Offense As Team Defense And What It Means For 2012
All units play a role in scoring and scoring prevention. Yes - offense mostly scores, defense mostly prevents them, and special teams does a bit of each, but each play their reciprocal role in the other's success. And when a non-defensive unit blows up, your points allowed column and defense takes shrapnel - and associative fan flak - no matter how well they played.
In football, unlike baseball, scoring and scoring prevention isn't just the province of each respective unit. Just as bad offense in basketball can lead to a fast break bucket going the other way, offensive turnovers and 3 and outs will eventually break a football defense.
If we accept that bad offense can sink team defense (specifically, point allowed metrics) and dynamic special teams and defense can fuel scoring, can good offense and special teams buoy defense?
At Texas, the answer seems to be yes. And though it's nice to be great on offense, good enough is all that's needed to take a significant jump in Ws and Ls when you play good defense overall.
Dive in with me.
A very simple defensive chart of our last three years on defense:
| PA | YA | YPP | |
| 2011: | 22.2 | 306.1 | 4.6 |
| 2010: | 23.7 | 300.2 | 4.6 |
| 2009: | 16.7 | 251.9 | 3.8 |
PA - points allowed
YA - yards allowed
YPP - yards per play
**
Over the last three years, the Longhorn defense has surrendered a disappointing 20.9 points per game. But that number is paired with a very solid 286 yards per game, 4.3 yards per play allowed. Excluding points allowed (a function of team defense, not pure defense), and adjusting for the growth of spread offenses in the Big 12 (apologies to '99-'01 defenses), this three year stretch represents arguably the best three year statistical run in the Mack Brown era.
If defense wins championships, why were the Longhorns 25-13 during that time period?
Lack of offense, right?
Partly. Every year, the SEC and Virginia Tech put up teams that can't move the ball and they still win 10+. The 1999, 2001 and 2002 Texas squads weren't dynamic on offense (very comparable to 2009/2010 yards per play outputs), but they didn't turn the ball over, played good defense, and won plenty.
Between, 2009-2011, the Texas offense turned the ball over 92 times. Offense failed not only as a driver of points, but in its role on team defense. It was downright subversive.
What the Texas defense surrendered in points allowed over the last three years doesn't make sense in correlation with yards allowed and yards per play. It's about 4 ppg higher than it should be. That's 156 points of carelessness distributed over 3 years, and over 2010/2011, it moved 4-6 games to the loss column. In 2009, it may have cost us a national title.
The Texas offense over the last three years was a concrete life preserver.
Compare the above to this:
| PA | YA | YPP | |
|
2008: |
18.8 |
342.9 |
5.3 |
| 2005: | 16.4 |
302.9 |
4.4 |
| 2004: | 17.9 |
320.1 |
4.9 |
By contrast, these three defenses from recent Longhorn history surrendered 322 yards per game and a 4.9 yards per play average - right at or above the Texas 14 year mean under Brown - but allowed only 17.7 points per game. In those three years, Texas boasted a 37-2 record. In comparison to 2009-2011, those defenses gave up more yardage and yardage per play, but scoring allowed was markedly less not only compared to Texas '09-'11, but to expected correlative outputs.
Offense and special teams were buoying team defense.
By now, you've probably made the connection that 2004, 2005, and 2008 represent the three best Mack Brown offenses of the last decade, while 2009, 2010, and 2011 represent the worst. Not only in terms of pure offensive output (glory years: 6.6 yards per play; inglorious: 5.4 yards per play), but crucially with respect to turnovers (glory: 52 turnovers, inglorious: 92 turnovers).
The 2009 Texas offense was actually the beginning of this trend, obscured in the average fan's memory by a national title berth and a deceptive scoring average. Straight up awful in most big games, with per play averages (5.6) much closer to Garrett Gilbert's 2010 Texas squad (5.4) and last year's injury riddled cluster (5.2) than our best vintage, and it took 9 non-offensive touchdowns, 37 forced turnovers, luck, and dominant defensive play to compensate.
So what does it mean for 2012?
Good things, if we stay healthy. Offense doesn't have to be great to help your defense. Texas offenses in '99, '01, '02 were thoroughly mediocre, but Texas still won plenty by not turning it over, and scoring non-offensive touchdowns in bunches.
The numbers suggest that a minimal therapeutic dose of offense (5.7 YPP, < 21 turnovers on the season) guarantees lots of winning when paired with a good defense and special teams play. Which feed your offense easy scores and an inflated scoring average.
Call it the minimal dose of unit reciprocity.
So, if we're predicting 2012 win totals, tell me how many points we give up per game in 2012 on defense. It will tell me all I need to know about the Texas offense.
30 comments
|
Add comment
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Call it the minimal dose of unit reciprocity.
There’s a joke here that involves penicillin, but I’m too excited about the season to make it.
I’m going with 18.5 PA. And that’s my final answer.
by Parlin on May 21, 2025 7:50 PM CDT reply actions
18.5 is a good guess
I knew a guy who thought swimming pool immersion was as effective as penicillin.
by Scipio Tex on May 21, 2025 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Keeping your BAC over .08 for a full week is a cure for anything. Germs can’t live in that shit.
by Yossarian Rising on May 22, 2025 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions
I suppose its too early
To start trend watching. But it seems that of the three best offensive years two were with VY and running the ball was actually quite effective for us. Last year was a transition year in terms of scheme and personell. But effectively we couldnt throw the ball.
Im hopeful that a return to effective running will reduce our turnovers. Also hopeful that our running game will be based more on efficient scheme than transcendent players.
This is not an indictment of passing per se I love tossing the rock, its just that it will be nice when we have a choice to run or pass as opposed to being forced to do one or the other because its all we can do.
by texitect on May 21, 2025 8:03 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
I won't hazard a guess on PA
I can’t wrap my head around the numbers, but the concept is crystal clear.
It got that way watching us (try to) play offense the last three seasons.
It was because of the numbers and explanations on this site that I first began to gueasy in the stomach during the early part of 2010. I can’t say I knew the bottom was about to fall out — but when it did, I knew it wasn’t because the defense stopped hustling or forgot how to tackle.
I would guess that if we had reduced our turnovers by half and been able to make just one measly first down on each of our 1-2-3-punt series the last two seasons, the 13-12 record would have been more like 18-8 (with an additonal bowl).
Course, we might still have gd gd, so I guess some good came of it.
by edsp on May 21, 2025 8:07 PM CDT reply actions
Yup
The 2009 Texas offense was actually the beginning of this trend, obscured in the average fan’s memory by a national title berth and a deceptive scoring average.
It was hard to watch Muschamp’s head nearly explode that last year he was here.
Great post.
by Sailor Ripley on May 21, 2025 8:08 PM CDT reply actions
2010
Muffed punts had to account for 5 or so easy scores that season. Dammit Curtis Brown, you were so damn good at playing corner, how could you be so bad at punt returns. Thing is when he made a good decision and actually caught the ball, he actually had great returns. But when he muffed the catch, god almighty.
by BurntOrangeJuice on May 21, 2025 9:56 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Very frustrating
Really quick guy, but not exactly a natural ball catcher. His pick 6 against Tech is still one of the best pure corner plays I’ve ever seen.
by Scipio Tex on May 21, 2025 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Staying hydrated is hard!
by BurntOrangeJuice on May 22, 2025 7:15 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Remember the cries to get him to play some receiver?
by Horncasting on May 22, 2025 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions
I think I filed those next to Redding to LB
by Scipio Tex on May 22, 2025 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions
During the early Greg Davis years,
I could not understand why our offensive and defensive coordinators didn’t work together to prevent some of the frustrating game plans. Far later I understood that Davis was more like the professor no one understood, so they avoided the class because it was such a snooze.
by j_java on May 21, 2025 10:01 PM CDT reply actions
That's a good comparison
I guess textbook offense isn’t a compliment after all.
by Scipio Tex on May 21, 2025 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions
One of many pluses with this staff
Is the collaboration between offense and defense. Whether it’s joint discussion of recruits or a back-and-forth analysis of schemes and game plans, there’s just no way that it doesn’t help everyone involved raise their respective games.
by nobis60 on May 21, 2025 11:25 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Great Piece
“It’s about 4 ppg higher than it should be.” Where is the source for this correlation? Nice metric.
by UTeze on May 22, 2025 2:10 AM CDT reply actions
Kind of my brain
I had a bunch of stuff proving that contention but took it out because it took the article down a rabbit hole. Basically, there’s a clear predictive relationship between Yards Allowed, yards per play allowed, and Points Allowed.
Think of it this way:
In 2011, we were #11 in the nation in total defense (yards allowed), but #33 in scoring defense.
In 2010, we were #6 in the nation in total defense, but #49 in scoring defense.
In 2009, we were #3 in the nation in total defense, but #12 in scoring defense.
Those pairings make no sense and it doesn’t take much investigation to realize the hidden story: an offense so bad that it’s consistently betraying our ability to limit another team’s points, even when the defense is playing Top 10 football.
The reversal of that trend is far more important for our 2012 win total than just pure organic growth in offense. We’ve been shooting ourselves in the foot for three year’s running and the offense has been holding the gun.
by Scipio Tex on May 23, 2025 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
One set of numbers I have looked at since I read
an article in which Gary Patterson said it was the second most important set of numbers aside from points they score versus points they allowed is the spread between the Frogs third down conversion percentage and the opposing offenses’ third down conversion percentage.
The worst seasons for his teams have been the years when that spread was less than five percentage points.
Applyng that same criteria for Texas under Mack the two smallest threads were 4% by the 2003 team which ended the year with the brutual Holiday Bowl loss to WSU and 3% in 2010.
by davey o'brien on May 22, 2025 7:59 PM CDT reply actions
the oldest cliche
a good offense is the best defense.
by 55f100tx on May 22, 2025 8:11 PM CDT reply actions
Good stuff. 52 versus 92 turnovers is staggering.
I was wondering how the opponent’s average starting field position compared during these same two periods.
by WreckerTex on May 22, 2025 11:39 PM CDT reply actions
As we are all aware of,
the single most important stat which determines probability of win vs loss is turnovers. Keep the other team from getting the ball on a short field, your chance of winning goes up exponentially. Especially if Defense plays like a monster (20 pts or less allowed /game) and the offense moves the turnover stat in the right direction, Texas will be playing at our standard again.
A&M;'s all-male cheerleaders, or "Yell Leaders", will be right at home when visiting Arkansas. It's like "Deliverance", but it's real...
by bevosteve67 on May 25, 2025 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions
while huckleberry may not be impressed with these metrics
I am. Nice work.
19.2 PA.
Now what’s our record?
by Vasherized on May 23, 2025 10:05 AM CDT reply actions
KSU
I think KSU’s ball control offense is highly underrated for this reason. They gave up piles of yards last year and didn’t generate a ton on offense but they were exceptional at protecting the ball, stealing the ball, and scoring in the red zone.
Their season doesn’t make any sense if not for TOP and TO’s. It begs the question: which offense is better? The one that scores 30 ppg or the one that scores 25 but turns it over less often? I guess that would be pretty easy to calculate if you factored in expected points per possession.
by Nickel Rover on May 28, 2025 11:00 AM CDT reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by Scipio Tex on 





















