The OKC Thunder Met Company Man Joey Crawford in Game 3
After blowing out the Lakers in Game 1 and rallying to win Game 2, the Thunder were prepared to go up a decisive 3-0 in LA, setting up an epic Western Conference Finals against their small market facsimile in San Antonio.
OKC vs. San Antonio! The flyover finals!
With a likely Indiana vs. Philly/Boston matchup in the East!
Can you hear the sound of the channel being flipped? The NBA can.
Weathering early LA energy and desperation, as well as heavy minutes from LA's starters, the Thunder were up 70-69 at the end of 3. Poised to separate themselves in the 4th quarter with young legs and a deeper bench as they had all year.
Then the NBA happened. Then Joey Crawford happened.
You know Joey Crawford.
Yeah, that guy. And let's not forget that's he's a convicted tax cheat who served 6 months of house arrest and three years probation for lying and misreporting income. The guy who kicked Tim Duncan out of a game and challenged him to a fight after Tim Duncan couldn't stop laughing at his awfulness while sitting on the Spurs bench. Tim Duncan was literally kicked out of a basketball game for giggling. That also earned Joey a suspension, but Stern reinstated him, as he did after his IRS fraud, after Crawford agreed to double up on his psychologist's visits. In a role where basic ethical fiber and self-control are paramount, this is the stuff of fiction.
The league's Man in Havana was dispatched to the land of starfuck to do what he do. And what he do is make sure that NBA series run a respectable course in major market cities. No one tells him to do it. No one picks up the phone and commands it to be so. It's implicitly understood that the guy who owes David Stern his continued livelihood (Crawford's repeated ethical offenses on and off the court would have him banned from any credible professional league) will be a company man when the time requires.
Or maybe Kendrick Perkins fixed him with a "fuck you" stare in the late 3rd quarter and he decided to offer some payback. I never rule out pettiness as Crawford's motivation.
Jesus made water into wine, but his officiating crew conjured 49 second half points for the Lakers on 11 made baskets. What's the more impressive feat? I'm not sure which JC to choose.
Andrew Bynum and Kobe Bryant combined to go 11 of 38 (28.9%) from the floor, but managed 29 of 30 from the free throw line. The Thunder racked up 30 personal fouls, with 5 on James Harden, who fouls sparingly, and 5 on Nazr Mohammed in just 13 minutes, with Harden receiving two phantom calls defending Kobe down the stretch. While the Thunder were being held to defensive standards of accountability that you'd expect in a girl's junior high game, Metta World Peace was clutching Kevin Durant like a three year old dropped off at daycare.
Tom Ziller of SBNation.com explains:
Kobe drew a foul on James Harden ... 23 feet from the basket ... where Bryant posed no threat. It would have been a really awful foul ... if it were a foul at all. It was one of the more ticky-tack fouls you'll see, just some light contact that could have been incidental and certainly didn't disadvantage the Lakers in any way.
The Thunder were in the penalty, and Kobe hit both. In the fourth, the Lakers scored 30. Seventeen of those came on 18 free throw attempts; the Lakers got to the line for a pair in nine possessions, and got 17 points out of it, or 1.9 points per possession. L.A. scored 13 points on 17 official shots from the floor in the fourth, or 0.8 points per possession. The Lakers had trouble scoring when they were not at the line in the fourth quarter on Friday, and that awful foul class basically gave L.A. an extra point.
That's all L.A. needed.
This isn't Thunder apologia. Well, it is. But it doesn't mean it's wrong.
This is an example of a league picking and choosing winners. It gives the NBA a bush league, arbitrary quality you just don't see outside of boxing and World Cup soccer. The NBA is a magnificent sport, blessed with arguably the greatest crop of young talent and older stars in its history, it's spectator friendly, the athletes are the best on the planet; but predestination by whistle (and a proven history of game fixing with Tim Donaghy) threatens to render it as nothing more than an athletic display.
Carry on David Stern. Just don't call it a basketball game. That fourth quarter was basketball theater.
37 comments
|
Add comment
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd believe it was just bad officiating
Except the Thunders and Spurs and Hawks of the NBA’s world never get the good side of bad calls.
It’s part of why I put the NBA in my WGAF file years ago.
by edsp on May 19, 2025 2:20 PM CDT reply actions
WWE, imo.
No thank you for reminding me why I fall out of love with the league of my youth every summer.
What a cunt Stern is.
Now having said that…OKC disappointed me down the stretch with rushed, inexperienced possessions. Their shot selection reminded me of our play clock mismanagement in Lubbock in 08.
OKC needs to run, run, run in the quick turnaround tonight.
by Young Williams on May 19, 2025 2:34 PM CDT reply actions
Home and away
If someone has watched two similar and consistent officiating efforts in the NBA playoffs or NCAA tournament in the past decade, send me a link. Calls change quarter to quarter and half to half. Your round of 32 game is a scrum and your sweet sixteen game has 3 starters with 2 fouls by the first TV time-out. Home team gets benefit of the doubt, and the further they lag in the series, the more doubt they get, if they’re important enough to the ratings.
I’ve been watching college and pro basketball for 30 years now, and I still don’t know play to play what’s going to get called or not. That’s ridiculous. It’s why I don’t watch nearly as much as I used to.
by G.O.F on May 19, 2025 3:21 PM CDT reply actions
I swat my two year harder for minor things
harder than Harden “fouled” (and I use that term only because I have to) combined on ALL 5 fouls. It was one of the most OBVIOUS displays of attempting to determine the outcome of the game I have ever seen. Mistakes are happen, but the NBA needs a compeling series outside Boston/Philly. They know SA will sweep the Clips and the Heat are now going down in 5 so they wanted to manufacture a series despite the Thunder’s clear dominance.
by RQ on May 19, 2025 5:01 PM CDT reply actions
Spurs beat LAC today by 10 after being down by 24 in the 2nd quarter to go up 3-0.
I guess Joey couldn’t make the early tipoff, but it wouldn’t surprise me if he calls game 4 tomorrow. Can’t have either LA team out too early. We’ll see who Stern trots out tonight to try to fuck the Thunder like a tied goat—-you know they will—-try that is.
by boorad on May 19, 2025 5:14 PM CDT reply actions
Not a fan of either team or the NBA for several years partly because of this.
by Quigley on May 19, 2025 7:15 PM CDT reply actions
bad officiating both ways
you’re rooting for the thunder, which is why the officiating seemed one sided to you, but it was clearly bad both ways. it was a war zone in the paint, with no fouls being called either way, while ticky tack fouls were called on the perimeter all day long.
i like the thunder as well, but the officiating wasn’t one-sided, it was just bad. the thunder themselves had 28 FT’s, so it’s not as if they weren’t getting calls either. and saying that harden fouls sparingly is false. though he’s done a good job of staying out of foul trouble this year, he was extremely foul prone for the last two years in okc. and honestly, after watching him repeatedly put his head down, run full speed at the hoop and then flail his arms to pick up a foul every time, i’ve lost sympathy for him.
i’m not trying to defend the officiating, it was horrible. but it’s not as cut and dry as everyone here seems to believe. if you really want to see one-sided officiating, i’ll refer you to game 5 of the heat/mavs in 06 and game 2 of lakers/celtics in 08.
by NMHorn on May 19, 2025 8:13 PM CDT reply actions
And that wouldn't clearly favor one team, would it?
If LA could choose an officiating style, it would choose “war in the paint, ticky-tack on the perimeter.” That maximizes their bigs. A huge advantage.
by G.O.F on May 19, 2025 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions
not necessarily
perkins and ibaka are defensive players. gasol and bynum are offensive players. a game in which fouls are not being called in the paint would greatly benefit the defensive players, not the offensive ones.
by NMHorn on May 20, 2025 2:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Interesting
If I have the better bigs, I want more freedom for my players in there - more latitude to gather rebounds, get position, etc. I want fewer whistles inside, not more.
by G.O.F on May 20, 2025 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions
i see your point. i was mainly referring to free throws (and thus, shooting fouls) because the FT discrepancy seemed to be what everyone was having an issue with. but i understand your argument about rebounding and positioning.
in the end, no matter how the games are called, it’s up to the players to adjust to the officiating and play accordingly, and that applies for every level of basketball. in a perfect world, every game would be called the same across the board. unfortunately, real life is a bitch.
also, it looks like we’re headed for a SA/OKC conference finals. can we please stop with the “small market teams always get screwed by refs” conspiracy theories?
by NMHorn on May 20, 2025 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Just because I hear voices in my head,
it doesn’t mean they don’t have good ideas.
It doesn’t take a conspiracy theorist to realize that self-interest is a powerful motivator.
I see your point, too, though I am the more skeptical type. The NBA knows better than we do that officiating bias is difficult to prove. While they may not predetermine results in the W-L column, it is not too hard to imagine a scenario where the weighing scales of justice are slightly tampered with to give the big-market teams a slight edge. I don’t have an axe to grind against the NBA in particular; I simply recognize that most large businesses do not have the moral rectitude to always resist the urge the pad the bottom line
I do not believe that online poker is fair, that Goldman Sachs was simply “hedging” its positions, that legislators are not swayed by lobbying groups, that physicians are not influenced by pharma rebates, and that high-frequency trading simply adds liquidity to the stock market.I also do not believe that any of these suppositions will ever be proven beyond reasonable doubt. But all things being equal I will never bet against the house. Just like many others, I’ve lessened my emotional stake in the NBA over the years simply because of what I think intuitively to be true.
by Fried Rice on May 21, 2025 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions
D Fischer needs to do what he does best: a hard “screen” on joey and send a message
by UT_BKC on May 19, 2025 8:15 PM CDT reply actions
I struggle to watch regular season NBA games and I had hope for some
quality viewing after some very good first round series, but why does it seem the longer the play-offs go the worse the quality of play.
The Philly-Boston series i horrific to watch at times, as NMHorn points out it is a rugby scrum in the lane , and aside from the Spurs it seems everyone else is happy to shoot jumpers instead of running a half court offense.
by davey o'brien on May 19, 2025 9:30 PM CDT reply actions
completely disagree NMHorn
Lakers shot 25% more foul shots, on some completely bogus, phantom, calls. It was a Joey Crawford special. Scipio’s column reads like my texts to friends last night. I always laugh when small market teams screw the nba ratings, because the deck is always stacked against them.
by Noonan100 on May 19, 2025 11:34 PM CDT reply actions
On that buzzer-beater at the end of the 3rd quarter, Kobe caught the ball, and moved his left foot. Then his right foot. Then his left foot again. Then his right foot again. Then he shot the ball.
This and all of Scipio’s piece above are why I watch about five NBA games a year. It’s basically pro wrestling to me.
by nordberg on May 19, 2025 11:35 PM CDT reply actions
and can anyone tell my why ron artest is still in the league
seriously, after his history in the league, he should have been suspended indefinitely and/or arrested for assault and battery.
by Noonan100 on May 19, 2025 11:37 PM CDT reply actions
And Kevin Durant drains a pull up 3 to win the game
Cold-blooded. KD is the best clutch shooter in the league.
by Scipio Tex on May 20, 2025 12:13 AM CDT reply actions
Cooooolllldddd Blooooooddeddddd!
Sorry, I
Gangsta rap made me do it.
by TexasTopHand on May 20, 2025 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions
and this after he stunningly missed two free throws
no memory whatsoever. He’s like a combination of gervin and sam perkins, and he’s only going to get better.
by Noonan100 on May 20, 2025 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Westbrook was amazing BTW
He kept OKC in the game.
by Scipio Tex on May 20, 2025 12:14 AM CDT reply actions
You'd think the bookies, the Mafia, and Las Vegas (or is that all redundant?)
would keep the game honest.
by lurkerinthedark on May 20, 2025 7:15 AM CDT reply actions
I've told this story before...
…but I went to law school with the daughter of the NBA’s head of officiating. She was pretty blunt that the officiating is uneven. According to her, the league instructs its officials to hold their whistles in the last few minutes. Basically, there are different rules late in the game.
Anyway, it’s this kind of horseshit that prevents me from giving a single fuck about the NBA. It’s a rigged league. Always has been, always will be.
Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
by BrickHorn on May 20, 2025 9:56 AM CDT reply actions
I quit watching years ago
If I get beat in a fair contest I congradulate the opponent but I can’t tolerate a cheater. It’s like playing OU under Swindler or aggie under Jackie Shady. Different sets of rules.
by ole tnhorn on May 20, 2025 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I quit watching too
Basketball is filled with arbitrary fouls. You could call a foul on every play at any time.
That’s why I havent watched a game in years, and have no desire to do so.
What a joke.
by Checkmate on May 20, 2025 2:52 PM CDT reply actions
stopped watching NBA about 10 years ago after
watching it for 25 years. No longer respect it.
by Texoz on May 20, 2025 11:07 PM CDT reply actions
Scipio
any early thoughts on the inevitable Thunder vs. Spurs matchup?
It had been my thought that the Spurs would struggle against a team that can initate offense with 3 different perimeter stars but given their own offensive dominance and Timmy’s rejuvenation I’m now doubtful that OKC will handle Pop’s chess moves well enough to secure victory.
I’m guessing SA tries to put the games into the hands of Westbrook’s decision making and hope that he throws up more 9-24’s than 10-15’s.
Also curious about how the Thunder’s excellent half-court defense and Ibaka handle the Spurs offense. I’m guessing they’ll need to keep Ibaka on Duncan much of the time, and the Spurs have been killing it with backdoor cuts and 3’s set up by Tim’s passing. There are no good answers for this team. It might be the most underrated squad of the last several years.
by Nickel Rover on May 21, 2025 9:07 AM CDT reply actions
Expecting a very entertaining series
Unfortunately for the Thunder, Greg Poppovich vs. Scotty Brooks is Belichik vs Herm Edwards.
by Scipio Tex on May 21, 2025 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions
The Spurs are just way too dominate
A healthy Spurs squad is a scary thing. They roll 10 deep and everyone one of them knows how to play solid, team basketball. How outrageous is it that they have won 18 straight, and the sideline reporter had to ask Tony and Timmy after the game last night what it was like to be in a close game? San Antonio is going to be the new LOB (Larry O’Brien) city!
"I don't know. Never had one"
-- Darrell K. Royal to Mack Brown on how to coach a team after a losing season
by Vincent McAppleash on May 21, 2025 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions
I think the idea that the NBA fixes games
Is a bit overdone. It’s mostly either older people who have this attitude, “In the good ol’ days, it was so much better…” even though some teams threatened to turn the NBA into a thugfest back then and still had bad officiating (as if MJ never got a pass), or it’s people who are bitter that their team lost.
I’m not saying the officiating in the NBA is great, but I have yet to hear a good argument that if the NBA fixes game, what the heck they’ve been thinking about allowing the ratings-killing Spurs to make and win the Finals four times. Furthermore, we just witnessed a hilariously bad flagrant foul call against Ron Artest (World Peace), and then the refs hit both him and Kobe for complaining about that hilariously bad call. If the NBA really wanted to fix games, that seems rather puzzling that such bad officiating goes against Hollywood’s team who is fighting to extend the series.
by TheElusiveShadow on May 21, 2025 10:00 PM CDT reply actions
I don't think they fix games at all
Except for the ones that NBA refs have admitted to fixing because they gamble.
Fixing suggests some sort of active complicity between the NBA and its refs.
I do think the NBA assigns officials with an understanding that those officials understand context.
OKC is up 3-1 in the series and unless the Lakers are up double digits in the late 3rd, they don’t have the legs to hold off OKC. The World Peace call wasn’t good, but he’s not exactly going to get the benefit of the doubt when he does a little extra shove.
by Scipio Tex on May 21, 2025 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions
I think that's just Donaghue
And I have a hard time trusting such a dubious guy.
I think NBA reffing needs serious improvement, so it’s easy for any team to argue that the refs have it in for them because there are plenty of bad calls to point to. I’ve even heard Laker and Celtic fans claim mistreatment, which makes me laugh because they are two of the darling franchises of the league (I still marvel at how Rondo nearly decapitating Brad Miller a few years ago didn’t draw even a flagrant one). As far as understanding context, I know the league tells refs to swallow their whistles in crunch time, and I personally don’t like it because I don’t think the game should be much different just because it’s in the final seconds. However, I know a ton of fans would get very angry if games were decided by foul calls, even if they were perfectly legitimate, so in many ways the NBA does that to satisfy the fanbase.
I think basketball reffing is one of the toughest reffing jobs of all sports, so I try not to be too hard on them. I do share the dislike of Joey Crawford, though. The NBA could use an overhaul in how it approaches officiating. I just hope it’s good enough to let the Spurs and Thunder shine, because that should be one fun series (unfortunately, while I want Durant to win, I’m not sure if they can take out San Antonio).
by TheElusiveShadow on May 22, 2025 2:09 AM CDT up reply actions
I wouldn't call it fixing either, but when you see who is officiating a game
and you can pretty much know how the game is going to be played out something is wrong with this picture.
It reminds me of when Greg Maddux was with Atlanta and you knew if a certain umpire was behind the plate anything calf level and up and four inches outside the plate and in would be a strike.
Absolutely changed the result of the game because the strkes being called were freaking unhittable to anyone outside of Ralph Garr, Manny Sanguillein, and Vlad.
When you can’t even try to guard someone because you know you are going to be called by Crawford it not only impacts the result, but distorts the game to a point it is unwatchable.
by davey o'brien on May 22, 2025 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Exactly...
It’s not that Stern is outright fixing games, because he’s not. But the amount of purely arbitrary fouls that are called/not called in NBA games is astounding. I love the sport and I love to watch the best play it, but there are nights when my viewing ends with a head shake and a flip of the channel. Not when Durant is playing, of course, but it’s happened plenty.
by hiphopopotamus on May 22, 2025 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions
This series will be great
for a lot of reasons. One being that with two small market teams that will go to at least to 6 games and probably 7 there is no need to officiate contextually (is that a word?). The only thing that will piss me off is when they inevitably and inexplicably assign Joe Crawford to some of the games. There is no way he should be allowed within 100 miles of a game involving the Spurs, especially in the playoffs, after the shit he pulled on Timmy.
by boorad on May 22, 2025 2:21 PM CDT reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by Scipio Tex on 
























