Coin Flip
There is a valid argument to be made about the 2011 Texas baseball team and it has painfully real ramifications - Is this team still improving and yet to reach their peak? Or are they already bumping the ceiling and showing warning signs of an early postseason exit?
It’s mid-May, and I’m still unconvinced that I know the correct answer. I’m also unconvinced that next weekend’s A&M series will unequivocally answer the question. I’m also unconvinced that releasing his new book in mid-May was good timing on Augie Garrido’s part.
I'm also unconvinced that Rafa is heterosexual, but that's a different post.
The Aggies are a good team, but if the Horns come out of next weekend with a 2-1 series win, what do we really learn? Carrying out the hypothetical: Texas wins the regular season Big 12 title.
Forget the conference tournament, with a series win, the Horns put themselves in a great spot for a top national seed. There are a boatload of unremarkable postseason resumes across the country and a regular season Big 12 title + Texas tradition + one of the premiere college baseball facilities in the country + the new ESPN deal + Augie Garrido + Taylor Jungmann……you can see where that’s headed.
With a series win, Texas proves to be good enough to beat the Big 12. Except on Saturdays.
But is a win, or even a sweep, a sign that the Longhorns are peaking at the right time? Or is it a mask that temporarily disguises a few consistent and fatal flaws?
IMPROVING & PEAKING
At the end of March, Texas lost a series at Oklahoma State. As tempting as it was to glean conclusions from that, it should be noted that the Horns only drop a series once every two years. At the time, it also may have been the best possible outcome for this team.
Since losing the Oklahoma State series, Texas is 19-5. .790 baseball is pretty good.
Furthermore, the Texas offense was, um….er….“pedestrian” through the end of March. As the temperature started climbing steadily, so did most offensive stats. The team is currently hitting about 40 points higher since April 1st.
Interestingly, this is the third consecutive year of post-March offensive improvement. By most measures, the 2011 offense was worse through March than the 2009 or 2010 versions. The measurable improvements have compensated for the difference though, with 2011’s numbers being stronger than the past two years.
A lot of credit needs to go to Tant Shepherd and Paul Montalbano. Shepherd has emerged as the middle-of-the-order guy that was missing over the first two months. Montalbano has been very strong in relief duty since Cohl Walla was injured. Both are Seniors. That’s clutchiness and leadership – two things a team needs in June.
If the offense flounders, there’s always Taylor Jungmann. Kid is so good that it’s prudent to discuss how his name fits with the Burt Hooton’s of the Longhorn history books.
SMOKE & MIRRORS
About the time that I convince myself that this team is grooving, reality rears it’s head and I argue myself to the opposite end of the spectrum. Normally this happens in the form of a defensive lapse or a black hole on offense.
In 2010 it seemed to happen on Sundays. This year Saturdays are the outliers.
Augie Garrido said, “I have confidence in this team’s ability to score enough runs when it’s matched up with the kind of pitching and defense we have.”
I do too. But my confidence feels hollow still…and it’s May. It’s nearly crunch time, so the time to be looking for answers is yesterday, not today.
And it’s not talent or a gap in the roster that worries me. Sure I’d prefer one more lefty in the bullpen. Yes, I think the lineup could be improved with a couple of specialized batsmen. But that’s nitpicking – this team is going to win 40 games.
It’s the intangibles that are preventing me from buying in at this point. I don’t have confidence that this team knows how to perform for a month straight with a championship focusednessest.
Is it a lack of leadership in the dugout? Is it overconfidence in the pitching staff on behalf of the offense? A book tour? Are the Disch-Falk Diamonds busy with Spring finals?
The Horns are going to pound Southern this weekend. I also expect them to win the A&M series and after that comes a fairly meaningless Big 12 tournament.
After that I can’t tell what’s coming next. Is this 2005 or 2008?
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don’t know if it’s lack of focus or intangibles for me. I don’t really see it in terms anything beyond mathematics. We don’t score a lot of runs. We’re good at preventing them. When we pitch dominantly, we win. When we experience some standard deviation in our pitching, that lines up with our lack of run production and we are a coin flip.
The best model for our postseason hopes probably looks a lot like the SF Giants last year.
by Scipio Tex on May 12, 2025 12:45 PM CDT reply actions
Are Saturdays really the problem this year, or is it just games not pitched by Jungmann? In BigXII play we have 3 Saturday losses (OkSt, Baylor and Tech) and 4 Sunday losses (OkSt, Kansas, OU and Nebraska).
by Toby on May 12, 2025 2:01 PM CDT reply actions
It would be an Osterman-level shame if this team doesn’t take advantage of having Jungmann in the postseason.
by Matt Cotcher on May 12, 2025 2:25 PM CDT reply actions
In the postseason, I hope to the see the following strategy re: Jungmann starts:
If we score anything like 5 runs early in the game, pull Jungmann. We’ll need his arm later in any series to come in in relief when (invariably) Stafford struggles in the middle innings. We score too few runs to not intelligently cluster our pitching performances. Complete games and shutouts are nice, but letting Jungmann go the distance in games we could while still giving up a few runs is not a luxury we have this season.
by pleaseplaykindle on May 12, 2025 2:51 PM CDT reply actions
The Saturday losses are more worrisome to me because it’s Cole Green pitching. I am usually able to make all the Saturday games so he’s the guy I’ve seen pitch the most. He pitches great, except for one inning. His problem this year has been giving up the big inning. He gets the side out in the first, gives up a crooked number in the second and then cruises the rest of the game. Those Sunday losses (except for Okie State) are all after we’ve already won two games. If Cole loses, we have our backs to the wall that third game, and Sunday seems to be a letdown day for us.
by New Braunfels Horn on May 12, 2025 2:53 PM CDT reply actions
What will be interesting to see is how Augie orders the starters in the post season. Will he keep the same order, allowing Jungmann to get that first win for us at each round? Or will he switch Jungmann to the second starter as either the clincher or redeemer?
Last year the order was Workman, Green, and Jungmann in the Regionals and then Green, Jungmann, and Workman in the Super Regionals.
by TexasWright on May 12, 2025 3:43 PM CDT reply actions
“It would be an Osterman-level shame if this team doesn’t take advantage of having Jungmann in the postseason”
If only we could pitch Jungmann virtually every game like Cat.
by roach on May 12, 2025 5:28 PM CDT reply actions
Nice article, Matt !
Good point about the release date of Augie’s book. May or may not be a distraction.
The A&M series will test the team’s ability to perform under pressure and provide a key to the post -season performance.
The setback of Alex Silver (he would have started at 3B) due to cancer, the Cohl Walla injury, and early season injuries to Kephart and Kjerstad (two newcomers who could have had more impact) have signficantly contributed to the offensive woes.
by torre on May 13, 2025 9:15 AM CDT reply actions
Assuming we make the supers, I’d like to see Jungmann on Friday. A win in the first game puts the team in a commanding position. However, I understand the argument of throwing Jungmann on Saturday against what would likely be the other team’s #2 pitcher…a matchup where we should be able to score a few more runs than against their team’s ace on Friday.
by uthookem on May 13, 2025 11:30 AM CDT reply actions
I’m probably old school, but I figure if a team has completed 90% of its schedule, you pretty well know what it is. In this caase, somewhere around real good with a “minus” sign attached.
Two wins in the Aggie series probably means a No. 6 or No. 7 national seeding. This team desperately needs the home field to have a shot at Omaha. I think they get that far if they play the regionals and supers at D-F . . . but they go 1-2 or 2-2 and bow out shy of the CWS Championship Series.
Given the number of freshmen in key roles (closer, 3B-cleanup hitter, RF-No. 2 hitter, starting cartcher), I hoped for an April-May surge. Ain’t gonna happen. Still beats the hell ouf 5-7, though.
by edsp on May 13, 2025 5:22 PM CDT reply actions
I come out tails on this one. As great as Augie is, like the rest of Texas sports, a level of complacency has set in. Last year our hitting seemed a lot stronger, but the B12 was weak and when we faced good pitching we were exposed.
I doubt we make it out of superregional, but then again possible pairings could be weak, also.
by 2xhorn on May 14, 2025 2:55 PM CDT reply actions

by mlcotcher on 

























