Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: College and Magnolia for Auburn fans!

Perimeter Run Game PSA

Stolen from the NASA training video: Run Game Concepts of the Future, circa 1982.

Star-divide

Fullscreen is recommended for optimal viewing experience. Eventually we'll go 3-D.

Hope everyone enjoys.

Tweet Comment 81 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I can't believe this stuff is free. Awesome.

I don’t want to jump to any conclusions, but on that last Holiday bowl clip with Jeremy Hills taking the toss, I’m pretty sure Johnathan Gray would house that.

I can’t wait to see some running game glory in 6 months. Harsin’s gonna have some fun toys to play with.

Is it September yet?

by BurntOrangeJuice on Mar 16, 2026 11:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Glad to see LHS back in full force!

Always has the best breakdowns. Love the new add in for opposing player thoughts! Keep ’em coming.

How do you think having MB, JB, and JG available will affect Harsin’s play calling next season? Might we see more variations on the diamond formation?

by STLaw on Mar 17, 2026 1:35 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm not a huge believer

in the diamond at this stage. I think it’s a fun set from a misdirection standpoint but I don’t think having those three guys all in the same package makes all that much sense from a specialization/practice rep allocation standpoint. It might be useful in the same way that the unbalanced looks are in that a lot of defenses may have only prepared one defensive look for them in which case you should be able to find a play in the package to gash em.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Holgo says he likes Diamond because it brings the defense in tight making it easier on the QB to read coverage.

by CMDR on Mar 17, 2026 3:23 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

maybe on the outside

but between the tackles you’re opening yourself up to a lot more looks from the defense, particularly if you can’t win the inside battles. I think having viable passing and protections from the set is of paramount importance because its a set that begs to be heavily blitzed.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

With an FB and HBack role regularly on the field, it seems it’d be easy to motion in and out of the Diamond, limiting the defense’s ability to call Diamond-defeating blitzes.

by CMDR on Mar 18, 2026 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

very good point

and ultimately why I think we’ll get more run out of the half diamond formation (that we actually saw pretty regularly last year).

by LonghornScott on Mar 18, 2026 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh Noes!

This is incredible! The defender response aspect (oh hai) is particularly helpful for explaining how the play is supposed to confuse, and it also gives a sense for how the D tries to counter? Twofer! Thanks for showing the Hills play too—multiple plays to keep the D honest.

All to a soothing football synth beat.

Thanks!

by canuckhorn on Mar 17, 2026 1:49 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Wonderful addition....

You acquitted yourself nobly, i.e., you done good!

by J.R.69 on Mar 17, 2026 7:23 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks for the breakdown LHS!

I really appreciate all the analysis that you provide. Always look forward to them. Great primers on the basics

by ATL Exile on Mar 17, 2026 8:35 AM CDT reply actions  

LonghornScott and Scipio

May save us from hari kari this offseason. If ya’ll are able to bring in a little at a time, we just might make it through to fall camp.

"Most of my clichés aren't original." -Chuck Knox

by Dustin Brockelman on Mar 17, 2026 10:57 AM CDT reply actions  

Questions for you LHS....

LHS: Always appreciate your breakdown analysis.

1. I know it’s not Hopkin’s natural position. Still, isn’t it surprising that he would make an initial mis-step on a simple pin block after a full season of reps? Is he less prone to mental mistakes at guard?

2. Do you feel that Cochran has quicker feet to allow him to recover from a similar mistake?

3. Do you think that Gray, in Brown’s place on that TFL, is quick enough to have avoided the penetrating DL – if Gray had taken an outside angle to avoid the TFL? No gain would have been better than a TFL.

4. I haven’t studied Gray to know how elusive he is. Subjective question: Do you think Gray has a significant or marginal advantage over Brown in avoiding similar TFLs? Does Gray excel at reversing direction? If he is, my thought is that it may cause defenses to slow down their backside pursuit to contain.

Thanks, and please keep the breakdowns coming.

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 11:00 AM CDT reply actions  

Good Qs

1. The 4i tech is not super common. So it could be that Hopkins just misread his responsibility (or didn’t catch a call) on the play. Instead of stepping first with his inside foot and splitting the defender he stepped first with his outside foot.

2. It’s not really an issue of quickness in this case. You can’t take a bad first step and expect to recover regularly in close quarters.

3. I think in general that Brown does a really good job at avoiding TFLs. Penetration is just a killer and especially on the playside. Can’t have it. What I would have liked to see is the fullback not chase the penetration because if the running back does find a way to elude that player, the offense still has a chance for a big play.

4. I try not to make too many comparisons between players before seeing them against D1 athletes. I think the major difference is probably that Gray takes the well blocked play to the house. All three of our running back talents bring something really nice to the pin n pull play. Gray is the homerun threat, Bergeron presents a serious problem for a secondary player trying to fill the alley, and as I stated Brown is great at transitioning from horizonal stretch to vertical cut.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Another nice addtion

Great job Scott. I’d like to request that we keep the 80’s beats in all future vids. I’m being serious about that.

The most interesting thing to me thru the rest of spring and into the fall is the Center position. While Espinosa might have some good feet a solid nose is going to abuse him right now and that will limit what Harsin is able to do. I have confidence in Searels but if we enter the season with Espinosa as the starter I think opposing defensive coordinators will attack him.

by maninblack on Mar 17, 2026 11:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Class still in session?

1. Espinosa – a RS Sophomore – can he develop and progress sufficiently in time for the Fall season, or does he need another year of development?

2. Your opinion on Garret Porter – a RS Junior: Do you think he has starter skills, insufficient skills, motivational issues, development issues, or what? Do you think Porter will push Espinosa for starts at Center in August?

3. Do you expect a noticeable improvement in the OL this Fall — to the extent that it translates in better pass pro, less sacks on Ash’s blind side, less TFLs, better run production? Your thoughts in general?

Thanks again LHS.

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 11:25 AM CDT reply actions  

tough questions to answer without being at a lot of practices

1. Personally, I like what Espinosa brings to the table and I will be surprised if he gets supplanted at center. So far the only thing that our experimentation on the line suggests to me is that we are building depth through different combinations. Would I love to have a guy with all the tools at center? Certainly. I think Espinosa could eventually be a guy that gives you everything you want there. His mechanical improvement is just as important as adding strength. Leverage and using all of the power of your hips will go a long way, he needs to be able to make those quick jab blocks and entrench himself. When the center is blocking a nose he is working in a extremely small space and every detail is crucial. I think he could get to a place where he isn’t a liability on inside zone and power by the start of the season and then we will be able to play off his ability to pull (Pin N Pull).

2. From the two open practices, he doesn’t look ready yet but it’s a very small sample size to project from. For the sacrifice in quickness, he wasn’t winning one on one battles the way you’d want. IMO, if you are going to put a tall guy at center in this offense he needs to be an impressive athlete because he’s got to have the feet and flexibility to play with low pad level and keep his balance. For me, the interesting prospect at center would be Flowers but I don’t think he’s got any experience there and given that we snap the ball at different depths (under center, shotgun, and pistol) building reps there and providing needed depth at guard would be a tall order.

3. Absolutely. I think we’ll be better at both tackle spots, we have a lot more experience under our belts and we have our best raw talent at his natural position. Add to that just the physical development and additional reps and there’s no question in my mind that the OL is going to be stronger. Last year we could barely field a starting 5 at this point. The most significant upgrade for the offense will be a reduction of plays that go for a loss and that will be the result of improved recognition (esp from the QB position) and improved execution (for all the reasons I just mentioned).

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is what Espinosa could face when playing OU - gulp!

6’7’ - 330 lbs. of bad ass.

"Statistics are for losers, I like winning games!" Will Muschamp

by Snide Aside on Mar 17, 2026 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just heard

about this dude. Apparently he can do a backflip. Obviously that isn’t remotely useful on a football field but it hints at the kind of stellar athleticism that was the hallmark of the better Stoops defenses.

by Nickel Rover on Mar 19, 2026 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

What would you rate....

…the overall performance of the 2011 O-line? Speculating of course, What is a reasonable projection / expectation of overall performance for the 2012 O-line?

In terms of ratings, it seems to me that the 2011 O-line earned a D rating (below average). The 2012 O-line should achieve an overall rating of approx. C+ (above average).

Your thoughts?

by Rio Lobo on Mar 27, 2026 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Remember when this site used to be good?

Kidding. This was badass. Give us more!

by WreckerTex on Mar 17, 2026 11:28 AM CDT reply actions  

What a dumbass.

I mean that oher guy. Not you.

by BurntOrangeJuice on Mar 18, 2026 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

LHS, I know that I ask unfair questions...

…and you don’t have a crystal ball. But, that’s part of the fun of these breakdown sessions. You are an excellent resource, and it’s great to have the advantage of your insights, knowledge and experience — and knowing when things are predictable.

Your educated, conditional hunches are welcomed.

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 11:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Nothing against Espinosa, but...

Mason Walters played mostly Center in High School. I read that Searels experimented briefly with Walters at Center this Spring, but don’t know his evaluation of that. If Walters did supplant Espinosa at Center, then Flowers could step in Walters’ vacated position at OG.

That would seem to be an upgrade. Your conditional hunch on that combination?

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 12:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I read that

as Searels building depth through trying a different combo. I think people got excited about it because there has been so much talk about Espinosa as “the problem” this offseason. I would speculate that Walters would struggle with leverage at center and in terms of quickness he’s our slowest starter. In terms of the overall effectiveness of our run blocking, tight end is a much bigger concern of mine than center.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Understood...

… and it can be said that no one has stepped up to take Center away from Espinosa. My chief concern was Espinosa’s ability to handle the nasty nose tackles — avoiding being pushed into the backfield, but that’s problematical for many Centers.

Is an OG allowed to chop-block a nose tackle in college — if the nose tackle is not already engaged by another blocker?

Thanks LHS.

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

chop block

is a low & high combo and I don’t think it’s ever legal in college (but I don’t know the actual rule).

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Found this...

First and 10 from team A’s 20 yardline. A8 blocks defensive tackle B6. The impact knocks B6 backwards. A8 then turns to his left and blocks B1. While B6 is no longer contacting A8, he is blocked below the knees by A4. A4’s block takes place after the ball has left the free-blocking zone. Under NCAA rules, that’s a legal block. B6 was disengaged from A8 and A8 was no longer confronting him

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

hmmm

I don’t think of that as a chop block. Just two different blocks that occurred. What context were you thinking about for Texas? We definitely already attack the 1 techs (backside or playside) with our guards and with combos between our guards and center. I’m not generally a fan of teaching linemen to go low unless they are trying to kill pursuit.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

It resembles a chop block...

…but, by one blocker only, followed by a brief delay, then engagement by a 2nd blocker only.

In the context of preventing the Nose Tackle penetrating thru Espinosa into the backfield:

At the snap, Espinosa retreats a step. The adjacent OG first hits the NT low to take him off his feet. OG then recovers and continues to a LB. Meanwhile, one second later, as the NT begins to regain his feet/balance, Espinosa blocks the NT to the ground (pancake). I believe that specific scenario is referred to a "legal chop block" by the OG in the NFL – and I think it also legal in college.

It may be more effective than a double-team and doesn’t consume the full attention of two O-linemen.

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think in that scenario

we’re better off working the combo and letting Espinosa work to the linebacker. I think the places where you have concern are on the power play and base pass protections where Espinosa needs to work 1-on-1 against the nose and losing ground can kill the play.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good stuff LHS

Do you plan to breakdown the tight end issue — discussing the solution and the alternatives available if the ideal blocking tight end does not emerge?

by Rio Lobo on Mar 17, 2026 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I try not to plan

too much. We’ll just have to see where this offseason takes us. Last season I had great ambitions for doing stuff on the offense and defense and I only got to maybe a tenth of what I wanted to.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because you spend weeks selecting the right music

But no matted how often you post these, they’re fucking awesome and we all win.

by Vasherized on Mar 18, 2026 9:52 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Can't help but think that

in this league and this offense, the center will be pulling and working in space so much more frequently than going 1 on 1 against a 0 or 1 tech, that Espinosa is probably the best option for most of the snaps this season.

LonghornScott - Is it an absolute no-no to start a different center when going against a team that uses a true nose tackle? Would this telegraph the offensive game plan too much?

by HawkHorn on Mar 17, 2026 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

nope.

I think if you are going to focus on inside zone and power that you want an enforcer at center if you can get it. But you have to have the passing game to go with that because you aren’t going to make a living running inside zone and power without some way to get at the safeties.

But there’s no problem strategically with playing a different center. Now in terms of rhythm and comfort, you generally want to play an entire unit together as much as possible. When Mack talks about being 2 deep at offensive line and being able to rotate the entire second line in… that’s your ideal situation.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks, LS

When a zero or one tech is in the game, I wonder what percentage of plays called have the center pulling or comboing to the 2nd level, what percentage he’s doubling the NT, and what percentage he’s heads up against a nose. Without some really detailed data this would be impossible to come up with, but have you gotten a general sense of it from watching so much film?

by HawkHorn on Mar 17, 2026 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

well its a give and take

because you call based on what your guys can do. I think that our gameplan in the Cal game probably changed a little bit after Cal attacked Espinosa on the first power read and almost blew the play up. You’ll notice that Harsin started trying to work the perimeter a lot more after that. And not all 0 and 1 techs are going to be the same. It becomes a significant issue if they can tell their nose to go attack the center every single play and the offense doesn’t have an answer to threaten the defense between the tackles. Then you are opening yourself up to a lot of junk defense and limiting your play calling at the same time. I’m not at all convinced that we are up that creek with Espinosa.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

what's the difference

between pin and pull and power o?

by mattw on Mar 17, 2026 1:10 PM CDT reply actions  

glad you asked

There are a number of differences but if I were going to sum up how to spot the difference you want to looks at the pullers. In the power o, the pulling guard is always coming from the backside of the play and in the pin and pull the pullers are on the playside and it could be any combo of two players depending on defensive alignment. There are a lot of other differences too. Philosophically, the power o is an inside power run that is an imposition of will on the down defenders while the pin and pull attempts to delay down defenders in order to play a positioning game with the second level of the defense (more of a finesse run with a few anchor points).

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

awesome

i figured it might have something to do w/ the backside guard and where the back’s primary running lane is supposed to be but i couldn’t really tell the difference. i thought we were running power o every time i saw a dude pull and it was just a variation of it. thanks, man. you’re a boss at this stuff.

by mattw on Mar 17, 2026 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

both plays

have a number of variants. Namely they can both be run either inside or outside the tight end. Another important difference is that the running back wants to pressure inside first on the power o then work his way into the gap whereas he wants to pressure outside first on the pin n pull then cut vertically. One wants to pull the second level defenders toward the line then cut outside then, the other wants to force them sideways then cut between them.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

So badass, Scott.

Oh hai! Oh noes!

I thoroughly enjoyed that. Great use of video and graphics and the clarity of your explanation was crystalline. I expect to see a ton of this this Fall whether in the form of the classic play you diagrammed or the alternative versions we saw against Tech.

The shame of our TE situation is that this play can really expand in options when the TE can punish that outside defender - the sharper the corner you give to your RB, the more quickly they can get their shoulders squared and headed upfield.

Can’t wait ’til our offense matures sufficiently so that we can execute all of the bootleg and play action variations off of this play when backside secondary guys get caught looking into our backfield.

Great job.

by Scipio Tex on Mar 17, 2026 1:22 PM CDT reply actions  

yea this play really can really punish

a soft edge from the defense if your tight end can consistently pin. In conjunction with the Power O and Slice Zone that can really make life tough on the defensive front when you can run to the boundary consistently.

I think that with a greater emphasis on the read game we can still get to some really good things, but with a guy who really excels in the run game and offers something in the passing game at tight end this offense would tear this league up… especially when you add in the speed sweeps and bootlegs on the backside.

I anticipate that we will actually continue to see a lot of ace looks and/or a motioning Miles O into the left side because with the way our offensive line is shaping up this year we will have good pulling options either direction.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Better than LHN

Don’t need it when I have LHS! Thanks for the analysis. You talked about the emphasis on first step during the open practice and you see the importance during that play.

Don’t have any questions. Just want more of this stuff.

by Monahorns on Mar 17, 2026 3:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Oh hellz yah!

LHS - how did you know it was my birthday? Thanks so much!

September can’t come soon enough.

by Effbomb on Mar 17, 2026 5:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Typically fine effort, LHS.

Thanks for the time and thought you put into these.

by hh500 on Mar 17, 2026 5:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Awesome Stuff LHS

And this is and what you did last year was just a fraction of what you wanted to do? The body of work is impressive on its own. Thanks a bunch

A few questions on your video
1) On the Defensive end who was positioned outside the TE, it seemed to be that the initial push from the TE would be towards the inside of the DE. What I mean is that the TE would in my opinion pin the DE with his back to the side line. Which is what I see him do in the video. He has his back to the center while he pins the DE with his back to the sideline. However initially you note that the TE would ark outside, which would make it impossible for him to pin the DE with his back to the side line. Can you explain?

2) What happens when the DE moves laterally to have inside leverage on the play? So for example in this video if the DE moves towards the tackle he threatens the inside run. I am assuming that the RB then tries to take the play outside while the TE pins the DE with his back to the center. Is that correct? What happens to the pull in this case? The DE then has the ability to disrupt the pull and the safeties can flow to the outside thus stuffing the run.I am guessing the FB would be able to help here.

3) Can you explain to me why the TE has to block the backside defensive end in this formation? Isnt the backside defensive end already out in terms of his ability to affect the play, or will be able to chase down the RB from behind?

4) The companion naked toss play is facinating. I am assuming that the formation is the same and it forces all the line backers to flow towards the right side of the play. Can you provide a little more color on this? Is the formation identical and set up to put defenders out of position?

One honest comment on the video. I love the information and love everything you have put out there. I generally spend considerable amount of time rewatching your videos because i am revisiting some of my own thought processes about certain plays. However, The music did not do justice to your video. It distracted from the message, and I had to rewatch the video and internally tune out the music, so that I could understand what you were saying. Again thanks for all your hard work, it has created tremendous value for me.

Greg Davis... Gone!

by Crimson Fog on Mar 17, 2026 6:05 PM CDT reply actions  

I appreciate honest feedback of all types.

I think the background music is a work in progress and I think even an adjustment in volume and some better mixing (which I know very little about) could make a difference. I do think there’s some value there in keeping some rhythm there in a lengthy explanation. On to the questions

1) If you rewatch you’ll see that the tight end initial movement is almost flat toward the sideline. The force defender is almost certainly going to read that as the tight end trying to reach him, but you can see that the tight end then squares and settles at the defender steps to his outside, having just effectively positioned himself out of the play and widened the running lane in the process. If the tight end fights for that inside position right off the bat, the force player is going to attack his block and the offense will have less room to operate.

2) A hard crash inside at the snap by the defender indicates that he isn’t actually the force player. In that situation the tight end would continue up field to attack the strong safety (or whichever defender presents first to him). The crashing defender would then be handled by one of the pullers (either the first or the second depending on his depth) and they could either kick or log block him depending on how hard he is crashing. Either way, that’s the block that the running back should be focusing on to make his cut. There’s a lot of overlap here with the power O in terms of decision making and coordination by the pullers. Getting players that are effective at reading the edge and blocking on the fly is rep intensive but it pays big dividends.

3) if the defender to the backside is blitzing, there’s no doubt that he can run this play down from behind. As I pointed out in the video to, the protection on the backside is key to creating ambiguity between the run and the pass and the playside/backside.

4) The formation is the same except that we didn’t motion the receiver in pre-snap. It complements the pin n pull play because the backside blocking feels the same to the backside defenders and they all bite hard on the blocking flow. With man coverage on the outside and having established running to the boundary, you see the huge amount field Hills has to work with. Really he should have bounced the play even further outside but he was trying to hit the homerun and just couldn’t get it vertical fast enough. The naked play isn’t “sound” on its own, you have to set it up… and it’s a reminder that when Harsin gameplans he always builds on his base concepts. I think as we start to get better execution in our base we’ll start to see a lot more of these sorts of devastating calls from him.

Sorry if any of that didn’t translate clearly, I know the written format is not always the easiest.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

backside

If anyone wonders why the backside containment is a must they need to go back BH (before Harsin) and see how many times over the years our backside help either missed the block or did not attempt one and the end or lb made the play. By the way, I kinda like the music.

by b&g80; on Mar 17, 2026 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can imagine that

Would that change if its Daje johnson toting the rock. I guess this being a slow developing play would negate any speed advantage you might have.

Greg Davis... Gone!

by Crimson Fog on Mar 17, 2026 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

No this is great - Thanks

Thanks for the context, that works. What is interesting is that the pin and pull formation has essentially the same blocking, as the naked toss. Most likely the wide receivers are blocking the back side defenders as well. And when you do it enough, the blocking and the run flow forces the defense to flow right, creating room for the running back on the naked toss.

I wonder if there is a misdirection pass play here?. I can envision a bootleg to the left with the running back providing blind side protection., but apart from that I do not see who the recepient of the pass would be.

This is a really interesting way of running against stacked fronts. I am not sure how play action would work here. I guess we could see some TE play come in there. If there is good QB play, what variation of pass plays do you anticipate here?

Greg Davis... Gone!

by Crimson Fog on Mar 17, 2026 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

when you think about play action

you want to think about who has too much responsibility in the secondary? Who have you stressed with your run concept and how can you play off of that.

The obvious candidate is the field safety. He had to make a touchdown saving tackle, so giving him that same read on the backside of the formation and then going over the top with your #1 receiver on a fly or post is great. You can also pressure the field flat by booting out and hitting the tight end or full back draggin across with a deep clearout from the #1 receiver or pick up an easy 10-12 yards on a medium comeback route from the #1 in his 1-on-1 coverage.

The other target would be the boundary safety. If you ran almost the exact same look and had the tight end arc into a vertical route (basically a wheel), you would really put that safety in a bind. Fill the alley or cover the tight end? Can’t do both.

Basically, once you establish the ability to attack the alley , there is a lot of low hanging fruit in the passing game (which is exactly why Harsin has a lot of mechanisms in his offense to do so). We had those opportunities quite a bit last year but couldn’t recognize and execute.

by LonghornScott on Mar 17, 2026 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

How many RS freshmen centers

who didn’t miss time during their RS year would you expect to win the majority of battles against a NT? It is amazing that some fans are handing the job to Walters , Porter and, yes, even high school junior Darius James.

by Horncasting on Mar 17, 2026 7:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Excellent point

Most of us forget what it was like in OUR first year of college - never mind playing in front of 100,000 screaming maniac,s facing a 325 lb. behemoth with red eyes and that is actually growling!

UT fans cut no slack - you don’t kill that animal than you are a POS!

"Statistics are for losers, I like winning games!" Will Muschamp

by Snide Aside on Mar 17, 2026 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I think Espinosa will be better after another summer with Willie. At the end of the day, LHS makes a valid point. With so many different formations, the snaps are rep intensive and we need to make sure that the starter get as many snaps as he can. Also he may have struggled against NTs, but his snaps for the most part were good and he did not make unforced errors. I think as you see better execution by the QB, the Guards and TEs, Harsin’s game planning should put enough doubts in DTs, that they may not have the initial burst that they otherwise have - advantage Espinosa. Last year if you were a DT playing against Texas, the game planning was easy. Do not fear the pass, and play the run. With better QB play and more movement by Ash through zone read and bootlegs, you start to put pressure on the defensive line and the OL starts to make better blocks.

Greg Davis... Gone!

by Crimson Fog on Mar 17, 2026 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

If LSH

Cannot get laid at will with those smooth tones something is cosmically adrift in the universe.

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Mar 17, 2026 9:33 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

DO NOT CHANGE THE MUSIC

Unless it’s lay down some Frank Stallone themes.

by Scipio Tex on Mar 18, 2026 12:12 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Mixing tips

One thing that would help for mixing is to use multiband EQ on the music track to “scoop out” about 20-30% of the vocal part of the frequency (around 300 Mhz) in the background music. Every mixing program on Earth has at least a plugin for multiband EQ, including Audacity. The effect is not incredibly noticeable for the music but usually improves the clarity of the voiceover.

Also, fades are your friend. As a rule of thumb, start with the music at a full listenable volume and fade at least half the distance to zero before talking over it.

But hey, for an amateur you did done damn good.

by Dagga Roosta on Mar 19, 2026 4:53 AM CDT reply actions  

In his first version he played Anvil's Metal on Metal

in the background and screamed over the top like Lou Ferrigno.

by Scipio Tex on Mar 19, 2026 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Speech band is centered between 300 Hz - 3kHz, not 300 MHz.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_frequency

Sorry, I have a degree in acoustics and only rarely get to impress the ladies with it. So…

To: Ladies.
Me: Heeeeeeeyyyy

WVU slept dey couch.
@pleaseplaykindl

by pleaseplaykindle on Mar 19, 2026 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who else in the new Big 12 runs like this?

I am fairly certain that these concepts of Power O and Pin-and-Pull are not unique to Harsin. But as Longhorn fans we have been bludgeoned with “everyone run toward the sideline and pray the running back finds a hole” and “everyone pile up in the middle while the running back plows into the backside of a lineman and pray something good happens” that this seems to be groundbreaking running game strategy. But which teams will we face this coming year that have this advanced of a running game design? K-State comes to mind, and OSU of years gone by, but what about the others?

by TexasWright on Mar 19, 2026 10:56 AM CDT reply actions  

Not groundbreaking. Most teams

run power and zone. Not a whole lot are employing pin n pull… most stick with outside zone in its place. Harsin likes diversity and redundancy in the ways that he can target different parts of the field. But anytime you are pulling, you are introducing additional variables and decision making. When it’s done well it’s very difficult to stop. The good thing about our running system is that although it’s fairly sophisticated it is also fairly utilitarian. On a gap play like Power O, the down blocks are basically a zone call away from the intended gap. But yeah, overall we’ve got more concepts in our run game than most teams do.

The use of power, pin n pull, and fold blocking stresses run fits big time for the defense because it changes the gap structure post snap and uses angles against the defense… it’s also a very nice counter to the zone pressure concepts that have become so prevalent for defenses because they are often pushing their front players to cover a gap that they are not originally aligned to defend. In combination with the extensive use of motion it makes it difficult for the defense to stay with pressure concepts and not get burned. If they sit in base then the combo blocks in the zone schemes are enhanced.

Wisconsin is probably our closest analog in the run game conceptually in college football (but that’s from my limited perspective… I don’t watch enough games). Kansas State is just as diverse as us in their run concepts if not moreso. Teams like Iowa State, West Virginia, Oklahoma State, Baylor and Oklahoma have been more sparing in their run concepts in recent years… paring down to primarily IZ, OZ, Power and supplementing with the quick game, screens and draws. I think it’s an intelligent way to structure an offense in terms of utility and production / rep. Mainly because precise execution in the quick game makes you a lot less reliant on a great read and less likely to give up sacks/turnovers from pass rush. However, when you face a great defense I think relying on the quick game and only a few run concepts is not going to cut it unless you have a wicked QB talent (and preferably one that is part of the running game as well). Because those teams have athletes capable of pressuring that quick game and then all the sudden those QBs become turnover machines and you don’t have a run game that functions without production from the quick game.

by LonghornScott on Mar 19, 2026 11:55 AM CDT reply actions  

Those spread teams

that work the Zone, maybe some Power, and then loads of screens and draws do have the advantage that their concepts attack multiple points of the defense and force the defense to commit players close to the LOS, have freakish athletes, or hope they can bend without breaking.

It’s much easier, especially with the AirRaid, to be functional in utilizing all those concepts than it is to have the athletes on defense to handle all the stresses. You really only need 2 big playmakers surrounded by competence to cause serious problems.

Harsin and KSU are phenomenal at building a running game that can acomplish the same things as the spread. So you can stress the defense everywhere without a ton of talent and you can also be physical.

by Nickel Rover on Mar 19, 2026 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

yep. absolutely.

Both a very viable on a macro level, in fact the AirRaid is a better performer on a macro efficiency level. Against those few defenses that have the athletes, I’d much rather have a physical, diverse running game. We have the added benefit of being in a league where it makes us an outlier.

by LonghornScott on Mar 19, 2026 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

AirRaid

and a option-heavy, diverse run-centric offense are my 2 preferences for collegiate offensive schematics.

I think the track record of option-based teams both in winning championships and in maintaining year-to-year success is much stronger than that of the pro-style teams. I suspect the AirRaid will achieve the same thing.

Do you know, does OU employ AirRaid practice techniques? It’s the only sense I can make out of what they get out of the QB position in terms of production and consistently finding the open receivers.

by Nickel Rover on Mar 19, 2026 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know for sure

But I sort of doubt it based on the different offensive concepts they have run over the last decade. Hard to say, obviously they have ties to a lot of the coaches that have carved out the AirRaid.

Are you specifically referring to the fast installs and high rep repeat philosophy?

by LonghornScott on Mar 19, 2026 6:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Right

my suspicion is that they have multiple (AirRaid, Pro-style) concepts that install quickly and rep repeatedly. They aren’t terribly complicated at all, but their execution-level is generally pretty high in the passing game.
So I’m thinking: AirRaid methods with prostyle concepts. Since Leach coached there this seems entirely possiblea and it makes sense of their succession from Heuple-White-Bradford-Jones.

by Nickel Rover on Mar 19, 2026 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions  


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
Mixed Emotions and Marquise Goodwin

Recent FanPosts

Bc_logo_257x257_small
A Cool College Football Moment
Bc_logo_257x257_small
Wake Up The Echoes
Nobis_small
Some Early NFL Wagering Thoughts
0101_small
Colt dropped to #2
200px-apollo_creed_promo_small
First 2014 commitment? WR Lorenzo Joe per 247
Justified-olyphant_small
Texas vs. TCU on Thanksgiving: Is That a Good Thing?
Bc_logo_257x257_small
SB Nation Studios - Conference Preview Videos
Small
I'm not buying the West Virginia Hype
Picture_016_small
It's official Texas vs TCU on Turkey Day

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Picture_016_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Authors

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover