Bo Pelini at Big 12 Media Day
Pelini did a nice job at Big 12 media day. I just like to hear the guy talk defense. Cogent, intelligent, very little cliche. In reading his comments, I was absolutely struck by his identification of the distinct folly of two of our longest tenured defensive coordinators. I'll be curious to see if you see it as well.
Q. Following up on what you said about spread offenses. What will it take for college defenses to catch up to what the spread's been over the last several years?
Well, I hear a lot about spread offenses. And the bottom line is every spread offense is different. And there's not one -- there's very few that are the same. Everybody features different things and they obviously have different personnel.
Defensively you have to be very multiple to be able to effectively deal with everything you're going to see on a week-to-week basis. And you can't just line up and have one base defense and expect to stop everything that you're going to see over the course of 12, 13 games. And you have to be multiple. You have to really teach your kids conceptually and teach your kids to be able to react and adapt on game day, because things are going to change. It's ever-evolving on offense and you have to have the same flexibility on defense. You have to be very flexible and multiple and your kids have to have a good understanding of what you're doing so they can make the changes on game day and easily make adjustments.
Two words for you: Gene Chizik
Q: Is it all scheme or what is the key, the one thing that you have to do to stop those offenses, maybe one or two things?
I think the key to playing good defense is evaluating what exactly an offense is trying to accomplish and what their strengths are and you have to develop a game plan to offset what they're trying to accomplish and take it away from them. So they have to get out of their comfort zone.
And I believe this. Defensively it's not just what you do, it's not all about scheme. You can -- everybody wants to -- every coach out there wants to have the pencil last. When you're playing on Saturday, you don't have that luxury. You're playing, in this conference, there's a lot of good coaches and they're very well coached. You're not always going to have the pencil last. It's not just what you do but how you do it. You can't just go get so wrapped up in outscheming the opponent. If you do that, you'll forget how you do it and forget about technique. Technique and fundamentals are essential.
And if you're playing very sound technique-wise and you have good fundamentals and you teach them, you have your guys understanding your scheme, you'll be able to match up and deal with any problems that offenses can associate or going to make you deal with a particular Saturday.
Two words for you: Carl Reese
The Tampa 2 Doppleganger and the Mad Scientist - may Muschamp erase their memories forever. Amen.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff. What about Nebraska? Can Pelini (or anybody) return them to consistent Top 10 status or has the landscape shifted so much that their natural recruiting disadvantages are too strong to overcome? They seem like a good candidate for your contrarian O scheme ideas.
by Sailor Ripley on Jul 24, 2025 10:36 AM CDT reply actions
I have 3 words for the first one: TaylorTRoom. Or maybe that is 1 word.
by BRAGGonUT on Jul 24, 2025 12:45 PM CDT reply actions
The best way to beat the spread is to march your slow, lanky white MLB up to the line of scrimmage. That strategy also works magic against the I-formation, the I-formation option, the pro set, the run ’n shoot, the single wing, the double wing, the wing-T, the wishbone, the flexbone, the T-bone, the shotgun, etc., etc.
by Bull Reese on Jul 24, 2025 1:00 PM CDT reply actions
There were a ton of Texas high school coaches rolling their eyes when Chizik proclaimed he would be dictating what the offenses could do versus his three LB schemes regardless of the situation. Big 12 OC’s called B.S. and attacked Chizik’s 4-3 so well that Chizik resorted to gambling his secondary against the run to save face for his “dictating” schemes/personnel. Chizik might have listened to some of the best Tampa 2 defensive coaches around but he failed to recognize he didn’t have their experience to provide proper adjustments nor their knowledge to fix what was broken within the base scheme. One trick pony that was even less impressive with his position coaching ability.
Come on Scip—-Bull could find ways to outnumber every formation known to man until the spread came up with solid protection schemes that the “chuck and duck” never solved. Bull came off the bus bringing seven—was prepared seven ways from sundown to bring eight if seven wasn’t enough and in a pinch could squirm his coverage two deep and bring nine with doubleheaders off the edge. Bull is still best known for finding terrific info on little known fishing resorts in the pressbox literature rags and having only one LB capable of calling his signals so talent was optional at the Mike LB.
Adjustments, teach fundamentals, stress intelligent reactions while bringing a nasty attitude—-how can Muschamp make our defense better you ask.
by TexasFootball on Jul 24, 2025 3:44 PM CDT reply actions
“and having only one LB capable of calling his signals so talent was optional at the Mike LB.”
Is this why DeAndre Lewis started at MLB for him?
He has excelled at OLB in the NFL, making me think he wasn’t put at this optimal position in college. If he was the one who called signals for Reese, that makes sense.
by Beergut on Jul 26, 2025 6:13 PM CDT reply actions
D.D. Lewis was an all-confrence player (twice if IRRC). Must not have been too bad for a running back playing out of position.
by flamingmonkeyass on Jul 27, 2025 11:32 PM CDT reply actions
I thought DD played NG in college.
Oh, and don’t ever trot out All Conference lists when trying to make a point.
by Sailor Ripley on Jul 27, 2025 11:36 PM CDT reply actions

by Scipio Tex on 
























