Texas Longhorns Football - NFL Pro Day: Offense
Just held today. Some quick thoughts on which Longhorns can improve their draft stock on a Texas offense that saw its last draft choice come from the 2005 recruiting class. I wish that was a misprint. 2009's foreshadowing, 2010's total meltdown, and 2011's struggles make some sense, don't they? On offense, we effectively had the upper class talent of a Conference USA team.
Offense
Cody Johnson. The 5-11, 250 fullback went through three evolutions during the season. In his first few games, he was an inconsistent blocker still learning the position and rarely made clean contact, usually ineffectually acquiring the defender after a stalking tip-toe. Walk-on Jamison Berryhill was a better option. In the middle of the year, Cody began to make violent contact at the point of attack, but didn't always bring his feet. You'd see him rock a LB, pause to admire his handiwork, and allow a late recovery. By the end of the season, Cody was a quality blocking FB who brought contact without overextending on initial impact and then drove through the hole. Some of that was sabotaged by our need to use him as a running option and the total decline of our offense, but his development was noticeable.
Cody's best chance for being drafted is a favorable projection of his blocking growth line graph combined with his value-add as a goalline RB and short yardage converter. He may also be just good enough running the ball to allow roster flexibility in making him your #3 or #4 HB as well as FB. He has consistently demonstrated the ability to move the chains and his 36 career touchdowns attest to his nose for the goalline. Johnson has soft hands and though he has not been featured in the passing game much, he has the capacity to move the sticks in play action. Cody's lack of reps as a blocker may hamper him since his quality film in his primary role is limited. Although he might be a late round flyer, he may be best served signing a free agent contract with a team of his choosing. Had Johnson been properly cast as a FB from the start of his career, I have little doubt he'd be a 5th or 6th round draft pick.
David Snow. David was the steadiest performer on last year's OL, my personal OL MVP, and started 32 games in his Longhorn career. He can play guard or center and he showed substantial improvement in his final year as a run blocker. He was never redshirted and I can't help but think that a 5th year senior Snow would be an even better prospect given his development from his junior to senior year.
Snow is competent - not overwhelming at the point of attack, but a game competitor who gets into the defender's pads and can turn a shoulder. He has decent mobility moving laterally on zone and is athletic enough to pull and lead. Our problems in interior pass protection were almost entirely on Walters and Espinosa. Unfortunately, he didn't see high level S&C until Wylie got here, and spent most his time blocking GD's sloppy version of zone running schemes. Like many recent Longhorn OL starters before him, he wasn't given the developmental tools to compete immediately with NFL level DL talent, but unlike them, Snow has a perceptible upside as a utility interior OL. He showed well at the East-West Shrine game practices and that may pique the interest of a NFL GM sufficiently to get a late round grab. But I'm doubtful. Like Johnson, Snow may actually benefit from the free agent route where he can choose his spot and situation.
Fozzy Whittaker. Our best skill player and special teams performer had played his way into a NFL draft pick but is a question mark after wrecking his knee in Columbia, Missouri. He has an injury plagued history, but his explosiveness, burst, and the surprising power he displayed (he trucked quite a few people) in the seven games of his senior year should be sufficient to garner legitimate interest as a Free Agent signing. Fozzy will be able to run next month and if his recovery over the summer goes according to schedule, a NFL team may lock him up on their taxi squad to see what he's capable of contributing in Year 2. When healthy, Fozzy is a legitimate NFL 3rd down back and special team talent and coaches will love Captain America's can-do spirit.
Tray Allen. The athletic Allen looks great "on the hoof" - guru nonsense jargon alert! - and has the potential to test extremely well, but came up small when given an opportunity in big games. The previous regime was criticized for their inability to find Allen more playing time, but a quick re-watch of this year's OU game is probably all that's required to address the idea that Allen got a raw deal. Paralyzed would be a kind description. He never really found his position and there was always a disconnect between his physical ability and play. I don't see any possibility for Allen being drafted and the same issues that plagued him in high school all-star games when he was one of the most sought after recruits in the nation have never really resolved themselves.
Blaine Irby. That Blaine was able to play football again, much less walk correctly, and make some big plays for us down the stretch is a testament to his heart and character. Wish him well on his next chapter in life, but it won't involve pro football.
Overall:
It's quite possible that the Texas offense doesn't have a single player drafted, a testament to the lack of accountability that we'd tolerated in our program on the offensive side of the ball and in our key developmental support programs, but that's over now and we do have three players capable of making a roster via free agency. I see plenty of potential NFL draft choices on next year's offense, but most of them are sophomores or 3rd year juniors.
The good news is that our defense is considerably better, as reflected on the field.
12 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wish these guys well
But these guys and:
… a Texas offense that saw its last draft choice come from the 2005 recruiting class.
leaves me incredulous. What a…
Ah nevermind. Onward and upward.
by Sailor Ripley on Mar 20, 2026 2:59 PM CDT reply actions
It's an incredible statistic.
One we need to move on from if we don’t want to develop ulcers.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 20, 2026 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I knew it was bad but I didn’t realize it was this bad. I’m curious as to what recruiting folks thought about the ‘06/’07 classes at the time and whether it was more the input (the actual talent), the output (the development) or both.
by tjarks on Mar 20, 2026 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Absolutely both.
There’s no doubt that most of the recruiting sites engaged in a “Longhorn bump” and fed the bubble. Some two stars went to three; some three stars went to four. It’s also important to remember that we had no plan - it was just taking a bunch of guys with no blueprint as to how they fit, no plan for what our offense was, no plan for development. Throw in some stale offensive coaching and bad S&C and you’re not exactly maximizing your raw material. The on-field success over that time period was a fresh coat of paint on termite riddled wood.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 20, 2026 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions
I suspect
Greg Davis saw his role as simply “making magic” with what everyone else brought into his kitchen. Hence his resentment at catching much of the blame for the 2010 disaster.
I wonder what he thought of the declining influx of talent, perhaps not much. His decision to revert in 2010 to the 2001 offense and then quickly to the 02 offense didn’t suggest a man who was deeply invested.
by Nickel Rover on Mar 20, 2026 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions
How does taking a bunch of guys with no blueprint differ from just getting the best athletes and sorting them out later? That is assuming the bunch of guys are highly althletic, which may not have been the case in 06/07. I’ve seen quite a few comment and posts saying that our plan should be to take athletes and sort them out later, and i think we’d end up with the same situation.
How do you view players like Melton, CJ, Chiles, and Whaley (too soon for an eval on him)? I think I’m missing some. I think Melton and CJ should be conisidered successes. Chiles ended up contributing some at WR, and I feel like he would have been good if he’d just been moved a year sooner. I think Whaley is on track to be a significant contributor as well. I guess the failure might be from a planning perspective if these switches leave you short in a position. Like say not having a back up QB in the NC or a RB in 2010.
by UT_BKC on Mar 20, 2026 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions
difference is attributes of the position and baseline athletic level
Highly athletic is the first part of the answer. We don’t sweat Quandre Diggs as a take because his position will work itself out. We don’t sweat Adrian Phillips. We don’t sweat Kendall Sanders. These guys are ballers.
For OL - you must have a blueprint of attributes you want. Guard and tackle don’t have interchangeable attributes. We recruited a bunch of guards, took a couple of bad athlete OTs, and then were shocked when the OT cupboard turned up bare. Last year, Searels was asked to field an OL in which the five best athletes were all natural guards. That’s flat out negligence.
It was clear Chris Whaley wasn’t a future RB by his junior year of high school. That he’s a good athlete and can translate his skills elsewhere is a boon, but you still needed to take a real RB that year instead of anointing him. He’s a great example of a staff that simply wouldn’t take a realistic view of the talent and recruited with no total staff input.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 20, 2026 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Turning Chiles into any kind of success story woud require centrifuge-caliber spin
Melton was born to be a DL and had some sort of Ferdinand the Bull-level disconnect between his body and what he wanted to do. No issues with him as a take, but he’s not much of an argument for their being a plan on the offensive side of the ball.
Scip touched on Whaley - again, you always want to take a guy with that size/speed combo but him as your sole “RB” take in a given class was laughable.
by nobis60 on Mar 20, 2026 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions
good stuff
David Snow. David was the steadiest performer on last year’s OL, my personal OL MVP, and started 32 games in his Longhorn career. He can play guard or center and he showed substantial improvement in his final year as a run blocker. He was never redshirted and I can’t help but think that a 5th year senior Snow would be an even better prospect given his development from his junior to senior year.
Couldn’t agree more. He struggled in the first few games with the transition and then really took on that role at the left guard spot. I hope we can get the same type of decision making from the spot this year.
by LonghornScott on Mar 20, 2026 3:20 PM CDT reply actions
On Allen:
My curiosity was satisfied during a spring practice a few years ago when I watched him try to pass block. Anticipation is such an underrated skill to have for any athlete in any sport, and when you don’t have it you stick out like a sore thumb.
You can’t play OL and try to react to whatever happens in front of you. You have to dictate the action. He did, to his credit, get better, but he seemed to me like a guy that never quite “got it.”
by John Kocurek on Mar 20, 2026 5:27 PM CDT reply actions
There are a lot of 7 footers
who play basketball because they feel they have to do so. I’m sure there are quite a few 6-4, 300 pound guys carved from granite who play football for the same reason. I kinda always felt that way about Allen.
by Scipio Tex on Mar 20, 2026 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by Scipio Tex on 

























