Mack Brown Spring Press Conference - The One Where He Says Lots of Candid, Interesting Stuff; Shocking Us All
Interesting stuff from Mack Brown's recent press conference courtesy of the always helpful Texassports.com. He was surprisingly open and his musings reveal some of the mindset of the new staff and the kinds of conversations they've been having in the coach's offices. Give it a read, as it's well worth your time.
[WR] John Harris will rejoin the team for practice today. [LB] Demarco Cobbs will rejoin the team for practice today. Sheroid Evans will be out there full speed today as well.
Welcome back. Harris is a physical blocking presence outside and a reliable pass catcher who can throw touchdowns when we trickerate. Cobbs is our starting SLB and a Diaz favorite, but he needs reps. Sheroid is the fastest guy on our team in shoulder pads and I know our coaches are eager to see what that he looks like at safety, nickel, and on special teams.
DJ Monroe will finally be getting his reps at WR...
He needs to be outside. That's who he is. And to do that he's got to catch better. He runs 10.3 100 meters. So it makes sense that that's his place to play. So we've told him catch better. I mean, you just need to do that. It's really important. So work really hard. You're fast. You're great with the ball in your hands in space, but we can't hide you if you've got one play.
This is good news for our offense if DJ can improve catching the ball and it certainly helps to disguise some of our DJ packages. It's also revealing of our plans for Gray. We're clearing out the depth chart at RB. Put sprinters like Goodwin and Monroe - as incomplete as they may be - on the field with Shipley and the new attitude Mike Davis and you're asking some questions that an opposing DC may not be able to answer.
I liked reading this:
Right now we have some good young ones coming in. I told the entire team Sunday night, when we met, that you've got seven days to get your spot. And like last year, we played 18 freshmen. So if you don't have a spot leaving here, we're going to put freshmen in your place. But what we will do is put up on the board after the spring game who we think can beat the best teams we play or all the teams we play. And that doesn't mean he's a starter, but if he can give us 20 plays, can give us 12 plays, he'll be in that group. If you're not in that group and you're not significant in special teams, then we're going to put a freshman in your place. And that's going to be your fault now.
Okay then, Mack. Bring it. That outburst is a little like to seeing your mother jump on a motorcycle after grinding out a cigarette on a Hells Angels' forehead. Awesome, but unexpected.
Dominic Espinosa thoughts...
Dominic Espinosa has done a really good job. He's smart. He's getting stronger. Hurt his shoulder senior year in high school. Didn't get to lift that spring. Then he had an operation. So he really hasn't lifted at all the last couple of years. So he's above 300 pounds now. So he's getting stronger.
Good to hear. Longhorn Scott and I had a recent phone conversation in which we were trying to figure out the pervasive "Dominic Espinosa is killing this football team!" meme, when guys like Hopkins and Walters struggled just as much as he did. Not to mention Trey Allen. Or the QB position. Or our RB's constitutional soundness. Espinosa is young. He's getting coached and he's able to lift now. He'll improve.
Mack had some thoughts on OL philosophy that were promising:
'07 is when we started getting trouble some on the offensive line. And we quit redshirting guys on the offensive line. We had to start playing them. And we haven't been as consistently good across the board two-deep since then. And that's what we've gotta get back to. We've got a decision to make with Kennedy Estelle and Curtis Riser when they come in.
A-fuckin'-men. I've been beating this horse for some time. Good to hear Mack take a couple of whacks at it. Suck it up, realize that OL age more like wine than may flies, and stop robbing Peter to pay Paul for our previous developmental sins.
Akina has some love for Duke Thomas...
But Duane likes the fact now that even Duke Thomas, he thinks may get in the mix, because he's done so well in the first eight days at corner. He's been really impressed with him, and we think he's shown maturity beyond his years at walking out there and playing corner for a guy that didn't play there much. So we've really been impressed with his attention to detail, his toughness and his maturity
Pretty remarkable how Quandre Diggs, Adrian Phillips, Duke Thomas, and Mykkele Thompson all basically played the same Do Everything And Win The Game For Us position in high school. Not to mention John Harris and Miles O. Our recruiting process is now more about overall athletic ability and personal attributes of competitiveness and toughness than worrying about how many reps they got in a narrow positional area. ATH-O-LETE isn't a dirty word.
A bizarre rule change that I hadn't heard about yet. Check this out...
And then the second rule that changed, we met with the officials for an hour yesterday as a staff and this is one that disturbs me and I feel like we should talk about it and I may not get it all right, but if you lose your helmet next year, you have to stop playing. You can still play in your initial contact with the player in front of you, but you lose your helmet, you can't continue to play somewhere else. So if I'm a defensive end rushing the passer, supposedly I can rush him, but quarterback steps up, I can't continue to rush or it's a penalty. If you lose your helmet, you have to come out of the game for a play, regardless. So your quarterback could lose his helmet on the next to the last play of the game and he's out for the last play.
I can't think of any injuries associated with this, so the remedy seems odd. A lot of players play without their chin straps properly buttoned and there are an alarming number of helmets coming off on any given play, so perhaps that fashion goes by the wayside. Or the NCAA realizes they made a stupid rule that has no impact on the real causes of concussive head trauma.
Linebacker play:
We want those guys to show up here in the last seven days. Steve Edmond and Jordan Hicks have really had a good eight days. Jordan's had his best eight days and Steve’s just gotta keep playing more. Steve's got some unbelievable ability but still has to keep playing.
Regarding Edmond, I don't recall Mack being this exuberant about a player that hasn't started a game yet, but it's pretty clear that Edmond has some early returns that suggest he'll win the election for AssKicking Mike. Can't wait to see him.
Mack on five year scholarship proposals solving the problem of programs running off kids....
The way I feel like is we explain to the parents it is a one year scholarship that's renewed every June. But if your son, if he has a felony or flunks out of school or doesn't try at all, he'll be gone for the first two and the third one we're going to try to help you get us make him try. Other than that he'll have his scholarship.
Most Texas transfers occur because the player's ego doesn't align with their actual play. I've yet to hear a Mack Brown ran Player X off story. Similarly, the medical scholly can be used as an honorable discharge so that all parties can move on.
QB game managers...
What we'd like to do is have a good enough team that if the quarterback's not having a stellar day we can still win. And the last four or five years we haven't been that way.
Glad we had this revelation.
How about Bergeron's stature?
His weight has fluctuated between 238 and 241, and he hasn't lost one ounce of speed. And some of his high school teammates came to one of the junior days and saw him and said; My gosh, he looks like he's really lost weight. I walked over and asked him. And he said, "I'm 241. I've actually gained weight." But he's lost body fat
Injured vs. hurt...
Cedric Benson against Michigan, the first play of the game, hyperextended his knee and the doctor said, "I'm not sure I would play if I was you because you're a first round draft choice." [Benson] said, "Tape it up, I'm going to play. " He went back in and played every play. That's the attitude we want to get on this football team. had too many guys in my estimation hurt. We've had too many guys that will miss a game or miss a practice. So we're putting a tremendous amount of emphasis on who is out there every day, who is consistent every day, who gets ready to practice every day and who is excited about playing every day
You may remember me writing about this a week ago. Was this message targeted to any players in particular?
I quit paying much attention to Brown's press conferences some time in 2002, but this one struck me as candid and direct with regard to a number of subjects. I heard some really encouraging things that suggest he's been doing some thinking on program direction. I like what I heard. Is this the offseason making me an easy mark or is Mack getting all transparent and extra butch?
What do you think?
67 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think Mack stared into the abyss
And also realizes he doesn’t have that many more go ’rounds.
And nice is he is, he clearly has a mean streak…
This is all very good news, if accurate.
by Sailor Ripley on Mar 21, 2026 12:56 AM CDT reply actions
Henceforth he is RAM
Red Ass Mack.
Nice to have you on the 40, RAM. Some of us have been asking for you to show up for years.
Simplicity is always the secret, to a profound truth, to doing things, to writing, to painting. Life is profound in its simplicity. - Charles Bukowski
by windycityhorn on Mar 21, 2026 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions
Who went out and replaced the golf clap
with this current BAMF
"Slammed that hoe on the counter like I just got 35 on the domino table!!"
Sherrod Harris
by AlDe2356 on Mar 21, 2026 1:06 AM CDT reply actions
The evolution of Mack...
Mack will always be Mack, but we’ve seen too many other necessary and welcome changes in the program to think that this press conference is some sort of outlier. The 5-7 season forced Mack to analyze his program beyond his insistence that Greg Davis was a great offensive coordinator because he had the stat sheet to prove it—never mind that destroying New Mexico State helped average out a guaranteed smooth buttf**king at the hands of OU.
It forced him to realize that having numerous players drafted during his tenure belied the fact that Mad Dog’s strength and conditioning regimen was slightly less effective than working out once a month on a Tony Little Gazelle.
In other words, Mack has never been one for intensive self-analysis, and he even needed Dick Tomey to tell him how bad things had gotten inside the program instead of himself seeing the glaring weaknesses that were obvious to virtually everyone.
I forget which “insider” posted it last season, but there was a report that Mack was “amazed” at some of Harsin’s schemes. Think about that for a second. Mack was so blinded by his loyalty to previous assistants that seeing a new playbook or set of plays that built upon one another truly astounded the head coach at the University of Texas.
I have a feeling that hasn’t been the only time recently in which Mack said to himself, “Holy sh*t. I’ve had it all wrong.” And that feeling has only been enhanced by seeing Wylie’s “County Fair” workouts and recruiting classes that will likely eclipse his previous successes, which is saying something.
This is not to say that Mack hasn’t done countless things right for the program. But now he’s finally shoring up his blind spots. He sees a Texas team that went 8-and-5 last year with a quarterback who was fourth string in the summer and without a healthy running back late in the season. He sees a massive influx of talent about to make Texas even better. He sees a chance to cement his legacy. And, in turn, we’re getting to see him evolve right in front of us.
None of this guarantees us anything, but I think it’s real, and it’s sure as hell fun to watch. Great stuff, Scip.
by Cricketslayer on Mar 21, 2026 2:19 AM CDT reply actions
Nice contextual piece
I agree on all of it.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 21, 2026 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Got to admit, I did not expect to see Mack
turn things around like he did in 2010. For a very successful coach with a pretty healthy ego who seemed set in his ways to do what he did after going 5-7 - i mean he totally upset the apple cart. For a middle aged man to essentially tell himself, “I’ve got to step outside my comfort zone and learn some new tricks, do things different, but still be me and be as ethical as possible” takes guts, and is a very rare thing to see.
Coach Brown, I understand that this project’s ultimate success will not be determined until we start playing, but color me impressed so far.
A&M;'s all-male cheerleaders, or "Yell Leaders", will be right at home when visiting Arkansas. It's like "Deliverance", but it's real...
by bevosteve67 on Mar 22, 2026 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Holy Hell. Mack 2.0?
Regardless, I am jacked to see Bergeron and Edmond next year, and I think Duke Thomas is going to end up being one of our favorites, ala Quandre Diggs.
Gangsta rap made me do it.
by TexasTopHand on Mar 21, 2026 3:15 AM CDT reply actions
Mack has always had a nugget or two in his Press Conferences
Granted, this one has more nuggets than usual and is more candid than his normal coach speak. This presser has the same vision of the future of this team as Macks “I can’t trust my coaches” Conference. Pointed at the players. Win your spot or be replaced, only with more optimism sprinkled in.
This football team will be so much tougher this year along with knowing the system, they will be hard to beat. Ash will make his mark and with the runningbacks we have it will be choose your poison.
by 55f100tx on Mar 21, 2026 6:22 AM CDT reply actions
Yeah, he has.
But you had to pan and burn some calories to find it. There were some fat gold nuggets sitting in the middle of the stream.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 21, 2026 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions
The depth chart comment
was the biggest thing for me. Everything else was either a status update (which are important) or an “I’ll believe it when I see it” type thing. This, though, is a situation where there is a real example of accountability and recent examples of younger guys playing, so it should really get through and light some fires under some butts.
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
twitter - @aaronbrotman
by Elm City Horn on Mar 21, 2026 7:36 AM CDT reply actions
Is my memory failing me?
When did Ced ever play against Michigan?
by Slugfest on Mar 21, 2026 7:36 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
First Rose Bowl
Was hurt very early in the game and rendered almost a nonfactor.
by Horncasting on Mar 21, 2026 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions
That was a glorious game
Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen
by realmccoy on Mar 21, 2026 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions
So it is failing me.
Thought he was gone by then. Only remember the play of the Texas quarterback and the kicker — don’t remember their names ;)
by Slugfest on Mar 21, 2026 8:03 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
How dare you besmirch the memory of Dusty Mangum like that!
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
twitter - @aaronbrotman
by Elm City Horn on Mar 21, 2026 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions
Great stuff
Love the Ced Benson anecdote. Dude gets treated harshly because he was aloof in college and busted as a Bear. But he was the RB for my first two years in college and was friggin’ awesome. The Benson/Young comeback show against Okie St in ‘04 is still my favorite game I’ve watched in DKR.
http://aseaofblue.com | https://www.barkingcarnival.com | @JC_Hoops
by jc25 on Mar 21, 2026 8:05 AM CDT reply actions
Agree, but think Mack forgot about the HUGE game that Benson got hurt and didn't come back in
Conf. championship game against Colorado. Was a big momentum swinging point in that game that is often forgotten because of the way Simms played.
by Horncasting on Mar 21, 2026 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Also, saying he never missed a game due to injury is false
He missed the Holiday Bowl game against Washington due to the injury he suffered in the CCG.
by Horncasting on Mar 21, 2026 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions
I think Mack was highlighting playing through the pain.
Are you hurt or injured? I believe that was what Mack was getting at. I don’t believe he wanst kids playing if they are actually injured.
"You’d think some of these Ohio St guys would wear long sleeves, instead of reminding us why they were in trouble last year."
-Rich Eisen, 2012 NFL Combine
by TexaStunna on Mar 21, 2026 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Yup.
The Benson/Young comeback show against Okie St in ‘04 is still my favorite game I’ve watched in DKR.
WVU slept dey couch.
@pleaseplaykindl
by pleaseplaykindle on Mar 21, 2026 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Although the 2008 Missouri dismantling was pretty sweet.
IIRC, they had negative yards of total offense at the half, down 35-3.
WVU slept dey couch.
@pleaseplaykindl
by pleaseplaykindle on Mar 21, 2026 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
That was an awesome game
I was sitting in the endzone when Mal Williams tore down that ball between two Mizzou defenders. Best catch I’ve seen in person besides the Michael Griffin INT at the Rose Bowl. I was in that endzone too and he friggin’ flew out of nowhere.
http://aseaofblue.com | https://www.barkingcarnival.com | @JC_Hoops
by jc25 on Mar 22, 2026 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions
I always thought the turning point on how Ced was viewed was . . .
when he said he’d rather win the Heisman than beat OU before his senior year.
Speaking of Ced, the PR Director for the Bengals is a Texas grad and has noted a couple of times that Benson has been great in Cincinnati and nothing like the guy who was chased out of Chicago.
by Cirque Du Salado on Mar 21, 2026 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions
That was dumb...
Clearly, the right answer was “to win the Heisman, we’ll need to be OU first.” But I don’t fault the guy for wanting a Heisman. Many of us would take individual achievement over our company’s success. Not an apples to apples comparison, I know.
http://aseaofblue.com | https://www.barkingcarnival.com | @JC_Hoops
by jc25 on Mar 22, 2026 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions
It appears Mack has actually changed
This whole accountability thing for Mack seems counter intuitive & contrary to 59+ years of experience. You almost never see anyone do a 180 on basic beliefs at this stage of their lives.
by ole tnhorn on Mar 21, 2026 8:46 AM CDT reply actions
I don't know if he 180'd on core basic beliefs.
I just don’t don’t know if he had any basic beliefs in some of those areas related to S&C, scheme, recruiting evaluation.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 21, 2026 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Duke Thomas
Scipio made a very good point in his assessment of recruiting the best athletes on high school teams. I often wondered why Texas only seemed to recruit a QB as a QB. From all my years of watching high school football in DFW, I knew that the best player on the team often plays QB. Other than a few examples here and there, Texas never seemed to follow this logic.
Good to see we’re going after the best athletes these days regardless of position.
Also, I’d like to know who was responsible for finding and recruiting Duke Thomas. I don’t recall him being very high on any recruiting lists; however, someone must have done his job to evaluate Thomas’ talent.
by knoxtnhorn on Mar 21, 2026 9:03 AM CDT reply actions
My guess would be Akina
but when in doubt just chalk it up to our beloved Applewhite. IIRC he got us Diggs.
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
by 2Cor12:9 on Mar 21, 2026 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Duke was known
He was at Copperas Cove and I’m guessing that our staff wasn’t going to ignore the head coach at Copperas Cove when he says,“Hey, we’ve got another really dynamic kid at QB who can help you.”
by Scipio Tex on Mar 21, 2026 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions
ha!
it’s gonna be hard to ever totally move past that one.
by Nickel Rover on Mar 21, 2026 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Accountability, emphasis on productivity, and projection of personnel needs?
Well dang, Mack could never be a manager in the place I work!
"Did I?" said Smiley. "Yes. Yes, well I suppose I did."
by Burrito Electrico on Mar 21, 2026 9:26 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Potential
If you ever wondered what Texas could be if we were committed to excellence in every facet of the program you are about to find out.
I do think Mack deserves credit for really making effective changes in how he runs things. Think about your own work experiences and how rare that really is, especially for someone who has had so much success.
I think we are still running up the curve in 2012, but after that look out. Texas is about to open a jumbo can of whupass and I am ready for it.
by bullzak on Mar 21, 2026 9:51 AM CDT reply actions
Scipio: I noticed the same thing about Mack's comments
Actually, I noticed it at his pre Spring Training session, and with the one either before or after the bowl game.
He is more open. He volunteers stuff without having to be prompted by a questioner. He’s much more descriptive into why a certain player is not playing — without naming names, of course. He describes the parameters for how a player can assure his value to the team, and explains why a freshman will be inserted.
Biggest issue, to me, is that Mack is getting a bunch of new ideas in his headset. He’s hearing fresh voices. And he’s listening. And acting on some of those ideas. I got the impression in 2010 that what we had done from 2005-2009 worked because we had — for the most part — a big edge in talent. Not because the system was perfect. When the offensive recruiting broke down (2006-2008), the system broke.
What I love most: Mack basically said the “system player” is no more. If you can play, you will, and you probably won’t redshirt. If you can’t play, we’ll help you decide what your best career move might be (transfer, quit football, accept medical hardship status). Accountability is the word one of my bosses used as a mantra. Amen
by edsp on Mar 21, 2026 10:13 AM CDT reply actions
That's what I think too
Conversations that the coaches are having are seeping out in press conferences when previously those conversations weren’t really happening beyond, “Sounds good, coach. We’ll get it done.” A Mack meeting was a bunch of dudes nodding.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 21, 2026 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions
I have a question
How is playing an OL as a freshmen stealing Peter to pay Paul?
I agree that the O-line that year won’t be as good due to playing an immature player for a year or two. But it sounds like you are saying that playing a Freshmen/Sophmore lineman is somehow retarding his development. I would actually think for the specific player a Junior who has already played 2 years would be much better than a Junior who redshirted and sat on the bench for a year.
So are you saying bad for the Offensive line performance (agree) or are you saying bad for the Offensive lineman development (don’t agree)?
by Monahorns on Mar 21, 2026 10:55 AM CDT reply actions
Also on this topic...
I agree you can’t be playing crappy freshmen on the OL that need to redshirt, but I think there will be rare cases when a freshman really is good enough to crack the two-deep. Especially in the situation we are in right now where we are still nowhere near optimum depth on the OL. My bet is that Riser ends up on the 2 deep at guard.
And in the rare cases where an OL recruit is good enough that you think you might lose him after 3 years, why not put him in the rotation as a frosh.
by Big(g) Ern on Mar 21, 2026 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions
The problem is that OL is typically the position that requires the most physical development after HS
A junior who has already played 2 years may well be better than a SOPHOMORE who redshirted and sat on the bench for a year (which is what the two players from the same recruiting class would be), but you get the sophomore for two more years. His overall experience in the program, mass/functional strength and general grown-ass man-ness as a senior all probably have an appreciably higher ceiling if he’s a 22 year old who redshirted vs a 21-year old who didn’t.
Playing true freshman OL means that you’re throwing a guy to the wolves undeveloped on the front end - which is bad for your OL - and shaving a good bit of potential off of his last year with you - which is also bad for your OL. There’s always the outlier like Orlando Pace who’s just going to walk in and dominate regardless, but if you’re making a practice of playing true freshman OL you are significantly compromising your OL’s potential in a systemic way.
by nobis60 on Mar 21, 2026 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions
This
Playing true freshman OL means that you’re throwing a guy to the wolves undeveloped on the front end – which is bad for your OL – and shaving a good bit of potential off of his last year with you – which is also bad for your OL.
Also, OL seems to be the one position that truly doesn’t develop until the 3rd year, and playing vs. redshirting doesn’t seem to speed up that timeframe.
by Horncasting on Mar 21, 2026 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions
That's fine...
And I don’t disagree, but what if the freshman is better than what you have on campus? Do you redshirt Riser this year even if he is significantly better than your other options?
Honest question - not trying to argue here. Hopefully at some point in the near future, we are at a point where the thought of any freshman being better than our current two-deep on the OL is laughable, but I don’t think we are there yet.
by Big(g) Ern on Mar 21, 2026 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions
That's where the 'robbing Peter to pay Paul' line of thinking comes in
There may be situations where your current team is at least marginally, or even significantly, better playing a talented true freshman vs an upperclassman who never, ever should have lettered at Texas cough Britt Mitchell cough. But doing so almost certainly compromises your team down the road as you lose out on that player’s full potential as a senior.
If you fall into the ‘playing freshman OL’ trap, you are almost certain to systematically hurt your program long term unless you, at some point, take your medicine and accept short-term pain for long-term gain. Hopefully, your coaching staff is able to make decisions with that long-term view in mind vs throwing guys into the fire for fear that they’ll be fired at season’s end unless this freshman OL saves the day.
by nobis60 on Mar 21, 2026 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions
It's generally not good for your quarterback, either
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
twitter - @aaronbrotman
by Elm City Horn on Mar 21, 2026 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
So it's the 5th year?
I can understand that but I don’t think that’s specific to OL. Any player in your program will be better year 5 than year 4.
by Monahorns on Mar 21, 2026 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
The tiebreaker
among 5th yr OL and other 5th yearplayers is the additional strength that comes with being a year older. That is more critical to the OL position than to any other. DT is second and others, IMO, aren’t close.
by boorad on Mar 21, 2026 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions
This extremely well trained staff.......
…… is forcing Mack to admit to his past failings. That is a great thing. Yet, past experience (as in NOS) has showed that he always reverts back to his norm.
--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---
by HornChamps on Mar 21, 2026 10:55 AM CDT reply actions
A near-fatality in Cal Poly...
…if I recall, back early last year, when a player’s helmet was knocked off, continued playing, tackled or was blocked, and blacked out, lost consciousness and was induced into a coma for three days?
Scip & Sailor, down here in LA I believe I read something about that. I know i read about it in the paper, but might not have been at Cal Poly…
Just FYI.
by scagnetti on Mar 21, 2026 11:06 AM CDT reply actions
Personally...
I would like to see the new rule toned back a bit - particularly on the next-play issue - paired with a stiffer penalty for knocking someone else’s helmet off.
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
twitter - @aaronbrotman
by Elm City Horn on Mar 21, 2026 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Penalty for knocking someone else's helmet off seems like a bad idea.
That would encourage players to not buckle their chin strap, because if someone accidentally knocks it off, their team collects the penalty yardage. Although this last season there was a de facto automatic penalty for knocking a player’s helmet off anyway, clean hit or not. The penalties on Goodwin vs. UCLA and Vaccaro vs. Mizzou are still infuriating to me, moreso Vaccaro’s. That’s the textbook definition of a form tackle. Nope, penalty. Terrible.
"ABC welcomes you back to Vince Young Field"
-Rose Bowl sign
by Andrew Wiggin on Mar 21, 2026 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
I was thinking of it more as a tack-on.
I’ve seen enough hands to the face that remove a helmet and it goes uncalled. Don’t think that would be fair to the player who lost his hat. Admittedly, there may be an incentive problem either way.
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
twitter - @aaronbrotman
by Elm City Horn on Mar 21, 2026 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah that's a fair point too
That wouldn’t be fair to the kid who lost his hat, and hands to the face goes uncalled often enough that it could become a problem. Incentive problem either way sounds right.
I say the solution is to make penalties reviewable. If a kid loses his helmet, go to the review, and one of the teams is getting a penalty either way. That way you can make sure it’s the right team. I don’t get why penalties are not already reviewable. Basically any other play in the game can be reviewed. Basketball often uses review to determine if a hard foul should be a flagrant 1 or flagrant 2. Why can’t football allow challenges/review of penalties? That may be a whole new issue though.
"ABC welcomes you back to Vince Young Field"
-Rose Bowl sign
by Andrew Wiggin on Mar 21, 2026 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions
Legal hit should remain legal, just to clarify
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
twitter - @aaronbrotman
by Elm City Horn on Mar 21, 2026 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Donald Jr
needs to get to work. Frankly, I don’t think you can be taught to consistently catch a football, unless it’s a question of effort/concentration instead of “hands”. And then there’s the route running skills, separation, timing, downfield blocking, etc. Daje Johnson’s stock just rose significantly, I believe.
by boorad on Mar 21, 2026 12:48 PM CDT reply actions
I don't think they're asking him to be Steve Largent
Just work on catching two routes: a fly and a hitch/screen.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 21, 2026 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Exactly
And if he can’t execute the handful of plays the staff assigns, put a freshman in there.
by edsp on Mar 21, 2026 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Instead of forcing a player out the next play
why don’t they just make it a penalty for not having your chin strap buckled? You see them all the time with one of the buttons unhooked. It doesn’t seem to happen nearly as much in the NFL and if it were a penalty then the coaches would force the kids to buckle up. Anyway, what don’t the kids buckle up; is it a fashion thing like Denard Robinson’s untied shoes?
by matonmacs on Mar 21, 2026 12:50 PM CDT reply actions
It's a fashion deal
And some guys like having their helmet come off so that they can face time without the official throwing a flag for helmet removal. I find it odd.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 21, 2026 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions
The rule
seems to be designed to do exactly that. I imagine most coaches’ response to the rule will be to “encourage” guys to keep the chin strap buckled or be punished for not doing so when instant replay proves that to be the root cause on a particular play.
by boorad on Mar 21, 2026 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Really Good PC
Mack said, in very nice way, kick ass, or get out of the way!
My dad used to say, move over shallow water, let the deep water roll. He meant the same thing, and it was funny, but when he was coaching, it was wise to take the advice.
I like the new attitude.
by j_java on Mar 21, 2026 8:58 PM CDT reply actions
"Butch" Brown
Tougher than “Mack”?
Or just tougher than Sally?
by lurkerinthedark on Mar 21, 2026 11:18 PM CDT reply actions
I think that's something that should stay between the two of them, don't you?
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
twitter - @aaronbrotman
by Elm City Horn on Mar 22, 2026 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions
Tape it up
We really don’t want injured players risking more serious injury do we?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on Mar 22, 2026 8:36 AM CDT reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by Scipio Tex on 


























