions
Hands inside the numbers
As long as the OL keeps their hands inside the DL’s shoulders officials don’t typically call holding even if they have hand fulls of jersey. Now if the DL separates and the OL grabs jersey or OL is outside the shoulders then holding is usually called. That is why DL are taught to not allow OL to get their hands on them.
by ShinerCHE on Sep 6, 2025 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Look on the bright side
We’re finally capitalizing on the single most salient characteristic of Big XII officials – they don’t call holding!
by nobis60 on Sep 6, 2025 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions
There's a lot more holding on slow-motion
Than fullspeed. But yeah, noticed a couple as well.
by CMDR on Sep 6, 2025 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Just to be clear
The safety is generally supposed to be unblocked, right? In other words, even if everything goes according to plan the offense’s goal is to give the RB a one-on-one with the safety?
by matonmacs on Sep 6, 2025 3:56 PM CDT reply actions
Depends
on the formation, but generally yes. Or the corner.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Zone vs Man
Is there something inherently difficult in teaching zone concepts to college players? Is this a deficiency of Akina?
It’s always felt to me that we’ve struggled far more often when playing more zone-based coverages than man-based. Baylor shredded our zone last season. I think I remember us using a lot more zone in 2009 against the aggies and Johnson shredded that defense as well (although we picked it up later in the game).
by Fozzz on Sep 6, 2025 4:47 PM CDT reply actions
the teamwork
in trading of receivers, reading and recognizing patterns, and weak spots often seems to be a weak point of ours. Scipio has theorized that Akina teaches individual technique well but struggles in teaching cohesion and unit teamwork in zone.
I don’t know what went wrong against A&M; but we played pattern-match zone/man all year in 2009 to great effect.
We also play zone pretty well in our Fire Zones, where Diaz has simple and particular methods that he teaches.
I think our problem this year is just having inexperienced linebackers. Edmond surely never had to make great coverage drops in high school and I’m not sure his skill set is particularly well suited for it. Hicks and Cobbs should be great at it with time.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions
They need to figure out the balance between
maintaing their area and playing a man. You want to cover people, not grass. But when there is no receiver around, get a good drop, and be still. Don’t shuffle around and create meaningless activity. Your presence is taking away the route that’s about to happen behind you and when you bail to challenge a RB releasing who is ten yards from the sticks, you expose us.
by Scipio Tex on Sep 6, 2025 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions
you catch us doing that?
I noted a little bit of Hicks and Edmond losing track of receivers and geting caught flat-footed but I didn’t pay too much attention. They just look a bit unpracticed, and almost surely are. God knows our passing game doesn’t make them think or practice route recognition much.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 6, 2025 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions
help this computer dunce out please
it is blank where the film should be, i must have something blocking it, but what?
by 55f100tx on Sep 6, 2025 6:36 PM CDT reply actions
This is awesome.
you ain't a beauty but hey you're all right.
by kalone on Sep 6, 2025 7:25 PM CDT reply actions
Many thanks
This obviously took a lot of time to do – selecting plays and organizing them to tell the story you wanted to tell. Much appreciated as it gives those of us with less understanding of the intricacies of line plan a much better understanding of why things happened as they did and what to watch for in future games.
Seeing this, I’m much more impressed with the line’s improvement from last year than I was watching live. I remember thinking after the first play that we weren’t moving people out. Watching the replay with your commentary, I see that we did move some people, just didn’t quite have all the elements in place. Looking forward to seeing how they progress next week.
by LakeTravisHorn on Sep 6, 2025 9:57 PM CDT reply actions
My week is now complete
Thanks, Scott.
Seriously, I started looking forward to this at the final gun Saturday night. While I was happy to find a feed and watch the game, it is really hard to determine all that is going on in real time. Your coverage of our fullback blocking is particularly educational for me. I just couldn’t tell at the time exactly what was going wrong on some of those plays, but watching it in slo-mo with your commentary makes it all come together.
by Longhorn in Canada on Sep 6, 2025 10:36 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks, LHS.
Great breakdown as always. So, we have a fullback in the 2014 class. Anybody step up sooner?
by Flipteach on Sep 6, 2025 11:48 PM CDT reply actions
Eggs Ackley
what I was thinking Saddy night, after watching RR flailing and Santos crushing returners… We’re going to need someone to stepninto that role, fer sher. Could it be #24? Serially doubtful, but he could damn sure do it…
.
.
You Ain't Never Whipped... Until YOU Quit -- Tex Long, Seven Words of Wisdom
.
.
by longtex on Sep 7, 2025 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions
Speed Sweep's Affect on Zone
What a difference between inside zone run in the first half and second half. At first I was willing to chalk that up to being a conditioning factor in the game and say that Wyoming was just tired of trying to tackle Bergeron and Brown. But, after rewatching and seeing your breakdown, I think Jaxon and DJ gave Wyoming a lot more than they thought they could handle on the speed sweeps. Later in the game, Wyo’s defenders were much more apt to look at the speed sweep than earlier in the game (DJ’s beast-monster TD is probably a big reason for that). But getting a LB and Safety to step toward that speed sweep makes a huge numbers difference in the zone running game.
by Katfid54 on Sep 7, 2025 9:37 AM CDT reply actions
Yeah
And that’s really the great thing about our base package. Any of the backside constraints can be paired with the base runs to enhance them. That’s why its not always a bad thing to run with 8 in the box. If you can create some hesitation, you can still gain a numbers advantage on an inside run and the chances for an explosive result go up with a safety walked down.
by LonghornScott on Sep 7, 2025 9:42 AM CDT reply actions
this reminds me of a high school football game I once attended
My alma mater Cedar Park was facing Leander, and they kept using Blake Gideon as the QB to run Zone-Read.
Despite the fact that we needed the ball back and they were marching down the field at will, we kept our safeties back in a 2-deep shell. I started yelling, “bring in the safeties!”.
Finally we dropped them down to the box, they hesitated on the read, and then Gideon was down the sideline with nobody left in the backfield to take an angle on him. TD Leander, game over.
by Nickel Rover on Sep 7, 2025 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions
So your coaching cost your team the game
YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY HERE
by Scipio Tex on Sep 7, 2025 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by LonghornScott on 
















