Texas 71, Texas Tech 67: Post-Mortem
WELCOME TO THE NIT!
...is what I would have typed had Texas not managed to snag a lackluster victory from the jaws of defeat. Stop me if you've heard this before: the Longhorns fell in a hole early, built up a "fool's gold" lead, let their opponent back into the game, and almost found themselves weighed, measured, and found wanting.
Texas' performance against Texas Tech was as much a moral defeat as an actual victory. While the Longhorns absolutely needed the win to stay in consideration for an at-large tournament bid, the methods in which they procured the victory left fans wondering why Texas seemingly hasn't improved since the start of conference play.
Texas Tech is not a good team. The Red Raiders are 8-20, have one conference win, and generally all-around suck at everything except, maybe, limiting their opponents on field goal percentage. For example: Luke Adams, who played 34 minutes against Texas, shot 0-4, and turned the ball over twice, may be the worst player in the Big 12. On the season, he's shooting 30% from the field, and has more combined turnovers and fouls (72) than rebounds, assists, blocks and steals (62).
Frankly, the Longhorns should have led by 20+ after the first half. The Longhorns let Texas Tech's bigs, Jordan Tolbert and Robert Lewandowski, light the scoreboard early, then were fortunate enough to earn two fouls on both before the 10 minute mark. Without Tech's killing giants in the game, Texas players forced a few turnovers, got a few transition buckets, and ended the first half up 11. Like I said, it should have been 20, and Tech went into the locker room feeling pretty decent about how the half played out.
Just for your edification, Tolbert and Lewandowski ended up combining for 23 points and 11 rebounds; Alexis Wangmene and Clint Chapman had 14 and 12. Yikes.
With Tolbert back for the second half, Billy Gillispie went to junk defenses, utilizing box-and-one and triangle-and-two zones that Texas simply had no answer for. Instead of attacking weak spots, the Longhorns seemed content to flail around aimlessly, utilizing little ball movement and not forcing any interior action. On defense, Texas continuously got burned on pick-and-rolls, overcompensating on the perimeter and allowing Tech's ball-handlers to drive by and dish to open scorers. By the way, Tech shot 2-14 from the perimeter. Ooh, that's scary!
If you recall my Oklahoma State (and Baylor!) post-mortems, I said Texas played stupid, irresponsible, and often ugly basketball. At no point was that more evident in the final 90 seconds of regulation. With Texas up 3, 55-52, the Longhorns did the following: had THREE brain-dead loose/dead ball fouls to allow Tech to shoot free throws without taking any time off the clock; missed TWO free throws that could have helped ice the game; gifted Tech an extra posession after inexplicably using their top free throw shooter (J'Covan Brown) to inbound the ball; allowed their third-best ball-handler (Julien Lewis) to drive the ball in an attempt to win the game, only to have him initiate the offense about four seconds too early, then turn the ball over, thereby giving Tech a last-second shot to win the game. Tthankfully, Jaye Crockett missed. Barely. Got all that?
Good grief.
Texas continued its listless ways in overtime, falling behind by 6 before an absolute money trey by Lewis brought Texas to within 1 and gave the Horns the boost they needed to snatch a win. It's fitting that Texas took the lead on a Brown steal and lay-up, because Texas' halfcourt play was abysmally bad all game.
A win is a win, though. Texas needs one more this week against Oklahoma to go into the Big 12 Tournament feeling, well, okay about its NCAA tournament chances. That's where my eyes are focused, but to beat the Sooners, Texas will need to ball a heckuva lot better than they did in Lubbock.
17 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sure, Tech is abysmal and it was hard to watch . . .
Besides the bone-headed plays at the end, J’Covan’s shot wasn’t falling (4-for-13 from the field, 1-for-7 from the arc) and it was a road game.
Somehow disaster was averted . . . It was like the time I fell asleep at the wheel driving north on I-35 near Waxahachie as a senior . . . (This was before seat belt laws) . . . While asleep, I drifted into the median and was gently awakened by my head bouncing off the ceiling of the car . . . My car slowly came to rest without damage to me, the vehicle or anybody else.
Dodging bullets = always good
by Cirque Du Salado on Feb 26, 2026 9:40 PM CST reply actions
Dodging bullets...
…is good only if you’re firing off a few of your own. Right now, Texas is Russian rouletteing itself with 5 bullets in the six-shooter.
I didn’t even get to J’Covan’s mediocre game. Had a thoroughly forgettable game, was getting frustrated that his shot wasn’t falling and pretty much just took himself out of the offense.
http://aseaofblue.com | https://www.barkingcarnival.com | @JC_Hoops
by jc25 on Feb 26, 2026 9:54 PM CST up reply actions
For a non BBall player, what are junk defenses?
by UT_BKC on Feb 26, 2026 11:09 PM CST reply actions
Very basically
Instead of playing straight man-to-man or zone, you play hybrids, like a box and one, diamond and one, triangle and two, etc.
They are usually used to combat a team with a star or two. Remember when Kevin Durant and Texas lost to USC in the tourney a few years ago? Kevin Berger does.
by Sailor Ripley on Feb 27, 2026 12:00 AM CST up reply actions
This is getting like Scipio's post mortems from two years ago.
Still hope we make the tourney though.
by Sailor Ripley on Feb 27, 2026 12:01 AM CST reply actions
Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin
I think we bubble in to the Dance!
by Zzzizzzy on Feb 27, 2026 12:35 AM CST reply actions
What I don't get
If a team runs a box and one . . and J’Covan takes his man to the far left corner . .. that leaves a 4-on-4. It is easier to drive a lane in a 4-on-4 situation than a 5-on-5.
It seems Kabongo should either be knifing through or dropping dimes, but that’s not been the case. Surely the team has worked on this. I’d be curious to know exactly what we should be seeing in these situations. Surely we’re not practicing being baffled.
I’ll be surprised if we don’t handle Oklahoma . . .and then get skewered in Lawrence. . . . check that . . .not “surprised” . . . visibly staggered. I’ll be curious to see if that dislodges Texas from “the last four in” status on CBS and ESPN.
by Cirque Du Salado on Feb 27, 2026 6:50 AM CST reply actions
Dribble penetration is generally harder against a zone
In a zone (with a box-and-one), you have four pairs of eyes following at you instead of just your primary defender, and because there’s no primary defender, there’s no initial smothering ball-you-man defense that quick penetrators like Kabongo can easily blow by.
Generally, beating a zone requires crisp passing, good outside shooting, and recognition of interior weak points like the high post. Naturally, Texas did none of these against Tech.
http://aseaofblue.com | https://www.barkingcarnival.com | @JC_Hoops
by jc25 on Feb 27, 2026 8:14 AM CST up reply actions
I am a drive the seams and reverse the ball man, myself
Hit those seams with a couple dribbles, and move the ball on to the next guy. Do that two or three times, and there usually isn’t much of a zone left. Especially useful if you don’t have guys inside that you want to work the ball into.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
by Reggieball on Feb 27, 2026 5:54 PM CST up reply actions
The Kansas game is on ESPN primetime Saturday night.
Which I assume means that College Gameday will also be there. With the way this team is playing, a night game at Kansas on national TV is not the best scenario to leave a last impression with the committee.
by srr50 on Feb 27, 2026 7:45 AM CST reply actions
It's a night game...
But Gameday will not be there. They have the option to choose it, but their other option is UNC @ Duke. I’m sure you can guess which one they’ll be selecting.
by hiphopopotamus on Feb 27, 2026 10:33 AM CST up reply actions
And I quote . . .
" . . . the methods in which they procured the victory left fans wondering why Texas seemingly hasn’t improved since the start of conference play." (jc25)
Ahhh, the question that will not die for Rick Barnes-coached teams.
Nothing is more real than nothing.
-- Beckett
by AKHorn on Feb 27, 2026 3:36 PM CST reply actions
Hoping this was a let down game
Let down games happen. Particularly after the week they just had. Good to have a win, rather than a loss, in the let down game.
The Texas offense was just plain bad against Tech. It was the worst offensive performance in almost exactly a month (against Iowa State). The offense really hasn’t been a problem lately; it has been poor defense and rebounding that has undermined the Horns down the stretch this season. In fact, I would argue that the Texas offense has been really good this season, particularly when you consider the seeming lack of firepower that this team has. If Texas was as good defensively as they have been offensively, this would be a top 20 (at worst) team.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
by Reggieball on Feb 27, 2026 6:05 PM CST reply actions
"after inexplicably using their top free throw shooter to inbound the ball"
I’ll defend this.
You want a good passer, who is used to making in-bounds plays, to do that, if you need to get the ball in. It’s what I contend should have been done last year against Arizona. Hard for me to object when they do it, even with bad results.
Using Kabongo, however, was an acceptable substitute, and Barnes did not make Brown run across the floor to get the ball.
by BobInHouston on Feb 27, 2026 8:56 PM CST reply actions
I'll bite
If my hazy memory serves me correctly, Kabongo handles a lot of the inbounds passes on non-crucial possessions. I understand not wanting to use Kabongo because (A) he’s your lead guard and you want him handling the ball so as not to turn it over, and (B) dude is short and you don’t want a taller defender impairing his vision. Of course, both of those points apply to Brown as well, only he’s ALSO your best free throw shooter and VERY unlikely to get the ball back once he’s inbounded it.
Further, it’s not like Texas has inexperienced inbounders. I mean, Clint Chapman has only been in the program for five freakin’ years and surely has some experience in picking up the ball after it’s gone through the hoop and getting it into his guards. Right?
http://aseaofblue.com | https://www.barkingcarnival.com | @JC_Hoops
by jc25 on Feb 28, 2026 8:15 AM CST up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by jc25 on 





















