Joe Paterno, Penn State Administration, Covered Up Sandusky's Sexual Abuse
And they did it for at least 14 years. Allowing the continued sexual abuse of at least ten boys. A number that, most experts suggest, doesn't reflect the true number of Sandusky's victims.
Those are the findings of former FBI director Louis Freeh and his investigative team after interviewing 430 people and analyzing 3.5 million e-mails, tasked by the Penn State Board of Trustees to issue a comprehensive finding on what happened in Happy Valley.
From former director Freeh's press conference this morning:
Our most saddening and sobering finding is the total disregard for the safety and welfare of Sandusky’s child victims by the most senior leaders at Penn State. The most powerful men at Penn State failed to take any steps for 14 years to protect the children who Sandusky victimized. Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley never demonstrated, through actions or words, any concern for the safety and well-being of Sandusky’s victims until after Sandusky’s arrest.
With respect to the 2001 incident, where Mike McQueary actually witnessed rape, eventually reporting it to Penn State leadership after a panicked call to his father and no attempt to help the victim:
...it is more reasonable to conclude that, in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at Penn State University – Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley – repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky’s child abuse from the authorities, the Board of Trustees, Penn State community, and the public at large. Although concern to treat the child abuser humanely was expressly stated, no such sentiments were ever expressed by them for Sandusky’s victims.
Pleas for Joe Paterno's ignorance about the true nature of Sandusky's abuse were proven false. He knew as early as 1998 and did nothing.
The evidence shows that these four men also knew about a 1998 criminal investigation of Sandusky relating to suspected sexual misconduct with a young boy in a Penn State football locker room shower. Again, they showed no concern about that victim. The evidence shows that Mr. Paterno was made aware of the 1998 investigation of Sandusky, followed it closely, but failed to take any action, even though Sandusky had been a key member of his coaching staff for almost 30 years, and had an office just steps away from Mr. Paterno’s. At the very least, Mr. Paterno could have alerted the entire football staff, in order to prevent Sandusky from bringing another child into the Lasch Building. Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley also failed to alert the Board of Trustees about the 1998 investigation or take any further action against Mr. Sandusky. None of them even spoke to Sandusky about his conduct. In short, nothing was done and Sandusky was allowed to continue with impunity.
Indeed, Paterno was probably the primary reason that Penn State admins didn't report McQueary's incident to the Department of Public Welfare, local police, or even to The Second Mile charity.
Based on the evidence, the only known, intervening factor between the decision made on February 25, 2026 by Messrs. Spanier, Curley and Schulz to report the incident to the Department of Public Welfare, and then agreeing not to do so on February 27th, was Mr. Paterno’s February 26th conversation with Mr. Curley.
Even more damning:
We never had the opportunity to talk with Mr. Paterno, but he did say what he told McQueary on February 10, 2026 when McQueary reported what he saw Sandusky doing in the shower the night before: "You did what you had to do. It is my job now to figure out what we want to do." Why would anyone have to figure out what had to be done in these circumstances? We also know that he delayed reporting Sandusky’s sexual conduct because Mr. Paterno did not "want to interfere" with people’s weekend.
Joe Paterno may not protect children, but he will protect a weekend.
Keep in mind that these same men, who after being informed of a graphic rape by a suspected pedophile who they knew ran a foundation for children, using the prestige of Penn State football to awe and groom his victims, never even attempted to follow up, to identify, or look after, the child McQueary saw being raped.
Think about it. If you have a feeling of physical illness and your hands are clenching into fists right now, then I pronounce you human. Those boys were an inconvenience to them. A bother. An embarrassment. This is a Soviet Politburo discussing a bread shortage in The Ukraine while eating caviar.
None of these four men took any responsible action after February 2001 other than Mr. Curley informing the Second Mile that Mr. Sandusky had showered with a boy. Even though they all knew about the 1998 incident, the best they could muster to protect Sandusky’s victims was to ask Sandusky not to bring his "guests" into the Penn State facilities.
When you rape, please don't do it here.
The bizarre conceit offered by Paterno apologists (and some remain) is that Joe was a middle manager who did all he could, vaguely wishing his "superiors" would do the right thing.
Penn State employees knew better:
This is best reflected by the janitors’ decision not to report Sandusky’s horrific 2000 sexual assault of a young boy in the Lasch Building shower. The janitors were afraid of being fired for reporting a powerful football coach.
I won't pretend to comprehend Paterno's or the administrator's motives - I can't fathom the callousness of their thought process - but Occam's Razor suggests that a man that built and carefully nurtured an entire personality cult centered around his own Goodness and Rightness and Self-Effacing Modesty, and a university built upon the public image of its football program and it's public leader, couldn't be bothered to help abused kids for no reason more than preservation of public image.
Once Paterno and his lackeys "bosses" knew and refused to act in even the most perfunctory manner, every day that went by - and every new report and rumor - simply reminded them of their moral infancy and cowardice. Yet, that whole time, their central mission never changed: Forget the boys; Protect the legacy.
Before his death, Joe Paterno remarked that "With the benefit of hindsight, I wish I had done more."
The measured banality of that phraseology, the suggestion that hindsight is the necessary ingredient when confronted with the most simple matters of immediate moral action, reveals his own disconnection and concern for reputation right up until his last moments.
Let's be clear: Those boys wish you'd done anything at all, Joe.
The National Child Abuse Hotline is 1-800-4-A-CHILD (1-800-422-4453).
166 comments
|
Add comment
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Disgusted, furious
No words. How anyone could continue to defend Paterno is beyond me.
Someone else mentioned this: Sandusky’s wife should be tried as an accessory. As should any of the men mentioned still living.
by txTDM on Jul 12, 2025 12:50 PM CDT reply actions
Certainly they will have issues
with respect to the Clery Act.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 12, 2025 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Speaking of the wives
…probably the most damning editorial I’ve ever read…just brutal
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/The-Sandusky-wives-see-no-evil-3664938.php
by Black out the windows on Jul 12, 2025 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Yuck.
I talked to my kids about this. They are 7 and 10.
by Sailor Ripley on Jul 12, 2025 12:52 PM CDT reply actions
They covered up the raping of children for AT LEAST 14 years, and this went all the way to the top of Penn State. Maybe some of it was found in this FBI investigation, but at what point do we need to ask the question “what else did they cover up over the last 30+ years?”
If they wouldn’t report child rape, what about the rape of a woman? What about a murder?
by UT_BKC on Jul 12, 2025 1:08 PM CDT reply actions
Maybe they killed Kennedy?
The facts at hand are damning enough. Let’s stick with them.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 12, 2025 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions
It’s so damnable that those kids were failed by so many different people.
It’s a very real reminder that you can’t sit back and expect that someone else will do the right thing. It’s also a very real reminder that there are some absolute monsters out there.
by tronaldinho on Jul 12, 2025 1:22 PM CDT reply actions
We can only hope
That Paterno is raped for eternity by Sandusky when he arrives in hell.
"All the white meat is gone. There's nothin' but necks on the platter."
Darrell Royal
by Snide Aside on Jul 12, 2025 1:33 PM CDT reply actions
If you value your soul
Don’t ventue over to the SBNation PSU site Black Shoe Diaries.
Plenty of posts with plenty of recs still defending Paterno to the last breath.
by CMDR on Jul 12, 2025 1:52 PM CDT reply actions
I was on there earlier and didn't see that
I did see a lot of really interesting mental gymnastics to give Paterno the benefit of the doubt.
Oh, my bad.
My bad?!
Your bad don't work in my world! -Ray Lewis
by TexasGarcia37 on Jul 12, 2025 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions
That's more what I saw, too.
You have to understand that Joe Pa was a cult figure, in the truest sense. He wasn’t the football coach. He was Penn State and All That Is Right. It’s incredibly difficult for them to unwrap their identity as Penn Staters - and implicitly Paternoites - from the place where they went to school and shared so many experiences. When you attack Paterno, you’re attacking Penn State. There is no separation for many of them.
They want badly to preserve that legacy, and they’ll perform whatever mental contortions are required to do so.
That written, I’ve already seen several Penn State fans start to sever Paterno from that sense of identity. I suspect it happens more over time.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 12, 2025 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Well stated
He wasn’t the football coach. He was Penn State and All That Is Right.
As a nine year old playing my very first year of football, my father would have me watch games with him to begin a learning of the game. My dad would show me Paterno and tell me that he is “all that is right.” It was easy to do with the likes of Jackie Sherrill and Barry Switzer running around. When the story originally dropped, I was of the mindset that Paterno couldn’t be involved. He is “all that is right” I told myself. Paterno was the epitome of winning the right way to me. With these recent findings, I can no longer keep a clear conscience and excuse Joe Paterno. These findings aren’t statistical facts like YPC, Comp %, etc. No one can take these facts and manipulate them to fit a theory or idea. These are cold (very cold) hard facts. Joe Paterno knew of children being abused/raped and not only did nothing, he helped conceal it. There is nothing right about the way Joe Paterno and PSU handled the situation.
"You’d think some of these Ohio St guys would wear long sleeves, instead of reminding us why they were in trouble last year."
-Rich Eisen, 2012 NFL Combine
by TexaStunna on Jul 12, 2025 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions
This 100%
The ENTIRE identity of Penn State football and thus Penn State University was Joe Paterno. EVERYONE (fans, fans of other schools, media members, hell other coaches) lauded him and Penn State for doing things the “right way.” Even in some of the lean years, PSU and its fans could always lean on this identity.
And he’d been there for 60 some odd years. Even if we were to find out Darrell Royal did something evil, the entire image of the University of Texas and it’s football program isn’t wrapped up in that.
Now it’s completely and utterly destroyed. It’s not easy to flip a switch and remove an identity like that.
I agree with you that over time, Penn State fans will start to come to proper terms with this issue.
by DoubleB on Jul 12, 2025 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions
“He did have integrity and you can’t tell me other wise, I don’t give a shit who you are. He may have made a mistake, but that man had more integrity in his pinky then we all did combined…”
5 recs
That sounds like an outlier now, but atleast 6 members of that site feel the same way.
by CMDR on Jul 12, 2025 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I saw that.
He doesn’t understand that real integrity has little to do with complying with the NCAA rule book, stressing a degree, or building libraries. Paterno valued his legend and legacy more than the well-being of young boys.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 12, 2025 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions
statue debate
I know a lot of people are calling for the Paterno statue to be removed because of the news of today. I happen to have the opposite opinion. I think the statue should stand as a reminder of what can happen when a coach has too much power and upsets the natural checks and balances in an athletic dept.
Oh, my bad.
My bad?!
Your bad don't work in my world! -Ray Lewis
by TexasGarcia37 on Jul 12, 2025 1:53 PM CDT reply actions
It's a testament to the folly of memorializing someone before their life's story is complete
Let’s just hope Ricky or Earl don’t do anything heinous from here on out.
Final score: Texas wins, 76-37-5
by Cocky Bovine on Jul 12, 2025 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I think they should just simply turn the statue the other way. Seems fitting.
by EggNog on Jul 13, 2025 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Joint and severable
culpability. No Question.
All it would have taken was for one out of the group to go to some policing entity outside of psu. Whistle blowing would not have gotten them fired.
They were implicitly afraid of Paterno’s power and as the evidence is mounting, there may be indications of more than implicit fear. All under the guise of “horseplay”.
by lonesome devil on Jul 12, 2025 2:05 PM CDT reply actions
So college football would have been better off had Joe left it to Barry and Jackie.
by davey o'brien on Jul 12, 2025 2:08 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Wow. This is actually quite a salient point.
Joe Paterno was walking around like college football needed him to be a guiding light while dozens of boys just needed him to make a 3 digit phone call.
by NateHeupel on Jul 12, 2025 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions
In a strange way you're right
…treating the players like the paid employees they actually are and divorcing it from the whole “student athlete” canard would probably diminish the god-like power of coaches that creates the culture that enables this kind of disgrace.
by Dreadful on Jul 12, 2025 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Wow - this is it in a nutshell. rec 100%
Joe Paterno was walking around like college football needed him to be a guiding light while dozens of boys just needed him to make a 3 digit phone call.
"All the white meat is gone. There's nothin' but necks on the platter."
Darrell Royal
by Snide Aside on Jul 12, 2025 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions
No
It is simplistic to turn people into either demons or saints. With Paterno, we see the simplism at both ends of the spectrum. He was not the sweetheart of a man many of us supposed, but this terribly damning participation in a criminal conspiracy does not give the lie to every act of his life.
When this story first broke, Aggies on Texags were crowing that this somehow vindicated Jackie Sherrill. That’s absurd. The hypocrisy and criminality revealed in the case of Paterno does not diminish the criminality, hypocrisy or sleaziness of anybody else. The issues stand separately.
It strikes me as perverse to dip a brush into this bucket of disgusting scandal and to somehow think it can act as a whitewash for covering shit stains (named above).
Davey O’Brien is a smart writer and person. I prefer to think the comment is more of a throwaway bit of wit than a serious point.
by RomaVicta on Jul 12, 2025 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I simply cannot agree with this.
Sally Jenkins of the Washington Post, who did the last known public interview with Joe Paterno, wrote this today:
Joe Paterno was a liar, there’s no doubt about that now. He was also a cover-up artist. If the Freeh Report is correct in its summary of the Penn State child molestation scandal, the public Paterno of the last few years was a work of fiction. In his place is a hubristic, indictable hypocrite.
If Paterno knew about ‘98, then he wasn’t some aging granddad who was deceived, but a canny and unfeeling power broker who put protecting his reputation ahead of protecting children.
Paterno used the last media interview he would ever give to continue protecting his reputation. Paterno has been covering up child rape for 14 years and possibly longer. Say that aloud. FOURTEEN YEARS. What’s the worst secret you’ve ever kept, and how long did you keep it for? Did an untold number of innocent children get irreparably hurt because of it?
It absolutely does give the lie to every act of his life. Knowing that he was capable of this, you absolutely have to question everything else he has ever done. Everything. You have to go back and look at his motivations and actions with new eyes, and ask yourself who and what he was really acting on behalf of. Because that kind of thinking isn’t born overnight.
It’s not about whitewashing when it comes to comparing Paterno to Switzer and Sherill. Those two can still suck a taint flavored lollipop until they die. It’s about relativity and the greater scheme of things. It’s about understanding that Paterno had the balls to talk those two coaches down when he would end up being undeniably complicit to a serial child rapist. Guys like Sherill and Switzer are the kind of trash that when they become too filthy, they’re easily washed away. Paterno was not only placed on a pedestal; he made sure he stayed there.
The issues do not stand separately. Paterno’s own hubris saw to that. By measuring himself against those types and looking down his nose at them, he inextricably linked himself to them.
by NateHeupel on Jul 13, 2025 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
The irony of this situation for Paterno is that if he had put the welfare of the victims above all else, and acted accordingly, the pedestal he built for himself would have been raised higher by his fans and the general public. But because he placed Penn State’s reputation (i.e. his own legacy) on that pedestal himself, he lost everything he tried to preserve and, in doing so, perpetuated the commission of a heinous crime.
This is the risk we, as fans of anything, take on by idolizing anyone. Not only do we set ourselves up for disappointment when flaws are revealed, but we encourage that feeling of invincibility and self-righteousness that many pedestal-dwellers possess.
by LifetimeLonghorn on Jul 13, 2025 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Demons and Angels
First, your condemnation of Paterno is not needed in response to my post. You merely echo what I wrote.
Second, we just disagree about humans. Seldom do we find anyone who is pure evil and never do we find anyone who is pure good. The notion of the “tragic flaw” has informed literature since men first began telling stories. Paterno’s tragic flaw has been revealed and rightfully reviled.
The values that Paterno stood for regarding college football are not diminished by this horrendous act regarding the child rape on campus. Indeed, even if Paterno himself had been caught running a dirty program, those values would not be diminished- only he would be diminished as has happened here.
Which brings me to the place in your disagreement with me where you agree with the point of my post:
Guys like Sherill and Switzer are the kind of trash
Exactly. I don’t suppose that you suggest that college football be left to their “kind of trash.” We are not in disagreement about the main point at all.
by RomaVicta on Jul 13, 2025 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions
I wrote what I wrote not to be funny.
Instead that a man who viewed himself as the protector of the great game of college football never acted upon his duty (One that was morally required of him as a devoutly religious man and legally as Sandusky’s superior and latter an employee of a University receiving Federal funds.) to protect those who could not protect themselves.
No where do I excuse Barry and Jackie and we can take the stance that a sin is a sin so paying a kid to some might be as wrong as covering up the horrible acts of an old friend. I don’t and believe in Dante’s concept of Hell.
Could be wrong, but I do recall that Christ’s strongest words of rebuke were not directed at some of the most egregious sinners he encountered, but those who wrapped themselves in their piety and beat their breasts aloud about protecting what they believed in while forgetting their job wasn’t to take power, but to protect those who could not protect themselves.
Yes, this all reads like Joe’s life was written by Bernard Malamud and while I don’t see him as a Demon he will now carry the title of Pharisee Joe for me.
by davey o'brien on Jul 13, 2025 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions
So
You actually do think college football should be left to the Sherrills and Switzers?
Maybe I’m not reading your posts correctly. I don’t get that point at all.
Maybe add the word “either” as in: The game shouldn’t be left to Paterno either.
by RomaVicta on Jul 13, 2025 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Didn't say that either.
I agree with Nate. That as big a horses asses Barry and Jackie might be and for all the NCAA rules they have broken their sins from what I know are not as bad as Joe.
Perfect world we go 1984 on all of them and remove any record of they and their dealing from the history of college football, but we don’t have that luxury.
Jackie is a snake who would do anything to win, Barry was the same and more. He allowed his program to run wild and in a short period of time we saw in Norman players charged and convicted of gang rape, a player shooting another, and the Sooners starting quarterback arrested by the Feds (not the local guys but the damn DEA) for trafficking and Barry did warn Thompson the Feds were on to him.
Maybe my perception of the world has been warped by age and cynicism, but with all that happened at OU under Barry the events of PSU are worse. I understand, not agree, but understand Barry did what he did to win. Hell, Barry’s famous quote about feeding the monster alludes to the fact that Barry was very few aware that he was overseeing something he really had no control over other than to continue win.
Joe on the other hand did what he did why? Loyalty to a pedophile or loyalty to Joe. Hubris?
It is interesting if you Google that word you find this definition:
“Hubris (play /ˈhjuːbrɪs/), also hybris, means extreme pride or arrogance. Hubris often indicates a loss of contact with reality and an overestimation of one’s own competence or capabilities, especially when the person exhibiting it is in a position of power.”
Hauntingly you also find this narrative:
“Violations of the law against hubris included what might today be termed assault and battery; sexual crimes ranging from rape of women or children to consensual but improper activity, in particular anal sex with a free man or with an unconsenting and/or under-aged boy;456 or the theft of public or sacred property. Two well-known cases are found in the speeches of Demosthenes, a prominent statesman and orator in ancient Greece.”
Finally:
“See also
Beot
Groupthink
Narcissism
Nemesis
Victory disease
Self-love
Barak"
The only lacking from the Wikipedia page is a picture of Joe in his black shoes, white socks, and wind breaker.
Jackie paid for his deeds, Jerry Parks served time, Charles Thompson served time, I believe Nigel Clay-Bernard Hall- Glen Bell served time, and Barry resigned.
Winning at all cost might not be right, but it is woven into the fabric not only of college football, but to some degree this country. Hopefully there is no place in any society for covering up the way Joe and the others did at State College.
by davey o'brien on Jul 13, 2025 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Confused
Your writing seems to contradict itself from post to post on this subject.
Nobody is arguing Paterno is a good man. The conversation was prompted by your short post at the top.
Again, maybe I’m just not getting it. No need to work it further.
by RomaVicta on Jul 14, 2025 1:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Not trying to and I guess what I meant originally was that the presence
of Barry and Jackie in college football is not as heinous as someone who hid the actions of a serial pedophile within and affiliated with his pristine program for 15-20 years.
I also think Roma that your original point was that Joe should not be vilified for one event, but please remember that not only has there been a series of legal issues involving his players that have been swept under the rug for years. Joe bullied the local media and he was the one who dictated punishment or lack there of for his players.
That aside if all we know is the issues surrounding Sandusky this is something that has gone on for near two decades which far supersedes the concept of being a one time event in Joe’s career.
by davey o'brien on Jul 14, 2025 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
Perhaps I was unclear
I also think Roma that your original point was that Joe should not be vilified for one event,
No. I spoke to his acts not his person. Whatever good Paterno may have done or represented regarding college football is not undone by this hideous action regarding Sandusky. Conversely, Paterno’s good acts don’t excuse what this foul act says about Paterno’s character.
I’m not an apologist. I was addressing what you wrote and the first response agreeing to it. I don’t think college football is best left to the Barrys and Jackies of the game no matter what Paterno has done.
by RomaVicta on Jul 15, 2025 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions
If this doesn't spell out "loss of institutional control",
I’m not sure what does. Whether or not the NCAA decides to investigate and sanction Penn State’s football program (and since it was coaches and administration involved, not the players, I would be shocked if they did), if I was sitting on the Board of Regents for PSU I would either, 1. cancel football for at least two years, or 2. direct that every single penny generated by the football program go towards assisting the victims.
One thing is certain: Penn State’s attorneys will be writing a lot of checks in the next few years.
A&M;'s all-male cheerleaders, or "Yell Leaders", will be right at home when visiting Arkansas. It's like "Deliverance", but it's real...
by bevosteve67 on Jul 12, 2025 2:43 PM CDT reply actions
Scip's write-ups
It sounds like we all share in the horror of the lack of action by the men involved (I include McQuery in this too) but I want to give a shout to Scip’s writing. Both this article and, especially, the one he wrote right after the news broke (“Ceding Personal Responsibility to Institutional Bureaucracy”) have been spot on point. All college football wittiness aside, Scipio, you not only write well, you do a masterful job of dealing with hard reality rather than falling into the trap of relative righteousness. I remain a big fan.
"I swear -- by my life and my love for it -- that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."
by J Galt on Jul 12, 2025 2:52 PM CDT reply actions
An order of crow, lightly seasoned...
I wanted to drop my comment under this specific comment because that earlier piece of Scip’s was one I commented on a lot. I felt, and still to a certain extent feel, that it was a bit of a rush to judgment at the time.
Unfortunately, now that the investigation has concluded, the facts have shown that Scipio was indeed correct. Paterno knew far more than he let on, and the inaction on his and the administration’s part was inexcusable. Scipio, you and I had a spirited debate about timeliness, and while I still think it was better to wait until the investigation was concluded before damning everyone far and wide, I’d have to be a LOT shallower than I am not to acknowledge that your suppositions were almost entirely correct, as where the conclusions you drew from them. So kudos to you, sir.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions
No crow needed.
I think your training has taught that you supposition and assumption are dangerous ways to run a society. Frankly, I’d rather have been wrong.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 13, 2025 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh. My. God.
Latest national data on sexual abuse of children shows that 1-in-4 girls and 1-in-10 boys report abuse. Approximately 1-in-6 boys are actually abused. We also know that in general serial sexual abusers abuse an average of 117 children.
by pleaseplaykindle on Jul 12, 2025 3:15 PM CDT reply actions
Heart-wrenching
I hope people take a moment and stop to think about that statistic.
I haven’t commented much on this horrific story, partly because of finishing up law school (and now studying for the bar…eeeeek!). But also partly because I’ve been trying to reconcile the outrage I’ve seen with the fact that this thing goes on all the time, just not with a nationally prominent football program involved. I’m still working through all my thoughts on this, but part of what is bothering me is the seeming lack of outrage at this when it goes on in other contexts.
And look at that statistic: 1-in-4 girls. I won’t turn this into a femi-nazi rant, but think about how that translates into who those girls will become as young women and how they will relate to others, especially men if they were abused by a man. And if that statistic is any where near correct, that is 25% of our future women. That is huge. That is infuriating. That is society changing.
Its maddening to think of the damage to these kids’ (boys and girls) developing brains, how these children now associate sex within a relationship…
When you really peel back the layers and start looking at how our children are victimized, it is obvious something is very wrong with our society. If a young girl runs away from home, statistics show she will be approached by a pimp within 48 hours. The average age of a women entering prostitution is around 16 (most cited statistics say 13, but there has been a debate).
What is clear is that the age of children being prostituted is getting younger. Which means there is a demand for younger children.
Why do I bring up human trafficking? Anytime there is a large sporting event (think Super Bowl, NBA Finals, World Cup), trafficked persons are brought into that city in droves to help meet the increased demand in that city. This includes countless children, who have been trafficked from the US and abroad.
And if you live in Houston, we’re known as a hub for human trafficking.
I realize I’ve gone off-topic, but it is all connected. We need this type of outrage at all abuse of children, not just within a context that involves the abuser using a nationally prominent football team. And I’ll go further: we need this type of outrage at all people who sexually abuse any one of any age.
I’ve got to go back to studying now. The more I think about this, the more I want to punch something.
by Sasha is a Longhorn Dog on Jul 12, 2025 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Perfectly put, by both you and Mr. Freeh.
Secondly, let me just say that this is the risk we take when we elevate mortal men to godlike status. Football is a game. In the case of Penn State, it had become more important than protecting the lives of children. This is absurd.
And oh, nothing has changed. This could be going on at other places around the country and no one would know. All the articles are being written vilifying Paterno, Sandusky, and the several other men involved. But they (Sandusky excepted) were not exceptional. I would hazard a guess that at any other distinguished athletic program where a personality cult exists something exactly like this could happen. It’s not just the people we should be angry about, it’s the system.
by pleaseplaykindle on Jul 12, 2025 3:27 PM CDT reply actions
“I would hazard a guess that at any other distinguished athletic program where a personality cult exists something exactly like this could happen.”
No doubt. But most of those personality cults at the football level deal with breaking NCAA rules to win games and covering up the cheating. I think it’s a big leap from that to putting present and future children of central Pennsylvania in the crosshairs of a pedophile.
by DoubleB on Jul 12, 2025 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Well said
"I would hazard a guess that at any other distinguished athletic program where a personality cult exists something exactly like this could happen."
And the terrifying thing about the PSU scandal is that it will make all the rats seek cover. Particularly with what has already gone down and the shit storm that is sure to erupt in the next few days.
"All the white meat is gone. There's nothin' but necks on the platter."
Darrell Royal
by Snide Aside on Jul 12, 2025 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Just some thoughts…
1. It’s going to be much harder for PSU to get past this than they think. PSU has had 14 AP Top 5 finished. Sandusky is in the team photo for 12 of them.
2. Sandusky is the real villain, but it is mind-boggling how many people had to ignore, deny or compartmentalize to allow it to happen. However, we saw it time and again with the Catholic abuse scandal. People and organizations are screwed up.
3. Perspective-
In 1999, 12 kids died, and dozens more were injured, when TAMU’s bonfire collapsed. The report noted that TAMU’s administration was negligent (although, not criminally) in supervising this construction project on their campus.
Thanks to sovereign immunity, liability was capped at $50k per. They built a monument to the victims. If you ask any Ags today, they will tell you that was their finest hour.
Side point- Can you imagine what would have happened, if in 1998 a new Aggie administrator had proposed reviewing the whole bonfire construction enterprise? They would have been crucified. I’ll give PSU this much- they fired Paterno, and the university president, although too late. They have done more than the Ags ever did.
by TaylorTRoom on Jul 12, 2025 3:43 PM CDT reply actions
Apples and oranges, IMO
I understand your point, but one school administration was party to a shoddily executed tradition that led to a foreseeable, preventable tragedy; another administration actively covered up a decade and a half of child rape. I get negligence and the wages of stupidity. I’m fully capable of that. I can’t get Penn State’s actions. It’s not in my DNA.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 12, 2025 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah. The PSU actions (inactions) are hard to understand. My point is that after the fact, the PSU Board of Trustees was able to start firing people. That shows a recognition at some level that their institution had really, really screwed up (even if the whole constituency hasn’t come to terms with it). In contrast, three years ago the Ags’ AD started selling a DVD celebrating their ’99 win over Texas as a redemption for the collapsed bonfire.
by TaylorTRoom on Jul 12, 2025 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd prefer a similar type of transgression to make your point.
Both in moral scale and intent.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 12, 2025 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions
And also, the history lesson is kinda wrong
The PSU Board repeatedly tried in vain to figure out how to fire Paterno, off-and-on all last decade. They almost got it done in 2004. So I’m not convinced that they should be lauded for anything at all. They did the really, really obvious thing to do, the thing that any self-respecting Saul Goodman would advise them to do. Something that they’ve flirted with doing for a long stretch, presumably without knowledge of childey-rapey-stuff to aid their decision process. Ain’t exactly Profiles in Courage stuff to force that man into retirement. It’s quite literally the least I would expect them to do.
And I have no idea why the bonfire stuff is even relevant. It’s such a different tragedy. That’s like comparing Katrina to Antietam; it’s not fair to the memory of either one.
by Dagga Roosta on Jul 12, 2025 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I fucking hate humans
Did you read my comment, or did you merely see that it disagreed and begin composing your response immediately? by BrooklynHorn
by run Bevo run on Jul 12, 2025 4:13 PM CDT reply actions
Don't forget perjury
Given the new evidence, it’s even worse than anyone really imagined.
1977 - After being an ice cream man, Sandusky creates a charity for the same type of boys he victimizes
1977-1998 - Newly surfaced reports of abuse.
1998 - Paterno et al actively follow investigation of abuse, which later gets thrown out. FACT
1999 - Sandusky retires at the peak of his profession as coordinator. Continues to have access to Penn St facilities.
2001 - Given the context that Paterno et al knew about 1998 investigation, Paterno’s grand jury testimony that he didn’t know much becomes suspect. Further, there’s evidence that he was consulted on the decision to do nothing about McQuery’s eyewitness report of rape in the Penn State locker room. Another lie to the grand jury that he reported it up the chain of command. Given the chain of command then asked Joe his opinion, his testimony is disingenuous at the very least, if not a straight lie.
2001-2011 - Sandusky continues to have access to Penn St beyond the grand jury indictment up until his arrest in November, one week before Paterno breaks the all-time win record. He victimizes at least 5 more boys repeatedly for years.
November 2011 - Death - Paterno continues his story that he reported the 2001 incident to campus authorities, admits he didn’t know much about child rape, he didn’t know the extent of what McQuery saw and wish he could’ve done more. He not only new all of the details and the context of Sandusky’s activities, he lead the efforts to cover it up.
Disgusting liar. Worse than Sandusky, since Sandusky is a diseased predator the earth has always been afflicted with. Paterno et al let this animal run free to feast on the defenseless.
by Eskimohorn on Jul 12, 2025 4:19 PM CDT reply actions
Honestly, I have to wonder if Paterno had some mental/emotional issue where he couldn’t deal with the idea of what Sandusky was doing and being accused of. Like “Shutter Island” or something. It’s hard to make sense of it otherwise.
by TaylorTRoom on Jul 12, 2025 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions
This is a big piece of how this happened.
I work in the mental health field and am consistently impressed by the power of denial. When encountering something we cannot deal with, many of us go to remarkable lengths to distort reality. I use terms like “we” and “us” to point out that this is a common human phenomenon that we are all capable of and one we should all be on guard against. Thinking about it, most of us can probably think of examples of our doing this, fortunately with less tragic results.
Sasha’s linking of this to the 1 in 4 sexual abuse statistic for girls and 1 in 6 for boys and the need for similar outrage to that being expressed re: Paterno’s cover-up is dead on. The revulsion we all feel about child sexual exploitation makes it easy to pull back and just not think of the implications of those numbers. That urge is a factor in allowing it to continue.
That urge was clearly present in Paterno. The reality and implications of Sandusky’s pedophilia were more than Joe could deal with. His iconic status enabled that blind spot to be expressed with the cover-up. I agree with John Feinstein that this episode makes clear the danger of a football coach having that kind of power. Certainly the preservation of Paterno’s image and legacy figured in as well.
by hh500 on Jul 16, 2025 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions
One thought
Paterno Family Inc is responsible for some of his late in life statements - certainly his press releases. Joe’s mental capacity was somewhat clouded, increasingly as he got ill. I won’t get into my reasoning, but basically the statements and letters of the last year are primarily a product of Jay and Scott Paterno. Scott, particularly, is an odd, arrogant buffoonish character.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 12, 2025 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions
one has to ask
Why are they still talking?
Oh, my bad.
My bad?!
Your bad don't work in my world! -Ray Lewis
by TexasGarcia37 on Jul 12, 2025 9:35 PM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions
the civil suits
JoePa’s estate is subject to suits from the victims…these awards/settlements would eat into everyone’s inheritance….every time they put their spin out there, they are speaking to potential jurors…
"I was nice and didn’t go for a full cock shot" - LonghornEm
by UTLawGrad on Jul 13, 2025 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions
I, for one
have heard enough from the Paterno family for one lifetime. Today should have seen a press release from the family that read like “OK look, he’s our father/grandfather and we’ll always love him, but yeah he obviously fucked up big time. Sorry.”
As opposed to what we got, which was basically “Whatever, that report is gay. Go JoePa.”
by nordberg on Jul 12, 2025 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions
I liked them terming the report
“just an opinion.” Also, an opinion: gravity.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 13, 2025 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions
This is something I've always wondered about.
Obviously Sandusky did not start in 1998, 1998 is simply the point at which it became common knowledge (i.e. Paterno was definately aware). But my question would be the Watergate question: What did Paterno know and WHEN did he know it? it seems as likely as not that he would have had info before 1998.
by billb on Jul 13, 2025 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions
pre 1998
Sandusky was traveling to bowl and away games with a cabin boy. You’re telling me no one thought that was fishy?
by CMDR on Jul 13, 2025 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Don't have anything to add.
You’ve written very well about an infuriating set of events and decisions. Thanks for taking the time to express a thoughtful perspective.
by LonghornScott on Jul 12, 2025 4:46 PM CDT reply actions
All of my thoughts on this matter have been stated more eloquently than I could muster by Scipio and other posters here.
It’s when we have to face the reality that we share this planet with people like those described in Mr. Freeh’s statements and a little of our faith in our fellow man is taken from us that we need to hear something like this…
http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2012/7/11/3154042/eric-legrand-espys-speech-video
by BurntOrangeJuice on Jul 12, 2025 5:22 PM CDT reply actions
joined just to rec this
it’s the first article i’ve seen today with that phone number on it.
Remember the Rose Bowl The Story of The Alabama Crimson Tide & The Grandaddy of Them All
by kleph on Jul 12, 2025 5:58 PM CDT reply actions
A symbol for us all to remember.
First, and most importantly, this is a tragedy. My thoughts and prayers are with those that suffer, on all sides of the horrible story.
For those of us on the outside of this story (thank God), the take away is simple: When we lift men up beyond a level men should go, we create the environment for abuse and horror to happen. Be it athletics, beauty, power, sex or any other category, mankind’s nature creates the environments like this one. We all must remain ever on guard in order to protect those unable to protect themselves. Those that are evil constantly lurk, and those that are blind constantly aid the evil, whether they know they are doing it or not.
by BurntOrangeAtlanta on Jul 12, 2025 6:23 PM CDT reply actions
Your take
was one I sought out when this broke. Good job being a voice of clarity and sense on an emotional topic.
by Nickel Rover on Jul 12, 2025 11:58 PM CDT reply actions
You might have a calling, Sasha.
You have the outrage. You are acquiring the tools. Do you have the passion?
Kids out there need an advocate, an attack dog on their side. Consider it.
by lurkerinthedark on Jul 13, 2025 6:40 AM CDT reply actions
How far?
Was Sandusky working alone or could there be a wider circle of abuse? The silence and inaction of Penn State officials might be comprehensible if there were other, powerful people involved.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on Jul 13, 2025 7:51 AM CDT reply actions
Only sort of related
but I never had a good feeling about Paterno since I heard the story of the 1969 season. The fact that he backed down from playing Texas but continued to campaign for a MNC was odd to me. So when people said things like Paterno was “all that was right”, I also had to some angry things to say under my breath.
Now looking back, it does seem like there was some cowardice in him. It was manifested in a benign way in 1969 but in a really horrific way later. Same issue though.
by Monahorns on Jul 13, 2025 8:56 AM CDT reply actions
To set the 1969 record straight,
although Penn State was being considered for the Cotton Bowl, the Penn State players had voted to accept a bid to the Orange Bowl in Miami BEFORE Ohio State’s loss to Michigan which allowed Texas and Arkansas to move to Numbers 1 and 2 in the polls. The players preferred Miami to Dallas (who wouldn’t in those days?) and had no idea that Texas would be ranked No. 1 by the time of the Cotton Bowl game. So to say Paterno “ducked” Texas is not really accurate. If they had voted on it after Ohio State’s loss, the players probably would have voted to go to the Cotton Bowl to play the Texas-Arkansas winner for the national championship (what team wouldn’t want that chance?). Paterno lobbying for his team then was no different from any other coach lobbying for his team in the BCS era, not that lobbying is really necessary in the wonderful BCS era (soon to be so deservedly discarded).
by lurkerinthedark on Jul 13, 2025 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions
So then
why did DKR make a comment about Paterno choosing to forego a chance to settle it on the field and instead on a soap box?
Plus if any of these stories is true, Paterno had ultimate control of the program. Blaming a vote the players had taken earlier is kind of an excuse. With a changed situation you couldn’t retake the vote? I don’t buy it.
by Monahorns on Jul 13, 2025 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions
And why is Penn State taking a vote that early? . . . Did they need to decide by Veteran’s Day so they could get super saver airline fares?
by Cirque Du Salado on Jul 13, 2025 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
The bids went out early
And nobody would back out of one of the three majors bowls (Orange, Sugar, Cotton) once it was given.
The bowl deals were made under the assumption that Ohio State would clinch the National Champoinship by beating Michigan.
Remember Ohio State could not go to the Rose Bowl (Big 10 rules prohibited back-to-back appearances.)
Notre Dame was a late wild card.
by srr50 on Jul 13, 2025 11:10 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Two points
No one can handle being worshipped whether you are a politician, a rock star, or a football coach. Paterno and Sandusky to a lesser degree were worshipped and thought they were God and that they could do what they wanted. That made everyone else around them less important than the “gods” and so justified the abuse and the cover-up.
If the administration of PSU is wise they will quickly cancel the football season in mourning and encourage all their athletes to transfer wherever they want. Can you imagine how ugly this will continue every Saturday of the fall, every time that PSU plays?
by LonghornsWin on Jul 13, 2025 9:06 AM CDT reply actions
I seriously doubt they will cancel football.
Although the new head of the Board of Trustees seems determined not to duck the institution’s responsibility in what happened, they also have to move forward and rebuild trust and reputation. From the outside, a complete break with the past may appear desirable, but from the inside things likely appear differently. If such a thing had occurred at Texas, would you seriously want to see football dropped for a year? The players are not at fault and they have a stake in this. A complete break with regard to the coaching staff, etc, etc might be needed, but many of them almost certainly were unaware of any problems—at least those who hadn’t been around a long time. I don’t envy Karen Peetz. She has a nightmare to deal with. But Penn State is much more than football, and now she has the opportunity to build on that without interference. Football can go on, but now it will be in its proper place. It’s a cautionary tale for all institutions of higher learning.
by lurkerinthedark on Jul 13, 2025 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions
I would want the season to be cancelled
I think that things will go much easier for Penn State if they did cancel the season. It will say in no uncertain terms that “we get it,” that football has become more important than the University and this is a clear, unmitigated manner to state that. I also think it is the only way to really have this behind you for the future in as quick a manner as possible.
As others have said, this has been a cover-up that has been ongoing for at least 15 years. I personally would want UT to drop football for at least two years and then start anew if this happened in Austin.
by LonghornsWin on Jul 13, 2025 9:41 AM CDT reply actions
A plea for sanity...
There’s going to be a lot of pressure on the NCAA or PSU or both to do something drastic like impose the death penalty, cancel the season, etc. I don’t think either of those are appropriate, and I’ll state my reasons:
1. The acts we’ve seen committed both in and of themselves (Sanduskey) and the coverup, are seriously heinous and deserve divine retribution. I have nothing to argue with in that statement. But let’s remember who committed them, and who didn’t, and choose who we punish appropriately. “Penn State” as an entity, hasn’t done anything to anyone (for purposes of this argument about NCAA enforcement, I’m ignoring civil liability). PEOPLE have acted here, and it’s PEOPLE that should be punished. I see 5 people as primarily responsible: Sanduskey, Paterno, Spanier, Curley, and Schultz. One is already dead, and thus we’ll have to let God sort that one out. One is already in prison, and good riddance. The other 3 are staring hard at prison time for perjury and other stuff, and that’s as it should be.
2. Who is being punished if the NCAA levies the death penalty on the football program? In my opinion, that isn’t going to matter much to any of the 5 people we know are responsible. Especially the dead guy. To my mind, you’re punishing student athletes, the student body, and fans, all of which had NOTHING to do with the scandal.
3. Penn State isn’t a person. It has no conscience, no remorse, no feeilngs. As justifiably horrified and pissed off as you might be about this, you have to acknowledge that you have no ability to make Penn State feel bad about what’s been done.
It sounds a bit silly to say that this scandal had nothing to do with football, but in a sense, it’s true. This could have happened in any sport. It’s about POWER. And the individuals who had power are gone, and either being punished or punishment is pending. Even if you accept that the NCAA has jurisdiction on something like this (which is probably worthy of its own thread), what are you accomplishing by cancelling the season or imposing the death penalty?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 11:14 AM CDT reply actions
1. Uh, its always people. USC didn’t get a house, Reggie Bush did. tOSU didn’t trade swag for tats, etc. SMU didn’t pay for play, the coaches/boosters did. Its the same hollow tone where people cry about not punishing the fans. All of a sudden the fans matter? SMU didn’t have fans?
2. See #1. USC is still being punished even though Pete Carroll and Reggie Bush are in the NFL. tOSU fired Tressell and Pryor is in the NFL. tOSU has plenty of students, athletes, and fans that had nothing to do with scandal. So did SMU. No one cried for them.
3. I disagree. Penn State was as major a player as any of the admin. It was the power, the prestige, the aura of Penn State in that small town that empowered not only Paterno but Sandusky. It was the culture of Penn State that enable Paterno et al to allow Sandusky to act with impunity. Punishing the culture to me is as important to me as punishing the admin guys, because in the same culture, different admin might behave the same way, but if you truly change the culture, then you’ve made real progress.
Maybe before Penn State can truly change its culture it needs to hit rock bottom. Lots of WE ARE tweets yesterday that didn’t end in “ashamed,” “embarrassed,” “to blame.” The prevailing notion among PSU fans seems to be to point the fingers at Sandusky, the admin, the BoT, and now finally at Paterno and say “It was them not us, WE still ARE.” There is very little out there in terms of taking personal responsibility for feeding the beast.
Whether or not the NCAA has the authority or grounds to weild any punishment is one thing. Whether or not its should is, to me atleast, quite clear. The law can’t punish the culture, only the NCAA can do that.
by CMDR on Jul 13, 2025 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm confused...
“There is very little out there in terms of taking personal responsibility for feeding the beast.”
As a UT fan, am I supposed to be personally ashamed that Cleve Bryant was doing what he was doing? I feed the beast, so if the beast does something bad, I’m responsible? Sorry, but I don’t need the whole PSU fanbase to prostrate themselves and run gravel through their hair to show personal responsibility. College football is SUPPOSED to be a beast that gets fed, and that doesn’t have a damn thing to do with experienced adults committing acts or omissions when they CLEARLY should have known better. The football, the culture, these things are incidental. It wasn’t the culture that failed, it was individuals who AGAIN, should have known better. Is UT’s culture of football so different from Penn State’s? I doubt it. And yet I have no doubt that Mack Brown, Bill Powers, etc., would have acted MUCH more aggressively if confronted with similar circumstances. Hell, I’d even trust Nick Saban to do better than Paterno did. So is it not sufficient for you to punish the people that actually did wrong, and you feel like you have to punish an amorphous “culture”?
Your points about USC and SMU would be more convincing if there was even a slight parallel. PLAYERS benefitted from those schemes, enriched themselves, and it impacted competitive balance. And while it sucked that Bush and Carroll where gone when the punishment went down, many others in the administration where still there. Who’s still there at Penn State that’s even peripherally involved with any of this? If there’s anybody on the coaching staff left or administration, get rid of them, I’m fine with that. But there is ZERO player involvement here.
Who’s left to punish?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions
This coverup allowed JoePa to keep his job longer. Keeping your head coach gives you no competitive advantage? Avoiding bad press which allows you to keep getting blue-chip recruits has no effect on competitive balance? WOW!
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
How?
How did the coverup allow him to keep his job longer? If he’d thrown Sanduskey to the wolves in 1998 (like he SHOULD have) why would he have lost his job sooner? There wouldn’t have been a reason to fire him.
You’re closer to making a good point with the blue-chip recruiting point, but my guess is a guy with Paterno’s PREVIOUSLY sterling reputation would have been able to overcome that, IF he’d done the right thing in the first place. So I think you’re wrong about that.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks for engaging.
Look it up. Paterno was on the brink of being let go in 2004.
You don’t think that would’ve happened then or even earlier if they had 6 years of negative publicity of JoePa’s successor (Sandusky)being given hush money in 99 to retire?
He did NOT do the right thing in the first place. THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT. If he did the right thing, then no penalty would be needed. See Cleve. Since it WAS hidden. That’s why it was an advantage.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Still missing something...
I’m not trying to be obtuse here, I’m just not seeing the dots you’re connecting. If they DO the right thing, and cast him off in 1998/99, why would they have all the bad publicity? They would have been rightly applauded for doing the right thing. In other words, I don’t think the bad publicity ATTACHES to PSU in the same way that it does now, when they DIDN’T do the right thing. And I certainly don’t think the publicity would have lasted 6 years. Sorry, but this country has the attention span of a colicky two year old.
So fastforward to 2004. Joe Paterno would still BE Penn State. He’d have the same power he had then. Maybe the arguments change, but the dynamics in play simply weren’t there. The administration was too cowed by his popularity to let him go, and risk the backlash. I just don’t see what additional power the administration would have in this scenario. My guess is he’d have died as coach.
Ergo, no competitive advantage.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
If there had been no cover up. Paterno would have been out in 2004 or sooner, imho..
Let me try to connect the dots.
In 1999 they let Sandusky go. Assuming no cover up. 1999 they STILL let him go but now many other boys come forward THEN instead of now. ITs disgusting. Its sordid. Its not on the level as now is. But its bad pub. They still find out that it was with Joe Pa’s blessings that the Second Mile was allowed to flourish, etc.
Follow up 1999 with a 5-7 season in 2000. Then a 5-6 season in 2001. It certainly LOOKS like at this point that it was your disgraced D coach that had more reason to do with your success than YOU.
2002 was a good year at 9-4. But 2003 you go 3-9 and 2004 4-7.
In 2004 4 admins went to joePed’s house and asked him to resign. Word is that they ALMOST had the clout to fire him. You don’t think a scandal of abused boys and a charity that’s been around since 1978 with blatant ties to PATERNO and Penn State would have tipped the scale?
I think he would’ve been let go after 2000 had the scandal broke out in 1999. But AT LEAST by 2004. Who’s to say how much of an advantage it was for PSU ot have so much positive press after every JoePa victory as he inched towards the all time winningest coach. Every win was a big deal. You don’t get ANY of that positive pub if he’s not the coach.
If you’re point is simply that it would’nt have the DEGREE of severity then as now. I agree. But don’t go so far to say that it wouldn’t still be SEVERE. This is unprecedented stuff. Estimates are that Sandusky was abusing folks well before 1977 when he ran an ice-cream truck.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Ok, I understand what you're saying.
I just disagree. I think Paterno picks up POSITIVE steam in this scenario. He’s lauded for putting the safety of children AHEAD of the football program’s welfare.
See, I don’t understand why you think anybody would say “it was with Joe Pa’s blessings that the Second Mile was allowed to flourish” and view that as a bad thing when NOBODY at Penn State KNEW anything prior to 98/99. So in our scenario, for what reason would Paterno NOT give his blessings prior to finding out in 98/99?
See, for your point to be true, you’ve got to show some evidence that Paterno knew something PRIOR to 99, and therefore that Sanduskey should have been let go at some earlier point. Otherwise, I think Paterno AND Penn State come out of this scenario smelling like the proverbial rose.
2004 and the Administration’s decision not to force Paterno out was a failure of WILL, not power. There’s no question they had the ABILITY to get rid of him. When he indicated he didn’t want to go, they had a choice to make. Can him and deal with the negative fallout (pissed off fans, donors, boosters, etc), or let him stay. I don’t see how him doing the right thing in our scenario changes that equation, because I’m not seeing what blame attaches to him if he had thrown Sanduskey to the wolves.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Fair response
I just think that the layers of this onion would have been discovered earlier than 1998. There are janitors and associates of the program that are dead now that wouldn’t have been 14 years ago. There are grown men that 42 now and won’t come forward about abuse they suffered. But in 98 they were 28 and may have come forward. I know its an argument from silence. But its more than just an educated guess. He’s been abusing 2 kids a year since 1998. Are we to assume that it STARTED in 1998? When most psycholigists say this behavior likely started when Sandusky was in his late teens?
Forgive me, but I’m just not that naive.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Agree completely
I agree completely with everything you just said there, I just don’t see what it has to do with punishment for a football program. I’m not GENERALLY comfortable punishing people for NOT possessing information unless I can show definitively why they SHOULD have known. I just don’t have evidence for that here.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions
OH....
If JoePa and company come forward with this in 98-99. No punishment would be necessary, imho. (or very minor) IF that indeed was the first time anything like this was discovered
Its the coverup and the allowance of more kids to be raped over the next 14 years that makes this worthy of being a death penalty type case.
Its the fact that Paterno was more concerned with people’s ‘weekend’ than notifying authorities to find victim #2.
Its the fact we KNOW that in 99 when they granted Sandusky access to the faciilities, Paterno noted that NO SECOND MILE kids should be with him because of potential liabilities.
Its the emails, etc That put football ahead of common decency.
Who knows how much deeper this could still go. The prosecutor from the 98 incident has been missing since 05! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Gricar
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Ok, we're still in agreement.
But again, what does any of that have to do with the players, current coaches, fans, students, etc. who would be effected by the imposition of the death penalty?
If the death penalty somehow effected Paterno, Sanduskey, or any of the others actually involved, I’d be all for it. But it just doesn’t. Vacate the wins, tear down the statue, take his name off the library, whatever. Don’t hurt the people that had nothing to do with it.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Wait, let me back up...
You’re saying they still try to cover up, but it’s uncovered at some earlier point? In that scenario, yeah, he’d have been forced out earlier I suppose. But again, why punish people that had nothing to do with the coverup?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm still deciding
I’m not sure if it is best to cancel the season or something, but I do think that Penn State, as a whole, takes a bit of responsibility for encouraging such a culture in the first place. When all that Cleve Bryant stuff went down, DeLoss didn’t mess around; he investigated what happened and then booted the guy. That’s the culture an athletics department should have. What happened at Penn State was inexcusable. Schools around the country need to know that it is not okay to empower a coach to be nearly untouchable and then try to run from the consequences when he misuses his power (cough, Ohio State).
On a side note, as slightly insensitive as this may sound, I think some criticism towards the janitors is warranted, and I’ve barely heard any. Believe me, I’m sympathetic to the fact that they are not powerful people and that they were afraid they’d lose their jobs, but just as we criticize Paterno and others for defending their public image more than kids, these janitors should have known that the kids are more important than their jobs.
by TheElusiveShadow on Jul 13, 2025 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
DISLIKE
This is quite possibly the most insane argument i’ve read. Even further out there than some stuff on the PSU boards.
You make it sound like the collegiate DEATH PENALTY is the actual ending of a human life. The Death Penalty as given to SMU shut down the program for 2 years…. with 2 more years of probation and limitations.
Because of the nature of crime IN GENERAL. You can never punish people for what happened in the past by going to the past. Sandusky can NEVER be retro-actively tortured for his behavior from (at least) 98-2012. He can only be punished from this point on. THAT’S HOW ALL PUNISHMENT WORKS.
By your rationale, we should never punish ANY country, ANY sport, ANY team because the players will be different than the ones who committed the grievances. Football is the reason these things were covered up. Football should be what’s punished. If it isn’t punished, we can expect this kind of buffoonery to continue. If I’m a booster, why not Risk it all for the 2013 football season if the only repercussions would have zero effect on my beloved football team.?
Further, the reason why we can’t punish those involved is because of the very obfuscation they perpetrated.
This WAS about Football. Make no mistake about it. If Sandusky was a Chemistry or History professor, this would’ve been properly dealt with 14 years ago or more.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions
This was in response to TexanNick.
nm
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Orangechipper
OC, I’m not gonna sit here and say your argument is invalid. It IS a valid viewpoint. I just disagree with it, for the reasons I stated. Again, I think there are reasons this is distiguishable from situations (SMU, USC, etc) where actual football playing was a little bit more central to the situation. That’s just not the case here. Yes, it’s about the power of football, but a program like UT shows that football can BE that powerful, and still act correctly when this kind of situation arises. In other words, i don’t think it’s just because of football that this was allowed to happen. And it certainly didn’t have anything to do with any players or even the majority of the football staff that’s currently there. For that reason I think an SMU-like death penalty would be in appropriate. But I certainly respect your right to disagree.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions
“i don’t think it’s just because of football "
So?? You still punish folks where it hurts the most. It was still MAINLY because of football. Football is what put PSU on the map. Not their academic credentials for sure.
Let’s pretend i own a restaurant. I build a culture that won’t let any bad publicity be said about my restaurant. I had ONE bad employee piss in a vat of Queso 15 years ago. I covered it up along with my managers. As a result of me covering it up. 4 people later developed incurable diseases.
Is the right punishment pissing in my wheaties or shutting down my restaurant or a fine?? I have all new managers now. The employee was let go with severance.
You shut that thing down! At least for awhile. Who cares that its all different employees now. I know its just an opinion. But i just can’t see it through your narrow lenses at all.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Disconnect
“You still punish folks where it hurts the most.”
This is where we have a disconnect, because I’m trying to understand WHY you feel there’s anybody left AT Penn State that did anything wrong, requiring punishment. Who is it, OC? Who did wrong, and how does shutting down the football program punish them?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions
The only reason there is no one left to punish is because those in charge were so successful at covering it up for so long.
So then the message is… If you’re gonna screw up. Cover it up for so long that then we’ll have no choice but to not punish you. WTF??
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions
No no no...
The people responsible HAVE been punished. We can argue whether it was enough, but that’s a separate issue. Joe Pa fired and dead, Sanduskey behind bars, and Curley, Shultz, and Spanier have all lost their jobs and will most likely face some jail time too.
My question is, who ELSE needs to be punished? Identify specific people, and then tell me why imposing the death penalty is the most effective way to accomplish that punishment. Or just tell me how imposing the death penalty somehow increases the punishment on the 5 people who we all agree were responsible.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions
But your alternative is useless.
These people were motivated by saving and propping up FOOTBALL. If you don’t punish football, then there is no motivation to stop this from happening in the future. Look at Joepa. He’s dead now. He never had to live with hardly any consequences.
Lets all get together and coverup CLEVE or any other UT scandal and just pay off players like a mofo. Why not? Texas willl win 10 straight championships before anyone catches on. And then when i’m 90 and they catch us. WHO CARES. they won’t touch our beloved football program anyway. Just me and my friends.
How can you not see it?
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Really?
Prison is useless? Gang rape in the shower (oddly appropriate for Sanduskey) is useless?
I have no problem with you being upset that Paterno died before really having to face the fire. I get that. But that doesn’t explain the comfort level you apparently have with punishing OTHERS who had NOTHING to do with it.
The man is dead. He’s in no position to care what happens to the football program. So I have to ask again… Who ELSE are we looking to punish here?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Look.
LETS PRETEND for a moment that in 2006 4th and 5 STILL happened. But then later Reggie Bush runs in for a winning TD with 0 seconds left to go.
We all know about Bush taking money from agents and USC assistants knowing about it and turning a blind eye. (which are no longer there)
What is supposed to happen? NCAA says, “All we can do is fine Bush and Carroll”
They cheated and it cost Texas a National Title.
And all you want to do is hurt THAT coach and THAT player?
The next year we lose some key recruits like Fozzy Whitaker and Colt Mccoy to other schools because we can’t ‘win the big one’ USC brags about its 3peat and vaults that into winning 3 more titles until this Bush thing is found out about.
According to you, NOTHING should happen to the teams from 2006 and forward because Bush is no longer on them…. And so they are ‘rewarded’ from the positive press the Heisman etc gave them.
Your logic just doesn’t follow.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Look at the larger point.
No, in that scenario, the NCAA would do something to USC, including vacating wins and titles (as they DID), because Bush shouldn’t have been on the field. And USC was responsible for putting him on the field.
And while it sucked that 2010-2012 USC players had to pay the price (since for some inexplicable reason it took the NCAA 5 frigging years to determine what everybody knew as early as February 2006 when Yahoo Sports broke the story) for something that had nothing to do with them, they at least knew it could be coming, again, because the story was 5 years old.
And USC was punished for stuff that happened ON THE FIELD, a key distinction here. Players have the ability to impact stuff that happens on the field. (One of Bush’s teammates could have come forward and blown the whistle).
What part of the Penn State scandal did the players have any power to prevent?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions
And you're still ignoring the question...
It seems we agree that the death penalty is punishment. Ok. And you say it needs to be imposed on Penn State. Fine. WHO are you punishing?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions
WE ARE PENN STATE. This is said whenever Penn State goes through tragedy or triumph.
But when it involves a scandal. we are NOT Penn State.
Can’t have it both ways.
I like how a news reporter put it. Drew shirley, “For years, Penn State University sacrificed young boys to save Penn State Football. Now, it is time to sacrifice Penn State to save Football’s soul.”
Now i don’t go as far as some are going. That they need to disband the program forever or for 10 years.
But a 2 year ban to assess things seems right.
Again, this happens ALL THE TIME. Two Pesos the restaurant was found guilty of copying Taco Cabana. I did nothing wrong, but now I can’t enjoy those fajitas anymore.
Bud adams sent my Oilers packing. I did nothing wrong, but yes i suffer the consequences.
The University of Penn State and the people they elected in charge… DID THIS. Thus the university HAS to be held responsible.
Howard Byant also says it well, “Most of all, allowing Penn State football to survive and profit — as if this were only about a couple of kids who cheated on an entrance exam — says that all of the rhetoric about accountability and protecting children was just exhaust, that compared to the importance of football, the university didn’t care then and doesn’t care now about children being raped on its premises. It is to retain the culture of intimidation and invincibility that has brought Penn State to this place. If a massive institutional failure that allowed young boys to be sexually molested on campus does not constitute reasonable cause to terminate the program and force true reflection, true change and true reform, nothing can legitimately deserve that penalty. The fear of Janitor B to come forward as a whistleblower in the face of power would be justified. Penn State football would indeed be invincible.”
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions
It's not that I don't understand the sentiment.
I do. I just disagree with it. Take this line, for example. “For years, Penn State sacrificed young boys to save Penn State Football.”
1). We’ve identified FIVE people who are responsible for this, one of them the rapist himself. Are you really comfortable saying PENN STATE did this when in actuality it boils down to the decision making of 5 people? This ISN’T a Nazi only following orders type argument. Other than those 5, WHO KNEW?!?
2) Those five HAVE BEEN punished by, AT MINIMUM, losing their jobs, and that’s only the beginning. Other than Paterno, all will most likely end up doing at least some jail time.
3) So are you telling me that football at Penn State must shut down because students are still yelling “We are Penn State”? IT’S THEIR FRIGGIN’ CHEER!!! You don’t think if this had happened at Texas there’d be a few people tweeting “Hook ’Em”?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions
What you are missing.
Those 5 are just representative of the bigger issue.
Those 5 got their jobs and were lifted up through the ranks BECAUSE of their blind devotion to Penn State. You do things in leadership because that’s what the BOT and the others that hired you and provide your salary WANT you to do.
THis is systemic. To argue that its just 5 people is tantamount to all of our problems as a nation are only because of who’s the current President of the USA. That’s ridiculous. This was an issue at EVERY area of hierarchy. This was systemic.
Therefore the Football team, which they were protecting should suffer. I’m not saying shut down the entire university. Just the football period for SOME amount of time.
by Orangechipper on Jul 14, 2025 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions
Why was it systemic?
To me, that’s a throwaway line, because it requires no follow up. You mentioned them doing what the Board of Trustees WANT them to do. And yet we have no evidence the Board of Trustees where involved in the coverup at all.
So why is it systemic? Because you need it to be for your argument, or because it actually was?
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions
How do you define it?
When at EVERY LEVEL. There are no checks and balances…
From the coach to the assistants (remember Mcqueary called his DAD! before joepa)
To the VP to the AD to the President.
EVERY LEVEL. That’s a SYSTEM.
by Orangechipper on Jul 14, 2025 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions
We're just not going to agree, and it's ok.
All of those people are GONE. I just want you to identify SOMEONE still at Penn State who you think still deserves punishment such to justify the death penalty. That’s all.
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions
Well i guess by your logic.. Enron should still be running. No one who did that is still there.
NOT LOGICAL
by Orangechipper on Jul 14, 2025 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions
If there was enough money left...
why not? Am I less of an American because I don’t HATE Enron the company, but instead reserve my hatred for the people that screwed it up? PEOPLE do things to you… so save your ire for them.
What exactly are you getting out of hating THINGS?
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
Did we just have a Stu Scott, "Hate the playa, not the game" moment?

Which eye do I look at?
Did you read my comment, or did you merely see that it disagreed and begin composing your response immediately? by BrooklynHorn
by run Bevo run on Jul 14, 2025 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
And you STILL can't identify someone left at Penn State to punish, can you?
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions
There is a solution - however harsh
It doesn’t make sense to administer the SMU death penalty - this affects WAY too many innocents.
But, because of the depth of the coverup and length of time involved, a purging must occur at Penn State.
From the lowest janitor to the top of the management chain - all must go! Including the Board members.
Anyone associated with the Paterno regime, and it WAS a regime, must vacate the premises.
A catharsis must occur for trust to be re-established with PSU.
So purge they must - even if it means throwing the baby out with the bath water.
This went on so long and so deeply, no one knows whom to trust in that institution anymore.
JoPa not only covered up the horror of pedifilia, he betrayed the trust and faith that every player, fan, friend and family that knew him. He betrayed Penn State.
He betrayed the community and he betrayed college football.
The ONLY way for Penn State to begin the process of trying recover it’s honor is a total, complete purging of any in JoPa’s regime - top to bottom!
"All the white meat is gone. There's nothin' but necks on the platter."
Darrell Royal
by Snide Aside on Jul 14, 2025 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
A football death penalty
I’m torn.
In a way doesn’t it almost cheapen the real offense? We’re so distraught over the child abuse we covered up for decades that…we’re canceling bread n’ circus? You can’t play games. That’s the message? I understand the desire to punish, to burn it to the ground, but I don’t see what it really accomplishes. But i also understand that when you ride with outlaws, you hang with outlaws.
by Scipio Tex on Jul 13, 2025 1:02 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
You have to do something, right?
If they do NOTHING: It makes the NCAA appear impotent. They can’t do what they did to USC for example, because then it sends the message that the NCAA thinks THIS case was on par with Reggie Bush’s taking of money.
So they have to do something HUGE or nothing at all.
Since i don’t believe ‘nothing’ is a valid option.
Its gonna be real bad.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions
The NCAA IS impotent...
but that’s not really the point. The point is, what does this scandal have to do with the types of violations that the NCAA is designed to deal with? Is there something wrong with the NCAA saying “this just isn’t what we’re designed to deal with”?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Lack of Institutional Control
If Paterno was willing to hide a pedophile because of bad publicity, what makes you think the culture didn’t spread into academic and legal problems with players.
As a matter of fact the Freeh report delves into Paterno’s refusal to let the University discipline his players. He bullied theVP of Student Affairs to the point that she quit.
As more investigations wrap up I would be surprised if their weren’t examples of pressure being put on professors as well. The protection of a pedophile is the worst example of the football program running the University but it is hardly the only one, and that is a classic example of “Lack of Institutional Control” that benefited the football program.
by srr50 on Jul 13, 2025 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Agree
So do you think the death penalty is the best way to combat this?
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't think it should be off the table.
Let the investigations run their course.
by srr50 on Jul 13, 2025 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm ok with that.
I understand the need and desire to punish. I just think it should be done for reasons that aren’t grounded in emotion. And given what we know about what happened, that’s what future punishment of the people at Penn State NOW looks like to me. I could be wrong, though.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Death penalty to me....
Is two years of no football. 4 years of no bowls/postseason.
That seems to fit for me.
It gives them time to eventually recover. But won’t completely kill the program. Anything less and time just marches on. Ho hum, Ho hum.
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Clarifying what I said
I was a bit unclear when I talked about canceling the season. I think this should come from Penn State, not from the NCAA. And it should come quickly FOR THE GOOD OF THE PSU FOOTBALL PROGRAM.
As people have said, anything short of canceling the season is going to be perceived (rightly or wrongly) as somehow condoning to a limited degree what happened. We have already seen the JoePa apologists from PSU come out and say he wasn’t tainted.
PSU has to have a reset button and that is the only way I can see of realistically doing it.
by LonghornsWin on Jul 13, 2025 1:44 PM CDT reply actions
I hear ya
And if Penn State decides that’s what they want to do, I have no problem with it.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
To introduce something rarely seen on BC,
I keep on thinking Matthew 10:39: “He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it.” The supreme, bitter irony of this is that more than anything else, Paterno loved his reputation, but his evil ended up costing him the very thing that he loved most. Karma might not be instant, but it’s generally going to get you sooner or later.
by Tigermad on Jul 13, 2025 2:43 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Death Penalty?
First let me establish my Bona Fides.
I was born in Pennsylvania and was inducted into the Paterno/PSU cult at an early age by an alumnus brother. The high school I graduated from populated the University with a large segment of its top 10 %. I was accepted to PSU - Main Campus, although I wisely chose to attend a far more beloved institution, originally situated on 40 acres and intended to educate the best and brightest of an exotic land to the south. I also grew up watching PS play cupcakes week in and week out throughout the 70’s and was the primary apologist for them up till the year I began attending college.
As for my Longhorn credentials, I attended and graduated the University a long time ago and have bled burnt orange since setting foot on the campus. I refer to UT as ’the mother of us all" since I feel it is the parent that educated, nutured and made we the alumni base the men and women that we are. Penn State may have “We are…” but we all feel the Eyes of Texas on us once we graduate.
We are the University and the University is us. Our respective actions reflect positively or negatively upon each other. A disreputable MBA grad from UT says something about the values instilled by his/her educator. An engineer who cuts corners and gets people hurt, speaks volumes about the ethics of his professors. Penn State and Paterno are no different. Their sins speak to the essence of what Penn State has become. As such, the whole institution is suspect and not mitigated by a few football players who graduated. In point of fact, the horrid antics of the student body and the continuing excuse making of the Penn State faithful, reaffirms the point that the institution is corrupt and has warped and compromised values.
As such, I believe the proposal that Penn State be given the Death Penalty is off the mark. While it is true that such an action would punish PSU and knock it off the track as far as football success, it would only foster even more fierce, fuhrer-like devotion to the notion of big time football at PSU. And engender a feeling of martyrdom. Better that they be booted out of the Big Ten and discontinue big time football entirely, a la University of Chicago. Let them devote themselves to academics.
And the Paterno statue should be consigned to the scrap heap of history along with the Sadam statue and Stalin’s.
by HornedGator on Jul 13, 2025 4:04 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks
And I have enjoyed your many columns on all things Texas. You are one of the most intelligent and insightful contributors anywhere on the ’Net. Keep em coming.
by HornedGator on Jul 13, 2025 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Interesting.
So no ‘death penalty’ as defined as a temporary 2 to 4 year ban.
But a TRUER meaning of death penalty as a complete giving up of the program??
by Orangechipper on Jul 13, 2025 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes
Because the crimes committed at Happy Valley dwarf the mundane transgressions of a Miami or Oklahoma. That is my point. A DP would be (under these circumstances) the equivalent of having to stand in corner of Mrs Kleppinger’s Kindergarten class. A punishment of two years and then it is business as usual, rejoin the recess. Help yourself to a kickball.
This is a transcendent act of cowardice and cravenness. Burn it down. Disperse the ashes.
Spread salt on the site.
by HornedGator on Jul 13, 2025 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions
why punish the statue?
The statue did nothing wrong. What are the facts that the statue knew anything? What else could the statue have done? Let the process run it’s course! The process is what’s important people!!
TexanNick - At least you had the courage to come back to the scene of the crime. You disgusted us when you defended Joe Pa last fall, and it appears you haven’t changed much.
by Lester Burnham on Jul 13, 2025 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
The statue ain't talking
I heard it refused to cooperate with Louie Freeh, has since lawyered up and isn’t gonna do nothin to incriminate itself.
Remember what Edmund Burke said:
All that is necessary for evil to prosper is for good statues to do nothing.
or something like that…
by HornedGator on Jul 13, 2025 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions
See above, Lester... WAY above.
I credited Scip for being right in the conclusions he drew at the time. I wasn’t defending Paterno per se, but rather defending against what I saw as a rush to judgment without facts. We HAVE facts now, and they bear out what Scip thought then. I have zero issues acknowledging that.
My point today is different. I’m trying to understand the point of an SMU like death penalty for Penn State in the context of what we know following the Freeh report. There are apparently plenty of people that favor it, but when I ask WHO is being punished by the death penalty, they go back to pointing out how heinous the acts and omissions were.
Which is nice and all, but it doesn’t answer the question. So I’ll ask you: Assuming you favor the death penalty in this instance, can you explain to me:
1) Who you’re intending to punish with it
2) Why you feel that the punishment is necessary
3) Why you think only the death penalty will do.
Thanks in advance. Your ignorance kinda disgusts me too.
by TexanNick on Jul 13, 2025 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions
See below for my actual death penalty thoughts
But I’ll take a shot at this anyway, since, as you say, nobody else seems to be:
1. The institution that is The Pennsylvania State University
2. At worst, for putting the strength and reputation of their football program above the welfare and safety of children. At best, for fostering an environment utterly devoid of any checks and balances, such that their head football coach was allowed with impunity to put the strength and reputation of their football program above the welfare and safety of children.
3. Because it removes the revenue associated with the entity that, by all indication, the institution considered to be more important than stopping a monster.
In short, PSU appears to have made a choice of putting football brand above child safety. The death penalty is a way of (temporarily) removing the financial benefit of that brand.
by tx2step on Jul 13, 2025 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well put
I couldn’t explain it any better or more succinctly than that. I agree wholeheartedly.
by HornedGator on Jul 14, 2025 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions
VERY well put
I think you’re falling into the same trap as some others though. You say you want to punish the institution… why? The institution didn’t make any decisions, PEOPLE did. And those people are or will be facing punishment.
On your point 3, the revenue, don’t you think some of that revenue might be needed to pay back the victims?
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Agents
Don’t agents of an organization or institution share legal liability with their organization or institution? By your reasoning, corporations should never be punished as entities so long as they fire agents (executives who make decisions or workers who execute them) responsible for damaging people.
The highest executives at PSU made decisions and acted in ways that caused great harm. They did so for the benefit of PSU. PSU shares the blame and liability.
I’m not sure what the NCAA should do, but in the grander scheme of things, PSU has responsibilities to answer for to someone.
by RomaVicta on Jul 14, 2025 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Good point, Roma
I said in an earlier post that I was ignoring civil liability in my argument about whether the death penalty was appropriate.
I’m not talking about letting companies avoid criminal or civil penalties, I’m talking about a unique type of penalty, the NCAA death penalty, and it’s appropriateness to THIS situation.
Tell you what, to those who favor the death penalty in this case, find me ONE prior example of NCAA sanction that had ZERO player/fan/booster involvement, and I’ll shut up.
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions
It's not a trap at all
But a pretty well accepted and wide-ranging set of precedents that look to hold the institutions themselves accountable for negligent and/or malicious decisions made by individuals within them. See BP, Sygenta and JP Morgan for only a few recent examples. You can argue that set of precedents is generally wrong-headed if you want to, but if it’s applicable anywhere it seems applicable here.
The Freeh report detailed not only decisions by 3 people, but also a pretty shocking lack of compliance oversight that, at a minimum, enabled the enablers. Even if you take the most narrow read possible of the Freeh report to be some really bad decisions made in a leadership/oversight vacuum, it was the institution itself that created and persisted said vacuum over two fucking decades.
From the irony department, btw, here is a lecture from a Penn State professor on institutional corruption. I’ve no interest in either defending or refuting the political undertones of his presentation which (of course) is about Congress, but some of his early points on what constitutes corruption of an institution seem salient.
by tx2step on Jul 14, 2025 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't disagree with your overall point
I’m not sure how the death penalty is supposed to fix it. You mention “a pretty shocking lack of compliance oversight”. It’s the word “compliance” I want to focus on
What NCAA regulation did Penn State not comply with? The death penalty is an NCAA penalty, so I want to know what NCAA rule they’re accused of violating. “Lack of institutional control” sounds nice, but NONE of us really knows what it means. If we’re honest, we can all admit that Paterno, et al., did a fine job complying with NCAA rules, and a pretty crappy job complying with some legal ones like, perjury to name just one.
So if you favor using the NCAA to punish violations of CRIMINAL law, that’s fine, just say so, and be prepared to defend it in other contexts.
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions
I kind of get TexanNick's point here, but also the see the other side of it.
This type of crime and negligent act (I suppose it would be obstruction of justice. Not a lawyer or in law enforcement) is just not something the NCAA deals with, therefore they shouldn’t be expected to know how to deal with it properly and hand down the appropriate punishment.
Athletic programs have compliance offices designed to help ensure that the programs are following NCAA rules. These compliance offices could be thought of as a local extension run by the institution it functions within. The law enforcement analogy would be UTPD as the University’s extension of APD. If someone were to observe a sexual assault in the Moncrief building, would it be appropriate for the witness to go to the compliance office to report it, and then for the compliance office to report it to the NCAA? Of course not. So why is it appropriate for the NCAA to be responsible for handing down sanctions to Penn State on what was a crime.
On the other hand, I can see the argument that the coverup, not the actual crimes committed, are the result of a lack of institutional control and accountability. So, while it is not the NCAA’s place to punish the crime committed by Sandusky, it could be considered the NCAA’s place to punish the lack of institutional accountability that resulted in the cover up.
by BurntOrangeJuice on Jul 14, 2025 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions
I will say that,
if Congress, the Pennsylvania DPS, Supreme Court, or FBI declared that Penn State should undergo a court mandated dissolution of it’s entire Athletics Department, I would NOT find that to be excessive.
by BurntOrangeJuice on Jul 14, 2025 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
My heart's not really in this argument
Since, per below, I think an NCAA death penalty would essentially etch-a-sketch this whole shit stain way faster than I would otherwise prefer. And let’s (both) face it: the most (only) consistent thing about the NCAA is its feckless inconsistency. Feckless, just by the way, is a word that should be used much more often, but I digress…
I see/read the “show me the specific NCAA rule PSU broke” argument a lot. I’m not enough of an NCAA rules expert to know and (again) don’t especially care enough about defending this particular viewpoint to go research it. From a general compliance and oversight standpoint, it seems clear from the Freeh report that PSU not only violated the Clery act with respect to Sandusky’s crimes, but also had general institutional weaknesses that severely hampered their ability to comply with the Clery act. Whether the NCAA itself looks to provide additional governance with respect to NEA compliance initiatives such as Clery is an exercise I’ll happily leave to others.
Your arguments above seemed to center around the basic question of ‘why punish an institution for the acts of individuals/’ That question seems answerable to me, both from a humanity what-we-think-is-right perspective and an overall legal precedent one. Beyond that, I pretty much lose interest.
by tx2step on Jul 14, 2025 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Agree with both BOJ and tx2step
There are absolutely 2 sides to this argument. And there probably IS some NCAA rule that’s been violated. I just wanna know what it is, and why the death penalty is supposed to be the best fix.
by TexanNick on Jul 14, 2025 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions
It does seem rather trivial
to punish the football team for such heinous acts. While the acts center around the football team and particularly the coaching staff, it’s clear the PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY was involved in the coverup.
Its also pretty clear that everyone has a duty if not a legal obligation to report child abuse when it is suspected, this is particularly true of educators.
You can’t just punish the football team and make amends for these crimes.
If the school doesn’t act in a significant manner, not just to punish the guilty but to insure that these types of crimes never occur again, I would suggest that Congress seriously look at removing all federal funding from the university. Is there a more egregious example of a school failing in it’s basic mission?
Scipio, while I think your writing on this subject has been excellent and extremely thoughtful— perhaps the best writing I’ve seen on the subject,— your last line I think is wrong. Those kids would have been better off had Joe Paterno done NOTHING. I think the report makes pretty clear that he actively tried to deflect the initial investigations into Sandusky’s crimes to protect his reputation. He didn’t just look away, he tried to keep everyone else from looking too.
by texitect on Jul 13, 2025 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions
This is sort of where I am..
It is folly, of course, to think that there is any path ahead that does not hurt people who essentially had nothing to do with the decisions of the institution. The alumni are hurt now, as are the current students, as are football fans, as are the football players. Those wheels were set in motion long ago, and there’s not really a way around them. What likely punishes at least the athletes the least is the currently-envisioned death penalty, allowing the athletes to transfer without loss of eligibility, etc.
Perhaps once my nausea subsides and my fists unclench that will seem fair, but right now it frankly strikes me as too easy. PSU should not get to wipe the slate so clean so fast, becoming the feel-good story of (say) 2015 after sitting out 2, then managing to compete enough in a weakened conference to appear in some mid-level bowl game. They should not get redemption that fast.
Where I differ from HornedGator is I say, at least for 2012, keep the library, keep the statue, keep ‘we are penn state,’ keep it all. But every game, every white-out, every chant, and every TV shot of the statue will only remind us and you (you=PSU, NOT HornedGator) of what you let yourself become.
So, by all means PSU. Play football. Every week stand on the national stage and look not only the country but more importantly two-plus decades of assault victims in the eye and own the fuck up to what you let happen.
by tx2step on Jul 13, 2025 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
I didn’t set a timetable on their stripping of the right to play football. Give em a year, do the investigation, let it play out in court (the Curley, Schultz and (potentially now) Spanier), but ultimately break it all down. Don’t let them continue to foster this climate of “football first” after all this. They have abrogated that right from the time they allowed one more boy to suffer when they were clearly aware of what was happening.
by HornedGator on Jul 14, 2025 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions
different views
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs -- ask yourself what makes you come alive, and then go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive."
-- Harold Thurman
by thanos on Jul 13, 2025 7:34 PM CDT reply actions
2nd try
http://www.johnziegler.com/editorials_details.asp?editorial=219
http://tominpaine.blogspot.com/
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs -- ask yourself what makes you come alive, and then go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive."
-- Harold Thurman
by thanos on Jul 13, 2025 7:35 PM CDT reply actions
Maybe John Ziegler should do a little investigating of his own
before writing.
The reason Louis Freeh did not interview some of the main subjects (President Graham Spanier Mike McQueary, Tim Curry) was because he was asked not to, since they are under criminal investigation by the State Attorney General and the Feds.
The fact that Freeh got so much material without subpoena power or any real threat of punishment is rather damning in and of itself.
by srr50 on Jul 13, 2025 8:52 PM CDT reply actions
I'll stop at " so much material"
He supported the popular narrative. No more no less. Don’t care why he didn’t speak to the right parties. Can’t complete the investigation without it. Not defending anyone. Just want facts.
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs -- ask yourself what makes you come alive, and then go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive."
-- Harold Thurman
by thanos on Jul 14, 2025 2:02 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Don't worry you get all the facts you need
from the criminal and civil investigations.
The Freeh report was for Penn State and paid for by Penn State.
When the criminal trials for the others begin they will turn on each other with the speed of a cheetah.
by srr50 on Jul 14, 2025 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions
agreed
That’s all I want. Freeh has a history of screw ups, the board wanted a decision that supported theirs, and I would like actual evidence and not conjecture. Now we have people on this board trying to connect dots from 1969 to speak to his character? Wow. Btw, I think we lose against that defense. Would have liked to have played then but that 69 PSU defense was one of the best
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs -- ask yourself what makes you come alive, and then go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive."
-- Harold Thurman
by thanos on Jul 15, 2025 3:04 PM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions
He also...
Had access to the grand jury testimony. So in a way. HE DID know what they said UNDER oath.
He didn’t interview them directly. But he did have their answers under oath.
by Orangechipper on Jul 14, 2025 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions
burn it down
Every time I see any PSU student, athlete or booster quoted I am shocked and horrified and want to punch them in the mouth that is spewing moral equivalence trash. I had held out hope that the school would do the right thing and voluntarilly shut the son of a bitch down, but reading articles abour normalacy of life on campus or hearing students, players, fans and alumni say you can’t ignore all joe pa’s good deeds makes me realize it won’t happen from psu’s own volition. So, the ncaa needs to nuke it from orbit.
I am as big a ut fan as ever lived. My SR year was ricky’s heisman and I drove to every game (manhattan, LA, stoolwater, lincoln etc). I wenrt to law school in st louis 12 hour drive away and still attended 9 games a year. I named my dog vincey after VY and would name my son TJ if the wife would allow it. I camped out at the football stadiun for courtside hoops tickets every sunday night for my 3 years at ut (graduating a year early I still consider my dumbest college decision). UT football of the VY era literally was the only positive thing in my life for 3 or 4 years as I was in a disaster of a marriage- it actually saved my sanity and mental health as I walked through the valley of the shadow of death. This is all to establish my bonafides when I say the following:
If this were mack I would be leading the charge, pitchfork in hand to destroy anyone associated with the cover up. I would want us to take at least a 5 year break on football, and I could be talked into every sport on campus since the AD/President were complicit. I would burn all my memorabillia and never watch another game if we did not come to grips, in a serious way, with our part in feeding the beast, that allowed this to happen.
I believe I would end friendships with people who said it was ok for mack to protect and condone child rapists b/c “you have to also remember his good deeds too.”. I literally can’t wrap my mind around being friends with someone with that warped a world view.
The average PSU stakeholders response has sickened me almost as much as anyone in the power structure. Burn that motherfucker to the ground.
by Wulaw Horn on Jul 14, 2025 9:10 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
make sure you call Pookie if you're really gonna burn this mother down
Oh, my bad.
My bad?!
Your bad don't work in my world! -Ray Lewis
by TexasGarcia37 on Jul 14, 2025 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions
Paterno is scum
Turns out he saw what was coming and quickly negotiated a lucrative exit plan for himself.
On a bigger note, our society has its priorities screwed up big time. On the heels of this story of a football- obsesed school tolerating pedophilia, this week Alabama unveiled a giant statute of Saban, one of the least likeable human beings alive.
by ransomstoddard on Jul 14, 2025 3:58 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
You had better watch what you say ransom
or Kristen Saban will punch your lights out.
by srr50 on Jul 14, 2025 4:05 PM CDT reply actions
statue to stay
Per espn sources close to the board of trustees.
I defy anyone to read that article and not be incensed. Those gutless cowards on the board of trustees have an opportunity to lead and they are circling the waggons. I no longer want to see their football program shut down I want to see their university cease to exist. Just incredible the callousness from those idiots and why- to try to whitewash the legacy of a man who is directly responsible, through his galling silence and cover up, for probably dozens of young men being raped?
I feel like OT justice should be meted out in the showers with a red hot fire poker on some of these guys. Their behavior is a slap in the face to the victims, and a denial of basic human dignity. Shocking.
by Wulaw Horn on Jul 15, 2025 12:15 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Lack of leadership
I know they would have to wear kevlar and stay indoors for a while, but if I were they I’d take the statue down at night and cancel the season.
Leadership is making the hard decisions when no one else will.
by LonghornsWin on Jul 15, 2025 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed Wulaw.
A few more brain farts like this from the new PSU administration, and I’m going to flip my position entirely.
by TexanNick on Jul 16, 2025 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by Scipio Tex on 













