Big 12 Media Contract Extension: Security > Maximum $$$
The report that the Big 12 is about to extend its media rights contract with ESPN have been out for a while now. Sports Business Daily is now saying that the pending media rights extension will be patterned after the new Pac-12 media deal, which means that ESPN and Fox would share broadcasting and cable programming rights for the league.
That could have a positive effect for the Longhorn Network, and it certainly brings financial stability to a league that was on the verge of dissolving not that long ago. The current contract with ESPN runs through 2016, so why extend it this far out, and by doing so, could you be leaving money on the bargaining table?
Right now ESPN has the broadcast rights to the Big 12, while Fox has the cable rights for football through 2016. The current report says that the two media outlets will agree to swap games on occasion. The two have a similar agreement in place for the new $3 Billion agreement with the Pac-12.
This could work in favor of the Longhorn Network. Fox may want a Big 12 game for its broadcast network and would trade it for a game to be on one of the stable of ESPN cable channels, including the LHN.
The extension will be through 2025 and the money is good -- really good. The Big 12 will be getting $2.5 Billion over 13 years ($1.3 Billion from ESPN, $1.2 Billion from from Fox). That works out to over $19 Million a year for each of the 10 members of the league. That isn't the top of the financial mountain (both the Pac-12 and Big Ten pay their members $21 Million a year), but the view is pretty damn good from there. Unlike those two leagues, Big 12 members have control over their third tier rights, which include at least one football game a year and several basketball contests as well.
The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend
The deal works for ESPN and Fox for a couple of reasons. They get the league for 2012 dollars. It is probably cheaper now because there is no bidding war, and there might have been one if the Big 12 waited.
When Comcast purchased NBC they made it clear that they are very interested in challenging both ESPN and Fox for sports programming, and they are interested in college football. They would love to have a BCS league to join Notre Dame on their network.
Both ESPN and Fox are invested in seeing that Comcast/NBC Universal doesn't get a foothold in live sports programming, and keeping the BCS leagues to themselves is a great way to block any new competitor.
So what is in it for the Big 12? Why not wait to renegotiate closer to the end of the contract? Why not at least get a permanent Commissioner? Chuck Neinas is serving as interim commissioner until later this summer. Moreover both the SEC and the ACC are expected to enter contract talks with ESPN in the near future and it is expected that they will see substantial increases, probably more than what the Big Ten or Pac-12 are getting.
One advantage for the Big 12 is that it solidifies the membership and stops the revolving door that has been whirling feverishly at the Big 12. The league brought in TCU and West Virginia to replace Texas A&M and Missouri, and this contract helps make it in the best interest of all ten members to keep the league stable. It also would seemingly make it in the best interest of the members to keep the league at 10 -- at least for a while -- to keep the per-team payment up.
Everybody gets a boost in media money, Texas has easier access to more than one football game for the LHN, and the networks can turn their attention to other leagues.
23 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting
Honestly, I wonder why we are sitting at around 19 million though. I’m surprised they didn’t set it around 21 million per team since they ARE paying in today’s dollars rather than tomorrow’s. I’m just wondering if this will affect the view of the Big 12 ,outside of its 10 teams, in a negative light.
These bigtime TV contracts confuse me sometimes…this is why I don’t enjoy entertainment and media law fields.
by STLaw on Mar 22, 2026 8:36 PM CDT reply actions
equal revenue sharing
srr,
weren’t Texas, OU, NU, and A$M at roughly 20 million prior to equal revenue sharing, with other members earning something less than that? Of course, all schools were the beneficiaries of their own 3rd tier rights.
This contract seems to restore Texas and OU to their original position and raise the income for everyone else. Is that correct?
by j_java on Mar 22, 2026 8:53 PM CDT reply actions
That $20 million was the proposal when the Pac-12 move cratered
but it was based on renegotiating the TV pact. Then A&M and Missouri cut and ran, so that deal never was in place.
by srr50 on Mar 22, 2026 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry, i’m not comprehending how this possibly gets more games for the LHN. May be lack of sleep due to our new daughter clouding my head. Can you explain it again? Maybe give an example?
by UT_BKC on Mar 22, 2026 8:56 PM CDT reply actions
Fox has the cable rights to the Big 12, but would like to put games on the broadcast network
So maybe they would like to have the TCU-Arkansas contest. ESPN agrees to let it go to Fox in return for another game to be put on one of its networks, say Texas vs. UTEP or Wyoming — which it could place on the LHN.
by srr50 on Mar 22, 2026 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Completely unrelated, but MSU just fucked my bracket hard.
by UT_BKC on Mar 22, 2026 8:58 PM CDT reply actions
Well crap, if this is Fox/ESPN attempt to block Comcast, I think I’d have a better chance of getting Nixon to run for President in 2012 than to get the LHN.
by Black out the windows on Mar 22, 2026 10:13 PM CDT reply actions
Is the 19 million a year in addition to the money we are already getting from ESPN for the LHN?
Or does some of it overlap?
Gangsta rap made me do it.
by TexasTopHand on Mar 22, 2026 11:08 PM CDT reply actions
Yes
the LHN is third tier revenue which belongs to us, like all schools’ third tier rights do in the Big 12 (like the SEC). This is tier 1 and Tier 2 money.
by boorad on Mar 23, 2026 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions
Gotcha.
Bottom line is, we’re loaded—and set up quite nicely any way it shakes out.
Gangsta rap made me do it.
by TexasTopHand on Mar 23, 2026 1:56 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, I think we're getting far more media money than any other program in the country with the LHN
Our media works out to being, what $28M / year guaranteed? That’s actually getting pretty crazy high when you think that we probably were getting half of that two or three years ago.
by notsofst on Mar 23, 2026 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
More $ now
The parameters of this deal would raise the annual payout for first- and second-tier rights by $5M for every school. Since ESPN already controls the contract until 2016, the Big 12 schools would essentially be forfeiting $20M over the next four years for the right to hit the open market. Would the new deal signed in four years make up for all of that? I’m skeptical.
by Blatant Homerism on Mar 22, 2026 11:39 PM CDT reply actions
The financials completely elude me, but
I like the stability aspect.
The 10-team Big 12 (makes no less sense than any of the other league names [BIG East? HA!] except maybe the SEC [and even that name is shaky with Mizzou]) is looking to be a really strong league right now with broad inter-regional appeal and many interesting games on the slate.
by lurkerinthedark on Mar 23, 2026 3:12 AM CDT reply actions
Finally some STABILITY
Best part of renegotiating the TV deal is that the conference finally has some STABILITY. Gotten rid of the demented and delusional schools and fan bases that have persistently tried to tear down the Big XII, and can stop wasting off-seasons wondering about realignment and expansion (and seriously, the current round-robin format is by far the strongest option, creating much better conference rivalries and ultimately crowning an actual conference champion).
by MR_HORNS on Mar 23, 2026 7:17 AM CDT reply actions
What is the 1st point in time......
….that ESPN can choose to renegotiate the LHN deal if revenues are insufficient?
--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---
by HornChamps on Mar 23, 2026 12:19 PM CDT reply actions
From what I've read
there is no such clause. It’s guaranteed. In fact, if certain merics are met, we could make more.
by boorad on Mar 23, 2026 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Comcast/NBC and Disney throwing money at each other over the SEC could lead to some staggering contract number.
My source close to the program can beat up your source close to the program!
by burrito on Mar 23, 2026 12:36 PM CDT reply actions
Comcast can't throw money at the SEC for 13 years.
by Texas Wahoo on Mar 23, 2026 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions
ESPN's contract with the SEC runs for 13 more years.
While the SEC has signaled they will renegotiate based on more members, ESPN is not going to let them switch to NBC a couple of years into the deal.
by Texas Wahoo on Mar 23, 2026 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions
now I see what you mean
by “can’t” rather than “won’t”.
by boorad on Mar 23, 2026 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by srr50 on 

























