Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: What's the Worst Trail Blazers Move in the Last 5 Years?

The NCAA & Penn State

201200716_rvr_su1_008_extra_large_medium

Mandatory Credit: Photo By US PRESSWIRE

Andrew Sharp: Penn State Punishment: NCAA Finally Gets Something Right

The NCAA handed down a historic punishment to Penn State football on Monday, a package of sanctions that leaves Joe Paterno's former program crippled for the immediate and distant future. And that's okay.

Spencer Hall: NCAA Beats Up Corpse, Then Demands Your Applause

NCAA president Mark Emmert's decision to absorb power accomplished nothing, but let's all marvel at the wreckage he's left of Penn State football anyway.

Bomani Jones: Penn State, And The NCAA's Thirst For Punishment

A four-year bowl ban, a $60 million fine, and 14 years of vacated wins leaves Penn State a ruined football program. The NCAA had the rare opportunity to rain punishment on a team, and they didn't waste it. That and more in today's Monday Morning Jones.

Stewart Mandel: NCAA's Mark Emmert overstepped bounds in hammering Penn State

...the legacy of the Penn State scandal will no longer be Jerry Sandusky's heinous crimes or the courageous victims who stood up to him. Thanks to a brazen power play and a carefully orchestrated p.r. extravaganza, this human tragedy will take a backseat over the next four years (or longer) to a more trivial narrative: Whether Penn State football can recover from crippling NCAA sanctions.

Amy K Nelson from SBN Studios after the jump.

Star-divide

In their response to the Penn State football sex abuse scandal, the NCAA handed down major sanctions against the football team, including a 4 year postseason ban, a 5 year probation period, a reduction in scholarships, and the vacating of all wins from 1998 to 2011. The vacated wins will also be reflected in former head coach Joe Paterno's career record, no longer positioning him as the winningest head coach in college football history.

Be excellent to each other.

Tweet Comment 68 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Spencel Hall summed the whole things up nicely

“They will not do any of this. The NCAA’s punishments serve no purpose, solve no problems, and prevent nothing”

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 12:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Serves a few purposes:

- Establishes a $60M fund for prevention/treatment of child molestation. Whatever you feel about the football punishments, you can’t say this one is worthless.
- The coverup presumably happened in order to maintain JoePa’s legacy and the image of Penn State football. The punishment sends a harsh message: “Kids first. Cover up molestation and your program is dead.”

People say ruling won’t prevent this from happening again, just as punishing cheating programs hasn’t stopped cheating. I disagree. The ruling basically says, “This is the absolute worst thing a program can do. It’s not worth it.”

by txTDM on Jul 23, 2025 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

criminal cover up is a near weekly part of every D1 head coach’s job. DUI attorney’s fees in college towns are one of the few tent poles holding up the economy right now.

I know one is worse than the other, but it’s still a criminal issue, not a football one. Penn St gained no competitive advantage here, in fact you could argue they haven’t really been relevant since they forced Sandusky out. He’s a monster, but one of the all-time great coaches. This also happened 14 years ago.

I agree that PSU should be punished, but not by the NCAA and not like this. Force out the remaining administrators and coaches. Put people in jail. I just don’t see the victory in crippling the program now.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I’ll go a step farther than you. I don’t feel sorry for PSU, but I think the NCAA is in danger of creating a moral hazard. What we now have seen:

1. Programs like tOSU, USC and PSU that have acknowledged mistakes get hammered by the NCAA.
2. A program like Auburn gets to skate. This came after they, upon the NCAA looking into the purchase of its QB, told the NCAA that they admit nothing and will see them in court if they try anything,

If Oregon (who had a payment to a street agent show up as a line item expenditure!), who also lawyered up, admitted nothing, and told the NCAA to pound sand skates, the message will be clear- schools that submit to NCAA regulation will be punished severely for violations. Schools that refuse NCAA authority will not be punished at all. That is a moral hazard.

I don’t like this. The courts, that have jurisdiction over this, are addressing the issue. PSU will be punished. Meanwhile, the NCAA has other arenas of jurisdiction (recruiting and eligibility) that are uniquely theirs. How well they handle those issues is how they should be judged.

by TaylorTRoom on Jul 23, 2025 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Point Shaving

Don’t forget the FBI has an active point shaving investigation going on concerning the Auburn basketball program. Haven’t heard a peep about that since it was disclosed. It will be interesting to see what the NCAA does concerning other criminal violations in college sports?

by Randolph Duke on Jul 23, 2025 1:28 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

You are correct

there may be unintended consequences, but refusing to hold the program accountable in this way would be wrong too.

The answer is to find a better way to get at schools who don’t submit to NCAA authority.

One way to do this, though very heavy handed, is for the NCAA to punish schools for not allowing investigations under the suspicion of wrongdoing. This could result in other problems but it could punish schools for not cooperating. Essentially, schools would have to promise to work with the NCAA and not doing so would be perceived as insubordination worthy of punishment.

by Monahorns on Jul 23, 2025 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

It serves notice and stands for the principle that...

that if your institution is so rotten that it chooses football over child rape, your institution should probably not be allowed to profit from football any more.

by Dreadful on Jul 23, 2025 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why not vacate the wins and let the criminal justice system do what it needs to do? It’s not like all the other child molester coaches out there are being scared straight.

What if Jerry Sandusky was actually the head of an international stolen car smuggling ring? Does this still happen? I don’t think so. I think it’s an overreaction/grandstanding from an impotent governing body taking advantage of the horrible nature of the crime.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Huh?
What if Jerry Sandusky was actually the head of an international stolen car smuggling ring? Does this still happen?

Had he operated the criminal activity out of the athletic department and run a chop shop in the locker room showers of PSU and had Paterno been alerted and all the other actions had followed, I dare say that that would cause much more of a stir than you suppose.

Granted, the outrage over child rape would be rightfully greater, but to dismiss criminal activity of lesser degree or even suggest college DUIs are in the same stratosphere is absurd.

A crime was covered up to maintain the reputation of the school and head coach. Diminishing that reputation would have surely had some impact on PSU’s ability to compete for recruits and on the field.

Had Sandusky been doing what he did in the hazmat showers of the Chemistry Bldg, you’d have more of a point.

by RomaVicta on Jul 23, 2025 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

“Granted, the outrage over child rape would be rightfully greater, but to dismiss criminal activity of lesser degree or even suggest college DUIs are in the same stratosphere is absurd.”

This is my exact point. It’s not absurd. None of it falls under NCAA jurisdiction, no matter how heinous the crime. Or, none of it should, anyway. It’s not an amateur athletics/football issue. That fact that the crime is what it is allows the NCAA to overreach here, and that bothers me.

Sandusky should rot in jail, and so should those that allowed this to stay covered up. I think the NCAA is right in doing certain things — vacate the wins, fine the program, whatever. PSU covered this up to protect it’s wins and legacy. Take those things away.

A bowl ban and scholly loss, a severe scholly loss, punishes almost nobody that had anything to do with a (mostly) non-football issue. Did the NCAA do anything about Baylor’s murder? I forget because they were also caught cheating. They don’t punish schools with repeat criminal offenders, like Florida under Urban Meyer or even that great 2-3 year run Mack had.

If you are OK with the NCAA coming down on programs that allow this type of atmosphere, fine. I’d be OK with it, too, but it’s not something they’ve done. Now I feel they have to start.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ya' Think?
This is my exact point. It’s not absurd. None of it falls under NCAA jurisdiction, no matter how heinous the crime.

For better or worse, the NCAA is what we have to protect the image of sports - not “armature sports”, not Olympic Sports, not any qualified sports, just sports, athletics if your British. Period. Do you think any of the professional leagues well? The NCAA is what we got, and they did what needed doing.

PSU was different. The state laws on university governance are different (not Public Universities, but “state related”). A century long coach is different. Happy Valley is different, but not that different. I thank all big college programs are isolated and insular, but none yet like State College (not even college station). (I lived in PA a while, it is different. Just look on the PSU sites today.)

The NCAA needed to do this! In addition to all the criminal prosecution, they needed to do this.

People whine over the new student’s that will never see a bowl game. Crip, Earl was a junior, DKR a coach when I enrolled at UT, (yeah, I’m old, screw you), and it had nothing to do with my choice. If some freshman wants to go to Pitt, or Temple now, it won’t be that big a deal (I didn’t need a uhaul to move after my first year, did you?) The new players will probably have even less trouble leaving. The new staff knew what they were doing, and took there chances, and can probably still leave too, or take the money and, then, run.

As for the fans, who are whining all over the interwebs just now, and the alumni, etc, etc. Isn’t that the whole point?

Yes, this is a punishment of the fans. For years. And of the Alums, and the town. Why? Because they did just what Paterno did. Even if you grant the stupid claims of his defenders, Saint JoPa looked away, even if he didn’t know, he looked away. And so did all the PennSt. fans and students and administrators… And that who is getting punished. We can’t cover that locker room and stadium with a tarp, the way we would if it had termites or mold, but we need to know that if you live something, even as dumb as a team, you gotta watch and take care of it, and guard it, not a damn statue.

by J-M-M on Jul 23, 2025 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Becuase you can't put the football program in jail.

The idea of institutional liability is pretty commonplace in the real world. Here the institution - from the godfather, Paterno, to his titular (but not actual) bosses in the University, all the way down to guys like McQueary and the janitor, all the way down to the misguided fools who rioted after he was fired and the Matt Millen style apologists) was corrupted and either reckless or downright guilty of enabling this behavior at all levels.

Ergo, the institution itself should be punished. Having it take a time-out for a few years seems like the best idea to me.

by Dreadful on Jul 23, 2025 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

it should be punished, absolutely

but here’s my thing: Emmert’s very first comment in the announcement was about how this case brought on “deeply powerful emotions.” I believe the NCAA overreacted because of that. Had the crime been nearly anything else, PSU’s punishment would not have been so severe.

I don’t think the NCAA should respond emotionally. That’s not their job.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

but the crime was incredibly severe

The crime wasn’t anything else, short of premeditated murder it’s arguably about the worst one out there and in some sense even worse. And it’s not just emotional - it’s simply quantifiably worse for society to have a sexual predator on the loose than to have somebody moving a few kilos of weed or betting on football games or whatever other corruption you can imagine.

by Dreadful on Jul 23, 2025 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

so when Dave Bliss tried to cover up a pre-mediated murder, what happened to Baylor?

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who cares? That the NCAA may have acted inconsistently

…hardly matters. But if Baylor Univerisity showed the same level of institutional corruption and enabling of ongoing crimes that Penn State Football did here I’d have no problem handing them the same punishment.

by Dreadful on Jul 23, 2025 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

if this is a new direction for the NCAA, so be it. I don’t think it is.

PSU broke certain bylaws, similar to those nebulous NFL “proper conduct” rules. There is nothing in the book about murder or raping children, awful as they are. That’s not what the NCAA is there for.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

The NCAA isn't for anything in its book.

…its whole book is a fantasy built around the fig leaf of the noble student athlete, which is why it spends its time vigorously protecting eligibility rules of which the primary object is the siphoning away of potential recompense to players that people pay to see, and into athletic departments and adminstrators.

Again, an interesting argument, but irrelevant to the ultimate appropriateness of the remedy.

by Dreadful on Jul 23, 2025 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well said

There is no such thing as “too harsh” for Penn State here.

And it IS a football issue, not just a legal issue, as much as people want to say it isn’t. PSU football and the image around it are the reason Sandusky didn’t go down much sooner, the reason more kids needlessly became victims. It deserves to be killed.

by txTDM on Jul 23, 2025 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for rounding all this up in one place, Sailor

I’m at least a little surprised by the magnitude of the penalty. The fine is the best part — that’s the one way some form of punishment can directly go from the university to to programs/people who need the assistance.

On the rest, it’s kicking a beaten animal. What’s the point? Bowl probation is silliness — when you strip a program like this one was stripped, bowls ain’t gonna happen. Reducing the scholarships means the team can’t compete; well, fine, but who are you punishing? Students, who had no part in the abuses. Players and the new coaches, likewise. Extending the program for that along assures that most (many?) top athletes who might have become Nittany Lions will go elsewhere. Again, what’s the point? And taking away Penn State’s/Paterno’s wins is the most meaningless punishment you can make. It’s a purely on-paper, let’s rub their faces in it deal.

Hopefully, any bowl and TV money that is forfeited goes go charities, not the Big Ten — that would let other schools benefit from Penn State’s sins.

by edsp on Jul 23, 2025 12:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Since the coverup was presumably to protect JoePa/Penn State legacy

“Rubbing their faces in it” by taking away their wins seems appropriate. Sure, it’s just on paper. But it kills the thing they most wanted to protect. Even if it was already essentially dead in the public’s eyes, makes sense to make it official.

Totally agree about forfeited money going to charities.

by txTDM on Jul 23, 2025 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure

I think Paterno made a different calculation. There were likely two potential outcomes he considered:

1) No one ever finds out: Nothing happens to Paterno/PSU. Terrible things potentially continue to happen to boys.
2) The wrong person finds out: All hell breaks loose. Life as you know it is over.

I just don’t think the NCAA’s response to discovering these crimes would have influenced the decision either way. He weighed the probability of getting caught against not and opted to cover it up. Not sure the NCAA’s actions today do anything to deter future actions.

That said, giving current players the opportunity to transfer, free of a penalty, helps. Forcing the university, which still seems unbelievably callous about this thing, to support charity helps.

If I were PSU, I would just take a year off. Take a step back from football to focus on more important things. Remodel the damn locker room & showers. Let the foregone season serve as a memorial for the victims. Just seems like they need some time to properly assess how things got so bad before trying to move on.

by tronaldinho on Jul 23, 2025 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disagree

“Not sure the NCAA’s actions today do anything to deter future actions.”

Sure they do. The calculus is more complicated than you make it seem. It’s more like this:

1. No one finds out: Nothing happens.

2. Someone finds out - several possible outcomes:

2(a) NCAA buys my horseshit excuse: nothing happens.

2(b) NCAA gets involved - several possible outcomes:

2(b)(1) NCAA declines punishment, citing bullshit about “purview”

2(b)(2) NCAA punishes PSU - several possible outcomes, ranging from a slap on the wrist to going full-blown Sandusky on the school.

What the NCAA established is that anyone who makes the same decision JoePa made is headed toward the most extreme version of outcome 2(b)(2). It establishes a precedent now. There is very little uncertainty remaining. Cover ups will come undone, and the act of covering up a crime this serious will result in (almost) the strongest medicine the NCAA can dish out.

When JoePa and Co. made their fateful error, the uncertainty plagued the analysis and let them to think “We’ll get away with it and, if we don’t, we’ll likely get a slap on the wrist.” Now that analysis is something more like “We might get away with it, but if we don’t, the program and my legacy are fucked.” That is a SIGNIFICANT difference, from a deterence standpoint.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

"What the NCAA established is that anyone who makes the same decision JoePa made"

that decision has been made hundreds of times in the history off the NCAA era. Dave Bliss made it, and Baylor is now better and shadier than ever.

Maybe this is a new era of NCAA heavy-handedness, but I doubt it. Until they beat somebody down for actually cheating to maintain a competitive advantage, I will remain convinced that this was mostly about the nature of the crime and less about the actions afterwards.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

“I will remain convinced that this was mostly about the nature of the crime and less about the actions afterwards.”

Dude. Of course it’s about the nature of the crime. You don’t punish all crimes the same and it stands to reason that you don’t punish all cover-ups the same. If the local police never hear about a fight in the locker room that would technically amount to criminal assault, it’s not that big of a deal. But when they never hear about a serial molestor operating with your implicit acknowledgement, that’s a huge fucking problem. Not only is the crime far more extreme, but Paterno’s inaction allowed Sandusky to commit further crimes.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

every word you wrote is right

the only part I have a problem with is who is handing out the punishment, and who is actually punished.

A jury of peers should decide these people’s fate, not the NCAA. They nuked a city to kill one warlord.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

And a jury will decide their fate. But a jury won’t be sitting in judgment of whether Penn State upheld its responsibilities as an NCAA member institution, nor should it. That’s where the NCAA fits in.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

PSU definitely did not do their part. However that aspect of the crime, in my opinion, doesn’t match the penalty, at least not when you consider the last 30 years of precedents.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Precedents were made to be broken

The NCAA clearly decided it was time to set a new bar, given the heinous nature of this crime and the blatantly self-serving nature of the cover-up.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess my point was that

If somebody found out about it, Paterno had to know he was facing potential jail time. If you’re in jail, who cares what the NCAA has to say about it?

by tronaldinho on Jul 23, 2025 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Certainly, this logically

will serve as a deterrent. Sound reasoning there. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean that the NCAA should have stepped in here, and that it didn’t overstep it’s bounds insofar as its mandate to protect the “amateurism” of college sports, which, is pretty much it’s sole function.

by stevenebraska on Jul 23, 2025 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why shouldn't the NCAA step in?

One of its member institutions behaved reprehensibly. The NCAA has the ability to censure its members.

I think there’s some confusion between overlapping and exclusive jurisdiction. Think about it this way. If I commit a serious crime, only the criminal courts have the right to try me for my crimes and, potentially, sentence me for official state-sanctioned punishment. But that does not deprive other bodies from taking action against me. My employer could fire me. My family could disown me. My wife could divorce me. These entities all enjoy the ability to punish me, despite the fact that punishing a “crime” is legally the responsibility of the criminal justice system.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

say you didn't commit a crime

Your creepy uncle that you haven’t seen in over a decade did. It’s not really a matter of whether or not your employer can fire you at that point, but should they.

I get the point you’re making and that point is correct. Sandusky and the PSU administration need to take it from every angle possible.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

“say you didn’t commit a crime … Your creepy uncle that you haven’t seen in over a decade did”

Come on, man. That’s not what happened here. JoePa et al. knew about Sandusky’s behavior, knew it was on-going, and took steps to cover it up to avoid a little tarnish on the sterling reputation they had worked so hard to develop.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Joe Pa. et al. will be punished

They aren’t the ones I’m worried about. Everybody with direct knowledge has been or will be prosecuted . . . or dead. More importantly, those things will come down form the proper authorities.

All the NCAA has here is conduct unbecoming, basically.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep

But that conducts is really, really, REALLY unbecoming.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

As a criminal defense attorney

I fully understand what you’re saying. People involved in hit and run accidents may be prosecuted under the penal/transportation code here in Texas depending on the nature of the accident, and they may also be sued in the civil courts. Prosecutors routinely make restitution a part of any plea bargain deal, as they have every right to do so. This does bot preclude seeking damages in the civil courts.

However, that’s what the civil courts are there for.

Further, I’m not even saying the NCAA shouldn’t have stepped in. I’m simply stating that the fact that they did, while certainly creating a deterrent for future inaction by coaches and administrators, isn’t necessarily “proper” (if that’s the right word, might not be) under the system the NCAA and it’s member institutions have set up. The action here is kinda like an executive order, or the president exceeding his authority under the war powers act. At least an argument could be made, and is being made, to that effect.

In other words, I guess I’m just of the view that unprecedented circumstances doesn’t necessarily always warrant unprecedented action.

My wife, if she existed, wouldn’t have a set of bylaws that limited the scope of her ability to punish me or whatever (that would be nice)…the NCAA, however, does have such bylaws.

by stevenebraska on Jul 23, 2025 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

“My wife, if she existed, wouldn’t have a set of bylaws that limited the scope of her ability to punish me or whatever (that would be nice)…the NCAA, however, does have such bylaws.”

True. But the NCAA also has some very broad powers under its bylaws, particularly 4.1.2(e) and 2.4. See this link and the NCAA Bylaws for more details.

Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

by BrickHorn on Jul 23, 2025 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I feel like I'm backin con-law,

which I suppose is where I drove this, so no problem there.

This language, particularly the word “responsibility” seems to be where PSU dropped the ball in the context of NCAA rules:

“For intercollegiate athletics to promote the character development of participants, to enhance the integrity of higher education and to promote civility in society, student-athletes, coaches, and all others associated with these athletics programs and events should adhere to such fundamental values as respect, fairness, civility, honesty and responsibility. These values should be manifest not only in athletics participation, but also in the broad spectrum of activities affecting the athletics program. It is the responsibility of each institution to:”

Mike McQueary and Joe Paterno didn’t exactly foster a culture of responsibility here.

And I’m not even going to point out how just about everyone failed in this regard:

19.01.2 Exemplary Conduct.

“Individuals employed by or associated with member institutions for the administration, the conduct or the coaching of intercollegiate athletics are, in the final analysis, teachers of young people. Their responsibility is an affirmative one, and they must do more than avoid improper conduct or questionable acts. Their own moral values must be so certain and positive that those younger and more pliable will be influenced by a fine example. Much more is expected of them than of the less critically placed citizen.”

by stevenebraska on Jul 23, 2025 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

statute 19.01.2

I think Nick Saban breaks that one every 15 minutes or so.

by John Kocurek on Jul 23, 2025 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Penn State's penalties

I don’t have a problem with any of the penalties imposed on Penn State this morning by either the NCAA or the B1G.

It is true that the Pennsylvania court system will have the final say on Curley and Spanier, and Paterno has already gone to his judgment before his maker. However, the scope of Jerry Sandusky’s crimes, and the complicity of Penn State’s most important decision makers in covering up those crimes meant the NCAA had to act against the school.

I didn’t see the grandstanding this morning that some others apparently did. I saw Mark Emmert, in a business-like manner, and with appropriate compassion for Sandusky’s victims, hand down penalties that I felt were very consistent with the crimes carried out on Penn State property over more than a decade. Spencer Hall, Bomani Jones, and others are entitled to their opinions, and get paid to express them. I’m entitled to think they’re wrong, and nobody is paying me to express my opinion.

I enjoy college football as much as anyone, and in some ways, I’m sorry for the Penn State athletes and fans who will have to endure years of hardships on the field because of today’s penalties. However, I’m very much sorrier for the damage inflicted on Jerry Sandusky’s scores of victims, abetted by the decisions of Penn State’s administrators for years to turn their back on the victims, in the name of protecting Joe Paterno’s name and Penn State football. Today’s penalties, to me, were appropriate to the crimes. Someday, years away, Penn State’s fans will cheer again. I seriously doubt Sandusky’s victims will ever cheer for anything a day in their lives.

"Where is the church? Who took the steeple? Religion's in the hands of some crazy ass people!" (The gospel according to Jimmy Buffett)

by coolhorn on Jul 23, 2025 2:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Honest question...

Who are the people that are named in the Freeh report that are still with the university (not including guys like Curley who are on LOAs and will soon be gone and probably in jail)?

I ask because if all the people that covered it up are gone, who is getting punished? The people that hired the people that covered it up that are still there? ummm.. OK. If what has happened to PSU and the involved coaches and administrators since November isn’t deterrent enough for people in high places to cover things up (and it may or may not be), I don’t think what the NCAA did today does anything more other than let the NCAA say “we care too.”

I am generally fine with deleting JoePa’s legacy and the $60MM fine. Anyone with the authority to extract money from the university for the benefit of the victims should do so. But I’m not sure that by crippling the football program, the NCAA is making anything better or creating any new deterrents that haven’t already existed. If it’s cripple the football program or the victims don’t get justice, fine, I’ll go for the latter. But since everyone involved in the cover up is gone (I think — hence the initial question) with at least 3 looking at jail time, what’s the point of punishing the new administration?

At the end of the day, what the NCAA thinks it needs to do is a small part of the big picture. I just squirm a little bit that they thought they needed to get involved considering their targets are all gone.

by A-Tex Devil on Jul 23, 2025 4:02 PM CDT reply actions  

This argument is so OLD.

Its brought up every single time that NCAA sanctions are given out. Same was said for SMU, for Aggy, for USC, etc.

If you don’t punish people for DELAYING the discovery of things. You wind up encouraging it.

Team A: Forthcoming and they get punished. Because after all, the people that committed the acts are STILL THERE.
Team B: NOT forthcoming and obfuscated the truth. Therefore, when its all found out nobody is around that was involved. So they get ZERO punishment as an institution. So nobody gets punished.

Which team would YOU choose to be next time trouble comes knocking at your program’s door? Do you finally see why they HAVE to punish team B MORE than team A?

Further, THE BOTS and alumni push to hire the president and AD and Football Coach. Its a representative system.

Why else do we as Longhorns sing, “The eyes of Texas are upon you?” We understand that we represent more than just ourselves. We represent our University.

WE ARE PENN STATE. Until that time when the entire system we fought to protect and encouraged to win at all costs bites us in the ass. Then its, WE ARE PENN STATE… except those couple guys that we hired to represent our School, our Athletic Program and our football coach. EVERYONE BUT THEM!

by Orangechipper on Jul 23, 2025 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

OC, you're missing his point, and it's also mine.

“If you don’t punish people for DELAYING the discovery of things. You wind up encouraging it.”

But the whole damn conclusion of the Freeh report was that nobody but Paterno, Curley, Spanier, and Schultz KNEW! For the rest of the administration and student body and football program, you want to hold them accountable for delaying the discovery of something they knew nothing about? Why?

by TexanNick on Jul 23, 2025 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

REPRESENTATION

Those that had nothing to do with it (your words) Still funded and hired the people that had EVERYTHING to do with it.

by Orangechipper on Jul 24, 2025 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Okay.

I paid a lot into the UT program. Should Gloria Allred be coming after me for my share of the Cleve Bryant situation?

Of course not. Because what Bryant did was ILLEGAL, and outside the scope of his duties to UT. What Paterno, Curley, Spanier, et al did was ALSO illegal, and the decision to cover up was outside the scope of their respective duties.

So again, what moral blame attaches to the factually blameless?

by TexanNick on Jul 24, 2025 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

It was also within the scope of their respective duties

purely because it would possibly have an effect on recruiting, though why they didn’t just fire Sandusky in 1998 or 2001 boggles my mind as it gets rid of the problem that would screw recruiting.

TEXAS FIGHT

by Darklust on Jul 26, 2025 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just to pile on late here,

Your example shows the problem at Penn State. You know about the Bryant thing; he’s gone. It was not hidden, could not be hidden, for a decade.

It wasn’t last November that people found out that PSU was weird, insular, secretive. I knew it and I’ve never been closer than the turnpike. It’s a state school but isn’t subject to public disclosure. That isn’t true at UT or anywhere else I know of. Even the regents turned down the responsibility of supervision, not just of football but the whole university. The CIA and NSA have more watchdogs than Paterno did.

I don’t know what the State College hotel owner, or the stadium hotdog seller, or the average alum could have done alone, but they should have put their voices together and yelled. If you care about something, you don’t put a halo on someones head and say, ‘take care of this, Holyone’, you keep an eye on it and protect it from those who claim to be saints. And that is why those that are PSU, are getting what they deserve.

by J-M-M on Jul 26, 2025 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

First of all the other people KNEW of the crime.

Mike McQueary for one. The janitors for others. But they were afraid to either come forward or they identified the “proper authority” to report it to as the football coach.

Secondly, (and this is more than a little disturbing to me) the idea that Sandusky started to molest young boys in the late 1990’s doesn’t come close to being logical. When the criminal and civil cases start to wind their way through the system this story could become much, much uglier, and the cover up seen to be much more widespread.

Joe Paterno ran off a University Vice President who had the audacity to think that his players should come under the same disciplinary rules as other students on campus.

Joe Paterno kicked the Athletics Director and President of the University out of his house for suggesting that it might be time for him to retire.

The idea that Sandusky had brought boys on campus while he was coaching and that people knew about it is not very farfetched.

My fear is that we will see over the next months and years that this “Lack of Institutional Control” reaches far back into the Paterno Era.

by srr50 on Jul 24, 2025 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Alright, fair enough.

So put a show cause penalty on McQueary, identify and terminate the janitors. It doesn’t change the basic point. Punish those that knew and facilitated the cover up. Sometimes in life, you have to punish the innocent with the guilty, I get that. But here, you’ve got the guilty clearly identified, dead to rights. Explain why we SHOULDN’T be more circumspect in our punishment.

Secondly, I’m sure you’re right that Sandusky’s crimes predate those that we know about at this point. It would be illogical to assume otherwise. But that doesn’t mean, and there is no evidence to suggest that anybody currently at Penn State knew, or could reasonably be expected to know. If evidence comes out that they did, we simply reevaluate. Why is that idea such a burden to people?

Paterno was run amok, no doubt about it. But your point about him resisting pressure to retire is a bit specious. If the BOT and Admin wanted him out bad enough, they had all the power in the world. What they sufferred from was cowardice and a lack of will, the courage to withstand the backlash that would have occurred if they appeared to be forcing him out. They failed to assert the power they ALREADY had, and as such, ceded that power to Paterno.

But again, that entire administration and “culture” is already gone.

by TexanNick on Jul 24, 2025 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nick, It might be cliche, but it is an integral part to all that happened

and the severity of the punishment that you seem to not grasp the simple truth that Penn State and State College were basically the domains of Joe Paterno and that all those in power had long ago ceded any control over he and that program.

You can either accept it or not, but that is the origin to what has gone on in that part of the Pennsylvaina for decades. I and others have directed you to various sources that said this when the situation first broke and you done have to dig too deep in the Pittsburgh area to find writers and radio people who will give you a much, much different view of Joe than the person that Penn State media machine has cranked over during his time in State College.

by davey o'brien on Jul 24, 2025 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's fair, davey.

I’m honestly not that bothered that sports reporters got their feelings hurt when he wouldn’t answer questions he didn’t like. Reagan used to do this with charm, and if Paterno HAD a little more charm, it wouldn’t have made the stink that it did.

As to the disciplinary issues, I agree, the Admin failed to step up BIG time.

But again, the Penn State Admin is basically a complete overhaul at the top levels right now. They may have come in under a cloud, but to me, that doesn’t mean I’m going to tar them with the same brush I used on their predecessors.

To try to turn this back to my point, all of the punishment with the exception of the vacated wins is FORWARD looking, meaning that it punishes or otherwise curtails the privileges of those having nothing to do with the crime. I understand that that’s usually the case with NCAA punishment. Therefore I think a conversation is needed about the overall mission and effectiveness of NCAA enforcement. I WISH it wasn’t this situation that cried out for it, but it is.

by TexanNick on Jul 24, 2025 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem is that Penn State benefited greatly as a school

and the football program for the reputation Joe and Jerry built during their time in Happy Valley. It is the very basis for the cover-up and why I think that the NCAA’s actions are proper.

That program is a huge sense of pride in the area and if you have every had the fortune to be about a PSU grad for any period of time they are only too happy to tell you how they are the only school that has been doing it right.

My thought is simply that the NCAA wanted it clear that core mission of an institution can not be the betterment of the institution at the cost of sacrificing was is right and in this case a criminal cover-up.

What I really find interesting in all of this is that my brother-in-law is an incredibly smug Big 10 guy who loves to boast about the academics and morals of the conference are far above all the other conferences. To this day he won’t budge a bit on this issue, Ohio State, Michigan, or Iowa.

by davey o'brien on Jul 24, 2025 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

"Penn State benefited as a school."

I agree with this, Davey, and I wish I could figure out a way to decouple it from the problem, but I can’t. And the fact is, Penn State HAS done a lot of things right, for a long, long time. That doesn’t take away from the heinousness here.

by TexanNick on Jul 25, 2025 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Paterno, Curley, Spanier and Schultz FACILITATED. the. CONTINUAL. RAPE. of. CHILDREN

because they placed a greater value on “The Penn State Image” which was based upon the football program than the lives of CHILDREN. For that reason the NCAA destroyed that False Idol. If not the NCAA then who? Civil and criminal courts wouldn’t do that. We continually disparge the NCAA for inaction but in this instance I applaude them.

“Penn State: Winning with Horror”

by ole tnhorn on Jul 24, 2025 8:15 AM CDT reply actions  

Why?

Your premise that the NCAA HAD to act is based on the idea that the civil and criminal courts aren’t up to the job. I’m just curious WHY you say that. The criminal courts seemed to have no trouble dealing with Sandusky, and it’s doubtful they’ll have much more difficulty with Spanier, Curley, etc. Paterno’s estate will most likely have to pay out in civil court. So why exactly do you think all of this is somehow insufficient? We haven’t punished sufficiently unless we include a few blameless just for good measure?

by TexanNick on Jul 24, 2025 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

to be fair...

I believe his premise is that the civil and criminal courts aren’t up to the job of dealing with the football program. Whether you accept that the program itself needed to be punished is your choice, but don’t mischaracterize his argument…

by Pflash on Jul 24, 2025 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't disagree.

I’m re-reading, and not quite seeing what you mean when you say I mischaracterized his argument. My post isn’t questioning WHAT he said, but rather WHY he believes that the criminal/civil justice system isn’t adequate to this challenge. I’m not saying it’s NOT a valid viewpoint, but he threw the premise out there without really offering any support for it, so I’m seeking to understand his thinking better, in the hopes it will help me understand or change my own.

by TexanNick on Jul 24, 2025 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions  


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Bc_logo_257x257_small
Why is Kevin Durant Wearing A Beret?
Bc_logo_257x257_small
SB Nation Studios's Big XII Preview
Bc_logo_257x257_small
Big 12 Coaches On Reality TV Shows
Bc_logo_257x257_small
We Were Penn State
Bc_logo_257x257_small
PSA: Burnt Orange Nation's In The Huddle - Texas 2012
Bc_logo_257x257_small
The NCAA & Penn State
Small
Wonderful news- Penn State gets hit hard
Small
A clarification from SEC Media Days
Small
2011-12: Not as bad as you think
Bc_logo_257x257_small
Sports Illustrated's College Football Mock Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Picture_016_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Authors

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover