Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

Texas Longhorns-New Mexico Lobos Post-Mortem: Defense/Special Teams

The Texas defense would like an opponent with more talent, but less homework. New Mexico forced some early indecision on the edge of our defense that resulted in frustrating 3rd and long conversions and endless Lobo possessions ultimately as pointless as any Dave Matthews song. Eventually, talent won out as the Longhorns acclimated to the rhythms of option football, remembered that they could set the LOS and that this isn't rugby, and Diaz's defense posted a shutout victory that left everyone wondering - is there anything to be learned from this?

Star-divide

Defense

We played the run defense equivalent of bend-but-don't-break, rarely outnumbering New Mexico at the LOS and basically disallowing them from having any long plays in the passing game or up the middle of the field.

Consequently, New Mexico offered a Flava Flav-like effort in rocking the clock. Their first three possessions of the 1st half combined for 30 plays for 112 yards and effectively prevented the Texas offense from seeing the ball. How? Well, they were 4 of 6 on 3rd down in the 1st quarter (2 of 9 the rest of the way), though they never really got anywhere. A lot of activity for little result. Then Quandre Diggs knocked out B.R. Holbrook. Embargo lifted!

DL

Jackson Jeffcoat was dominant, forcing turnovers, disrupting, delivering bit hits. 3 tackles for loss, a forced fumble, and a sack provide a nice statistical snapshot. UNM pretty much avoided him.

The Lobos didn't avoid Alex Okafor. I thought New Mexico exploited him or what we were doing with him at times. I watched a half dozen instances of Okafor settling inside with no clear assignment. I'm not sure if he had the dive, an assignment swap with a LB (scrape exchange, this seemed to be the case with Edmond a couple of times, but poorly executed) or he was supposed to confuse the QB's read by neither clearly feathering or crashing, or if it was some sort of ill-advised schematic slow play? UNM had several long QB keepers exploiting this tendency, all featuring Okafor sort of hanging out inside (you couldn't call it crashing) and Texas playing 10 on 11.

Okafor on the option from LonghornScott on Vimeo.

I'm puzzled, mostly because I respect Okafor and Diaz. Aside from the obvious long gainers around him in Q1, check out the 5:12 mark, 2nd QTR for another example (Edmond is cut, Phillips makes a great tackle coming from the backside of the play). Also, 3rd QTR, 1:58 mark. In any event, it's pretty much the recurring play that prevented us from holding UNM to 100 yards of total offense.

At DT, Desmond Jackson and Ashton Dorsey seemed to both best understand the imperative to create a new line of scrimmage (4 combined tfls) rather than to string out the option laterally. In reviewing the game tape, New Mexico would rather get a good initial push on your DL and cut your LBs and attack the edge so I'm not troubled by the paucity of overall tackles inside. Desmond Jackson was my interior DL MVP.

LB

All of them had problems taking on cut blocks. Jordan Hicks stuffed the stat sheet (12 tackles, 2 tfl) and flowed to the ball well for the most part. He's really coming on as a reliable tackler. Steve Edmond thrived in single assignment reads and though he clearly can't run to the ball laterally the way Acho or Robinson could, we haven't really had a LB that stops ball carriers cold inside as he can. I like that he allows us to play some stunting games with our DTs that we were more reluctant to attempt when our presence inside wasn't as strong. All of our guys need to practice using their hands and sprawling, but Edmond most. He plays a bit high, particularly as he tires and pursues, and it's exposing him.

Demarco Cobbs showed great closing speed in some situations, but this game really isn't his bag. Expect to see him in full effect over our next three contests.

DB

New Mexico was 6 of 16 for 35 yards and an interception and it's pretty clear that we weren't going to lose in the passing game given their personnel. Props to our corners for playing the pass honestly despite the option pressure and not getting suckered on a freebie. They also got a surprising amount of help over the top as Diaz called a very conservative game plan.

As for the run game, my first viewing of the tape made me think they had a number of slip ups, but the more I watched, the constant recurring issue was in how we played the QB keeper in option and, in fact, guys like Adrian Phillips on the backside of the play, who clearly didn't have the QB unless we're running some pretty odd assignments, were pretty heroic in making tackles that would have prevented long gains. I thought both he and Vaccaro were quite stout supporting the run. Good game overall.

Special Teams

If we get Anthony Fera healthy, this is a major team strength across the board. Unfortunately, Nick Jordan is pretty much a coin flip kicker between 35-45 yards at this stage of his development.

I raved about our kickoff coverage last week and the good news is that it's going to be duplicable all year long so long as Nick Rose keeps getting fantastic hang-time, placement, and depth. Dalton Santos, Kendall Thompson, Tevin Jackson, and Josh Turner continue to sprint down there like someone owes them money. Santos is going to kill somebody.

The punt game was also rewarding. Diggs exhibited great lower body strength and balance on his long punt return despite not a single member of the return team managing to get a block and our punt block brought back some good memories of our normal standard there. We outnumbered them 4 to 3 and an inside twist from the backside distracted their right upback enough for Mykkele Thompson to sprint right by him and get a textbook block.

Overall

Tough to complain about a goose egg along with two forced turnovers and 12 tackles for loss and dominant special teams, but this defense is still far from having played their best ball. Diaz basically made a bet that New Mexico couldn't score on us unless we busted a pass coverage or they broke a long run against a 8-9 man box. Though that may have disappointed those who wanted to man up outside and try to utterly dominate, Diaz collected at the bettor's window when it was all said and done.

Onward to Oxford...

Tweet Comment 82 comments  |  Add comment  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Barking Carnival

Texas Longhorns Defense Vs. New Mexico: Unit Breakdown

Sep 2012 by Drew Kelson - 30 comments

Big 12 Week 2 Recap: Tote Bags & Tiaras

Sep 2012 by Vasherized - 19 comments

Five Keys to Ten Wins For The Texas Longhorns

Sep 2012 by nobis60 - 19 comments

Comments

Display:

Agreed

Only minor concern going forward is tackling. There were too many missed the past few weeks, but I anticipate that we’ll see that effort improved upon as we get more snaps of live action under our belt.

by aaronlybrand on Sep 10, 2025 11:17 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I posted a little Intel report right before the season.

The only real disagreement in our staff was with respect to how much live tackling we were doing. I think we’re seeing the results of pulling back there and going so heavy on thud tempo.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

true but

Weve had two full games to work on our tackling, before it really counts and no major injuries. The jury is still out on weather we can clean that up, but its hard to be critical at this point. Its a long season and a bit less wear and tear at the beginning may help us to avoid the traditional “Sooner swoon” at the end

by texitect on Sep 11, 2025 9:31 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

what you did there

I see it.

"You’d think some of these Ohio St guys would wear long sleeves, instead of reminding us why they were in trouble last year."
-Rich Eisen, 2012 NFL Combine

by TexaStunna on Sep 11, 2025 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wonder if

the deciding factor was our overall depth. Maybe next summer they will ratchet it up a bit.

by Teamdirtyleg on Sep 11, 2025 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think this is 100% correct

You never want to hit the QB in practice.

We had major issues with RB injuries last year.

We had about 2 WR’s we had any confidence in, and one of them had injuries last year and the other just got back into football.

No depth at OT.

I can see why the coaches wouldn’t want to risk it.

by Horncasting on Sep 11, 2025 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

On a side note

I believe the kickoffs were moved back up to the 35 to create more touchbacks and help with player safety. But the way most teams are lobbing the ball down to the goal line, I’ve seen more hard hits on return men than I can remember.

by aaronlybrand on Sep 10, 2025 11:20 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Yep.

Totally agree.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Believe it's the move to the 25 yd line that hurts more

It was supposed to provide incentive for return teams to take the touchback. Instead, it gives superior teams more reason to hang the ball right at the goal-line and attempt to stuff inside the 20 instead of outright giving the offense the ball at the 25. Wonder if we see more touchbacks during conference play, when the talent and athleticism on both sides is more equitable.

by jc25 on Sep 11, 2025 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Unintended Consequences...

are a real bitch when people keep trying to fix football. This rule was probably brought to us by the same geniuses who loudly proclaimed that games were too long, interfered with ABC’s neat little 3.5 hour programming blocks, and that they were going to change the clock keeping rules to get them over more quickly. Where did I go so wrong that these idiots are in charge of changing the best part of my sporting year, and I’m left to complain about it on a message board.

by Bobby_Batronic on Sep 11, 2025 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Think it is both

Without the move up to the 35, I don’t know how many kickers could get good hangtime and have it land in such a perfect spot.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they changed the touchback back to the 20 next year.

by Horncasting on Sep 11, 2025 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting Stats

I also think it’s interesting that teams seem to have failed to account for the changed circumstances and new touchback location. Time after time after time this football season returners have caught the ball at the very front of their end zone and brought the ball out. But that’s a 10-yard different proposition than it was last year, not including the additional time KO teams have to get down the field. I wonder how long it will take for teams to realize that pretty much ANY TIME the ball makes it into the end zone, it should be downed.

by Katfid54 on Sep 11, 2025 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't fall on a blocked punt.

I have been explaining that to the crowds at Memorial Stadium since I was 7.

by JDBecker on Sep 10, 2025 11:58 PM CDT reply actions  

And don't catch an interception on 4th and long.

…or a fake punt. Unless you’re going to house that shit. Pet peeve of mine in addition to yours.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed, although

It only really matters if the ball passes the line of scrimmage. At that point you risk Leon Lett-ing the game

by DogTown on Sep 11, 2025 9:11 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Just watched alphahydro's Holiday Bowl defensive highlights and

the difference between the play calling in that game and these first two is just eye opening. Its clear that Manny is playing his cards really close to the vest. I know its a highlight reel and I’ve only seen each of the first 2 games once but I don’t recall much stunting or movement at all in these games. I think a summer in the blitz lab with all of our toys on defense is really going create quite the defensive monster and I for one have gone from being mildly concerned to voraciously curious as to what Manny is cooking up.

by superhardcore on Sep 11, 2025 12:10 AM CDT reply actions  

We did some stunting.

And when we did, the results were almost always positive. I tend to give Diaz the benefit of the doubt, but I have to confess to moments of watching our play of the option and wondering if his generation of coaches missed out on some vital instruction that many old coaches have internalized about option football.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great thing about Carl Reese

In the end, his defenses couldn’t keep up with the spread offense, but in his time here, I can’t recall one time where we didn’t totally annihilate an option offense we faced.

by aaronlybrand on Sep 11, 2025 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

I had the same thought.

There are just things you have to do to defend it well. And if you don’t see it all the time then you might not be able to pick it up.

by Monahorns on Sep 11, 2025 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

so now were wishing for carl reese?

I tend to agree that if you grew up playing the option, then coached against it every week, like so many Texas coaches in the past, then you would know the subtleties of defending the game in unpredictable fashion, rather than say assigning the safety to the QB on ever play, which is what allows air force to almost beat Michigan.

On the other hand who do you really worry about playing, the five true option teams, or the 100+ spread teams?

by texitect on Sep 11, 2025 9:48 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

No

I replied to Scipio

by Monahorns on Sep 11, 2025 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

i guess my point is

They didnt score a single point on us so whatever Diaz is missing is about as valuable as a BC tote bag

by texitect on Sep 11, 2025 9:52 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Just to add video

to Scipio’s play mentions:

by LonghornScott on Sep 11, 2025 1:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks!

1st highlight Okafor looks to have dive, but doesn’t crash hard (purposefully) but is in no man’s land – he’s not occupying a blocker or threatening an early pitch from the QB and he just gave up a short corner. And the dive is crushed by our DTs. LBs Cobbs and Edmond are cut down play side pretty easily, UNM has numbers, and Phillips has to come in from FS to make the play.

2nd highlight kind of illustrates what I’m talking about a little more clearly. Okafor shows inside, short corner offered up, allowing the H-back in motion across him without challenge and then they’ve got angles on Edmond and Hicks. Diggs saves the day by playing the QB and pitch man simultaneously and that allows Hicks to catch up. Josh Turner takes a bad angle, too.

From the backside, you see us basically dedicating everything to the dive man and we rely entirely on our secondary to defeat blocks and take on both pitch man and QB.

If our game plan was don’t allow the dive or the pitch on the option and make the QB keep it, mission accomplished I guess.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 2:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it's weird

The only thing I can think was that Diaz was worried about the dive because the 2 high defense we were basing out of would be more susceptible to a home run up the middle than on the outside. However, with the front already undermanned on most plays, overplaying the dive is just giving them a man up on the edge every single time. So try as I might, I can’t figure a line of reasoning that makes it make sense.

There’s one other thing that bothers me about it. We have a saddled form of the triple option in our offense. It’s not as if we never ever see it.

by LonghornScott on Sep 11, 2025 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah we see it

But we dont live it, our o prob blocks the option the same way or nearly the same way with the same reads everytime we run it. A team like unm will switch reads and block u different, so its really not the same thing at all.

by texitect on Sep 11, 2025 9:56 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

6 years of veer blocking

at Shiner and you understand what is hard to block. DL stunting and penetration destroy all veer concepts. NM was running mid-line Veer the entire game and ignoring our interior DTs and getting angles on the MLB preventing pursuit to the QB. You counter this with DT/DEs living in the back field.

by ShinerCHE on Sep 11, 2025 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Look at our LBs first steps, too.

They’re being told to honor the dive and then flow to the ball. The problem is that cedes the initiative to the offense. Anyway, glad that wasn’t Braxton Miller carrying the ball.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah noticed several plays

where LBs were late to flow to the outside resulting in cut blocks that slowed pursuit. Just shows how big the talent gap was.

by ShinerCHE on Sep 11, 2025 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Honoring the dive

against mid-line veer for the MLB is very important since they are reading the 3-tech which allows the play-side OG to release toward the MLB. The MLB must aggressively attack the OG to squeeze the hole and allow the DT to stop the dive. The first step must be downhill and with aggression otherwise, MLB becomes a roadblock to backside LB pursuit and opens inside running lanes. The problem is the MLB didn’t recognize quick enough that the DT had neutralized the dive so he should flow to QB.

by ShinerCHE on Sep 11, 2025 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Regardless of the scheme

Okafor wasn’t playing the option well. If his job is dive then he needs to do his best to hit the dive man as the QB is putting the ball in his gut and Edmond has to keep his outside shoulder free. Neither one of them did that. For me, I can’t tell if Edmond is just reading flow or if he really has the QB on that play. Do you think he knew?

After rewatching that play I think they were playing other keys and not the option. Okafor is reacting to the tackle’s movement and Edmond is reacting to backfield flow. Either didn’t know it was an option or Diaz didn’t have them prepared very well.

by Monahorns on Sep 11, 2025 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I kept asking myself where is Okafor

playing the option and seeing so few Okafor tackles was really odd. Athletic DEs are kryptonite to option attacks.

by ShinerCHE on Sep 11, 2025 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was kind of surprised to learn

That Steve Worster was not on the Lobos’ roster.

The Horns: www.barkingcarnival.com
The Boys: www.bloggingtheboys.com
The Tweetz: @KnowTheGame60

by nobis60 on Sep 11, 2025 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Excellent Post-Mortem

Well done Scipio and LHS. You both confirmed what frustrated me during the game. I think we are entitled to be puzzled, followed by a slow burn — as Diaz allowed this to continue repeatedly without adjustment well into the 3rd Qtr.

Early 2nd Qtr stats clearly showed the NM QB was dominating carries and yardage stats — yet we stubbornly committed Oak to stopping the dive option. Older coaches with experience in option football would have instructed Oak to crash on the QB immediately and every option play to his side for effect:

1. Makes the QB bruised and sorry NM runs the option;
2. Probability of a TFL;
3. Probability of disrupting the QB pitch or creating a hurried pitch to the trailing RB; or
4. Probability of causing an errant pitch and fumble in the backfield for recovery or TFL;
5. Yet, Oak was stranded in no man’s land — contributing nothing. Rationale strongly suggests that Diaz had nothing to lose by committing Oak to crashing on the QB every play to his side.

I appreciate the shut-out. But allowing NM to control clock and possession stole valuable time from our offense that needed to give Ash reps, and many new players a look in game time conditions. The result was only 61 total offensive plays to distribute among our playmakers.

by Rio Lobo on Sep 11, 2025 4:10 AM CDT reply actions  

Rio

it goes back to what the coaches scheme is. Some will have the DE crash the QB for the reasons you give. Others will require “feathering” in order to produce indecision in the QB and allow other defenders to pursue. Either one would have been better than what happened.

by Monahorns on Sep 11, 2025 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Old old school theory on defensing the option

was to make the QB carry a lot early, and beat the you know what out of him.

In theory, this would make the QB contact shy later on, and would also affect him as a passer. Coaches always felt you HAD to stop the inside dive because that’s what big boy football entailed — and the outside pitch was where you could give up home runs.

by edsp on Sep 11, 2025 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes

but you hit the QB before turning the corner not after for this scheme to work. We weren’t hitting him until 4-6 yards down field.

by ShinerCHE on Sep 11, 2025 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

On Big Oak

Diaz defense is a multiplicity of movement. Defending against the triple option requires read-react discipline (read: reps). Oak’s development since last year is the former, not the latter. Not sure what this says about his ceiling at the next level but modern offenses don’t employ this kind of attack. He regroups, works on eye drills, and is back to normal in Oxford.

We ARE The Joneses™ - Burnt Orange Nation
Follow @TXStampede

by TXStampede on Sep 11, 2025 5:39 AM CDT reply actions  

Want to see growth from Mack...

in terms of when to go for it on 4th and less than 6 yds to go inside the 40 yd line. When your team is 6 of 6 in the red zone and only making half its field goals outside the 20 then you should be going for fourth downs pretty regularly.

Unfortunately I think Mack prefers in this order 1) try the field goal 2) pooch for net of 20 yards in field position 3) fake

If anyone on the staff can explain this to Mack, it should be Diaz.

by feltgod on Sep 11, 2025 8:01 AM CDT reply actions  

except that

the goal in these first few games is not to optimize scoring. It’s to figure out what you’ve got. When one of your big unknowns is how your kickers will respond in a game… you want to get some looks at that.

I think generally Mack has been pretty good on risk percentages with 4th downs and special teams fakes.

by LonghornScott on Sep 11, 2025 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Totally agree
I think generally Mack has been pretty good on risk percentages with 4th downs and special teams fakes.

When I am acting like an irrational fan during live play, I’m screaming, “GO FOR IT!” When I sit back and watch replays, I realize that Mack does a pretty solid job of knowing when to go for it on 4th.

"You’d think some of these Ohio St guys would wear long sleeves, instead of reminding us why they were in trouble last year."
-Rich Eisen, 2012 NFL Combine

by TexaStunna on Sep 11, 2025 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree.

Mack is in the top 10% of coaches nationally with respect to going for it on 4th and short and special teams fakes. He has never been risk averse there and seems to get the %’s pretty intuitively.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is a really underrated aspect of coaching

When you have 100,000 people all wanting you to go for it and you have about 5 seconds to make a decision that you have to live with for a week to a year.

It’s probably really easy to turtle, and also easy to go crazy Pirate and just decide you hate your punter.

Witness, the Raiders, with Darren Mcfaddin, on the 1.5 yard line (with a possible first down as well) kicking a field goal against the Chargers last night. Pretty much sent the message that we’re a running team that can’t run the ball. Not to mention the fact that starting the Chargers on the 1.5 yard line isn’t such a bad thing either if you fail

by texitect on Sep 11, 2025 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mack usually nails the 2-pt conversion decision too

The 2008 OU game is the most illustrative example. We scored a TD to make it 28-26 with 5 minutes to go in the 3rd. So many stupid coaches would go for 2 there to unnecessarily tie the game. Mack thankfully knew better. We kicked the XP to make it 28-27, which allowed us to properly go for 2 in the 4th quarter to make it a 38-35 game. Exquisitely played by Mack in that situation. It’s the kind of thing that goes unnoticed by casual fans…until a coach screws it up.

by Horn79 on Sep 11, 2025 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Speaking of pooch kicking...

I kept waiting for us to fake going for it on 4th and having David pooch kick it. I mean, he was all-state as a punter. Any chance we’ll get to see that this year against better teams to give their offenses worse field position? Or did the coaches scrap that idea?

by jja619 on Sep 11, 2025 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Cobbs

Am I wrong in feeling like this breakdown pulls some punches on Cobbs? Like Okafor, I felt like Cobbs really struggled with playing his assignment in this game. There were numerous times where it looked like Cobbs took the wrong assignment, ran past his assignment, or just seemed lost on the field.

Counting the Wyoming game where we didn’t really see Cobbs show up, I’m a little concerned in that regard (especially considering that when Tevin Jackson was given reps, he immediately tore the head off of a UNM player). Are we content to have Cobbs be the LB that is good at rushing the passer and nothing else? Am I missing something?

by Katfid54 on Sep 11, 2025 8:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Give it 2 more games

I think we’ll see his value much more clearly on display

by LonghornScott on Sep 11, 2025 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta keep in mind that Cobbs

is almost a redshirt sophomore, though his eligibility says junior.

He was a safety, and used hardly at all except as a special-teamer in 2010.

Last year, he was learning LB when he got hurt. Played just 7 games, sparingly against A&M;, Mizzou, K-State.

He’s really learning on the job, and he’s playing a different position than the senior he replaced because he’s part safety, part linebacker, as opposed to Acho being a true ’backer.

by edsp on Sep 11, 2025 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

After two games it's fair to raise some questions about where his head's at

But any issues in defending the triple option aren’t likely to translate into problems with the rest of our slate – at least not until KSU, and hopefull we’ll have given him a good dose of film work by then.

He’s a Swiss Army Knife as a blitzer, SS-at-least caliber cover guy and sideline run eraser, and as LHS intimates we’re about to see those skills come into play a lot more strongly. I will be watching with interest to see if he’s missing run fits or looks to be carrying guys up the seam when he should have dropped into the flat and vice versa, but I’m not going to worry just yet.

The Horns: www.barkingcarnival.com
The Boys: www.bloggingtheboys.com
The Tweetz: @KnowTheGame60

by nobis60 on Sep 11, 2025 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Most everybody is giving Diaz the benefit of the doubt

I am too, but I have to confess that I am concerned. It is mainly due to poor tackling and missed/unclear assignments. The good thing is all these things can be fixed. The problem is will they? And when? After OU? The middle of the defense is still learning but we are getting beat in areas where I didn’t expect, like Okafor on the option. That and I am not sure Cobbs is as good as advertised. I understand his skill set and how that translates to spread offense. But I really need to see it. Spread offenses cause indecision too. He will still have to know where he is supposed to be and who he is supposed to key on. Haven’t seen him do that yet.

by Monahorns on Sep 11, 2025 8:56 AM CDT reply actions  

Not worried

Many on here thought it would take 2-3 games to have the newbies playing instinctive football. We did lose 3 players up the middle of the defense to the NFL and replace them with extremely skilled but extremely raw talents. No surprise that they aren’t clicking on all cylinders yet.

by Big(g) Ern on Sep 11, 2025 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Especially

when we have a ton left to work on and yet we have only allowed 8.5 points per game.

by Fico21 on Sep 11, 2025 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't see the game

So I didn’t see how the Horns looked against UNM except for the defensive highlights. But I also don’t have a residual bias from any frustration or disappointment I may have felt while watching it live.

The bottom line is, the defense did its job and did it pretty well. Shutout, obviously. Only gave up two big plays, both on runs on the first drive. From that first drive on, UNM never got anything really going, based on looking at the play by plays and the drive charts. Did they churn out a few first downs and third down conversions? Sure they did. And they possessed the ball. But they never threatened to score after that first drive.

Sure, UNM is terrible. They have been one of the worst teams in FBS for a while. With that said, weird things can happen when you play a triple option team in this day and age. Georgia Southern, an FCS school, ran for 300 yards at 7.7 ypc against Alabama last season. In November, no less. GSU scored 21 points on the Bama defense.

But weird things didn’t happen in Austin on Saturday. I don’t get the hand-wringing…

"If God dwells inside us like some people say, I sure hope He likes enchiladas, because that's what He's getting."

by RedmondLonghorn on Sep 11, 2025 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Edmond

How much playing time do you think he gets against the true spread teams on the schedule?

by Horncasting on Sep 11, 2025 10:10 AM CDT reply actions  

Plenty.

I think Diaz values him as a blitzer and physical presence.

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

now that's funny

triple option attacks at the next level are fearsome.

by mdhorn on Sep 11, 2025 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

MOAR TEBOW

The Horns: www.barkingcarnival.com
The Boys: www.bloggingtheboys.com
The Tweetz: @KnowTheGame60

by nobis60 on Sep 11, 2025 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

McShay

will discuss UNM with relentless passion, imo. Marginal 3rd round talent at this point until proven otherwise.

by Big(g) Ern on Sep 11, 2025 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great stuff

And very good point about the overall conservative defensive game plan. This sort of feels like a game that fits into the overall classic Diaz philosophy of smartly working to force negative plays while always maintaining soundness on the back end. That doesn’t excuse some of the assignment busts, but I wonder if Manny was just thinking keep the back end clean and our superior edge athletes will wreak enough havoc on their own to get the Lobos behind the chains on any given drive and short-circuit things. And lo and behold, they did.

The Horns: www.barkingcarnival.com
The Boys: www.bloggingtheboys.com
The Tweetz: @KnowTheGame60

by nobis60 on Sep 11, 2025 11:26 AM CDT reply actions  

Or we didn't really care about game planning

And didn’t want to commit some other stuff to film for KSU

by Scipio Tex on Sep 11, 2025 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Neither Here Nor There...

But did I see one of our defenders fly past their QB, who had the ball at the time, and head for the pitch man? They were driving towards the north endzone on our side of the 50 on the West sideline.

Just really looked odd. And the QB gratefully turned it North South and landed a big gainer.

by Bobby_Batronic on Sep 11, 2025 11:59 AM CDT reply actions  

That's not uncommon in standard option assignments where the

DE has the QB and the CB or SS has the pitch man.

by The General on Sep 11, 2025 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it looked like Okafor was asked to read the handoff and then make the play

It just ended up freezing him.

Next time he should just hit the QB every snap.

by notsofst on Sep 11, 2025 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  


User Tools

An SB Nation blog mostly about the Texas Longhorns.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
VY couldn't beat out these guys?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Dalton Santos is my new hero
Smokey_small
Michael Vick Likes Ladybugs
Intrepid_at_sea_-pd_pic_small
Aggies being aggies
Small
A quick comparison with Ole Miss
Small
Son of Jones Top Ten Week 2
2478379451_fddcbc40d1_b_small
Bad half for the replacement refs in Green Bay.
Bc_logo_257x257_small
Brandon Weeden's Final QB Rating For Today
Bc_logo_257x257_small
Texas Longhorns vs. New Mexico Lobos - Animated Drive Chart
Small
UK writer checks out DKR and Austin

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Archer_290_small Scipio Tex

Bc_logo_257x257_small Sailor Ripley

Editors

Nobis_small nobis60

Camera_photos_021_small srr50

Boyd_small Vasherized

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Authors

Jonathan_tjarks_small tjarks

Long_illustrated_beard_small LonghornScott

Small Nickel Rover